Validation of a simplified evaluation grid applied to the microsurgery on inert material via smartphone.

OBJECTIVES: Microsurgery is usually performed in experimental research models and clinical surgery. It requires meticulous technical skills and continuous training. Inert materials such as Shirataki noodles are readily available and low-cost consumables regularly used for practice. The objective of this study was to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of a simplified evaluation grid of suture on inert material (Shirataki Konnyaku noodle) under smartphone magnification. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten students performed end-to-end suture on inert material with magnification via their smartphone. Each suture was filmed, and the videos were randomized. Each student was evaluated on each video three times over three consecutive days, using a simplified evaluation grid. Intra- and inter-observer agreement was evaluated on Concordance Correlation Coefficients. Values were assessed on Pearson's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Intra-observer correlation was weak for 2 items (0.288 and 0.246) and moderate for the other 2 (0.419 and 0.529). Inter-observer correlation was weak for 3 items (0.344, 0.358, and 0.276) and close to zero for the other (0.034). CONCLUSION: This simplified evaluation grid for microsurgery training on inert material via smartphone was poorly repeatable and reproducible. Loss of certain items in the grid due to the use of inert material probably impaired relevance.

Impact of consolidation chemotherapy after delayed complete surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a propensity score analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficiency of consolidation chemotherapy after 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and delayed complete surgery on overall survival and progression-free survival among patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: This was a retrospective consecutive study with a propensity score to ensure balance for the baseline characteristics between the study groups. All patients treated for advanced ovarian cancer with 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by delayed complete surgery, without post-operative chemotherapy (group 1), or with post-operative chemotherapy (group 2), were included. We evaluated survival and the quality of cytoreductive surgery using the propensity score. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2017, 42 patients were included in group 1, and 59 in group 2. The median follow-up was 78 months (confidence interval (CI) 95% (60.1; not computable)). Neither progression-free survival nor overall survival were different between the two groups. The median progression-free survival was 10.2 months (CI 95% (8.8-17.0)) for group 1 and 10.4 months (CI 95% (7.9-12.8)) for group 2 (p=0.57). Five-year overall survival was 21.0% (CI 95% (10.4-42.3)) for group 1 and 26.1% (CI 95% (16.0-42.5)) for group 2 (p=0.73). CONCLUSIONS: Adding cycles of consolidation chemotherapy after delayed surgery following 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not demonstrate any survival improvement in patients treated for advanced ovarian cancer not amenable to primary or interval surgery.

A Pilot Study Comparing 2- and 3-dimensional Ultrasound Imaging for Confirmation of Essure Fallopian Tube Pregnancy Prevention Implants.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To show the feasibility of 2-dimensional (2D) ultrasound (US) imaging compared with 3-dimensional (3D) US to identify the location of implants and assess if the classification developed by Simorre et al in 2016 was applicable to the 2 types of US imaging (i.e., 2D and 3D). DESIGN: A prospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: The department of obstetrics and gynecology in a teaching hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred fifty patients who had undergone hysteroscopic sterilization with Essure (Bayer Pharma AG Laboratory, Lyon, France) fallopian tube pregnancy prevention implants were invited by letter to participate in the study; 50 replied positively between January and August 2017. INTERVENTIONS: An initial 2D US was performed followed by 3D US reconstruction. The primary end point was to compare the identification of device placement with 2D and 3D US imaging procedures according to this new classification. Secondary considerations were to evaluate the difficulty of attaining images, the quality of implant curvature, the duration of each imaging procedure, and the number of images performed for each technique. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Ninety-six percent of tubal implants were observed via 3D US compared with 100% via 2D US. The mean time of 2D US was 14.64 seconds for the right fallopian tube and 15.25 seconds for the left fallopian tube compared with 25.11 seconds for the right and 31.57 seconds for the left fallopian tube in 3D US (p <.01). The mean number of image acquisitions per patient was 1.02 (±0.14 standard deviation) for 2D US compared with 1.37 (±0.64 standard deviation) for 3D US (p <.01). The sonographer had no difficulty performing 2D US in 88% of cases compared with 58% of 3D US cases. CONCLUSIONS: Two-dimensional ultrasound appears to be an acceptable alternative to 3D US. We propose a 2D classification for cross section device localization to facilitate image interpretation.