Preexisting antibody assays for gene therapy: Considerations on patient selection cutoffs and companion diagnostic requirements.

Recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors are the leading delivery vehicle used for in vivo gene therapies. Anti-AAV antibodies (AAV Abs) can interact with the viral capsid component of an AAV-based gene therapy (GT). Therefore, patients with preexisting AAV Abs (seropositive patients) are often excluded from GT trials to prevent treatment of patients who are unlikely to benefit1 or may have a higher risk for adverse events outweighing treatment benefits. On the contrary, unnecessary exclusion of patients with high unmet medical need should be avoided. Instead, a risk-benefit assessment that weighs the potential risks due to seropositivity vs. severity of disease and available treatment options, should drive the decision if patient selection is required. Assays for patient selection must be validated according to their intended use following national regulations/standards for diagnostic assays in appropriate laboratories. In this review, we summarize the current process of patient selection, including assay cutoff criteria and related assay validation approaches. We further provide considerations on regulatory requirements for the development of in vitro diagnostic tests supporting market authorization of a corresponding GT.

Evaluation of Cellular Immune Response to Adeno-Associated Virus-Based Gene Therapy.

The number of approved or investigational late phase viral vector gene therapies (GTx) has been rapidly growing. The adeno-associated virus vector (AAV) technology continues to be the most used GTx platform of choice. The presence of pre-existing anti-AAV immunity has been firmly established and is broadly viewed as a potential deterrent for successful AAV transduction with a possibility of negative impact on clinical efficacy and a connection to adverse events. Recommendations for the evaluation of humoral, including neutralizing and total antibody based, anti-AAV immune response have been presented elsewhere. This manuscript aims to cover considerations related to the assessment of anti-AAV cellular immune response, including review of correlations between humoral and cellular responses, potential value of cellular immunogenicity assessment, and commonly used analytical methodologies and parameters critical for monitoring assay performance. This manuscript was authored by a group of scientists involved in GTx development who represent several pharma and contract research organizations. It is our intent to provide recommendations and guidance to the industry sponsors, academic laboratories, and regulatory agencies working on AAV-based GTx viral vector modalities with the goal of achieving a more consistent approach to anti-AAV cellular immune response assessment.

Evaluation of the Humoral Response to Adeno-Associated Virus-Based Gene Therapy Modalities Using Total Antibody Assays.

The number of viral vector-based gene therapies (GTx) continues to grow with two products (Zolgensma® and Luxturna®) approved in the USA as of March 2021. To date, the most commonly used vectors are adeno-associated virus-based (AAV). The pre-existing humoral immunity against AAV (anti-AAV antibodies) has been well described and is expected as a consequence of prior AAV exposure. Anti-AAV antibodies may present an immune barrier to successful AAV transduction and hence negatively impact clinical efficacy and may also result in adverse events (AEs) due to the formation of large immune complexes. Patients may be screened for the presence of anti-AAV antibodies, including neutralizing (NAb) and total binding antibodies (TAb) prior to treatment with the GTx. Recommendations for the development and validation of anti-AAV NAb detection methods have been presented elsewhere. This manuscript covers considerations related to anti-AAV TAb-detecting protocols, including the advantages of the use of TAb methods, selection of assay controls and reagents, and parameters critical to monitoring assay performance. This manuscript was authored by a group of scientists involved in GTx development representing eleven organizations. It is our intent to provide recommendations and guidance to industry sponsors, academic laboratories, and regulatory agencies working on AAV-based GTx viral vector modalities with the goal of achieving a more consistent approach to anti-AAV TAb assessment. Graphical abstract.

Development of a Highly Specific Anti-drug Antibody Assay in Support of a Nanoparticle-based Therapeutic.

PEGylated biotherapeutics can elicit anti-PEG (polyethylene glycol) immune responses in patients treated with this category of drugs. While anti-PEG antibody assays for this class of biotherapeutics have become a common element of the clinical immunogenicity testing strategy, the overall antibody incidence induced by the nanoparticle (NP) delivery system (such as ACCURINS®) has not been fully studied to date. To support the immunogenicity assessment of one of Pfizer's NP-based therapeutics, consisting of gedatolisib (GEDA) encapsulated in ACCURINS® (GEDA-NP), we developed an anti-GEDA-NP antibody (ADA) assay on the MSD platform for the detection of GEDA-NP induced ADA in human serum. The focus of our strategy was on developing a clinically relevant ADA assay and systematically addressing assay interference through rigorous assay optimization. Our efforts led to a fit-for-purpose assay for the detection of anti-GEDA-NP ADA in serum samples obtained from breast cancer patients. Results from method qualification indicated robust assay performance, as highlighted by inter and intra-assay precision within 25% CV for all controls, and reproducible response profiles across multiple runs during the assessment of assay cut points with breast cancer samples. The assay sensitivity was between 4.3 ng/mL and 123 ng/mL for surrogate positive controls of IgG and IgM isotypes, respectively. Additionally, assay interference from nonspecific matrix proteins and circulating drug was addressed, which ensured accurate assessment of ADA incidence that can be attributed to GEDA-NP.

Development of a Cell-Based Assay for the Detection of Neutralizing Antibodies to PF-06730512 Using Homogenous Time-Resolved Fluorescence.

The administration of biotherapeutics has the potential to induce potent immune responses. Among these responses, the production of anti-drug antibodies (ADA), including a subset of ADA referred to as neutralizing antibodies (NAb), is of heightened concern. Aside from their capacity to alter the pharmacological profile of a given biotherapeutic, NAb can also pose significant safety risks, especially in instances where an endogenous counterpart to the drug exists. As such, the inclusion of an assay to detect NAb in clinical samples is critical to the effectiveness of a tiered approach to immunogenicity assessment. PF-06730512 is a biotherapeutic protein being developed for the treatment of primary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). To support the immunogenicity assessment of PF-06730512, a cell-based assay was developed for the detection of NAb in FSGS serum samples. Herein, we describe the development of the assay with a focus on the challenges faced, including drug and blood collection tube interferences in NAb detection. The outcome of our efforts was a robust assay capable of detecting 1 µg/mL of a NAb positive control in the presence of clinically relevant drug concentrations up to 30 µg/mL.

Recommendations for the Development of Cell-Based Anti-Viral Vector Neutralizing Antibody Assays.

Viral vector-based gene therapies (GTx) have received significant attention in the recent years and the number of ongoing GTx clinical trials is increasing. A platform of choice for many of these studies is adeno-associated virus (AAV). All humans may be exposed to natural AAV infections and could mount an immune response against the virus. Consequently, there can be a high prevalence of pre-existing anti-AAV immunity. This presents a potential limitation for AAV-based GTx due to the potential for AAV-specific antibodies to reduce the efficacy of the GTx. Therefore, appropriate assessment of potential subjects enrolled in these studies should include evaluation for the presence and degree of anti-AAV immunity, including anti-AAV neutralizing antibodies (NAb). Recommendations for the development and validation of cell-based anti-AAV NAb detection methods, including considerations related to selection of appropriate cell line, surrogate vector/reporter gene, assay matrix and controls, and methodologies for calculating assay cut-point are discussed herein. General recommendations for the key assay validation parameters are provided as well as considerations for the development of NAb diagnostic tests. This manuscript is produced by a group of scientists involved in GTx therapeutic development representing various companies. It is our intent to provide recommendations and guidance to industrial and academic laboratories working on viral vector based GTx modalities with the goal of achieving a more consistent approach to anti-AAV NAb assessment.

Current Considerations on Characterization of Immune Response to Multi-Domain Biotherapeutics.

Compounds containing two or more structural domains with a distinct mode of action relevant to functionality have been defined as multi-domain biotherapeutics (MDBs). Several modalities, including endogenous protein fusions with an antibody Fc fragment or another polypeptide, bispecific antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, as well as polyethylene glycol conjugates have been viewed as examples of MDBs. Similar to other biotherapeutics, MDBs have the potential to induce a host immune response, commonly detected in the form of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). The need to characterize ADA specificity to a particular domain of the MDB has been identified as a potential regulatory requirement based on the compound nature of the drug and associated immunogenicity risk factors. MDB-related immunogenicity risk factors are discussed herein. The relative risk level of each of the immunogenicity factors was analyzed based on publicly available information. It is proposed that MDB-related immunogenicity risk factors can be divided into major and minor categories. Major risk category factors include (a) presence of immunogenic structural or linear epitopes of either non-human or human sequence origin and (b) significant homology of an MDB domain to an endogenous protein with a specific and unique function. Proposed minor risk category factors include (a) epitope spread, (b) repetitive antigenic structure of MDB, and (c) hapten-like effect due to chemical conjugation or fusion with a larger protein. Detailed modality-based information on several examples of MDBs is presented to support this proposal.

Bioanalysis of adeno-associated virus gene therapy therapeutics: regulatory expectations.

The number of gene therapy (GTx) modality therapies in development has grown significantly in the last few years. Adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based delivery approach has become most prevalent among other virus-based GTx vectors. Several regulatory guidelines provide the industry with general considerations related to AAV GTx development including discussion and recommendations related to highly diverse bioanalytical support of the AAV-based therapeutics. This includes assessment of pre- and post-treatment immunity, evaluation of post-treatment viral shedding and infectivity, as well as detection of transgene protein expression. An overview of the current regulatory recommendations as found in currently active and published draft US FDA and EMA guidance or guideline documents is presented herein.

Addressing soluble target interference in the development of a functional assay for the detection of neutralizing antibodies against a BCMA-CD3 bispecific antibody.

Proper evaluation of immunogenicity during clinical development of biotherapeutics is a major challenge to bioanalytical scientists, in part due to matrix interference in anti-drug antibody (ADA) and neutralizing antibody (NAB) assays. If not addressed, matrix interference could confound the immunogenicity assessment of a given biotherapeutic in clinical development. To support clinical development of a B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-CD3 bispecific antibody, a cell-based NAB assay was developed as part of a tiered approach to evaluating the immunogenicity of the drug. The assay endpoint (T cell activation) was chosen based on its strong association with the mechanism of action of the drug. The BCMA-CD3 bispecific antibody activates T cells through simultaneous binding of CD3 on T cells and BCMA on target cells. In this system, T cell activation was assessed through the measurement of luciferase activity in an engineered Jurkat cell line. In the presence of NAB, the degree of T cell activation measured by the amount of luciferase activity can be reduced. During method development, soluble BCMA (sBCMA) interference in the NAB assay was apparent. The binding of sBCMA to the anti-BCMA domain of the bispecific drug led to reduced T cell activation, which caused false positive results in NAB testing. To mitigate this interference, several strategies to eliminate sBCMA were investigated. Among the procedures tested, a bead-based approach proved most effective in depleting sBCMA, while maintaining robust assay performance and achieving fit-for-purpose sensitivity. Using this sample pretreatment procedure, the NAB assay tolerated sBCMA up to 2 µg/mL, or approximately four times the estimated median sBCMA concentration in serum samples from patients with active multiple myeloma.

Immunogenicity of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapeutics.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell immunotherapy has gained significant attention in the past decade due to its considerable potential in the treatment of various types of malignancies, particularly hematological. While success has been achieved in a number of studies, and two CAR-T-cell products were recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) (YESCARTA®, KYMRIAH®), this treatment modality continues to present challenges for clinical development. One major potential side effect is the ability of CAR-T products to induce host immune responses. Immunogenicity induction risk factors have been shown to be associated with the presence of non-human or partially human sequences in the CAR construct, suicide domain, or other components of the CAR-T, and also with the presence of residual viral proteins or other non-human origin proteins utilized as part of the gene editing step of CAR-T production. Both humoral (antibody-based) and cellular-type responses have been described, leading to various degrees of impact on CAR-T expansion and persistence, and therefore the overall safety and clinically meaningful response of the treatment. In this article we discuss various types of immune responses specific to CAR-T therapy, their impact on treatment outcome, and methodologies used to detect them.

PK of immunoconjugate anticancer agent CMD-193 in rats: ligand-binding assay approach to determine in vivo immunoconjugate stability.

BACKGROUND: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a new generation of anticancer therapeutics. The objective of this manuscript is to propose a methodology that can be used to assess the stability of the ADCs by using the PK data obtained by ligand-binding assays that measure various components of ADCs. RESULTS: The ligand-binding assays format of different components of ADCs provided unique valuable PK information. The mathematical manipulation of the bioanalytical data provided an insight into the in vivo integrity, indicating that the loading of the calicheamicin on the G193 antibody declines in an apparent slow first-order process. CONCLUSION: This report demonstrates the value of analyzing various components of the ADC and their PK profiles to better understand the disposition and in vivo stability of ADCs.

Considerations for the nonclinical safety evaluation of antibody drug conjugates for oncology.

Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) include monoclonal antibodies that are linked to cytotoxic small molecules. A number of these agents are currently being developed as anti-cancer agents designed to improve the therapeutic index of the cytotoxin (i.e., cytotoxic small molecule or cytotoxic agent) by specifically delivering it to tumor cells. This paper presents primary considerations for the nonclinical safety evaluation of ADCs and includes strategies for the evaluation of the entire ADC or the various individual components (i.e., antibody, linker or the cytotoxin). Considerations are presented on how to design a nonclinical safety assessment program to identify the on- and off-target toxicities to enable first-in-human (FIH) studies. Specific discussions are also included that provide details as to the need and how to conduct the studies for evaluating ADCs in genetic toxicology, tissue cross-reactivity, safety pharmacology, carcinogenicity, developmental and reproductive toxicology, biotransformation, toxicokinetic monitoring, bioanalytical assays, immunogenicity testing, test article stability and the selection of the FIH dose. Given the complexity of these molecules and our evolving understanding of their properties, there is no single all-encompassing nonclinical strategy. Instead, each ADC should be evaluated on a case-by-case scientifically-based approach that is consistent with ICH and animal research guidelines.

Proposed mechanism of off-target toxicity for antibody-drug conjugates driven by mannose receptor uptake.

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are developed with the goal of increasing compound therapeutic index by specific and targeted delivery of a toxic payload to the site of action while considerably reducing damage to normal tissues. Yet, off-target hepatic toxicities have been reported for several ADC. Locations of these off-target toxicities coincide with the reported locations of cell surface mannose receptor (MR). The relative proportion of agalactosylated glycans on the Fc domain (G0F vs. G1F and G2F components) in monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based biotherapeutics is closer to some disease state IgG rather than to a normal serum-derived immunoglobulin. The lack of the terminal galactose on a G0F glycan creates an opportunity for the mAb to interact with soluble and cell surface MRs. MR is a known multi-domain lectin that specifically binds and internalizes glycoproteins and immune complexes with relatively high G0F content and has been found on the surface of various cell types, including immune cells of myeloid lineage, endothelial cells, and hepatic and splenic sinusoids. In this review paper it is proposed that the mechanism of the off-target toxicities for ADC biotherapeutics is at least in part driven by the carbohydrates, specifically agalactosylated glycans, such as G0F, their interactions with MR and resulting glycan-derived cellular uptake of ADCs. Several case studies are reviewed presenting corroborating information.

Pharmacokinetics of gemtuzumab ozogamicin as a single-agent treatment of pediatric patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia.

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin is currently approved to treat CD33-positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first relapse in patients older than age 60 years. The objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of gemtuzumab ozogamicin in pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory AML. The study population comprised 29 subjects younger than age 18 with AML in first relapse. Dosages of 6, 7.5, and 9 mg/m(2) were administered during the study. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined following each dose for hP67.6, total calicheamicin derivatives, and unconjugated calicheamicin derivatives. hP67.6 pharmacokinetic parameters had a consistent and statistically significant change between the first and second doses. Increases in AUC and decreases in both CL and V(ss) from the first dose to the second dose were consistent with those of the adult population. Changes between dose periods for total calicheamicin derivatives and unconjugated calicheamicin derivatives were consistent with those of hP67.6. Changes in pharmacokinetic parameters between dose periods are attributed to saturation of CD33 binding sites and diminished clearance resulting from a lower peripheral blast burden and antigen. Children receiving 9 mg/m(2) had the following hP67.6 pharmacokinetic parameters: C(max), 3.47+/-1.04 mg/L; AUC, 136 +/- 107 mg x h/L; CL, 0.12 +/- 0.15 L/h/m(2); V(ss), 6.5 +/- 5.5 L; and t(1/2), 64 +/- 44 h after their first dose. Mean pharmacokinetic values are similar to values reported in adults. Individual children demonstrated large intersubject variability, similar to adults. The pharmacokinetics of gemtuzumab ozogamicin in pediatric patients closely follow the profile and variability of adult patients.

Antibody-targeted chemotherapy with CMC-544: a CD22-targeted immunoconjugate of calicheamicin for the treatment of B-lymphoid malignancies.

Antibody-targeted chemotherapy with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (CMA-676, a CD33-targeted immunoconjugate of N-acetyl-gamma-calicheamicin dimethyl hydrazide [CalichDMH], a potent DNA-binding cytotoxic antitumor antibiotic) is a clinically validated therapeutic option for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here, we describe the preclinical profile of another immunoconjugate of CalichDMH, CMC-544, targeted to CD22 expressed by B-lymphoid malignancies. CMC-544 comprises a humanized IgG4 anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody (mAb), G5/44, covalently linked to CalichDMH via an acid-labile 4-(4'-acetylphenoxy) butanoic acid (AcBut) linker. Both CMC-544 and unconjugated G5/44 bound human CD22 with subnanomolar affinity. CMC-544, but not unconjugated G5/44, exerted potent cytotoxicity against CD22+ B-cell lymphoma (BCL) cell lines (inhibitory concentration of 50%: 6-600 pM CalichDMH). CMC-544 caused a potent inhibition of growth of small but established BCL xenografts leading to cures (therapeutic index > 10). CMC-544 prevented the establishment of BCL xenografts and also caused regression of large BCLs (> 1.5 g tumor mass). In contrast, unconjugated CalichDMH, unconjugated G5/44, and an isotype-matched control conjugate, CMA-676, were ineffective against these BCL xenografts. Thus, CD22-targeted delivery of CalichDMH is a potent and effective preclinical therapeutic strategy for BCLs. The strong antitumor profile of CMC-544 supports its clinical evaluation as a treatment option for B-lymphoid malignancies.