Effect of protein composition of enteral formula on gastric content volume during continuous feeding: A randomized controlled cross-over study in healthy adults.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Enteral nutrition with polymeric intact protein formula is the preferred medical nutrition strategy in critically ill patients when oral intake is insufficient. Enteral nutrition formulas are often rich in casein protein, which has coagulating properties. Coagulation in the stomach impedes gastric emptying and might result in high gastric residual volumes which are a clinical sign of gastrointestinal intolerance and a major reason to decrease or to discontinue enteral feeding. In this study the impact of protein composition of enteral formula on gastric content volume (GCV) during and after continuous feeding was tested in healthy volunteers in whom gastrointestinal conditions of critically ill patients were mimicked. METHODS: An enteral formula including 4 proteins (P4) with non-coagulating properties was compared to a casein-dominant formula (Cas) with coagulating properties. Esomeprazole and codeine were administered to mimic stress ulcer prophylaxis and induce gastroduodenal motor dysfunction, both being hallmarks of critically ill patients. GCV was measured with magnetic resonance imaging during and after continuous enteral feeding (100 mL/h for 4h) in a randomized single-center cross-over study. Results are provided as mean (SD). Significance level of p < 0.05 was applied. RESULTS: Twenty subjects completed the study (14 women, 6 men, 25.8 (4.6) years old, BMI: 22.5 (1.5) kg/m2). The GCV as change from baseline at T = 240 (primary endpoint) did not differ between study products (P4: 124.3 (83.4) vs. Cas: 137.1 (102.0) mL, 95% CI: -57.4, 27.0, p = 0.457). During feeding and after cessation of feeding, the area under the GCV-curve (AUC0-360 GCV) for P4 and Cas was 44631.1 (15546.1) and 52822.2 (19686.1) mL∗min, respectively (p = 0.061). During feeding the GCV was lower at T = 180 min (175.4 (64.8) vs. 205.2 (75.4) mL, p = 0.038) and after cessation of feeding at T = 300 min (81.3 (71.1) vs. 116.3 (84.3) mL, p = 0.004) and T = 330 min (39.9 (53.9) vs. 73.6 (81.1) mL, p = 0.031). With P4 it took less time to reach half of the GCV at T = 240 min compared to Cas (52.8 (27.6) vs. 65.4 (29.9) min, p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: In this study in which healthy volunteers received esomeprazole and codeine to mimic gastrointestinal conditions of critically ill patients, observations of secondary endpoints suggest faster gastric emptying with P4 compared to Cas, and less gastric accumulation, possibly due to the non-coagulating properties of the P4 protein blend. Considering the small effect and the possible clinical relevance of reduced intragastric accumulation of enteral nutrition, the potential impact of protein coagulation should be further investigated in relevant study populations. Registered under Netherlands Trial Register identifier no. NTR6423.

Gastric accumulation of enteral nutrition reduces pressure changes induced by phasic contractility in an isovolumetric intragastric balloon.

BACKGROUND: An isovolumetric intragastric balloon to continuously measure gastric phasic contractility was recently developed by us. We aimed to investigate the readout of this technique in relation to gastric content and gastric emptying. METHODS: In this crossover investigation, the VIPUNTM Gastric Monitoring System, which comprises a double lumen nasogastric feeding tube with integrated intragastric balloon, was used to assess phasic gastric contractility by interpretation of the pressure in an isovolumetric balloon in 10 healthy subjects. Balloon pressure was recorded in fasted state, during a 2-hour intragastric nutrient infusion (1 kcal/ml at 25, 75, or 250 ml/h) and 4 hours post-infusion, and quantified as Gastric Balloon Motility Index (GBMI), ranging from 0 (no contractility) to 1 (maximal contractility). Gastric accumulation was quantified with magnetic resonance imaging and gastric emptying with a13 C-breath test. Results are expressed as mean(SD). KEY RESULTS: GBMI was significantly lower during infusion at 250 ml/h compared to baseline (0.13(0.05) versus 0.46(0.12)) and compared to infusion at 25 (0.54(0.21)) and 75 ml/h (0.43(0.20)), all P < 0.005. Gastric content volume was larger after infusion at 250 versus 75 ml/h (P < 0.001). Half-emptying time and accumulation were both negatively correlated with postprandial contractility. Postprandial GBMI was significantly lower when GCV>0 ml compared to when the stomach was empty. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Enteral nutrition dose-dependently decreased the contractility readout. This decrease was linked to gastric accumulation of enteral nutrition.

Impact of joint hypermobility syndrome on gastric accommodation and nutrient tolerance in functional dyspepsia.

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is defined as the presence of gastroduodenal symptoms in the absence of organic disease that is likely to explain the symptoms. Joint hypermobility (JH) refers to the increased passive or active movement of a joint beyond its normal range and is characteristically present in patients with joint hypermobility syndrome (JHS), which is a hypermobile subtype of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS). Recent reports have highlighted the co-existence of FD with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Our aim was to study the prevalence of JHS in FD compared with healthy subjects and to study the impact of co-existing JHS on gastric motility, nutrient tolerance, and dyspeptic symptoms in FD. METHODS: FD patients filled out a dyspepsia symptom severity score. Intragastric pressure (IGP) was measured with high-resolution manometry (HRM) during the intragastric infusion of nutrition drink (ND, 1.5 Kcal/ml, 60 ml/min) until maximal satiation in healthy subjects and FD. We compared IGP profiles and nutrient tolerance in HS and FD with or without JHS. RESULTS: JHS was present in 54% of FD patients (n = 39, 41.2 ± 2.2 years old) and 7% of healthy subjects (n = 15, 27.3 ± 2.3 years old). IGP drop and nutrient tolerance were lower in non-JHS-FD compared with JHS-FD and HS (AUC JHS-FD: -17.9 ± 2.5 vs. non-JHS-FD: -13.0 ± 3.3 mmHg min, p = 0.2, HS:-19.6 ± 2.9 mmHg min; ND tolerance non-JHS-FD: 671.0 ± 96.0 vs. JHS-FD: 842.7 ± 105.7 Kcal, p = 0.25, HS: 980.0 ± 108.1 Kcal). CONCLUSION: JHS often co-exists with FD. Non-JHS-FD was characterized by decreased accommodation and lower nutrient tolerance characterized compared with JHS-FD. Clinicaltrials.gov, reference number NCT04279990.

Erythromycin stimulates phasic gastric contractility as assessed with an isovolumetric intragastric balloon pressure measurement.

BACKGROUND: A novel technique to assess gastric motility by measuring the pressure in a low-volume intragastric balloon was developed to monitor (disordered) motility. We previously showed that this technique allows measuring pharmacologically induced inhibition of motility. In this study, we assessed whether it is possible to measure pharmacologically induced stimulation of gastric motility using 200 mg erythromycin. Erythromycin is a highly effective stimulator of gastric emptying and contractility. METHODS: After an overnight fast, a nasogastric balloon catheter was introduced in healthy subjects. After inflation with 120 ml of air, the catheter was connected to a pressure sensor. Intraballoon pressure was continuously recorded for 4 h. After a baseline recording of 2 h, 200 mg erythromycin was infused intravenously over 20 min while the recording continued for 2 h. Epigastric symptoms were surveyed on 100-mm visual analogue scales. Motility was quantified from the pressure recording as a gastric balloon motility index. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed. Data are shown as median (interquartile range). KEY RESULTS: Six subjects were enrolled and five completed the procedures (age: 28 (25-29) years, body mass index: 24.0 (23.8-24.5) kg m-2 ). One subject could not tolerate tube placement. Bloating, nausea, and epigastric sensation scores were 0 (0-3), 0 (0-1), and 1 (0-1) mm, respectively. Erythromycin significantly increased the motility index from 0.48 (0.41-0.51) to 0.79 (0.70-0.82) (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Gastric motility assessed via pressure measurement in a low-volume intragastric balloon is able to detect pharmacologically stimulated motility in healthy subjects, which further validates this technique.

Codeine delays gastric emptying through inhibition of gastric motility as assessed with a novel diagnostic intragastric balloon catheter.

BACKGROUND: The use of opioids as analgesic is on the rise, despite their inhibitory effect on gastric emptying. A novel feeding catheter with integrated intragastric balloon was developed to continuously assess gastric motility, enabling to investigate the effect of opioids on motility and emptying simultaneously. We aimed to discriminate normal and pharmacologically impaired gastric motility and its impact on gastric emptying in healthy adults. METHODS: The VIPUN Gastric Monitoring System comprises a nasogastric balloon catheter and a monitoring unit. In a four-way randomized, single-blinded, cross-over study, subjects received either placebo or 58.8 mg codeine phosphate in combination with either an uninflated or an inflated (180 mL) balloon catheter. Motility-induced pressure changes were recorded for 6 hours. During the first 2 hours, nutrients were infused (225 kcal, 75 mL/h). Gastric emptying was assessed with a 13 C-octanoate breath test and expressed as gastric half-emptying time (GET½). An algorithm, designed to detect phasic contractility, converted pressure changes to a gastric balloon motility index (GBMI). Results are presented as mean(SD). KEY RESULTS: Eighteen subjects completed the investigation (32(13) years, 22(2) kg/m2 ). After codeine, GBMI was lower (0.31(0.16)) and GET½ was longer (233(57) minutes) compared with placebo (GBMI: 0.48(0.15), P < .01 and GET½: 172(12) minutes, P < .001). Within-subject ΔGET½ correlated significantly with ΔGBMI (r = -0.77 and P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: The VIPUN Gastric Monitoring System allowed to assess gastric motility safely and continuously. The correlation between pharmacologically decreased gastric emptying and motility indicates a strong link between both. Gastric motility, measured with this innovative device, can be an indicator for gastrointestinal intolerance.

A comparison of various intragastric balloons for the assessment of gastric motility.

BACKGROUND: There is a clear need for a novel method to readily assess gastric motility in daily clinical practice. METHODS: In a crossover design, 10 noncompliant balloons of different shape and volume (25-350 mL), attached to a classic feeding tube, were introduced in the stomach of eight healthy volunteers. In the same experiment, a High-Resolution Manometry (HRM) catheter was positioned throughout the stomach. Gastric motility was recorded during fasting (2 hours) and liquid nutrient administration (30 minutes). Motility was quantified using a peak detection algorithm. Symptoms were recorded throughout the experiment using visual analog scales (100 mm). Results are presented as mean ± SD. KEY RESULTS: The % time during which motility-induced pressure increments could be detected with HRM but not by the balloon varied from 42 ± 24% in the smallest (25 mL) balloon to 1 ± 1% in the 330 mL balloon. On the other hand, bloating, discomfort and nausea scores were 0 ± 0, 0 ± 0 and 2 ± 5 mm, respectively, for the smallest balloon (25 mL) while these scores were 28 ± 38, 13 ± 30, and 38 ± 30 mm, respectively, for the largest balloon (350 mL). A phase III contraction pattern was consistently evoked in balloons with a volume >200 mL. CONCLUSION: Gastric motility could be assessed more accurately with larger volume balloons, while epigastric symptoms were evoked with increasing balloon volume. The optimal balloon to measure gastric motility has a 5 cm diameter and is 11 cm long (210 mL). A nasogastric balloon catheter can now be developed that enables relatively easy monitoring of gastric motility in patients with epigastric symptoms.