Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Neurol ; 93(2): 257-270, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36151879

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess the real-world effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of patients with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter survey compiling retrospective data from 79 PML patients, including 38 published cases and 41 unpublished cases, who received immune checkpoint inhibitors as add-on to standard of care. One-year follow-up data were analyzed to determine clinical outcomes and safety profile. Logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with 1-year survival. RESULTS: Predisposing conditions included hematological malignancy (n = 38, 48.1%), primary immunodeficiency (n = 14, 17.7%), human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (n = 12, 15.2%), inflammatory disease (n = 8, 10.1%), neoplasm (n = 5, 6.3%), and transplantation (n = 2, 2.5%). Pembrolizumab was most commonly used (n = 53, 67.1%). One-year survival was 51.9% (41/79). PML-immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) was reported in 15 of 79 patients (19%). Pretreatment expression of programmed cell death-1 on circulating T cells did not differ between survivors and nonsurvivors. Development of contrast enhancement on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging at least once during follow-up (OR = 3.16, 95% confidence interval = 1.20-8.72, p = 0.02) was associated with 1-year survival. Cerebrospinal fluid JC polyomavirus DNA load decreased significantly by 1-month follow-up in survivors compared to nonsurvivors (p < 0.0001). Thirty-two adverse events occurred among 24 of 79 patients (30.4%), and led to treatment discontinuation in 7 of 24 patients (29.1%). INTERPRETATION: In this noncontrolled retrospective study of patients with PML who were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, mortality remains high. Development of inflammatory features or overt PML-IRIS was commonly observed. This study highlights that use of immune checkpoint inhibitors should be strictly personalized toward characteristics of the individual PML patient. ANN NEUROL 2023;93:257-270.


Assuntos
Síndrome Inflamatória da Reconstituição Imune , Vírus JC , Leucoencefalopatia Multifocal Progressiva , Humanos , Leucoencefalopatia Multifocal Progressiva/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Síndrome Inflamatória da Reconstituição Imune/tratamento farmacológico
2.
Internist (Berl) ; 62(6): 611-619, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34032877

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The transfusion of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T­cells has become established as a new treatment option in oncology; however, this is regularly associated with immune-mediated side effects, which can also run a severe course and necessitate a specific treatment and intensive medical treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A literature review was carried out on CAR T-cell therapy, toxicities and the management of side effects. RESULTS: The cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and the immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) regularly occur shortly after CAR T-cell treatment. The symptoms of CRS can range from mild flu-like symptoms to multiorgan failure. In addition to mild symptoms, such as disorientation and aphasia, ICANS can also lead to convulsive seizures and brain edema. The management of CRS and ICANS is based on the severity according to the grading of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT). Tocilizumab and corticosteroids are recommended for CRS and corticosteroids are used for ICANS. In the further course persisting hypogammaglobulinemia and cytopenia are frequent even months after the initial treatment and promote infections even months after CAR T­cell therapy. DISCUSSION: Potentially severe complications regularly occur after CAR T-cell therapy. An interdisciplinary cooperation between intensive care physicians, hematologists, neurologists and specialists in other disciplines is of decisive importance for the optimal care of patients after CAR T­cell therapy.


Assuntos
Imunoterapia Adotiva , Receptores de Antígenos Quiméricos , Terapia Baseada em Transplante de Células e Tecidos , Síndrome da Liberação de Citocina , Humanos , Imunoterapia Adotiva/efeitos adversos , Linfócitos T , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA