William Stewart Halsted: letters to a young female admirer.

OBJECTIVE: To present the first new information in the past 25 years concerning the life of Dr. William Stewart Halsted. This paper reports on recently discovered personal correspondence of Dr. Halsted, beginning at age 66, to a young lady, Elizabeth Blanchard Randall, 40 years his junior. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Dr. William Stewart Halsted is generally considered the most important and influential surgeon that this country has produced. During his Hopkins days in Baltimore (1886-1922) he was rather reclusive, and little is known of his personal life. He was married but had no children. Several biographies written by Halsted's contemporaries constitute the bulk of what is known about Halsted's personal life. METHODS: All extant letters from Dr. Halsted to Miss Randall were reviewed. Archival materials were consulted to understand the context for this friendship. The correspondence between Halsted and Randall took place during a 3-year period, although their acquaintance was probably long-standing. RESULTS: The letters reveal Dr. Halsted and Miss Randall's great and warm affection for each other, despite their 40-year age difference. The letters have a playful nature absent in Halsted's other correspondence. This relationship has not been previously noted. CONCLUSIONS: Late in Halsted's life, he developed a warm and affectionate relationship with a young lady 40 years his junior, as revealed in Halsted's correspondence. Halsted's warm, personal, and playful letters are in stark contrast to his biographers' portrayals of him as a more serious and reclusive person.

Impact of race on the outcome of carotid endarterectomy: a population-based analysis of 9,842 recent elective procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of race and other potentially confounding variables on the outcome of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). SUMMARY: Previous studies have demonstrated that CEA is performed less frequently in black patients, although little attention has been focused on the influence of race on the outcome of surgery. METHODS: The Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission database was reviewed to identify all elective CEA procedures performed in all nonfederal acute care hospitals in the state from 1990 through 1995 to examine the influence of race and other factors on the rates of in-hospital complications, in-hospital stroke, length of stay, and total hospital charges. RESULTS: Carotid endarterectomy was performed in 9,219 (94%) white and 623 (6%) black patients during this period. The in-hospital stroke rate was 1.7%-3. 1% among black patients and 1.6% among white patients. Black patients had a longer length of stay and higher mean hospital charges than white patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified black race as an independent risk factor for in-hospital stroke. Performance of CEA by a high-volume surgeon was protective for the combined occurrence of in-hospital stroke or death, and whites were more than twice as likely to undergo surgery performed by high-volume surgeons. Conversely, undergoing surgery in a low-volume hospital was associated with in-hospital stroke, and blacks were four times as likely to use low-volume hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Black patients who underwent elective CEA in Maryland from 1990 to 1995 had an increased incidence of in-hospital stroke, a longer hospital stay, and higher hospital charges than whites. Black race was identified as an independent risk factor for in-hospital stroke, although the reasons for this influence of race on outcome are undefined. The authors' observations also suggest the possibility of limited access to optimal surgical care among blacks, and this issue warrants further study.

Results of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the 1990s: A population-based analysis of 2335 cases.

OBJECTIVE: The safety and efficacy of conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair are undergoing increased examination in parallel with the development of less invasive repair methods. Because most published studies of elective AAA repair report operations performed in tertiary referral institutions and thus may not reflect the outcome in the surgical community at large, the current population-based study was undertaken to document the results obtained across a broad spectrum of clinical practice in a defined geographic area and to examine the factors that influence the outcomes. METHODS: The Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission database was used to identify all the elective AAA repairs that were performed in all the nonfederal acute care hospitals in the state from 1990 to 1995. RESULTS: Elective AAA repair was performed on 2335 patients (mean age, 70.4 years) in 46 of the 52 (88%) nonfederal acute care hospitals in the state, including seven high-volume (>100 cases), nine moderate-volume (50 to 99 cases), and 30 low-volume (<50 cases) institutions. The in-hospital mortality rate was 3.5% and increased significantly with advancing age: less than 65 years, 2.2%; 65 to 69 years, 2.5%; 70 to 79 years, 3.5%; and more than 80 years, 7.3% (P =.002). Mortality rates were higher for women (4.5% vs 3.2%; P =.17), for blacks (6.7% vs 3.2%; P =.046), and for patients with renal failure (11.8% vs 3. 4%; P =.11) but not for patients with hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, and pulmonary disease. The operative mortality rate was inversely correlated with hospital volume (4.3% in low-volume hospitals, 4.2% in moderate-volume hospitals, and 2.5% in high-volume hospitals; P =.08), although no differences were noted in the mean ages or comorbidity levels of patients who underwent operations in these three hospital populations. The operative mortality rate was inversely correlated with the experience of the individual surgeon: one case, 9.9%; two to nine cases, 4.9%; 10 to 49 cases, 2.8%; 50 to 99 cases, 2.9%; and more than 100 cases, 3.8% (P =.01). Multivariate analysis results identified patient age (P =. 002), low hospital volume (P =.039), and very low surgeon volume (P =.01) as independent predictors of operative mortality. The mean length of stay and mean hospital charges were 10.6 days and $17,589 and decreased with increasing surgeon volume: one case, 22.7 days/$32,800; two to nine cases, 10.6 days/$18,509; 10 to 49 cases, 10.0 days/$16,611; 50 to 99 cases, 10.9 days/$17,843; and more than 100 cases, 9.6 days/$16,682 (P <.0001/P <.0001). CONCLUSION: Elective AAA repair is a safe procedure in contemporary practice in Maryland. Operative risk is increased among the elderly and when operations are performed by surgeons with very low volumes or in low-volume hospitals. Hospital lengths of stay were shorter and charges were lower when elective AAA repair was performed by surgeons with higher volumes.

Clinical pathway implementation improves outcomes for complex biliary surgery.

BACKGROUND: Complex biliary surgery is associated with significant morbidity, prolonged hospital stay, and high cost. Clinical pathway implementation has the potential to standardize treatment and improve outcomes. Therefore the aim of this analysis was to determine whether clinical pathway implementation and/or feedback of outcome data would alter hospital stay, charges, and mortality rates for complex biliary surgery at an academic medical center METHODS: Pre- and postoperative length of stay, hospital charges, and mortality rates were monitored for 36 months before (period 1) and for 2 18-month periods (periods 2 and 3) after implementation of a clinical pathway for hepaticojejunostomy. Outcome data were provided to the surgeons 18 months after pathway implementation to determine whether further clinical practice improvement was possible. RESULTS: From 1991 to 1997, 339 patients underwent hepaticojejunostomy at The Johns Hopkins Hospital for malignant and benign biliary obstruction. Total length of stay was 13.3 +/- 0.9 days for period 1 compared with 12.5 +/- 0.8 days for period 2 (not significant) and 10.1 +/- 0.3 days for period 3 (P < .01 vs period 1; P < .03 vs period 2). Hospital charges averaged $24,446 during period 1 compared with $23,338 during period 2 and $20,240 during period 3 (P < .01 vs periods 1 and 2). Hospital mortality rate was 4.5% during period 1 compared with 0.7% during periods 2 and 3 (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that implementation of a clinical pathway for hepaticojejunostomy reduces hospital mortality rates and that feedback of outcome data to surgeons results in further clinical practice improvement. Thus clinical pathway implementation and feedback are effective methods to control costs at an academic medical center.

Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of surgeon and hospital case volumes with the short-term outcomes of in-hospital death, total hospital charges, and length of stay for resection of colorectal carcinoma. METHODS: The study design was a cross-sectional analysis of all adult patients who underwent resection for colorectal cancer using Maryland state discharge data from 1992 to 1996. Cases were divided into three groups based on annual surgeon case volume--low (< or =5), medium (5 to 10), and high (>10)--and hospital volume--low (<40), medium (40 to 70), and high (> or =70). Poisson and multiple linear regression analyses were used to identify differences in outcomes among volume groups while adjusting for variations in type of resections performed, cancer stage, patient comorbidities, urgency of admission, and patient demographic variables. RESULTS: During the 5-year period, 9739 resections were performed by 812 surgeons at 50 hospitals. The majority of surgeons (81%) and hospitals (58%) were in the low-volume group. The low-volume surgeons operated on 3461 of the 9739 total patients (36%) at an average rate of 1.8 cases per year. Higher surgeon volume was associated with significant improvement in all three outcomes (in-hospital death, length of stay, and cost). Medium-volume surgeons achieved results equivalent to high-volume surgeons when they operated in high- or medium-volume hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: A skewed distribution of case volumes by surgeon was found in this study of patients who underwent resection for large bowel cancer in Maryland. The majority of these surgeons performed very few operations for colorectal cancer per year, whereas a minority performed >10 cases per year. Medium-volume surgeons achieved excellent outcomes similar to high-volume surgeons when operating in medium-volume or high-volume hospitals, but not in low-volume hospitals. The results of low-volume surgeons improved with increasing hospital volume but never equaled those of the high-volume surgeons.

Complex gastrointestinal surgery: impact of provider experience on clinical and economic outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Commonly performed elective gastrointestinal surgical procedures are carried out with low morbidity and mortality in hospitals throughout the United States. Complex operative procedures on the alimentary tract are performed with a relatively low frequency and are associated with higher mortality. Volume and experience of the surgical provider team have been correlated with better clinical and economic outcomes for one complex gastrointestinal surgical procedure, pancreaticoduodenectomy. This study evaluated whether provider volume and experience were important factors influencing clinical and economic outcomes for a variety of complex gastrointestinal surgical procedures in one state. STUDY DESIGN: Complex high-risk gastrointestinal surgical procedures were defined as those with statewide in-hospital mortality of > or = 5%, frequency of greater than 200 per year in the state, and requiring special surgical skill and expertise. Six procedures met these criteria. Using publicly available discharge data, all patients discharged from Maryland hospitals from July 1989 to June 1997 with a primary procedure code for one of the six study procedures were selected. Hospitals were classified into one of six groups based on the average number of study procedures per year: 10 or less; 11 to 20; 21 to 50; 51 to 100; 101 to 200; and 201 or more procedures per year. A hospital was included if at least one procedure was performed there during the study period. No providers fell within the 51 to 100, and 101 to 200 groups, so all analyses were performed for the remaining four volume groups that were classified, respectively, as minimal (10 or fewer procedures), low (11 to 20 procedures), medium (21 to 50 procedures), and high-volume groups (201 or more procedures). Poisson regression was used to assess the relationship between in-hospital mortality and hospital volume after case-mix adjustment. Multiple linear regression models were used to assess differences in average length-of-stay and average total hospital charges among hospital volume groups. We further analyzed mortality, length-of-stay, and charges at the procedural level to understand these subgroups of complex gastrointestinal patients. We also examined the relationship between provider volume and outcomes for malignant versus benign diagnosis groups. RESULTS: Complex gastrointestinal surgical procedures were performed on 4,561 patients in Maryland from July 1989 through June 1997. The study population averaged 61.6 years of age, was 55% male, 71% Caucasian, and had predominantly Medicare as a payment source. After case-mix adjustment, patients who underwent complex gastrointestinal surgical procedures at the medium-, low-, and minimal-volume provider groups had a 2.1, 3.3, and 3.2 times greater risk of in-hospital death, respectively, than patients at the high-volume provider (p < 0.001 for all comparisons); longer lengths-of-stay, 16.1, 15.7, and 15.5 days at the low-, medium-, and minimal-volume groups, respectively, versus 14.0 days for the high-volume provider (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Similarly, adjusted charges at the high-volume provider were, on average, 14% less than those of the low-volume group, which had the next lowest charges. Although mortality rates differed by procedure type, for each procedure, mortality increased as provider volume decreased, following the pattern found in the aggregate analysis. After case-mix adjustment, the risk of in-hospital death for patients with malignant diagnoses was significantly higher for the medium-, low-, and minimal-volume groups compared with patients at the high-volume provider, relative risk of 3.1, 4.0, and 4.2, respectively, (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that increased hospital experience is associated with a marked decrease in hospital mortality. The decreased mortality at the high-volume provider was also associated with shorter lengths-of-stay and lower hospital char

Should hepatic resections be performed at high-volume referral centers?

Recent studies have demonstrated the relationship between clinical outcomes of complex surgical procedures and provider volume. Hepatic resection is one such high-risk surgical procedure. The aim of this analysis was to determine whether mortality and cost of performing hepatic resection are related to surgical volume while also examining outcomes by extent of resection and diagnosis, variables seen with this procedure. Maryland discharge data were used to study surgical volume, length of stay, charges, and mortality for 606 liver resections performed at all acute-care hospitals between January 1990 and June 1996. One high-volume provider accounted for 43.6% of discharges, averaging 40.6 cases per year. In comparison, the remainder of resections were performed at 35 other hospitals, averaging 1.5 cases per year. Data were stratified into these high- and low-volume groups, and adjusted outcomes were compared. The mortality rate for all procedures in the low-volume group was 7.9% compared to 1.5% for the high-volume provider (P <0.01, relative risk = 5.2). No overall differences were observed between low- and high-volume providers in total hospital charges. When analyzing by procedure type and diagnosis, lower mortality was seen in the high-volume center for both minor and major resections, as well as resections for metastatic disease. It was concluded that hepatic resection can be performed more safely and at comparable cost at high-volume referral centers.

The importance of surgeon experience for clinical and economic outcomes from thyroidectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether individual surgeon experience is associated with improved short-term clinical and economic outcomes for patients with benign and malignant thyroid disease who underwent thyroid procedures in Maryland between 1991 and 1996. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: There is a prevailing belief that surgeon experience affects patient outcomes in endocrine surgery, but there is a paucity of objective evidence outside of clinical series published by experienced surgeons that supports this view. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of all patients who underwent thyroidectomy in Maryland between 1991 and 1996 was conducted using a computerized statewide hospital discharge data base. Surgeons were categorized by volume of thyroidectomies over the 6-year study period: A (1 to 9 cases), B (10 to 29 cases), C (30 to 100 cases), and D (>100 cases). Multivariate regression was used to assess the relation between surgeon caseload and in-hospital complications, length of stay, and total hospital charges, adjusting for case mix and hospital volume. RESULTS: The highest-volume surgeons (group D) performed the greatest proportion of total thyroidectomies among the 5860 discharges, and they were more likely to operate on patients with cancer. After adjusting for case mix and hospital volume, highest-volume surgeons had the shortest length of stay (1.4 days vs. 1.7 days for groups B and C and 1.9 days for group A) and the lowest complication rate (5.1 % vs. 6.1% for groups B and C and 8.6% for group A). Length of stay and complications were more determined by surgeon experience than hospital volume, which had no consistent association with outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Individual surgeon experience is significantly associated with complication rates and length of stay for thyroidectomy.

Importance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hospital volume is associated with clinical and economic outcomes for patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent pancreatic resection, palliative bypass, or endoscopic or percutaneous stent procedures in Maryland between 1990 and 1995. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies have demonstrated that outcomes for patients undergoing a Whipple procedure improve with higher surgical volume, but only 20% to 35% of patients with pancreatic cancer qualify for curative resection. Most patients undergo palliative procedures instead with a surgical bypass or biliary stent. METHODS: Analysis of hospital discharge data from all nonfederal acute care hospitals in Maryland identified all patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent a pancreatic resection, palliative bypass, or stent procedure between 1990 and 1995. Hospitals (n = 48) were categorized as high-, medium-, and low-volume providers according to their average annual volume of these procedures. Multivariate regression was used to examine the association between hospital volume and in-hospital mortality rate, length of stay, and hospital charges, after adjusting for differences in case mix and surgeon volume. RESULTS: Increased hospital volume is associated with markedly decreased in-hospital mortality rates and a decreased or similar length of stay for all three types of procedures and with decreased or similar hospital charges for resections and stents. After adjustment for case mix differences, the relative risk (RR) of in-hospital death after pancreatic resection was 19.3 and 8 at the low- and medium-volume hospitals, respectively, versus the high-volume hospital; after bypasses, the RR of death was 2.7 and 1.9, respectively; and after stents, the RR was 4.3 and 4.8, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pancreatic cancer who are to be treated with curative or palliative procedures appear to benefit from referral to a high-volume provider.

Surgical repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in the state of Maryland: factors influencing outcome among 527 recent cases.

PURPOSE: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture has been historically associated with high operative mortality rates. In this community-based, cross-sectional study, we examined factors influencing outcome after operations performed for ruptured AAA (rAAA). METHODS: An analysis of a state database identified 3820 patients who underwent AAA repair between 1990 and 1995, including 527 (13.8%) who had an operation for an rAAA. Demographic variables examined included patient age, gender, race, associated comorbidity rates, operative surgeon experience with rAAA, and annual hospital rAAA and total AAA operative volumes. Outcomes measured included operative mortality rates, hospital length of stay, and charges. RESULTS: Operative mortality rates increased significantly with advancing age (P < 0.0001) but were not related to gender (P = 0.474) or race (p = 0.598) and were significantly lower among patients with hypertension (P = 0.006) or pulmonary disease (P = 0.045). There was no relationship between hospital rAAA or total AAA volume and rAAA repair mortality rate, although high-volume surgeons (i.e., performing more than 10 rAAA repairs) had decreased mortality rates and hospital charges compared with other surgeons. Hospital lengths of stay and charges increased with age among survivors, but not nonsurvivors, of rAAA repair. Despite a stable incidence of rAAA repairs during the study interval and no significant change in the mean age of patients undergoing operation or the percentage of operations performed by high-volume surgeons, the statewide mortality rate declined from 59.3% to 43.2% (P = 0.039). CONCLUSION: The incidence of rAAA does not appear to be declining. Although operative rAAA repair continues to be associated with substantial risk and remains an especially lethal condition among the elderly, the operative mortality rate has declined in recent years in Maryland. Lower operative mortality rates and hospital charges are associated with operations performed by high-volume surgeons.

Statewide regionalization of pancreaticoduodenectomy and its effect on in-hospital mortality.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined a statewide trend in Maryland toward regionalization of pancreaticoduodenectomy over a 12-year period and its effect on statewide in-hospital mortality rates for this procedure. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies have demonstrated that the best outcomes are achieved in centers performing large numbers of pancreaticoduodenectomies, which suggests that regionalization could lower the overall in-hospital mortality rate for this procedure. METHODS: Maryland state hospital discharge data were used to select records of patients undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy between 1984 and 1995. Hospitals were classified into high-volume and low-volume provider groups. Trends in surgical volume and mortality rates were examined by provider group and for the entire state. Regression analyses were used to examine whether hospital share of pancreaticoduodenectomies was a significant predictor of the in-hospital mortality rate, adjusting for study year and patient characteristics. The portion of the decline in the statewide in-hospital mortality rate for this procedure attributable to the high-volume provider's increasing share was determined. RESULTS: A total of 795 pancreaticoduodenectomies were performed in Maryland at 43 hospitals from 1984 to 1995 (Maryland residents only). During this period, one institution increased its yearly share of pancreaticoduodenectomies from 20.7% to 58.5%, and the statewide in-hospital mortality rate for the procedure decreased from 17.2% to 4.9%. After adjustment for patient characteristics and study year, hospital share remained a significant predictor of mortality. An estimated 61% of the decline in the statewide in-hospital mortality rate for the procedure was attributable to the increase in share of discharges at the high-volume provider. CONCLUSIONS: A trend toward regionalization of pancreaticoduodenectomy over a 12-year period in Maryland was associated with a significant decrease in the statewide in-hospital mortality rate for this procedure, demonstrating the effectiveness of regionalization for high-risk surgery.

Influence of age and hospital volume on the results of carotid endarterectomy: a statewide analysis of 9918 cases.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the impact of patient age and hospital volume on the results of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in contemporary practice. METHODS: The Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission (MHSCRC) database was reviewed to identify all patients who underwent elective CEA as the primary procedure in all acute care hospitals in the state over the past 6 years. RESULTS: From January 1990 through December 1995, 9918 elective CEAs were performed in 48 hospitals at a total charge of $68.9 million. Postoperative death and neurologic complications occurred in 90 (0.9%) and 166 (1.7%) cases, including 0.8% and 1.7%, 0.9% and 1.6%, 0.9% and 1.8%, and 1.4% and 1.3% of patients < 65 years, 65 to 69 years, 70 to 79 years, and > or = 80 years old, respectively. The mean length of stay and hospital charges increased linearly with increasing age: 4.2 days/$6550, 4.4 days/$6834, 4.8 days/$7059, and 5.6 days (p < 0.0001 vs others)/$7756 (p < 0.005 vs 70 to 79 years and p < 0.0003 vs < 70 years old), respectively, for patients < 65, 65 to 69, 70 to 79, and > or = 80 years old. The mortality rate was 1.9% in low-volume hospitals, 1.1% in moderate-volume hospitals, and 0.8% in high-volume hospitals. The neurologic complication rate was significantly higher (6.1%; p < 0.0001) in low-volume when compared with moderate-volume (1.3%) and high-volume (1.8%) hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: CEA is a safe procedure in the majority of hospitals in contemporary practice, even among the very elderly, who may experience a longer length of stay and higher charges correlating with their documented greater medical complexity.

Parathyroidectomy in Maryland: effects of an endocrine center.

BACKGROUND: Surgery for hyperparathyroidism is associated with high cure rates and low morbidity and mortality when performed by experienced surgeons. We wanted to determine whether referral of patients with hyperparathyroidism to an endocrine surgery center has an impact on patient outcomes and costs. METHODS: Data from 901 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy recorded in the Maryland inpatient discharge database between 1990 and 1994 at 52 hospitals were compared with 169 consecutive patients who underwent surgical exploration by one surgeon (R.U.) at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. RESULTS: Although in 47 of 52 hospitals fewer than 10 parathyroidectomies were performed each year, in these hospitals four of five related deaths occurred before patient discharge. The percentage of parathyroidectomies in Maryland performed by one endocrine surgeon has increased from 8% in 1990 to 21% in 1994 and is associated with a 97% cure rate and no mortality. Moreover, while hospital length of stay (LOS) in the state has decreased from 7 to 3.1 days, LOS for the high-volume provider has declined to a mean of 1.3 days. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with hyperparathyroidism are increasingly referred to an endocrine surgery center, which results in a high cure rate, low morbidity, no mortality, and a shorter LOS. Improved surgical outcomes and lower costs depend on an experienced surgeon and argue for the referral of these patients to endocrine surgery centers.

The effects of regionalization on cost and outcome for one general high-risk surgical procedure.

PURPOSE: The effects of regionalization of tertiary care were studied by analyzing cost and outcome for pancreaticoduodenectomies in a state in which the majority of these high-risk procedures were performed in one hospital. METHODS: Using Maryland inpatient discharge data via a retrospective study, the authors compared cost and outcome data for a hospital with more than one half of the cases in the state to all other hospital providers as a group and with smaller groupings according to the volume of procedures performed. RESULTS: Hospital mortality, length of stay, and costs were significantly less at the high-volume regional medical center when compared with all other hospitals. Mortality and cost increased as volume decreased when hospitals were grouped according to volume. CONCLUSIONS: An academic medical center, functioning as a high-volume regional provider, can deliver tertiary care services with improved outcomes at lower costs than community hospitals.

Carotid endarterectomy--is intensive care unit care necessary?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether postoperative intensive care unit care is necessary for all patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy and whether a subgroup of patients at low-risk not requiring treatment in the intensive care unit could be identified. METHODS: Case control analysis of random numbers sample over the last decade of 50% of patients undergoing isolated carotid endarterectomy at a tertiary care hospital. One hundred twenty-nine patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy were identified. Preoperative risk factors, intraoperative course, intensive case unit interventions including vasoactive agents, myocardial ischemia/infarction, arrhythmias, bronchospasm, reintubation, neurologic events, and need for reoperation, were recorded. Timing of interventions, length of stay in intensive care unit, and postoperative course were all recorded. Financial impact was assessed. RESULTS: Among 129 patients only 31 patients did not require intensive care unit interventions. A multivariate linear regression analysis demonstrated a model in which a preoperative history of hypertension, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, and chronic renal failure were 83% predictive of the need for an intensive care unit bed. Specifically, patients could be stratified into a low-risk group before the operation by less than four risk factors. Additionally, all patients requiring interventions or with adverse outcomes were identified by the eight postoperative hour. CONCLUSIONS: In preoperative scheduling of intensive care unit beds, patients with less than four risk factors can be stratified to monitoring beds and those with greater than or equal to four can be stratified to intervention beds. After 8 hours, if no interventions are necessary or adverse outcomes occur, then floor recovery is safe. Patients who satisfy this algorithm would save 50% of current intensive care unit charges.

The use of intravenous digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of tetralogy of Fallot.

Sixteen patients with tetralogy of Fallot were studied with intravenous digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Of these, 11 were males and five were females, ranging in age from 26 months to 54 years, with a mean age of 22 years at the time of the initial study. Twenty-two DSA studies were performed in the 16 patients, in seven patients preoperatively, in 12 patients postoperatively, and in three patients both pre- and postoperatively. In the seven patients studied preoperatively, all DSA studies were considered technically adequate as corroborative evidence in the diagnosis of tetralogy of Fallot. All associated cardiac abnormalities were adequately demonstrated. The 16 postoperative studies on 12 patients were performed to evaluate the adequacy of the surgery and/or postoperative complications. These studies were judged as technically satisfactory. The authors utilized intravenous DSA in the pre- and postoperative evaluation of 16 patients with tetralogy of Fallot and found that reliable angiographic information was provided and that this technique may serve as a useful adjunct with other noninvasive and invasive tests in the preoperative and postoperative evaluation of these patients.