Vestibular Schwannoma International Study of Active Surveillance Versus Stereotactic Radiosurgery: The VISAS Study.

PURPOSE: The present study assesses the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) versus observation for Koos grade 1 and 2 vestibular schwannoma (VS), benign tumors affecting hearing and neurological function. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This multicenter study analyzed data from Koos grade 1 and 2 VS patients managed with SRS (SRS group) or observation (observation group). Propensity score matching balanced patient demographics, tumor volume, and audiometry. Outcomes measured were tumor control, serviceable hearing preservation, and neurological outcomes. RESULTS: In 125 matched patients in each group with a 36-month median follow-up (P = .49), SRS yielded superior 5- and 10-year tumor control rates (99% CI, 97.1%-100%, and 91.9% CI, 79.4%-100%) versus observation (45.8% CI, 36.8%-57.2%, and 22% CI, 13.2%-36.7%; P < .001). Serviceable hearing preservation rates at 5 and 9 years were comparable (SRS 60.4% CI, 49.9%-73%, vs observation 51.4% CI, 41.3%-63.9%, and SRS 27% CI, 14.5%-50.5%, vs observation 30% CI, 17.2%-52.2%; P = .53). SRS were associated with lower odds of tinnitus (OR = 0.39, P = .01), vestibular dysfunction (OR = 0.11, P = .004), and any cranial nerve palsy (OR = 0.36, P = .003), with no change in cranial nerves 5 or 7 (P > .05). Composite endpoints of tumor progression and/or any of the previous outcomes showed significant lower odds associated with SRS compared with observation alone (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: SRS management in matched cohorts of Koos grade 1 and 2 VS patients demonstrated superior tumor control, comparable hearing preservation rates, and significantly lower odds of experiencing neurological deficits. These findings delineate the safety and efficacy of SRS in the management of this patient population.

Ki-67 index as a predictive marker of meningioma recurrence following surgical resection.

BACKGROUND: Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors in adults. Although benign in a majority of cases, they have a variable clinical course and may recur even after a thorough surgical resection. Ki-67, a nuclear protein involved in cell cycle regulation, has been widely studied as a marker of cellular proliferation in various cancers. However, the prognostic significance of Ki-67 in meningiomas remains controversial. Here, we investigate the Ki-67 index, as a predictive marker of meningioma recurrence following surgical resection and compare it to established prognostic markers such as WHO grade and degree of resection. METHODS: The medical records of 451 patients with previously untreated cranial meningiomas who underwent resections from January 2011 to January 2021 at North Shore University Hospital (NSUH) were reviewed. Collected data included WHO grade, Ki-67 proliferative index, degree of resection - gross (GTR) vs subtotal (STR) - as judged by the surgeon, tumor location, and meningioma recurrence. This study was approved by the NSUH Institutional Review Board IRB 21-1107. RESULTS: There were 290 patients with grade I, 154 with grade II, and 7 with grade III meningiomas. The average post-resection follow-up period was 4 years, and 82 tumors (18 %) recurred. Higher WHO grades were associated with higher rates of recurrence, with rates of 11.4 %, 27.9 %, and 71.4 % for grades 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and subtotal resection corresponded to a higher rate of recurrence than total resection (34.3 % and 13.4 %, respectively). Higher WHO grades also correlated with higher Ki-67 scores (2.59, 10.01, and 20.71) for grades 1, 2, and 3, respectively. A multivariate logistic regression model identified Ki-67 and degree of resection as independent predictive variables for meningioma recurrence, with Ki-67 specifically predicting recurrence in the WHO grade II subset when analyzed separately for WHO grades I and II. CONCLUSION: Our 10-year retrospective study suggests that the Ki-67 index is an important predictive marker for recurrence of intracranial meningiomas following surgical resection, particularly among patients with WHO grade II tumors. Our findings add to a growing body of data that support inclusion of Ki-67 index in the WHO grading criteria for patients with meningiomas.

Impact of Multiple Sclerosis Subtypes on Pain Management in Patients With Trigeminal Neuralgia After Stereotactic Radiosurgery: An International Multicenter Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Trigeminal neuralgia affects approximately 2% of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and often shows higher rates of pain recurrence after treatment. Previous studies on the effectiveness of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for trigeminal neuralgia did not consider the different MS subtypes, including remitting relapsing (RRMS), primary progressive (PPMS), and secondary progressive (SPMS). Our objective was to investigate how MS subtypes are related to pain control (PC) rates after SRS. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter analysis of prospectively collected databases. Pain status was assessed using the Barrow National Institute Pain Intensity Scales. Time to recurrence was estimated through the Kaplan-Meier method and compared groups using log-rank tests. Logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR). RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-eight patients, 135 (52.4%) RRMS, 30 (11.6%) PPMS, and 93 (36%) SPMS, were included from 14 institutions. In total, 84.6% of patients achieved initial pain relief, with a median time of 1 month; 78.7% had some degree of pain recurrence with a median time of 10.2 months for RRMS, 8 months for PPMS, 8.1 months for SPMS ( P = .424). Achieving Barrow National Institute-I after SRS was a predictor for longer periods without recurrence ( P = .028). Analyzing PC at the last available follow-up and comparing with RRMS, PPMS was less likely to have PC (OR = 0.389; 95% CI 0.153-0.986; P = .047) and SPMS was more likely (OR = 2.0; 95% CI 0.967-4.136; P = .062). A subgroup of 149 patients did not have other procedures apart from SRS. The median times to recurrence in this group were 11.1, 9.8, and 19.6 months for RRMS, PPMS, and SPMS, respectively (log-rank, P = .045). CONCLUSION: This study is the first to investigate the relationship between MS subtypes and PC after SRS, and our results provide preliminary evidence that subtypes may influence pain outcomes, with PPMS posing the greatest challenge to pain management.

Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial solitary fibrous tumors: systematic review and pooled quantitative analysis.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs), formerly hemangiopericytomas (HPCs), are rare, aggressive dural-based mesenchymal tumors. While adjuvant radiation therapy has been suggested to improve local tumor control (LTC), especially after subtotal resection, the role of postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and the optimal SRS dosing strategy remain poorly defined. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were systematically searched according to PRISMA guidelines for studies describing postoperative SRS for intracranial SFTs. The search strategy was defined in the authors' PROSPERO protocol (CRD42023454258). RESULTS: 15 studies were included describing 293 patients harboring 476 intracranial residual or recurrent SFTs treated with postoperative SRS. At a mean follow-up of 21-77 months, LTC rate after SRS was 46.4-93% with a mean margin SRS dose of 13.5-21.7 Gy, mean maximum dose of 27-39.6 Gy, and mean isodose at the 42.5-77% line. In pooled analysis of individual tumor outcomes, 18.7% of SFTs demonstrated a complete SRS response, 31.7% had a partial response, 18.9% remained stable (overall LTC rate of 69.3%), and 30.7% progressed. When studies were stratified by margin dose, a mean margin dose > 15 Gy showed an improvement in LTC rate (74.7% versus 65.7%). CONCLUSIONS: SRS is a safe and effective treatment for intracranial SFTs. In the setting of measurable disease, our pooled data suggests a potential dose response of improving LTC with increasing SRS margin dose. Our improved understanding of the aggressive biology of SFTs and the tolerated adjuvant SRS parameters supports potentially earlier use of SRS in the postoperative treatment paradigm for intracranial SFTs.

Let's make size not matter: tumor control and toxicity outcomes of hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery for large brain metastases.

PURPOSE: Management of patients with large brain metastases poses a clinical challenge, with poor local control and high risk of adverse radiation events when treated with single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SF-SRS). Hypofractionated SRS (HF-SRS) may be considered, but clinical data remains limited, particularly with Gamma Knife (GK) radiosurgery. We report our experience with GK to deliver mask-based HF-SRS to brain metastases greater than 10 cc in volume and present our control and toxicity outcomes. METHODS: Patients who received hypofractionated GK radiosurgery (HF-GKRS) for the treatment of brain metastases greater than 10 cc between January 2017 and June 2022 were retrospectively identified. Local failure (LF) and adverse radiation events of CTCAE grade 2 or higher (ARE) were identified. Clinical, treatment, and radiological information was collected to identify parameters associated with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Ninety lesions (in 78 patients) greater than 10 cc were identified. The median gross tumor volume was 16.0 cc (range 10.1-56.0 cc). Prior surgical resection was performed on 49 lesions (54.4%). Six- and 12-month LF rates were 7.3% and 17.6%; comparable ARE rates were 1.9% and 6.5%. In multivariate analysis, tumor volume larger than 33.5 cc (p = 0.029) and radioresistant histology (p = 0.047) were associated with increased risk of LF (p = 0.018). Target volume was not associated with increased risk of ARE (p = 0.511). CONCLUSIONS: We present our institutional experience treating large brain metastases using mask-based HF-GKRS, representing one of the largest studies implementing this platform and technique. Our LF and ARE compare favorably with the literature, suggesting that target volumes less than 33.5 cc demonstrate excellent control rates with low ARE. Further investigation is needed to optimize treatment technique for larger tumors.

Brainstem Metastases Treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Masked versus Framed Immobilization.

BACKGROUND: Patients with brainstem metastases (BSMs) have minimal surgical options due to high-risk anatomy. To review our efficacy treating BSM using Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), we compared results on the basis of the utilization of mask-fixation (MF) or frame-fixation (FF). METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected for 32 patients. Follow-up data for 49 lesions were analyzed for local control rate (LCR) and objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Primary cancers included lung, breast, and melanoma; most lesions were pontine. MF was used in 18 patients. Average tumor volume was 0.99 cm3 (0.005-13.3 cm3). Thirty-nine lesions were treated with single-fraction 16 Gy. Ten lesions were treated in 3-5 fractions with mean dose of 22.5 Gy. Mean follow-up was 14.2 months (1.2-48.2 months). One-year LCR was 94.7%. ORR at last follow-up did not differ between MF and FF (P = 0.81). Average reduction of lesion volume at 6 and 12 months did not differ between MF and FF (64% vs. 45%, P = 0.77; 70% vs. 77%, P = 0.78). Failure occurred in a pontine colorectal cancer metastasis mask-immobilized for treatment with 14 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: SRS for BSM achieved high LCR despite variability in tumor size and histology with no significant difference between MF and FF. Although trials have historically excluded patients with BSM, our data support SRS as a safe and efficacious treatment. This is the first study showing that MF provides equivalent, successful outcomes when compared with FF for patients with BSM.

Using 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET for Postoperative Radiosurgery and Radiotherapy Planning in Patients With Meningioma: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: For patients with either an incompletely resected meningioma or recurrence after surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery is frequently used. MRI is typically used for stereotactic radiosurgery targeting, but differentiating tumor growth from postoperative change can be challenging. 68 Ga-DOTATATE, a positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracer targeting the somatostatin receptor type 2, has been shown to be a reliable meningioma biomarker. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of 68 Ga-DOTATATE on treatment planning in patients who had previously undergone meningioma resection. METHODS: We present a consecutive case series of 12 patients with pathology-proven meningioma who received a 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET between April 2019 and April 2021. Treatment planning was performed first using MRI. DOTATATE-PET images were then used to assess accurate tumor identification. RESULTS: Ten patients had WHO Grade 2 meningioma, and 2 patients had Grade 1 tumor. Eight patients had recurrent meningiomas, and 4 patients had newly diagnosed disease. Overall, 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET scans altered previously formulated treatment plans in 5 of 12 patients. In addition, 9 of 12 patients had disease foci not appreciated on MRI. CONCLUSION: In this series, incorporating 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET imaging had clinical utility for most patients in whom it was used. It proved particularly adept in demonstrating intraosseous meningiomas, differentiating recurrence from postoperative changes, and identifying subcentimeter disease foci. It is an imaging modality that our center will continue to use as a means of improving postoperative treatment plans after the surgical resection of meningiomas.

Does Size Matter? On the Role of Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Large Vestibular Schwannomas as Seen in an Institutional Experience of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for High-Grade Tumors.

OBJECTIVE: Management of large vestibular schwannoma (VS) is controversial. Surgery has historically been the treatment of choice, but emerging literature suggests that definitive stereotactic radiosurgery is feasible. We report our institutional experience of control and morbidity outcomes treating Koos grade 3-4 VS with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). METHODS: An institutional review board-approved database compiled outcomes of Koos grade 3-4 VS treated by GKRS from March 2014 to January 2021 with >6 months' follow-up. Baseline symptoms per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events definitions were recorded. Control rates, toxicities, and post-treatment volumetric changes were analyzed. Aggregate impairment scores (AIs) were defined by the sum of relevant Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grades to categorize symptomatic burdens. Baseline and post-treatment AIs were tested for association with definitive versus adjuvant strategies. RESULTS: In total, 34 patients with Koos grade 3-4 VS were identified, 19 treated with definitive GKRS (GKRS-D) and 15 with adjuvant GKRS (GKRS-A). Median follow-up was 34.2 months for GKRS-D and 48.8 months for GKRS-A. Patients who received GKRS-A had greater AIs at presentation (3.73 vs. 2.11, P = 0.017). Irrespective of treatment approach, tumor control rates were 100% without instances of brainstem necrosis or shunt placement. Six of 19 patients who received GKRS-D had improved post-treatment AI, and 63% of patients who received GKRS-D and 66% of patients who received GKRS-A had tumor shrinkage >20%. CONCLUSIONS: In well-selected patients with Koos grade 3-4 VS, definitive stereotactic radiosurgery may be an appropriate strategy with excellent control and minimal toxicity. Our data suggest that the need for surgical decompression should be considered based on pretreatment symptom burden rather than tumor size.

Direct dosimetric comparison of linear accelerator vs. Gamma Knife fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) of large brain tumors.

The purpose of this study was to directly compare the plan quality of Gamma Knife (GK) (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden)- vs linear accelerator (LINAC)-based delivery techniques for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) of large brain metastases. Eighteen patients with clinical target volumes (CTVs) larger than 9.5 cc were selected to generate comparative plans for the prescription dose of 9 Gy × 3 fractions, utilizing the Eclipse (Varian, Palo Alto, US) vs Leksell GammaPlan (LGP) (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden) treatment planning systems (TPS). Each GK plan was first developed using LGP's automatic planning, followed by manual adjustments/refinements. The same MRI and structures, including CTVs and organs at risk, were then DICOM-transferred to the Eclipse TPS. Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Dynamic Conformal Arc (DCA) plans for a Truebeam, with high-definition multi-leaf collimators (MLCs), were developed on these MR images and structures using a single isocenter and 3 non-coplanar arcs. No planning target volume (PTV) margins were added, and no heterogeneity correction was used for either TPS. GK plans were prescribed to the 50% isodose line, and Eclipse VMAT and DCA plans allowed a maximum dose up to 170% and ∼125%, respectively. Gradient index (GI), Paddick Conformity Index (PCI), V20GyRind, and V4GyRind of all 3 techniques were calculated and compared. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to determine the statistical significance of the differences of these planning indices for the 3 planning techniques. A total of eighteen treatment targets were analyzed. Median CTV volume was 14.4 cc (range 9.5 cc - 55.9 cc). Mean ± standard deviation of PCI were 0.85 ± 0.03, 0.90 ± 0.03, and 0.72 ± 0.11 for GK, VMAT and DCA plans, respectively. They were respectively 2.64 ± 0.17, 2.46 ± 0.18, and 2.83 ± 0.48 for GI; 15.33 ± 8.45 cc, 10.47 ± 4.32 cc and 23.51 ± 16 cc for V20GyRind; and 316.28 ± 138.35 cc, 317.81 ± 108.21 cc, and 394.85 ± 142.16 cc for V4GyRind. The differences were statistically significant with p < 0.01 for all indices, except for V4GyRind (p > 0.129). In conclusion, a direct dosimetric comparison using the same MRI scan and contours was performed to evaluate the plan quality of various fSRT delivery techniques for CTV > 9.5 cc. LINAC VMAT plans provided the best dosimetric outcome in regard to PCI, GI, and V20GyRind. GK outcomes were similar to LINAC VMAT plans while LINAC DCA outcomes were significantly worse. Even though GK has a smaller physical penumbra, LINAC VMAT outperformed GK in this study due to enhanced penumbra sharpening and better beam optimization.

Retrospective Analysis of Treatment Workflow in Frame-Based and Frameless Gamma Knife Radiosurgery.

Objective To improve the efficiency of frame-based and frameless Gamma Knife® Icon™ (GKI) treatments by analyzing the workflows of both treatment approaches and identifying steps that lead to prolonged patient in-clinic or treatment time. Methods The treatment processes of 57 GKI patients, 16 frame-based and 41 frameless cases were recorded and analyzed. For frame-based treatments, time points were recorded for various steps in the process, including check-in, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) completion, plan approval, and treatment start/end times. The time required for completing each step was calculated and investigated. For frameless treatments, the actual and planned treatment times were compared to evaluate the patient tolerance of the treatment. In addition, the time spent on room cleaning and preparation between treatments was also recorded and analyzed. Results For frame-based cases, the average in-clinic time was 6.3 hours (ranging from 4 to 8.7 hours). The average time from patient check-in to plan approval was 4.2 hours (ranging from 2.8 to 5.5 hours), during which the frame was placed, stereotactic reference MRI images were taken, target volumes were contoured, and the treatment plan was developed and second-checked. For patients immobilized with a mask, treatment pauses triggered by the intra-fractional motion monitoring system resulted in a significantly longer actual treatment time than the planned time. In 50 (or 55%) of the 91 frameless treatments, the patient on-table time was longer than the planned treatment time by more than 10 minutes, and in 19 (or 21%) of the treatments the time difference was larger than 20 minutes. Major treatment interruptions, defined as pauses leading to a longer than 10-minute delay, were more commonly encountered in patients with a planned treatment time longer than 40 minutes, which accounted for 64% of the recorded major interruptions. Conclusion For frame-based cases, the multiple pretreatment steps (from patient check-in to plan approval) in the workflow were time-consuming and resulted in prolonged patient in-clinic time. These pretreatment steps may be shortened by performing some of these steps before the treatment day, e.g., pre-planning the treatment using diagnostic MRI scans acquired a few days earlier. For frameless patients, we found that a longer planned treatment time is associated with a higher chance of treatment interruption. For patients with a long treatment time, a planned break or consideration of fractionated treatments (i.e., 3 to 5 fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery) may optimize the workflow and improve patient satisfaction.

Frame-Based and Mask-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery: The Patient Experience, Compared.

INTRODUCTION: Noninvasive frameless modalities have become increasingly utilized for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for benign and malignant pathologies. There is minimal comparison in the literature of frame-based (FB) and mask-based (MB) SRS. With the dual capabilities of the Elekta Gamma Knife® Icon™, we sought to compare patient perceptions of FB and MB SRS with respect to comfort and pain and to examine effects of lesion type on the patient experience of SRS. METHODS: Over a 1-year period, patients who underwent single fraction, fractionated or hypofractionated FB or MB Gamma Knife SRS at our institution were given an 8-question survey about their experience with the procedure immediately after treatment was completed. Descriptive statistics were applied. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients completed the survey with 65 FB and 52 MB SRS treatments. Mean pain for FB SRS (5.64 ± 2.55) was significantly greater than mean pain for MB SRS (0.92 ± 2.24; t114 = 10.46, p < 0.001). Patient comfort during the procedure was also higher for those having MB SRS (p < 0.001). Mixed results were obtained when investigating if benign versus malignant diagnosis affected patient experience of SRS. For the purposes of this study, malignant diagnoses were almost entirely metastatic lesions. Diagnosis played no role on pain levels when all patients were analyzed together. The treatment technique had no effect on patient comfort in patients with benign diagnoses, while patients with malignant diagnoses treated with MB SRS were more likely to be comfortable (p < 0.001). Among patient's receiving FB treatments, diagnosis played no role on patient comfort. When only MB treatments were analyzed, patients were more likely to be comfortable if they had a malignant lesion (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with MB SRS experience the procedure as more comfortable and less painful compared to those treated using a FB modality. Overall, this difference was not affected by a benign versus a malignant diagnosis and the treatment type is more indicative of the patient experience during SRS. A more homogenous sample between modalities and diagnoses and further follow-up with the patient's input on their experience would be beneficial.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic Surge on Radiation Treatment: Report From a Multicenter New York Area Institution.

PURPOSE: During the COVID-19 surge months of March and April 2020, our New York multicenter health system experienced an influx of cases with COVID-19. We sought to study the impact of the surge period on patients with cancer prescribed radiation treatment (RT). METHODS: We reviewed our secure departmental quality assurance database for all patients who underwent RT planning simulations from March 6, 2020, through April 30, 2020. A priority level between 1 and 3 was prospectively assigned to each case based on faculty consensus to determine which patients required immediate RT. In May 2020, each faculty physician again retrospectively reviewed their patients from the database and provided additional commentary on how the COVID-19 pandemic had affected each patient's care. All statistics are descriptive. RESULTS: A total of 412 RT courses in 406 unique patients were simulated for linear accelerator-based external beam RT. The median age was 66 years. Treatment intent was curative in 70.6% and palliative in 29.4%. Of the 412 cases, 66.7% were priority 1, 25% priority 2, and 7.8% priority 3. Two hundred thirty-nine cases (58%) underwent standard-of-care diagnosis, workup, and treatment plan. Seventeen patients (4.1%) electively canceled their RT, and 17 others (4.1%) electively delayed RT start. Thirty-four (8.3%) were prescribed hypofractionation to shorten their RT course, and 22 (5.3%) had a change in modality. Incomplete or delayed workup was identified in 19 cases (4.6%). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic surge resulted in 42% of our patients having a non-standard-of-care pathway. This outcome demonstrates a significant impact of the COVID-19 crisis on routine cancer care.

Implementation of Telehealth in Radiation Oncology: Rapid Integration During COVID-19 and Its Future Role in Our Practice.

PURPOSE: The widespread coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in significant changes in care delivery among radiation oncology practices and has demanded the rapid incorporation of telehealth. However, the impact of a large-scale transition to telehealth in radiation oncology on patient access to care and the viability of care delivery are largely unknown. In this manuscript, we review our implementation and report data on patient access to care and billing implications. Because telehealth is likely to continue after COVID-19, we propose a radiation oncology-specific algorithm for telehealth. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In March 2020, our department began to use telehealth for all new consults, posttreatment encounters, and follow-up appointments. Billable encounters from January to April 2020 were reviewed and categorized into 1 of the following visit types: in-person, telephonic, or 2-way audio-video. Logistic regression models tested whether visit type differed by patient age, income, or provider. RESULTS: There was a 35% decrease in billable activity from January to April. In-person visits decreased from 100% to 21%. Sixty percent of telehealth appointments in April were performed with 2-way audio-video and 40% by telephone only. In-person consultation visits were associated with higher billing codes compared with 2-way audio-video telehealth visits (P < .01). No difference was seen for follow-up visits. Univariate and multivariable analysis identified that older patient age was associated with reduced likelihood of 2-way audio-video encounters (P < .01). The physician conducting the telehealth appointment was also associated with the type of visit (P < .01). Patient income was not associated with the type of telehealth visit. CONCLUSIONS: Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have been able to move the majority of patient visits to telehealth but have observed inconsistent utilization of the audio-video telehealth platform. We present guidelines and quality metrics for incorporating telehealth into radiation oncology practice, based on type of encounter and disease subsite.

Radiotherapy dose escalation on pelvic lymph node control in patients with cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Data supporting dose escalation for node-positive cervical cancer are currently limited to small retrospective studies. The goal of this study was to assess whether radiation dose was associated with lymph node control or gastrointestinal toxicity in patients with node-positive cervical cancer. METHODS: A total of 390 patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix were treated between October 1997 and October 2017. Patients included in our analysis were those with squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma who were node-positive, treated definitively, and with at least one follow-up visit and post-treatment imaging scan. We excluded those without follow-up and those treated with palliative intent. All patients were treated with external beam radiation to pelvic±para-aortic fields with concurrent weekly cisplatin. All lymph nodes present at the time of treatment were stratified by size as <2 cm or ≥2 cm. Acute and late gastrointestinal toxicity were recorded for all patients. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients with 206 lymph nodes were identified. Median stage at presentation was FIGO IIB. Thirteen patients underwent definitive surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiation, of which 12 were treated to doses ≤5040 (range 2700-5940) cGy. Sixty-four patients were treated with definitive chemoradiation, of which 42 (66%) received ≤5040 (range 4500-5040) cGy and 22 (34%) received >5040 (range 5300-6640) cGy. Patients with pre-chemoradiation lymph nodes ≥2 cm had inferior lymph node control compared with patients with pre-chemoradiation lymph node <2 cm at 12 months (77% vs 100%, p=0.002). Radiation dose >5040 cGy was not significantly associated with improved lymph node control compared with ≤5040 cGy when analyzing all patients (12 months, 100% vs 89%, p=0.112). In patients with pre-chemoradiation lymph nodes ≥2 cm, radiation dose >5040 cGy was associated with improved lymph node control (12 months, 100% vs 60%, p=0.020). Acute grade ≥2 gastrointestinal toxicity was not associated with radiation dose >5040 cGy (20% vs 13%, p=0.424). Two patients developed grade ≥2 late gastrointestinal toxicity, both of whom were treated to ≤5040 cGy. CONCLUSIONS: This series supports the role of dose escalation for patients with lymph nodes ≥2 cm. Dose escalation is associated with improved control in patients with larger lymph nodes, and is not associated with greater gastrointestinal toxicity.

Development of a Comprehensive, Contour-Based, Peer Review Workflow at a Community Proton Center.

PURPOSE: Quality assurance and continuing quality improvement are integral parts of any radiation oncology practice. With increasingly conformal radiation treatments, it has become critical to focus on every slice of the target contour to ensure adequate tumor coverage and optimal normal tissue sparing. Proton therapy centers open internationally with increasing frequency, and radiation oncologists with varying degrees of subspecialization apply proton therapy in daily practice. Precise treatment with proton therapy allows us to limit toxicity but requires in-depth knowledge of the unique properties of proton beam delivery. To address this need at our proton therapy center, we developed a comprehensive peer review program to help improve the quality of care that we were providing for our patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We implemented a policy of comprehensive peer review for all patients treated at our community proton facility starting in January 2013. Peer review begins at the time of referral with prospective cases being reviewed for appropriateness for proton therapy at daily rounds. There is then biweekly review of target contouring and treatment plans. RESULTS: During a 6-month period from June 2013 to November 2013, a total of 223 new patients were treated. Documentation of peer review at chart rounds was completed for 222 of the 223 patients (99.6%). An average of 10.7 cases were reviewed in each biweekly chart rounds session, with a total of 560 case presentations. The average time required for contour review was 145 seconds (±71 seconds) and plan review was 120 seconds (±64 seconds). Modifications were suggested for 21 patients (7.9%) during contour review and for 19 patients (6.4%) during treatment plan review. An average of 4 physicians were present at each session. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that the implementation of a comprehensive, prospective peer review program is feasible in the community setting. This article can serve as a framework for future quality assurance programs.

Major complications from radiotherapy following treatment for atypical meningiomas.

OBJECTIVEComplications from radiotherapy (RT), in a primary or adjuvant setting, have overall been described as uncommon, with few detailed descriptions of major complications. The authors present two cases involving significant complications and their management in their review of patients undergoing RT for treatment of atypical meningioma.METHODSThe authors conducted a retrospective review of all patients with pathologically confirmed atypical meningioma (WHO grade II) treated with primary or adjuvant RT from February 2011 through February 2019. They identified two patients with long-term, grade 3 toxicity. The cases of these patients are described in detail.RESULTSTwo patients had major complications associated with postoperative RT. Patients 1 and 2 both were treated with postoperative RT for pathologically confirmed atypical meningioma. Patient 1 experienced worsening behavioral changes, cognitive decline, and hydrocephalus following treatment. This required cerebrospinal fluid diversion. Patient 2 developed radiation necrosis with mass effect and cognitive decline. Neither patient returned to his/her initial post-RT status after steroid therapy, and each remained in need of supportive care. Both patients remained free of tumor progression at 52 and 38 months following treatment.CONCLUSIONSThe postoperative management of patients with atypical meningioma continues to be defined, with questions remaining regarding timing of RT, dose, target delineation, and fractionation. Both of the patients in this study received fractionated RT, which included a greater volume of normal brain than more focal treatment options such as would be required by stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Further research is needed to compare SRS and fractionated RT for the management of patients with grade II meningiomas. The more focused nature of SRS may make this a preferred option in certain cases of focal recurrence.

Tumor control and survival in patients with ten or more brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery: a retrospective analysis.

INTRODUCTION: To assess tumor control and survival in patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for 10 or more metastatic brain tumors. METHODS: Patients were retrospectively identified. Clinical records were reviewed for follow-up data, and post-treatment MRI studies were used to assess tumor control. For tumor control studies, patients were separated based on synchronous or metachronous treatment, and control was assessed at 3-month intervals. The Kaplan-Meier method was employed to create survival curves, and regression analyses were employed to study the effects of several variables. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were treated for an average of 17 total metastases. Forty patients received synchronous treatment, while 15 received metachronous treatment. Univariate analysis revealed an association between larger brain volumes irradiated with 12 Gy and decreased overall survival (p = 0.0406); however, significance was lost on multivariate analysis. Among patients who received synchronous treatment, the median percentage of tumors controlled was 100%, 91%, and 82% at 3, 6, and 9 months, respectively. Among patients who received metachronous treatment, the median percentage of tumors controlled after each SRS encounter was 100% at all three time points. CONCLUSIONS: SRS can be used to treat patients with 10 or more total brain metastases with an expectation of tumor control and overall survival that is equivalent to that reported for patients with four or fewer tumors. Development of new metastases leading to repeat SRS is not associated with worsened tumor control or survival. Survival may be adversely affected in patients having a higher volume of normal brain irradiated.

Prophylactic versus reactive gastrostomy tube placement in advanced head and neck cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: A systematic review.

Although chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has improved disease outcomes in advanced head and neck cancer (aHNC), toxicity remains a major concern. Treatment interruptions and decreased quality of life (QOL) can occur due to malnutrition, secondary to mucositis, dysphagia and odynophagia. Gastrostomy tubes are used in many patients to improve nutrition during CRT. The optimal timing of PEG placement in patients with aHNC undergoing CRT remains controversial. Using the PubMed database, we performed a systematic review of published CRT series in aHNC to guide decision-making regarding optimal timing of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement. We aimed to compare outcomes when patients are treated with prophylactic PEG (pPEG) versus reactive PEG (rPEG). Twenty-two studies examining the role of PEG placement in CRT for aHNC were reviewed. pPEG reduces the number of malnourished patients (defined as >10% of body weight), but average weight loss at various time points following treatment appears similar to patients with rPEG. pPEG is also associated with improved QOL at 6 months, and greater long term PEG dependence. Clinical and dosimetric parameters that correlate with malnutrition in patients without pPEG include advanced age, percent weight loss preceding treatment, and radiation dose to the pharyngeal constrictor muscles. Based on this evidence, our institutional strategy is to encourage pPEG in those patients deemed at greatest risk of becoming malnourished during the course of treatment, and to approach the remainder of patients with rPEG.

Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation for Resectable Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

After definitive chemoradiation for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has been established as standard of care in patients whose tumors respond to treatment. In the modern era, however, a subset of patients might receive upfront resection for SCLC, yet the role of PCI in these patients has not been elucidated. In this review, we examine the literature to better define the role of PCI in this subset of patients. For patients with ≥ T2 disease, incomplete resection, or those not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, PCI is expected to offer a clinical benefit. For patients with T1 tumors treated with R0 resection, however, the rate of intracranial metastasis might be < 10%. In these patients, deferral of PCI might be appropriate because it would avoid known neurocognitive sequelae of cranial irradiation.

Hippocampal-sparing and target volume coverage in treating 3 to 10 brain metastases: A comparison of Gamma Knife, single-isocenter VMAT, CyberKnife, and TomoTherapy stereotactic radiosurgery.

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to evaluate hippocampal doses and target volume coverage with and without hippocampal sparing when treating multiple brain metastases using various stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) platforms. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We selected 10 consecutive patients with 14 separate treatments who had been treated in our department for 3 to 10 brain metastases and added hippocampal avoidance contours. All 14 treatments were planned with GammaPlan for Gamma Knife, Eclipse for single isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), TomoTherapy Treatment Planning System (TPS) for TomoTherapy, and MultiPlan for CyberKnife. Initial planning was performed with the goal of planning target volume coverage of V100 ≥95% without hippocampal avoidance. If the maximum hippocampal point dose (Dmax) was <6.6 Gy in a single fraction and <40% of the hippocampi received ≤4.5 Gy, no second plan was performed. If either constraint was not met, replanning was performed with these constraints. RESULTS: There was a median of 6 metastases per plan, with an average total tumor volume of 7.32 mL per plan. The median hippocampal Dmax (in Gy) without sparing averaged 1.65, 9.81, 4.38, and 5.46, respectively (P < .0001). Of 14 plans, 3 Gamma Knife and CyberKnife plans required replanning, whereas 13 VMAT and 8 TomoTherapy plans required replanning. The hippocampal constraints were not achievable in 1 plan on any platform when the tumor was bordering the hippocampus. The mean volume of brain receiving 12 Gy (in mL), which has been associated with symptomatic radionecrosis, was 23.57 with Gamma Knife, 76.77 with VMAT, 40.86 with CyberKnife, and 104.06 with TomoTherapy (P = .01). The overall average conformity indices for all plans ranged from 0.36 to 0.52. CONCLUSIONS: Even with SRS, the hippocampi can receive a considerable dose; however, if the hippocampi are outlined as organs of risk, sparing these structures is feasible in nearly all situations with all 4 platforms, without detriment to target coverage, and should be considered in all patients undergoing SRS for multiple brain metastases. SUMMARY: Hippocampi play an important role in memory, and sparing of these structures in whole brain radiation can improve neurocognitive outcomes. The hippocampi are not routinely spared when using stereotactic radiosurgery. We evaluated the incidental dose to the hippocampi when treating multiple brain metastases and sought to examine if hippocampal sparing is feasible without detriment to target coverage. We found that hippocampal sparing is possible without affecting coverage or conformality in most cases across treatment platforms.