Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Vox Sang ; 116(3): 336-341, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33107094

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Based on the Council of Europe directive which dictates regulatory requirements in Australia, blood donors are currently deferred from donating for 4 months after an endoscopic procedure if either polyps were removed or a biopsy sample was taken. We aimed to assess the incidence of blood-borne viruses (BBVs) (HIV, hepatitis B and C) in blood donors who donated after an endoscopic procedure and evaluate the risk to blood safety through risk modelling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Donors from 1/1/2013 to 31/12/2017 with an endoscopy deferral on their blood donor file with pre- and post-BBV testing were analysed to determine an incidence of BBVs using standard methods. The standard blood donor cohort was used as a comparator group. Using the incidence of endoscopies and BBV risk, the total residual risk estimate of allowing donors to return postendoscopy without restriction was calculated. RESULTS: The incidence of a BBV postendoscopy in this large cohort of 16,283 where testing has been confirmed postendoscopy was zero (95% CI 0-0·000105). The upper confidence interval of the zero events is 10·5 per 100 000 donations. Total positive donations from 2017 repeat donors were 1·87 per 100 000 (95% CI 0·0000117-0·0000277). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the residual risk remained negligible under realistic worst-case scenarios. CONCLUSION: A BBV endoscopy deferral is not required for blood safety in Australia. The presented data has enabled us to submit a request for an exemption to our regulator, which has been approved and the policy change subsequently implemented by Lifeblood on 4/4/2020.


Assuntos
Doadores de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Segurança do Sangue , Endoscopia/efeitos adversos , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Hepatite B/epidemiologia , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , Austrália/epidemiologia , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/etiologia , Hepatite B/etiologia , Hepatite C/etiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino
3.
Am J Infect Control ; 43(12): 1270-5, 2015 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26654232

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The persistence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) within an intensive care unit (ICU) possibly contained within dry surface biofilms, remains a perplexing confounder and is a threat to patient safety. Identification of residential locations of MDRO within the ICU is an intervention for which new scientific approaches may assist in finding potential MDRO reservoirs. METHOD: This study investigated a new approach to sampling using a more aggressive environmental swabbing technique of high-touch objects (HTOs) and surfaces, aided by 2 commercially available adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminometers. RESULTS: A total of 13 individual MDRO locations identified in this pilot study. The use of ATP bioluminometers was significantly associated with the identification of 12 of the 13 individual MDRO locations. The MDRO recovery and readings from the 2 ATP bioluminometers were not significantly correlated with distinct cutoffs for each ATP device, and there was no correlation between the 2 ATP devices. CONCLUSION: The specific MDRO locations were not limited to the immediate patient surroundings or to any specific HTO or type of surface. The use of ATP testing helped rapidly identify the soiled locations for MDRO sampling. The greatest density of positive MDRO locations was around and within the clinical staff work station.


Assuntos
Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Microbiologia Ambiental , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Trifosfato de Adenosina/análise , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Medições Luminescentes , Projetos Piloto
4.
Clin Microbiol Rev ; 25(2): 362-86, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22491776

RESUMO

Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is an important infection with an incidence rate ranging from 20 to 50 cases/100,000 population per year. Between 10% and 30% of these patients will die from SAB. Comparatively, this accounts for a greater number of deaths than for AIDS, tuberculosis, and viral hepatitis combined. Multiple factors influence outcomes for SAB patients. The most consistent predictor of mortality is age, with older patients being twice as likely to die. Except for the presence of comorbidities, the impacts of other host factors, including gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and immune status, are unclear. Pathogen-host interactions, especially the presence of shock and the source of SAB, are strong predictors of outcomes. Although antibiotic resistance may be associated with increased mortality, questions remain as to whether this reflects pathogen-specific factors or poorer responses to antibiotic therapy, namely, vancomycin. Optimal management relies on starting appropriate antibiotics in a timely fashion, resulting in improved outcomes for certain patient subgroups. The roles of surgery and infectious disease consultations require further study. Although the rate of mortality from SAB is declining, it remains high. Future international collaborative studies are required to tease out the relative contributions of various factors to mortality, which would enable the optimization of SAB management and patient outcomes.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/mortalidade , Staphylococcus aureus/patogenicidade , Humanos , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação
5.
PLoS One ; 6(6): e21217, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21713004

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite hVISA infections being associated with vancomycin treatment failure, no previous study has been able to detect a mortality difference between heteroresistant vancomycin intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) and vancomycin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (VSSA) bloodstream infections (BSI). METHODOLOGY: Consecutive methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) BSI episodes between 1996 and 2008 were reviewed. Patient demographics, clinical presentation, treatment and overall mortality at 30 days were extracted from the medical records. All isolates underwent vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (VMIC) testing by broth microdilution and Etest. hVISA was confirmed by population analysis profiling using the area under the curve method (PAP-AUC). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: 401 evaluable MRSA BSI episodes were identified over the 12 years. Of these, 46 (11.5%) and 2 (0.5%) were confirmed as hVISA and VISA by PAP-AUC respectively. hVISA predominantly occurred in ST239-like MRSA isolates with high VMIC (2 mg/L). Compared to VSSA, hVISA was associated with chronic renal failure (p<0.001), device related infections (haemodialysis access) (p<0.001) and previous vancomycin usage (p = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of mortality included age, presence of multiple co-morbidities, principal diagnosis, transit to ICU and severity of illness while infection related surgery and hVISA phenotype were associated with increased survival. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The presence of hVISA is dependent on the appropriate interplay between host and pathogen factors. hVISA in ST239 MRSA is an independent predictor of survival. Whether these findings would be replicated across all MRSA clones is unknown and warrants further study.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/mortalidade , Resistência a Vancomicina/efeitos dos fármacos , Vancomicina/farmacologia , Vancomicina/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Austrália , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/patogenicidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
J Clin Microbiol ; 49(4): 1489-94, 2011 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21270232

RESUMO

The best screening method for detecting heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) remains unclear. Using population analysis profiling utilizing the area under the concentration-time curve (PAP-AUC) as the gold standard, we screened 458 consecutive methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) bloodstream isolates to determine the most accurate and cost-effective testing strategy to detect the presence of heteroresistance. All isolates were also tested using the macromethod Etest (MET) and glycopeptide resistance detection (GRD) Etest. The MIC was determined by several methods, including standard vancomycin Etest, vancomycin broth microdilution (BMD), and Vitek2 testing. Fifty-five (12%) hVISA and 4 (1%) VISA isolates were detected by PAP-AUC. Compared to PAP-AUC, the sensitivities and specificities of MET, GRD Etest, BMD (using a MIC cutoff of ≥ 2 mg/liter), and standard vancomycin Etest (using a MIC cutoff of ≥ 2 mg/liter) were 89 and 55%, 71 and 94%, 82 and 97%, and 71 and 94%, respectively. Combination testing increased the overall testing accuracy by reducing the number of false-positive results. Cost was determined predominately by the number of PAP-AUC runs required following a screening assay. The most cost-effective strategy was BMD (using a MIC cutoff of ≥ 2 µg/ml) as a standalone assay or in combination with PAP-AUC, provided that BMD testing was batched. GRD Etest remained an alternative, with 71% of hVISA isolates detected. Prevalence influenced both cost and test accuracy, with results remaining unchanged for hVISA prevalences of up to 25%. Implementation of any testing strategy would therefore be dependent on balancing cost with accuracy in a given population and clinical context.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Sangue/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Resistência a Vancomicina , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/economia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Vancomicina/farmacologia
7.
Crit Care Resusc ; 12(1): 50-2, 2010 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20196714

RESUMO

Toxic shock syndrome is an uncommon condition in patients with neutropenia. We describe a 44-year-old man who developed toxic shock syndrome caused by hospitalacquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus while pancytopenic after chemotherapy. He died of multiorgan failure despite high-level intensive care support and treatment with appropriate antibiotics and intravenous immunoglobulin. This case illustrates the need for a high index of suspicion for toxic shock syndrome in patients with febrile neutropenia, and also highlights the lack of highquality evidence for the various treatment modalities used in this syndrome.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Choque Séptico/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Citarabina/administração & dosagem , Citarabina/efeitos adversos , Etoposídeo/administração & dosagem , Etoposídeo/efeitos adversos , Evolução Fatal , Humanos , Idarubicina/administração & dosagem , Idarubicina/efeitos adversos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/complicações , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos , Pancitopenia/induzido quimicamente , Pancitopenia/imunologia , Choque Séptico/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico
8.
J Orthop Trauma ; 19(5): 353-5, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15891547
10.
Am J Clin Dermatol ; 5(4): 239-59, 2004.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15301571

RESUMO

Methicillin (meticillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) emerged in the 1960s and is now commonly seen in hospitals, clinics and, since the mid-1990s, the community. Risk factors for the acquisition of MRSA include chronic dermatoses, underlying medical illnesses, attending healthcare facilities, use of prescription antibacterials, surgery, intravenous lines, hospitalization in an intensive care unit, and proximity to patients colonized with MRSA. Recent community-associated strains often occur in patients without these risk factors. Staphylococci are readily spread from person to person and readily contaminate the environment. Infection control measures thus involve identifying the infected patients, separating them from other non-infected patients, cleaning of the environment and, most important of all, scrupulous attention to hand hygiene. Alcoholic antiseptic hand rubs offer an alternative to antiseptic hand washes and increase compliance. Treatment of MRSA skin infections is challenging. Topical agents such as mupirocin or fusidic acid can be used, but the organisms often become resistant. Systemic therapy involves non-beta-lactams. Parenteral treatment is generally with glycopeptides such as vancomycin; oral therapy is more complex. Monotherapy with quinolones, rifampin (rifampicin), and fusidic acid often results in the development of resistance and so, if any of these agents are chosen it should be in combination. There are no data on combination therapy, although rifampin-containing combinations are often chosen. Fourth-generation quinolones and linezolid are expensive but promising alternatives.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Resistência a Meticilina , Infecções Cutâneas Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Administração Cutânea , Administração Oral , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA