Secondary Prevention and Extreme Cardiovascular Risk Evaluation (SEVERE-1), Focus on Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors: The Study Protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Despite significant improvement in secondary CardioVascular (CV) preventive strategies, some acute and chronic coronary syndrome (ACS and CCS) patients will suffer recurrent events (also called "extreme CV risk"). Recently new biochemical markers, such as uric acid (UA), lipoprotein A [Lp(a)] and several markers of inflammation, have been described to be associated with CV events recurrence. The SEcondary preVention and Extreme cardiovascular Risk Evaluation (SEVERE-1) study will accurately characterize extreme CV risk patients enrolled in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs. AIM:  Our aims will be to describe the prevalence of extreme CV risk and its association with newly described biochemical CV risk factors. AIM: Our aims will be to describe the prevalence of extreme CV risk and its association with newly described biochemical CV risk factors. METHODS: We will prospectively enrol 730 ACS/CCS patients at the beginning of a CR program. Extreme CV risk will be retrospectively defined as the presence of a previous (within 2 years) CV events in the patients' clinical history. UA, Lp(a) and inflammatory markers (interleukin-6 and -18, tumor necrosis factor alpha, C-reactive protein, calprotectin and osteoprotegerin) will be assessed in ACS/CCS patients with extreme CV risk and compared with those without extreme CV risk but also with two control groups: 1180 hypertensives and 765 healthy subjects. The association between these biomarkers and extreme CV risk will be assessed with a multivariable model and two scoring systems will be created for an accurate identification of extreme CV risk patients. The first one will use only clinical variables while the second one will introduce the biochemical markers. Finally, by exome sequencing we will both evaluate polygenic risk score ability to predict recurrent events and perform mendellian randomization analysis on CV biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: Our study proposal was granted by the European Union PNRR M6/C2 call. With this study we will give definitive data on extreme CV risk prevalence rising attention on this condition and leading cardiologist to do a better diagnosis and to carry out a more intensive treatment optimization that will finally leads to a reduction of future ACS recurrence. This will be even more important for cardiologists working in CR that is a very important place for CV risk definition and therapies refinement.

Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Myocarditis: Where We Are and Where We Will Go.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are specific monoclonal antibodies directed against inhibitory targets of the immune system, mainly represented by programmed death-1 (PD1) ligand-1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), thus enabling an amplified T-cell-mediated immune response against cancer cells. These drugs have significantly improved prognosis in patients with advanced metastatic cancer (e.g., melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma). However, uncontrolled activation of anti-tumor T-cells could trigger an excessive immune response, possibly responsible for multi-organ damage, including, among others, lymphocytic myocarditis. The incidence of ICIs-induced myocarditis is underestimated and the patients affected are poorly characterized. The diagnosis and management of this condition are mainly based on expert opinion and case reports. EKG and ultrasound are tests that can help identify patients at risk of myocarditis during treatment by red flags, such as QRS complex enlargement and narrowing of global longitudinal strain (GLS). Therapy of ICI-related myocarditis is based on immunosuppressors, monoclonal antibodies and fusion proteins. A future strategy could involve the use of microRNAs. This review considers the current state of the art of immune-related adverse cardiovascular events, focusing on histological and clinical features, diagnosis and management, including current treatments and future pharmacological targets.

Lomitapide in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: cardiology perspective from a single-center experience.

AIMS: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a genetic dyslipidemia characterized by elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and accelerated atherosclerosis. Frequently, traditional lipid-lowering therapy is ineffective in these patients, and lipoprotein apheresis is required. Lomitapide has been recently approved for HoFH. We reported our experience in HoFH patients treated with lomitapide, evaluating its efficacy and safety profile. METHODS: Probands suspected for familial hypercholesterolemia were extrapolated from the registry of patients admitted to our cardiology department. Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) criteria were adopted to diagnose familial hypercholesterolemia clinically. Individuals receiving a definite or probable diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia underwent family cascade screening and genetic test. Patients with a genetic diagnosis of HoFH were treated with lomitapide and monitored with serial follow-up visits. RESULTS: Within 1 year of screening, from a population of 3250 patients admitted to our cardiology department, seven probands were selected with a DLCN score greater than 5. A total of two patients resulted genetically homozygotes for familial hypercholesterolemia and started lomitapide. A marked reduction in LDL-C occurred in both patients on lomitapide (78% reduction in patient 1 and 86% in patient 2 already on lipoprotein apheresis, compared with baseline LDL-C), allowing the apheresis treatment to be stopped in the second case. Lomitapide was well tolerated, and both patients experienced only mild gastrointestinal events. CONCLUSION: Lomitapide is an effective and well tolerated cholesterol-lowering drug approved for the treatment of HoFH patients. It would be useful to administer it early in these patients to reduce LDL-C and avoid the development of fatal cardiovascular complications.

von Willebrand Factor and Venous Thromboembolism: Pathogenic Link and Therapeutic Implications.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent cause of disability and mortality worldwide. Von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a major determinant of hemostasis and clot formation, in both arteries and veins. Although VWF is mainly known for its role in arterial thrombosis, several studies suggest a pathogenic role for VWF and its regulator ADAMTS-13 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13) in venous thrombosis. Nongenetic and genetic factors, including gene mutations and polymorphisms, aging, hormone status, ABO blood groups, and systemic inflammation, have been involved in the modulation of both VTE predisposition and plasma levels of VWF. In several clinical settings, including inflammatory disease and cancer, VWF and ADAMTS-13 are currently investigated as possible determinants of vein thrombosis. These data indicate VWF as a potential therapeutic target in the management of VTE. Several studies report unselective antagonism of VWF for drugs used in daily clinical practice, including heparin and statins. Selective inhibition of VWF pathway has recently been tested in animal models of arterial and venous thrombosis as a novel therapeutic strategy to prevent platelet aggregation and thrombosis, promote vein lumen recanalization, and improve vein valve competency with excellent safety profile. In this review, we summarize the role of VWF in VTE, focusing on clinical and potential therapeutic implications.

Use and efficacy of saline hydration and N-acetyl cysteine to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy in low-risk populations undergoing coronary artery angiography.

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is most commonly defined as acute renal failure occurring within 48-72 h of exposure to an intravascular radiographic contrast medium that is not attributable to other causes. In the international literature, a 25% increase in serum creatinine levels or an increase in absolute values of 0.5 mg/dl from baseline has been suggested to define CIN. The reported incidence of CIN varies widely, ranging from 2 to 50%. This variability results from differences in the presence or absence of risk factors. With a retrospective analysis we evaluated the use of saline hydration plus N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) to prevent CIN in a low-risk population of patients undergoing coronary artery angiography compared with an historic low risk group not treated. From January 2009 to December 2009, 152 consecutive patients who underwent coronary artery angiography with a low osmolarity contrast agent were enrolled in our study, and compared with an historic control group consisting of 172 low-risk patients. Nephrotoxic drugs such as diuretics, ACE-I and ARBs were stopped at least 24 h before the procedure. Inclusion criteria to define low-risk population were the absence of: diabetes, age >65 years, or baseline creatinine >1.4 mg/dl. We have treated group A (152 patients, 47.3%) with a saline hydration (1 ml/kg/h) plus N-acetyl cysteine 600 mg 12 h before and 12 h after the procedure; group B (group control of 170 patients, 52.7%) were not treated. The overall incidence of CIN was 7.1% (23 patients). In particular, the incidence of CIN was 2.6% (4 patients) in the group A and 11.2% (19 patients) in the group B (p = 0.002). In the multivariate analysis, including risk factor such as age, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, current smoking habit baseline creatinine level, contrast index and hydration, the last variable was the only one inversely correlated independently with the incidence of CIN (p = 0.001). In conclusion, intravenous hydration with saline and NAC is an effective and low cost tool in preventing CIN in patients undergoing coronary artery angiography, and, according to the current guidelines, should be used in all high-risk patients for CIN. Our results show that even in patients at low risk, hydration with saline 0.9% plus NAC is useful and significantly reduces the incidence of CIN.