Wound related complications and the anterior rectus sheath versus Gibson approach to kidney transplantation: A single center randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Wound related complications (WRC) are a significant source of morbidity in kidney transplant recipients, and may be mitigated by surgical approach. We hypothesize that the anterior rectus sheath approach (ARS) may decrease WRC and inpatient opiate use compared to the Gibson Approach (GA). METHODS: This double-blinded randomized controlled trial allocated kidney transplant recipients aged 18 or older, exclusive of other procedures, 1:1 to ARS or GA at a single hospital. The ARS involves a muscle-splitting paramedian approach to the iliopsoas fossa, compared to the muscle-cutting GA. Patients and data analysts were blinded to randomization. RESULTS: Seventy five patients were randomized to each group between August 27, 2019 and September 18, 2020 with a minimum 12 month follow-up. There was no difference in WRC between groups (p = .23). Nine (12%) and three patients (4%) experienced any WRC in the ARS and GA groups, respectively. Three and one Clavien IIIb complications occurred in the ARS and GA groups, respectively. In a multiple linear regression model, ARS was associated with decreased inpatient opioid use (ß = -58, 95% CI: -105 to -12, p = .016). CONCLUSIONS: The ARS did not provide a WRC benefit in kidney transplant recipients, but may be associated with decreased inpatient opioid use.

Implementation of a novel living-donor kidney transplant preoperative checklist within the electronic medical record: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Checklist utilization in surgery has contributed to improved patient safety and reduced numbers of preventable complications. A living-donor kidney transplant (LDKT) preoperative checklist embedded within electronic medical record (EMR) was developed to enhance patient safety and prevent "never" events including: unexpected donor-recipient blood (ABO) incompatibility, positive (XM) cross match, infectious disease transmission, or procurement of an anatomically inappropriate allograft. Review of the initial 2 years of checklist utilization was performed. FINDINGS: This safety instrument operates by facilitating critical review and referencing of source documentation to confirm ABO, XM, infectious risk, and organ anatomy compatibility. It was met with high compliance rates and no "never events" have occurred following its inception. The checklist is readily available in the EMR and is accessible by all members of the LDKT recipient healthcare team. CONCLUSIONS: Checklist utilization was associated with zero LDKT "never event" occurrences. Surgeons felt the checklist was easy to use.