Real-life use of letermovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus in heart transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains the predominant opportunistic infection following solid organ transplantation (SOT). While valganciclovir is the drug of choice for CMV prophylaxis, its utility can be compromised due to the risk of cytopenia. Letermovir, a novel agent approved for CMV prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients and high-risk kidney transplant recipients, exhibits reduced toxicity. This study aims to present the practical application of letermovir as both primary and secondary prophylaxis against CMV in heart transplant recipients (HTR). METHODS: In this observational, retrospective, single-center study, we included all consecutive adult HTRs from June 2020 to January 2022 who were administered letermovir for CMV prophylaxis. We documented instances of CMV breakthrough infections, side effects related to letermovir, changes in neutropenia following the switch from valganciclovir to letermovir, and any drug interactions with the immunosuppressive regimen. RESULTS: The study comprised 10 patients: two received primary prophylaxis with letermovir due to a high risk of CMV infection (donor-positive, recipient-negative serostatus), and eight received it as secondary prophylaxis following a CMV infection. The median duration of letermovir administration was 8 months (range 3-12 months). No CMV breakthrough infections were reported while on prophylaxis. However, three patients experienced CMV breakthrough infections after discontinuing letermovir prophylaxis (30%). No significant side effects were observed, although one patient reported digestive intolerance. Among the nine patients on tacrolimus, six needed reduced doses after switching to letermovir. CONCLUSION: This real-life study appears to support the effectiveness of letermovir prophylaxis in HTR. Nonetheless, the risk of CMV infection post-treatment cessation is notable. Further drug monitoring and research on the efficacy of letermovir for CMV prophylaxis in SOT patients is warranted.

Heart Transplantation After Acute Aortic Dissection in an Adolescent With Marfan Syndrome.

This report presents the case of a 14-year-old patient with clinical features of Marfan syndrome who underwent an emergency Bentall procedure for acute type A aortic dissection. The patient required postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and was listed for heart transplantation because of persistent left ventricular failure caused by an intimal tear and thrombosis of the left main coronary artery. Heart transplantation was performed 5 days after the first procedure, and the patient was discharged 60 days after admission.

Comparison of Outcomes and Mortality in Patients Having Left Ventricular Assist Device Implanted Early -vs- Late After Diagnosis of Cardiomyopathy.

LVAD implantation in patients with a recently diagnosed cardiomyopathy has been poorly investigated. This work aims at describing the characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving a LVAD within 30 days following the diagnosis of cardiomyopathy. Patients from the ASSIST-ICD study was divided into recently and remotely diagnosed cardiomyopathy based on the time from initial diagnosis of cardiomyopathy to LVAD implantation using the cut point of 30 days. The primary end point of the study was all-cause mortality at 30-day and during follow-up. A total of 652 patients were included and followed during a median time of 9.1 (2.5 to 22.1) months. In this population, 117 (17.9%) had a recently diagnosed cardiomyopathy and had LVAD implantation after a median time of 15.0 (9.0 to 24.0) days following the diagnosis. This group of patients was significantly younger, with more ischemic cardiomyopathy, more sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) events at the time of the diagnosis and were more likely to receive temporary mechanical support before LVAD compared with the remotely diagnosed group. Postoperative in-hospital survival was similar in groups, but recently diagnosed patients had a better long-term survival after hospital discharge. SCA before LVAD and any cardiac surgery combined with LVAD implantation were identified as 2 independent predictors of postoperative mortality in recently diagnosed patients. In conclusion, rescue LVAD implantation for recently diagnosed severe cardiomyopathy is common in clinical practice. Such patients experience a relatively low postoperative mortality and have a better long-term survival compared with remotely diagnosed patients.

Relation of Body Mass Index to Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure Implanted With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

We aimed at characterizing the impact of low and high body mass index (BMI) on outcomes after left-ventricular assist device (LVAD) surgery and define the predictors of mortality in patients with abnormal BMI (low/high). This study was conducted in 19 centers from 2006 to 2016. Patients were divided based on their baseline BMI into 3 groups of BMI: low (BMI ≤18.5 kg/m²); normal (BMI = 18.5 to 24.99 kg/m²) and high (BMI ≥25 kg/m²) (including overweight (BMI = 25 to 29.99 kg/m²), and obesity (BMI ≥30 Kg/m²)). Among 652 patients, 29 (4.4%), 279 (42.8%) and 344 (52.8%) had a low-, normal-, and high BMI, respectively. Patients with high BMI were significantly more likely men, with more co-morbidities and more history of ventricular/supra-ventricular arrhythmias before LVAD implantation. Patients with abnormal BMI had significantly lower survival than those with normal BMI. Notably, those with low BMI experienced the worst survival whereas overweight or obese patients had similar survival. Four predictors of mortality for LVAD candidates with abnormal BMI were defined: total bilirubin ≥16 µmol/L before LVAD, hypertension, destination therapy, and cardiac surgery with LVAD. Depending on the number of predictor per patients, those with abnormal BMI may be divided in 3 groups of 1-year mortality risk, i.e., low (0 to 1 predictor: 29% and 31%), intermediate (2 to 3 predictors, 51% and 52%, respectively), and high (4 predictors: 83%). In conclusion, LVAD recipients with abnormal BMI experience lower survival, especially underweight patients. Four predictors of mortality have been identified for LVAD population with abnormal BMI, differentiating those a low-, intermediate-, and high risks of death.

Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Patients With Uncommon Etiology Cardiomyopathy.

The impact of uncommon etiology cardiomyopathies on Left-ventricular assist device (LVAD)-recipient outcomes is not very well known. This study aimed to characterize patients with uncommon cardiomyopathy etiologies and examine the outcomes between uncommon and ischemic/idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. This observational study was conducted in 19 centers between 2006 and 2016. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients with uncommon etiology were compared to patients with idiopathic dilated/ischemic cardiomyopathies. Among 652 LVAD-recipients included, a total of 590 (90.5%) patients were classified as ischemic/idiopathic and 62 (9.5%) patients were classified in the "uncommon etiologies" group. Main uncommon etiologies were: hypertrophic (n = 12(19%)); cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) (n = 12(19%)); myocarditis (n = 11(18%)); valvulopathy (n = 9(15%)) and others (n = 18(29%)). Patients with uncommon etiologies were significantly younger with more female and presented less co-morbidities. Additionally, patients with uncommon cardiomyopathies were less implanted as destination therapy compared with ischemic/idiopathic group (29% vs 38.8%). During a follow-up period of 9.1 months, both groups experienced similar survival. However, subgroup of hypertrophic/valvular cardiomyopathies and CTRCD had significantly higher mortality compared to the ischemic/idiopathic or myocarditis/others cardiomyopathies. Conversely, patients with myocarditis/others etiologies experienced a better survival. Indeed, the 12-months survival in the myocarditis/others; ischemic/idiopathic and hypertrophic/CTRCD/valvulopathy group were 77%; 65%, and 46% respectively. In conclusion, LVAD-recipients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease and CTRCD experienced the higher mortality rate.

Sarcoidosis diagnosed on granulomas in the explanted heart after transplantation: Results of a French nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a challenging diagnosis. Patients may progress to end-stage congestive heart failure and require cardiac transplantation without ever having been diagnosed. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with granulomas in the explanted hearts are unknown. METHODS: All French heart transplantation centers were contacted to participate in the study. Each center searched through local databases for the cases of non-caseating granuloma in the explanted hearts between 2000 and 2017. Data before and after transplantation were recorded from medical charts. Survival of CS and all- cause heart transplantation patients were compared. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (10 men, 5 women) received a diagnosis of CS based on pathologic data of the explanted heart and were recruited for the study. All patients were diagnosed as non-ischemic dilated or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and presented congestive heart failure. Eight patients (53%) had ventricular rhythm disturbances, and 3 (20%) a complete heart block. Ten out of 13 patients (77%) had extracardiac radiological signs compatible with sarcoidosis on chest computed tomography (CT) scans. One patient died 3 months after transplantation from infectious complications. The 14 remaining patients were still alive at the end of the study (median follow-up of 28.8 months). One patient had a second heart transplantation 5 years later because of chronic allograft vasculopathy. One patient presented a relapse of CS confirmed by myocardial biopsies 9 years after transplantation, requiring an escalation of immunosuppressive therapy. CONCLUSION: CS may be undiagnosed before heart transplantation. In 77% of cases, sarcoidosis could have been detected before transplantation with non-invasive imaging techniques.

Case report: Brincidofovir-induced reversible severe acute kidney injury in 2 solid-organ transplant for treatment of cytomegalovirus infection.

RATIONALE: Resistant cytomegalovirus-mediated infections are increasing in solid organ recipient with few available alternative treatments. Brincidofovir is an oral broad-spectrum antiviral in development for prevention and treatment of viral infection, particularly cytomegalovirus. PATIENTS CONCERNS: Although brincidofovir is an analogue of cidofovir, previous studies reported no renal toxicity. DIAGNOSES: Here, we report 2 cases of severe tubular necrosis in solid organ recipients, 1 heart and 1 kidney transplant. INTERVENTIONS: Both patients received brincidofovir for the treatment of cytomegalovirus infection with mutation of UL-97. They presented an acute kidney injury without any occurrence of other clinical event such as introduction of nephrotoxic drug, graft rejection, urinary tract obstruction or infection, and calcineurin inhibitor overdosage. In each case, renal biopsy showed extended tubular necrosis. OUTCOMES: The discontinuation of brincidofovir led to improve renal function without other any intervention. Reintroduction of brincidofovir in case 1, due to the absence of other medical alternative, led to a new episode of acute kidney injury. One more time, renal biopsy showed tubular necrosis and patient recovered renal function after discontinuation. LESSONS: To our knowledge, this is the first report of brincidofovir-mediated renal adverse event. Clinicians may be aware of this severe complication in this specific population.

Drug interaction between dabrafenib and immunosuppressive drugs: about one case.

Melanoma is a major public health problem. In recent years, it has been shown that melanoma can be characterized by specific oncogenes mutations such as the BRAF mutation, leading to the development of new therapeutic drugs. Dabrafenib is an inhibitor of BRAF, approved as a first-line treatment of metastatic or unresectable stage 3 or 4 melanoma with the BRAF mutation. Few studies have evaluated the drug interaction potential of dabrafenib. This molecule is an enzyme inducer that increases the synthesis of drug-metabolizing enzymes, including CYP3A4, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and UGT enzymes. Accordingly, the plasma concentrations of drugs metabolized by these enzymes are decreased. The decrease in plasma concentrations may cause a reduction or even loss of the clinical effect of these drugs. Many drugs metabolized by these enzymes may be affected, especially midazolam, warfarin, or rifampicin. However, interactions with immunosuppressants have not been described. Everolimus and tacrolimus are two immunosuppressive drugs metabolized by CYP3A4. We report a case of drug interaction between dabrafenib and immunosuppressive drugs (everolimus, tacrolimus), observed in a transplanted heart patient, requiring dosage adjustment of its immunosuppressive treatment to avoid graft rejection.