[Validation of the Spanish version of the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-Population Screener (COPD-PS). Its usefulness and that of FEV1/FEV6 for the diagnosis of COPD]. / Validación de la versión traducida del Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-Population Screener (COPD-PS). Su utilidad y la del FEV1/FEV6 para el diagnóstico de enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a highly undiagnosed disease. The use of short screening questionnaires designed to detect chronic airflow obstruction may help to the early diagnosis of COPD. PATIENTS AND METHOD: This was an observational, cross-sectional epidemiological study aimed to validate the translated into Spanish version of the COPD-PS questionnaire. Socio-demographic and clinical data of participants were collected, as well as their answers to the COPD-PS and EQ-5D questionnaires. The ratio FEV(1)/FEV(6) was measured with the COPD-6 device. The psychometric properties of the questionnaire and the diagnostic yield of the FEV(1)/FEV(6) ratio were analysed, both referred to the gold standard of post-bronchodilator FEV(1)/FVC < 0.7. RESULTS: Ten primary care centers participated in the study and included 94 controls and 79 cases with chronic airflow obstruction. Questionnaire characteristics were: feasibility, 2.3% of participants did not answer at least one item; mean time to fill the questionnaire was 47.7 seconds; 4.7% of individuals had a 0 score. Validity, moderate correlation with EQ-5D scores and moderate-high with FEV(1); the scores of COPD-PS were related to all parameters associated with COPD. A cut off of 4 units had the best sensitivity/specificity ratio and correctly classified 78% of participants. For the FEV(1)/FEV(6) ratio, a cut off of 0.75 correctly classified 85% of individuals. CONCLUSIONS: The COPD-PS questionnaire demonstrated good psychometric properties. A cut off score of 4 has excellent predictive value. A ratio of 0.75 in the FEV(1)/FEV(6) provides an excellent correlation with the ratio FEV(1)/FVC and is useful for the identification of individuals with chronic airflow obstruction.

Treatment patterns, use of resources, and costs of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients in Spain: results from a Delphi panel.

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 80-85% of lung cancer patients are diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), of which 50% of patients present with advanced or metastatic disease. The objective of this study was to describe treatment patterns, use of resources and costs associated with treating advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients in Spain. METHODS: A two-round Delphi consensus panel of clinical experts was carried out to describe local clinical patterns based on treatment algorithms from SEOM and ASCO treatment guidelines. The panel consisted of 19 oncologists and 1 hospital pharmacist, who were asked during the first round to define therapeutic pathways for NSCLC by the patients' performance status, age and histology; to quantify the use of resources associated with the preparation and administration of anticancer pharmacotherapy; management of adverse events associated with anticancer pharmacotherapy; and best supportive care (BSC). The second round was used to try to reduce the variability of responses in some questions and to further describe differences between intravenous and oral therapy. 2009 unit costs were applied to the use of resources described by the clinical experts. The perspective of the study was from the Spanish National Healthcare System. RESULTS: Performance status guided therapy decision and led to differences in costs. Patients with a performance status of 0-2 were expected to receive anticancer pharmacotherapy while patients with a performance status of 3-4 received BSC including analgesics and corticosteroids. Anticancer pharmacotherapies containing cisplatin or carboplatin were used preferably in first-line treatment, while the usual second- and third-line treatments were docetaxel, erlotinib or pemetrexed monotherapy. The importance of the cost of anticancer pharmacotherapy as a proportion of total healthcare costs was higher for combination therapies containing bevacizumab or pemetrexed. The anticancer pharmacotherapies associated with adverse events like febrile neutropenia or infection increased the total treatment cost. Administration costs were more relevant in regimens containing cisplatin and were low for orally administered therapies. The total cost per patient with advanced or metastatic NSCLC from starting anticancer therapy until death was estimated to be between €11,301 and €32,754 depending on the number of treatment lines received. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of advanced or metastatic NSCLC, healthcare costs are impacted by line of treatment, patient performance status, type of administration of therapy and adverse event management.

Epidemiology and costs of screening and management of precancerous lesions of the cervix in Spain.

OBJECTIVE: Oncogenic human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are essential causes of cervical cancer. Screening prevents cancer by detecting precancerous lesions (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, CIN). Our aim was to assess the annual number of Pap smears and CIN diagnoses in Spain and to estimate associated management costs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 1-year retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted among 65 gynecologists from public primary health care centers in 6 autonomous regions in Spain. We documented the total number of Pap smears performed and the management of women with CIN. Data on health care resource use related to CIN management for 2 years after diagnosis were collected and combined with unit costs to assess the mean cost per patient. We extrapolated to the general female Spanish population to estimate the total cost of screening and CIN management from the third-party payer's perspective. RESULTS: In our study sample, 3.5% of routine Pap smears were abnormal. We estimated that 7.6 million Pap smears are performed annually in Spain, at a cost of 622 million euro (US$987). Furthermore, 40,530 women are annually diagnosed with CIN 1, 26,243 with CIN 2, and 28,423 with CIN 3. The mean cost of CIN management per patient was 1,115 euro for CIN 1, 1,626 euro for CIN 2, and 2,090 euro for CIN 3. The total cost of CIN management was estimated at 147 million euro (US$233). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the costs of screening and management of CIN represent a heavy burden to the public health system in Spain.