Maximum entropy determination of mammalian proteome dynamics.

Full understanding of proteostasis and energy utilization in cells will require knowledge of the fraction of cell proteins being degraded with different half-lives and their rates of synthesis. We therefore developed a method to determine such information that combines mathematical analysis of protein degradation kinetics obtained in pulse-chase experiments with Bayesian data fitting using the maximum entropy principle. This approach will enable rapid analyses of whole-cell protein dynamics in different cell types, physiological states, and neurodegenerative disease. Using it, we obtained surprising insights about protein stabilities in cultured cells normally and upon activation of proteolysis by mTOR inhibition and increasing cAMP or cGMP. It revealed that >90% of protein content in dividing mammalian cell lines is long-lived, with half-lives of 24 to 200 h, and therefore comprises much of the proteins in daughter cells. The well-studied short-lived proteins (half-lives < 10 h) together comprise <2% of cell protein mass, but surprisingly account for 10 to 20% of measurable newly synthesized protein mass. Evolution thus appears to have minimized intracellular proteolysis except to rapidly eliminate misfolded and regulatory proteins.

Molecular mechanism for activation of the 26S proteasome by ZFAND5.

Various hormones, kinases, and stressors (fasting, heat shock) stimulate 26S proteasome activity. To understand how its capacity to degrade ubiquitylated proteins can increase, we studied mouse ZFAND5, which promotes protein degradation during muscle atrophy. Cryo-electron microscopy showed that ZFAND5 induces large conformational changes in the 19S regulatory particle. ZFAND5's AN1 Zn-finger domain interacts with the Rpt5 ATPase and its C terminus with Rpt1 ATPase and Rpn1, a ubiquitin-binding subunit. Upon proteasome binding, ZFAND5 widens the entrance of the substrate translocation channel, yet it associates only transiently with the proteasome. Dissociation of ZFAND5 then stimulates opening of the 20S proteasome gate. Using single-molecule microscopy, we showed that ZFAND5 binds ubiquitylated substrates, prolongs their association with proteasomes, and increases the likelihood that bound substrates undergo degradation, even though ZFAND5 dissociates before substrate deubiquitylation. These changes in proteasome conformation and reaction cycle can explain the accelerated degradation and suggest how other proteasome activators may stimulate proteolysis.

26S proteasomes become stably activated upon heat shock when ubiquitination and protein degradation increase.

Heat shock (HS) promotes protein unfolding, and cells respond by stimulating HS gene expression, ubiquitination of cell proteins, and proteolysis by the proteasome. Exposing HeLa and other cells to 43 °C for 2 h caused a twofold increase in the 26S proteasomes' peptidase activity assayed at 37 °C. This increase in activity occurred without any change in proteasome amount and did not require new protein synthesis. After affinity-purification from HS cells, 26S proteasomes still hydrolyzed peptides, adenosine 5'-triphosphate, and ubiquitinated substrates more rapidly without any evident change in subunit composition, postsynthetic modification, or association with reported proteasome-activating proteins. After returning HS cells to 37 °C, ubiquitin conjugates and proteolysis fell rapidly, but proteasome activity remained high for at least 16 h. Exposure to arsenite, which also causes proteotoxic stress in the cytosol, but not tunicamycin, which causes endoplasmic reticulum stress, also increased ubiquitin conjugate levels and 26S proteasome activity. Although the molecular basis for the enhanced proteasomal activity remains elusive, we studied possible signaling mechanisms. Proteasome activation upon proteotoxic stress required the accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins since blocking ubiquitination by E1 inhibition during HS or arsenite exposure prevented the stimulation of 26S activity. Furthermore, increasing cellular content of ubiquitin conjugates at 37 °C by inhibiting deubiquitinating enzymes with RA190 or b-AP15 also caused proteasome activation. Thus, cells respond to proteotoxic stresses, apparently in response to the accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins, by activating 26S proteasomes, which should help promote the clearance of damaged cell proteins.

Mechanisms That Activate 26S Proteasomes and Enhance Protein Degradation.

Although ubiquitination is widely assumed to be the only regulated step in the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, recent studies have demonstrated several important mechanisms that regulate the activities of the 26S proteasome. Most proteasomes in cells are inactive but, upon binding a ubiquitinated substrate, become activated by a two-step mechanism requiring an association of the ubiquitin chain with Usp14 and then a loosely folded protein domain with the ATPases. The initial activation step is signaled by Usp14's UBL domain, and many UBL-domain-containing proteins (e.g., Rad23, Parkin) also activate the proteasome. ZFAND5 is a distinct type of activator that binds ubiquitin conjugates and the proteasome and stimulates proteolysis during muscle atrophy. The proteasome's activities are also regulated through subunit phosphorylation. Agents that raise cAMP and activate PKA stimulate within minutes Rpn6 phosphorylation and enhance the selective degradation of short-lived proteins. Likewise, hormones, fasting, and exercise, which raise cAMP, activate proteasomes and proteolysis in target tissues. Agents that raise cGMP and activate PKG also stimulate 26S activities but modify different subunit(s) and stimulate also the degradation of long-lived cell proteins. Both kinases enhance the selective degradation of aggregation-prone proteins that cause neurodegenerative diseases. These new mechanisms regulating proteolysis thus have clear physiological importance and therapeutic potential.

ClpX Is Essential and Activated by Single-Strand DNA Binding Protein in Mycobacteria.

The ClpP1P2 proteolytic complex is essential in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Proteolysis by ClpP1P2 requires an associated ATPase, either ClpX or ClpC1. Here, we sought to define the unique contributions of the ClpX ATPase to mycobacterial growth. We formally demonstrated that ClpX is essential for mycobacterial growth, and to understand its essential functions, we identified ClpX-His-interacting proteins by pulldown and tandem mass spectrometry. We found an unexpected association between ClpX and proteins involved in DNA replication, and we confirm a physical association between ClpX and the essential DNA maintenance protein single-stranded-DNA binding protein (SSB). Purified SSB is not degraded by ClpXP1P2; instead, SSB enhances ATP hydrolysis by ClpX and degradation of the model substrate GFP-SsrA by ClpXP1P2. This activation of ClpX is mediated by the C-terminal tail of SSB, which had been implicated in the activation of other ATPases associated with DNA replication. Consistent with the predicted interactions, depletion of clpX transcript perturbs DNA replication. These data reveal that ClpX participates in DNA replication and identify the first activator of ClpX in mycobacteria.IMPORTANCE Tuberculosis, caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, imposes a major global health burden, surpassing HIV and malaria in annual deaths. The ClpP1P2 proteolytic complex and its cofactor ClpX are attractive drug targets, but their precise cellular functions are unclear. This work confirms ClpX's essentiality and describes a novel interaction between ClpX and SSB, a component of the DNA replication machinery. Further, we demonstrate that a loss of ClpX is sufficient to interrupt DNA replication, suggesting that the ClpX-SSB complex may play a role in DNA replication in mycobacteria.

Multiple myeloma cells are exceptionally sensitive to heat shock, which overwhelms their proteostasis network and induces apoptosis.

Proteasome inhibitors, such as bortezomib (BTZ), are highly effective and widely used treatments for multiple myeloma. One proposed reason for myeloma cells' exceptional sensitivity to proteasome inhibition is that they produce and continually degrade unusually large amounts of abnormal immunoglobulins. We, therefore, hypothesized that, heat shock may also be especially toxic to myeloma cells by causing protein unfolding, increasing further the substrate load on proteasomes, and, thus, putting further stress on their capacity for protein homeostasis. After a shift from 37 to 43 °C, all four myeloma lines studied underwent extensive apoptosis in 4 h, unlike 13 nonmyeloma cell lines, even though the myeloma cells induced heat-shock proteins and increased protein degradation similar to other cells. Furthermore, two myeloma lines resistant to proteasome inhibitors were also more resistant to 43 °C. Shifting myeloma cells to 43, 41, or 39 °C (which was not cytotoxic) dramatically increased their killing by proteasome inhibitors and inhibitors of ubiquitination or p97/VCP. Combining increased temperature with BTZ increased the accumulation of misfolded proteins and substrate load on the 26S proteasome. The apoptosis seen at 43 °C and at 39 °C with BTZ was mediated by caspase-9 and was linked to an accumulation of the proapoptotic Bcl-2-family member Noxa. Thus, myeloma cells are exceptionally sensitive to increased temperatures, which greatly increase substrate load on the ubiquitin-proteasome system and eventually activate the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. Consequently, for myeloma, mild hyperthermia may be a beneficial approach to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of proteasome inhibitors.

cGMP via PKG activates 26S proteasomes and enhances degradation of proteins, including ones that cause neurodegenerative diseases.

Because raising cAMP enhances 26S proteasome activity and the degradation of cell proteins, including the selective breakdown of misfolded proteins, we investigated whether agents that raise cGMP may also regulate protein degradation. Treating various cell lines with inhibitors of phosphodiesterase 5 or stimulators of soluble guanylyl cyclase rapidly enhanced multiple proteasome activities and cellular levels of ubiquitinated proteins by activating protein kinase G (PKG). PKG stimulated purified 26S proteasomes by phosphorylating a different 26S component than is modified by protein kinase A. In cells and cell extracts, raising cGMP also enhanced within minutes ubiquitin conjugation to cell proteins. Raising cGMP, like raising cAMP, stimulated the degradation of short-lived cell proteins, but unlike cAMP, also markedly increased proteasomal degradation of long-lived proteins (the bulk of cell proteins) without affecting lysosomal proteolysis. We also tested if raising cGMP, like cAMP, can promote the degradation of mutant proteins that cause neurodegenerative diseases. Treating zebrafish models of tauopathies or Huntington's disease with a PDE5 inhibitor reduced the levels of the mutant huntingtin and tau proteins, cell death, and the resulting morphological abnormalities. Thus, PKG rapidly activates cytosolic proteasomes, protein ubiquitination, and overall protein degradation, and agents that raise cGMP may help combat the progression of neurodegenerative diseases.

Proteins containing ubiquitin-like (Ubl) domains not only bind to 26S proteasomes but also induce their activation.

During protein degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, latent 26S proteasomes in the cytosol must assume an active form. Proteasomes are activated when ubiquitylated substrates bind to them and interact with the proteasome-bound deubiquitylase Usp14/Ubp6. The resulting increase in the proteasome's degradative activity was recently shown to be mediated by Usp14's ubiquitin-like (Ubl) domain, which, by itself, can trigger proteasome activation. Many other proteins with diverse cellular functions also contain Ubl domains and can associate with 26S proteasomes. We therefore tested if various Ubl-containing proteins that have important roles in protein homeostasis or disease also activate 26S proteasomes. All seven Ubl-containing proteins tested-the shuttling factors Rad23A, Rad23B, and Ddi2; the deubiquitylase Usp7, the ubiquitin ligase Parkin, the cochaperone Bag6, and the protein phosphatase UBLCP1-stimulated peptide hydrolysis two- to fivefold. Rather than enhancing already active proteasomes, Rad23B and its Ubl domain activated previously latent 26S particles. Also, Ubl-containing proteins (if present with an unfolded protein) increased proteasomal adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) hydrolysis, the step which commits substrates to degradation. Surprisingly, some of these proteins also could stimulate peptide hydrolysis even when their Ubl domains were deleted. However, their Ubl domains were required for the increased ATPase activity. Thus, upon binding to proteasomes, Ubl-containing proteins not only deliver substrates (e.g., the shuttling factors) or provide additional enzymatic activities (e.g., Parkin) to proteasomes, but also increase their capacity for proteolysis.

Inhibiting ubiquitination causes an accumulation of SUMOylated newly synthesized nuclear proteins at PML bodies.

Protein ubiquitination and SUMOylation are required for the maintenance of cellular protein homeostasis, and both increase in proteotoxic conditions (e.g. heat shock or proteasome inhibition). However, we found that when ubiquitination was blocked in several human cell lines by inhibiting the ubiquitin-activating enzyme with TAK243, there was an unexpected, large accumulation of proteins modified by SUMO2/3 chains or SUMO1, but not by several other ubiquitin-like proteins. This buildup of SUMOylated proteins was evident within 3-4 h. It required the small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO)-conjugating enzyme, UBC9, and the promyelocytic leukemia protein (PML) and thus was not due to nonspecific SUMO conjugation by ubiquitination enzymes. The SUMOylated proteins accumulated predominantly bound to chromatin and were localized to PML nuclear bodies. Because blocking protein synthesis with cycloheximide prevented the buildup of SUMOylated proteins, they appeared to be newly-synthesized proteins. The proteins SUMOylated after inhibition of ubiquitination were purified and analyzed by MS. In HeLa and U2OS cells, there was a cycloheximide-sensitive increase in a similar set of SUMOylated proteins (including transcription factors and proteins involved in DNA damage repair). Surprisingly, the inhibition of ubiquitination also caused a cycloheximide-sensitive decrease in a distinct set of SUMOylated proteins (including proteins for chromosome modification and mRNA splicing). More than 80% of the SUMOylated proteins whose levels rose or fell upon inhibiting ubiquitination inhibition underwent similar cycloheximide-sensitive increases or decreases upon proteasome inhibition. Thus, when nuclear substrates of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway are not efficiently degraded, many become SUMO-modified and accumulate in PML bodies.

SIP/CacyBP promotes autophagy by regulating levels of BRUCE/Apollon, which stimulates LC3-I degradation.

BRUCE/Apollon is a membrane-associated inhibitor of apoptosis protein that is essential for viability and has ubiquitin-conjugating activity. On initiation of apoptosis, the ubiquitin ligase Nrdp1/RNF41 promotes proteasomal degradation of BRUCE. Here we demonstrate that BRUCE together with the proteasome activator PA28γ causes proteasomal degradation of LC3-I and thus inhibits autophagy. LC3-I on the phagophore membrane is conjugated to phosphatidylethanolamine to form LC3-II, which is required for the formation of autophagosomes and selective recruitment of substrates. SIP/CacyBP is a ubiquitination-related protein that is highly expressed in neurons and various tumors. Under normal conditions, SIP inhibits the ubiquitination and degradation of BRUCE, probably by blocking the binding of Nrdp1 to BRUCE. On DNA damage by topoisomerase inhibitors, Nrdp1 causes monoubiquitination of SIP and thus promotes apoptosis. However, on starvation, SIP together with Rab8 enhances the translocation of BRUCE into the recycling endosome, formation of autophagosomes, and degradation of BRUCE by optineurin-mediated autophagy. Accordingly, deletion of SIP in cultured cells reduces the autophagic degradation of damaged mitochondria and cytosolic protein aggregates. Thus, by stimulating proteasomal degradation of LC3-I, BRUCE also inhibits autophagy. Conversely, SIP promotes autophagy by blocking BRUCE-dependent degradation of LC3-I and by enhancing autophagosome formation and autophagic destruction of BRUCE. These actions of BRUCE and SIP represent mechanisms that link the regulation of autophagy and apoptosis under different conditions.

PDE1 inhibition facilitates proteasomal degradation of misfolded proteins and protects against cardiac proteinopathy.

No current treatment targets cardiac proteotoxicity or can reduce mortality of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Selective degradation of misfolded proteins by the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) is vital to the cell. Proteasome impairment contributes to HF. Activation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) or cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG) facilitates proteasome functioning. Phosphodiesterase 1 (PDE1) hydrolyzes both cyclic nucleotides and accounts for most PDE activities in human myocardium. We report that PDE1 inhibition (IC86430) increases myocardial 26S proteasome activities and UPS proteolytic function in mice. Mice with CryABR120G-based proteinopathy develop HFpEF and show increased myocardial PDE1A expression. PDE1 inhibition markedly attenuates HFpEF, improves mouse survival, increases PKA-mediated proteasome phosphorylation, and reduces myocardial misfolded CryAB. Therefore, PDE1 inhibition induces PKA- and PKG-mediated promotion of proteasomal degradation of misfolded proteins and treats HFpEF caused by CryABR120G, representing a potentially new therapeutic strategy for HFpEF and heart disease with increased proteotoxic stress.

26S Proteasomes are rapidly activated by diverse hormones and physiological states that raise cAMP and cause Rpn6 phosphorylation.

Pharmacological agents that raise cAMP and activate protein kinase A (PKA) stimulate 26S proteasome activity, phosphorylation of subunit Rpn6, and intracellular degradation of misfolded proteins. We investigated whether a similar proteasome activation occurs in response to hormones and under various physiological conditions that raise cAMP. Treatment of mouse hepatocytes with glucagon, epinephrine, or forskolin stimulated Rpn6 phosphorylation and the 26S proteasomes' capacity to degrade ubiquitinated proteins and peptides. These agents promoted the selective degradation of short-lived proteins, which are misfolded and regulatory proteins, but not the bulk of cell proteins or lysosomal proteolysis. Proteasome activities and Rpn6 phosphorylation increased similarly in working hearts upon epinephrine treatment, in skeletal muscles of exercising humans, and in electrically stimulated rat muscles. In WT mouse kidney cells, but not in cells lacking PKA, treatment with antidiuretic hormone (vasopressin) stimulated within 5-minutes proteasomal activity, Rpn6 phosphorylation, and the selective degradation of short-lived cell proteins. In livers and muscles of mice fasted for 12-48 hours cAMP levels, Rpn6 phosphorylation, and proteasomal activities increased without any change in proteasomal content. Thus, in vivo cAMP-PKA-mediated proteasome activation is a common cellular response to diverse endocrine stimuli and rapidly enhances the capacity of target tissues to degrade regulatory and misfolded proteins (e.g., proteins damaged upon exercise). The increased destruction of preexistent regulatory proteins may help cells adapt their protein composition to new physiological conditions.

UBL domain of Usp14 and other proteins stimulates proteasome activities and protein degradation in cells.

The best-known function of ubiquitin-like (UBL) domains in proteins is to enable their binding to 26S proteasomes. The proteasome-associated deubiquitinating enzyme Usp14/UBP6 contains an N-terminal UBL domain and is an important regulator of proteasomal activity. Usp14 by itself represses multiple proteasomal activities but, upon binding a ubiquitin chain, Usp14 stimulates these activities and promotes ubiquitin-conjugate degradation. Here, we demonstrate that Usp14's UBL domain alone mimics this activation of proteasomes by ubiquitin chains. Addition of this UBL domain to purified 26S proteasomes stimulated the same activities inhibited by Usp14: peptide entry and hydrolysis, protein-dependent ATP hydrolysis, deubiquitination by Rpn11, and the degradation of ubiquitinated and nonubiquitinated proteins. Thus, the binding of Usp14's UBL (apparently to Rpn1's T2 site) seems to mediate the activation of proteasomes by ubiquitinated substrates. However, the stimulation of these various activities was greater in proteasomes lacking Usp14 than in wild-type particles and thus is a general response that does not involve some displacement of Usp14. Furthermore, the UBL domains from hHR23 and hPLIC1/UBQLN1 also stimulated peptide hydrolysis, and the expression of hHR23A's UBL domain in HeLa cells stimulated overall protein degradation. Therefore, many UBL-containing proteins that bind to proteasomes may also enhance allosterically its proteolytic activity.

Measuring the Overall Rate of Protein Breakdown in Cells and the Contributions of the Ubiquitin-Proteasome and Autophagy-Lysosomal Pathways.

In certain physiological or pathological states (e.g., starvation, heat shock, or muscle atrophy) and upon drug treatments, the overall rate of protein degradation in cells may increase or decrease. These adaptations and pathological responses can occur through alterations in substrate flux through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (UPP), the autophagy-lysosomal system, or both. Therefore, it is important to precisely measure the activities of these degradation pathways in degrading cell proteins under different physiological states or upon treatment with drugs. In particular, proteasome inhibitors have become very important agents for treating multiple myeloma and very useful tools in basic research. To evaluate rigorously their efficacy and the cellular responses to other inhibitors, it is essential to know the degree of inhibition of protein breakdown. Unfortunately, commonly used assays of the activities of the UPP or autophagy rely on qualitative, indirect approaches that do not directly reflect the actual rates of protein degradation by these pathways. In this chapter, we describe isotopic pulse-chase methods to directly measure overall rates of protein degradation in cells by radiolabeling cell proteins and following their subsequent degradation to radioactive amino acids, which diffuse from cells into the medium and can be easily quantitated. While pulse-chase methods have often been used to follow degradation of specific proteins, the methods described here allow quantification of the total cellular activity in degrading either long-lived proteins (the great bulk of cell constituents) or the fraction with short half-lives. Moreover, by use of specific inhibitors of proteasomes or lysosomes, it is also possible to measure precisely the total contributions of the UPP or lysosomal proteases. These approaches have already been proven very useful in defining the effects of inhibitors, growth factors, nutrients, ubiquitination, and different proteasome activators on overall proteolysis and on substrate flux through the proteasomal and lysosomal pathways.

Exploring the Regulation of Proteasome Function by Subunit Phosphorylation.

Rates of degradation by the ubiquitin proteasome system depend not only on rates of ubiquitination, but also on the level of proteasome activity which can be regulated through phosphorylation of proteasome subunits. Many protein kinases have been proposed to influence proteasomal activity. However, for only two is there strong evidence that phosphorylation of a specific 26S subunit enhances the proteasome's capacity to degrade ubiquitinated proteins and promotes protein breakdown in cells: (1) protein kinase A (PKA), which after a rise in cAMP phosphorylates the 19S subunit Rpn6, and (2) dual tyrosine receptor kinase 2 (DYRK2), which during S through M phases of the cell cycle phosphorylates the 19S ATPase subunit Rpt3. In this chapter, we review and discuss the different methods used to assess the impact of phosphorylation by these two kinases on proteasomal activity and intracellular protein degradation. In addition, we present one method to determine if phosphorylation is responsible for an observed increase in proteasomal activity and another to evaluate by Phos-tag gel electrophoresis whether a specific proteasome subunit is modified by phosphorylation. The methods reviewed and presented here should be useful in clarifying the roles of other kinases and other posttranslational modifications of proteasome subunits.

Measurement of the Multiple Activities of 26S Proteasomes.

Because proteasomes catalyze most of the protein degradation in mammalian cells, and their functioning is essential for cellular homeostasis, proteasome structure, biochemical mechanisms, and regulation in normal and disease states are now widely studied and are of major importance. In addition, inhibitors of the proteasome's peptidase activity have proven to be very valuable as research tools and in the treatment of hematologic malignancies, and a number of newer pharmacological agents that alter proteasome function are being developed. The rapid degradation of ubiquitinated proteins by the 26S proteasome involves multiple enzymatic and non-enzymatic steps, including the binding of ubiquitinated substrates to the 19S particle (Subheading 3.2), opening the gated substrate entry channel into the 20S particle (Subheading 3.3), disassembly of the Ub chain (Subheading 3.4), ATP hydrolysis (Subheading 3.5), substrate unfolding and translocation, and proteolysis within the 20S particle (Subheadings 3.3 and 3.7). Assaying each of these processes is important if we are to fully understand the physiological regulation of proteasome function and the effects of disease or drugs. Here, we describe several methods that we have found useful to measure many of these individual activities using purified proteasomes. Studies using these approaches have already provided valuable new insights into the effects of post-synthetic modifications to 26S subunits, the physiological regulation of the ubiquitin-proteasome system, and the impairment of proteasome activity in neurodegenerative disease. These advances would not have been possible if only the standard assays of peptidase activity were used.

Regulating protein breakdown through proteasome phosphorylation.

The ubiquitin proteasome system degrades the great majority of proteins in mammalian cells. Countless studies have described how ubiquitination promotes the selective degradation of different cell proteins. However, there is a small but the growing literature that protein half-lives can also be regulated by post-translational modifications of the 26S proteasome. The present study reviews the ability of several kinases to alter proteasome function through subunit phosphorylation. For example, PKA (protein kinase A) and DYRK2 (dual-specificity tyrosine-regulated kinase 2) stimulate the proteasome's ability to degrade ubiquitinated proteins, peptides, and adenosine triphosphate, while one kinase, ASK1 (apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1), inhibits proteasome function during apoptosis. Proteasome phosphorylation is likely to be important in regulating protein degradation because it occurs downstream from many hormones and neurotransmitters, in conditions that raise cyclic adenosine monophosphate or cyclic guanosine monophosphate levels, after calcium influx following synaptic depolarization, and during phases of the cell cycle. Beyond its physiological importance, pharmacological manipulation of proteasome phosphorylation has the potential to combat various diseases. Inhibitors of phosphodiesterases by activating PKA or PKG (protein kinase G) can stimulate proteasomal degradation of misfolded proteins that cause neurodegenerative or myocardial diseases and even reduce the associated pathology in mouse models. These observations are promising since in many proteotoxic diseases, aggregation-prone proteins impair proteasome function, and disrupt protein homeostasis. Conversely, preventing subunit phosphorylation by DYRK2 slows cell cycle progression and tumor growth. However, further research is essential to determine how phosphorylation of different subunits by these (or other) kinases alters the properties of this complex molecular machine and thus influence protein degradation rates.

The Logic of the 26S Proteasome.

The ubiquitin proteasome pathway is responsible for most of the protein degradation in mammalian cells. Rates of degradation by this pathway have generally been assumed to be determined by rates of ubiquitylation. However, recent studies indicate that proteasome function is also tightly regulated and determines whether a ubiquitylated protein is destroyed or deubiquitylated and survives longer. This article reviews recent advances in our understanding of the proteasome's multistep ATP-dependent mechanism, its biochemical and structural features that ensure efficient proteolysis and ubiquitin recycling while preventing nonselective proteolysis, and the regulation of proteasome activity by interacting proteins and subunit modifications, especially phosphorylation.

The deubiquitinating enzyme Usp14 allosterically inhibits multiple proteasomal activities and ubiquitin-independent proteolysis.

The proteasome-associated deubiquitinating enzyme Usp14/Ubp6 inhibits protein degradation by catalyzing substrate deubiquitination and by poorly understood allosteric actions. However, upon binding a ubiquitin chain, Usp14 enhances proteasomal degradation by stimulating ATP and peptide degradation. These studies were undertaken to clarify these seemingly opposite regulatory roles of Usp14 and their importance. To learn how the presence of Usp14 on 26S proteasomes influences its different activities, we compared enzymatic and regulatory properties of 26S proteasomes purified from wild-type mouse embryonic fibroblast cells and those lacking Usp14. The proteasomes lacking Usp14 had higher basal peptidase activity than WT 26S, and this activity was stimulated to a greater extent by adenosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate) (ATPγS) than with WT particles. These differences were clear even though Usp14 is present on only a minor fraction (30-40%) of the 26S in WT mouse embryonic fibroblast cells. Addition of purified Usp14 to the WT and Usp14-defficient proteasomes reduced both their basal peptidase activity and the stimulation by ATPγS. Usp14 inhibits these processes allosterically because a catalytically inactive Usp14 mutant also inhibited them. Proteasomes lacking Usp14 also exhibited greater deubiquitinating activity by Rpn11 and greater basal ATPase activity than WT particles. ATP hydrolysis by WT proteasomes is activated if they bind a ubiquitinated protein, which is loosely folded. Surprisingly, proteasomes lacking Usp14 could be activated by such proteins even without a ubiquitin chain present. Furthermore, proteasomes lacking Usp14 are much more active in degrading non-ubiquitinated proteins (e.g. Sic1) than WT particles. Thus, without a ubiquitinated substrate present, Usp14 suppresses multiple proteasomal activities, especially basal ATP consumption and degradation of non-ubiquitinated proteins. These allosteric effects thus reduce ATP hydrolysis by inactive proteasomes and nonspecific proteolysis and enhance proteasomal specificity for ubiquitinated proteins.

Inhibition of the Proteasome ß2 Site Sensitizes Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells to ß5 Inhibitors and Suppresses Nrf1 Activation.

The proteasome inhibitors carfilzomib (Cfz) and bortezomib (Btz) are used successfully to treat multiple myeloma, but have not shown clinical efficacy in solid tumors. Here we show that clinically achievable inhibition of the ß5 site of the proteasome by Cfz and Btz does not result in loss of viability of triple-negative breast cancer cell lines. We use site-specific inhibitors and CRISPR-mediated genetic inactivation of ß1 and ß2 to demonstrate that inhibiting a second site of the proteasome, particularly the ß2 site, sensitizes cell lines to Btz and Cfz in vitro and in vivo. Inhibiting both ß5 and ß2 suppresses production of the soluble, active form of the transcription factor Nrf1 and prevents the recovery of proteasome activity through induction of new proteasomes. These findings provide a strong rationale for the development of dual ß5 and ß2 inhibitors for the treatment of solid tumors.