Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 13(3): e0194567, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29566102

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Biologics containing growth factors are frequently used to enhance healing after musculoskeletal injuries. One mechanism of action is thought to be though the ability of biologics to induce homing and migration of endogenous mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) to a target tissue. However, the ability of biologics to stimulate chemotaxis (directed migration of cells) and chemokinesis (increase rate of cell migration) of MSCs is unknown. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to directly compare the ability of biologics including platelet rich plasma (PRP) and bone marrow concentrate (BMC) to induce MSC migration. The hypothesis was that leukocyte-low platelet rich plasma (Llo PRP) would induce migration to a greater extent than leukocyte-high platelet rich plasma (Lhi PRP) or BMC. METHODS: Bone marrow-derived MSCs were isolated from 8 horses. Migration of MSCs toward a biologic (BMC, Llo PRP, and Lhi PRP) or the positive control platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) was continuously traced and measured for 24hrs using time-lapse microscopy and a microfluidics device. Cell migration, chemotaxis and chemokinesis were determined by measurements of displacement, number of cells migrated, and cell flux. RESULTS: All biologics resulted in a significantly greater percentage of MSCs migrated compared to the positive control (PDGF). MSCs migrated further toward BMC compared to Llo PRP. Cell migration, measured as cell flux, was greater toward BMC and Lhi PRP than Llo PRP. CONCLUSION: The biologics BMC and Lhi PRP elicit greater chemotaxis and chemokinesis of MSCs than Llo PRP. However, all biologics recruited the same number of MSCs suggesting that differences in other regenerative effects, such as growth factor concentration, between biologics should be strongly considered when choosing a biologic for treatment of musculoskeletal injuries. The results of this study have the potential to reduce the need, risks, and costs associated with MSC culture and delivery.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos/farmacologia , Quimiotaxia/efeitos dos fármacos , Células-Tronco Mesenquimais/fisiologia , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/terapia , Sistema Musculoesquelético/lesões , Cicatrização/fisiologia , Animais , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Medula Óssea/métodos , Diferenciação Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Proliferação de Células/efeitos dos fármacos , Células Cultivadas , Quimiotaxia/fisiologia , Cavalos , Contagem de Leucócitos , Leucócitos , Osteogênese , Fator de Crescimento Derivado de Plaquetas/farmacologia , Plasma Rico em Plaquetas/citologia
2.
Cell Stem Cell ; 12(5): 602-15, 2013 May 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23642368

RESUMO

microRNAs regulate developmental cell-fate decisions, tissue homeostasis, and oncogenesis in distinct ways relative to proteins. Here, we show that the tumor suppressor microRNA miR-34a is a cell-fate determinant in early-stage dividing colon cancer stem cells (CCSCs). In pair-cell assays, miR-34a distributes at high levels in differentiating progeny, whereas low levels of miR-34a demarcate self-renewing CCSCs. Moreover, miR-34a loss of function and gain of function alter the balance between self-renewal versus differentiation both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, miR-34a sequesters Notch1 mRNA to generate a sharp threshold response where a bimodal Notch signal specifies the choice between self-renewal and differentiation. In contrast, the canonical cell-fate determinant Numb regulates Notch levels in a continuously graded manner. Altogether, our findings highlight a unique microRNA-regulated mechanism that converts noisy input into a toggle switch for robust cell-fate decisions in CCSCs.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo/genética , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , MicroRNAs/genética , MicroRNAs/metabolismo , Células-Tronco Neoplásicas/metabolismo , Células-Tronco Neoplásicas/patologia , Receptores Notch/metabolismo , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Divisão Celular Assimétrica , Carcinogênese/genética , Diferenciação Celular/genética , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Linhagem da Célula/genética , Proliferação de Células , Feminino , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Masculino , Proteínas de Membrana/metabolismo , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Proteínas do Tecido Nervoso/metabolismo , Transporte Proteico , Transdução de Sinais/genética , Ensaios Antitumorais Modelo de Xenoenxerto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA