Cluster-randomized trial of monthly malaria prophylaxis versus focused screening and treatment: a study protocol to define malaria elimination strategies in Cambodia.

BACKGROUND: Malaria remains a critical public health problem in Southeast Asia despite intensive containment efforts. The continued spread of multi-drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum has led to calls for malaria elimination on the Thai-Cambodian border. However, the optimal approach to elimination in difficult-to-reach border populations, such as the Military, remains unclear. METHODS/DESIGN: A two-arm, cluster-randomized controlled, open-label pilot study is being conducted in military personnel and their families at focal endemic areas on the Thai-Cambodian border. The primary objective is to compare the effectiveness of monthly malaria prophylaxis (MMP) with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine and weekly primaquine for 12 weeks compared with focused screening and treating (FSAT) following current Cambodian national treatment guidelines. Eight separate military encampments, making up approximately 1000 military personnel and their families, undergo randomization to the MMP or FSAT intervention for 3 months, with an additional 3 months' follow-up. In addition, each treatment cluster of military personnel and civilians is also randomly assigned to receive either permethrin- or sham (water)-treated clothing in single-blind fashion. The primary endpoint is risk reduction for malaria infection in geographically distinct military encampments based on their treatment strategy. Monthly malaria screening in both arms is done via microscopy, PCR, and rapid diagnostic testing to compare both the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of diagnostic modalities to detect asymptomatic infection. Universal glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency screening is done at entry, comparing the results from a commercially available rapid diagnostic test, the fluorescence spot test, and quantitative testing for accuracy and cost-effectiveness. The comparative safety of the interventions chosen is also being evaluated. DISCUSSION: Despite the apparent urgency, the key operational elements of proposed malaria elimination strategies in Southeast Asian mobile and migrant populations, including the Military, have yet to be rigorously tested in a well-controlled clinical study. Here, we present a protocol for the primary evaluation of two treatment paradigms - monthly malaria prophylaxis and focused screening and treatment - to achieve malaria elimination in a Cambodian military population. We will also assess the feasibility and incremental benefit of outdoor-biting vector intervention - permethrin-treated clothing. In the process, we aim to define the cost-effectiveness of the inputs required for success including a responsive information system, skilled human resource and laboratory infrastructure requirements, and quality management. Despite being a relatively low transmission area, the complexities of multi-drug-resistant malaria and the movement of vulnerable populations require an approach that is not only technically sound, but simple enough to be achievable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02653898 . Registered on 13 January 2016.

Heterologous prime-boost immunization in rhesus macaques by two, optimally spaced particle-mediated epidermal deliveries of Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite protein-encoding DNA, followed by intramuscular RTS,S/AS02A.

BACKGROUND: RTS,S/AS02A, a recombinant Plasmodium falciparum vaccine based on the circumsporozoite protein (CSP) repeat and C-terminus regions, elicits strong humoral and Th1 cell-mediated immunity. In field studies, RTS,S/AS02A reduced malaria infection, clinical episodes, and disease severity. Heterologous prime-boost immunization regimens, optimally spaced, might improve the protective immunity of RTS,S/AS02A. METHODS: DNA plasmid encoding P. falciparum CSP (3D7) was administered to six experimental groups of rhesus monkeys (N = 5) by gene gun (coded as D), followed by a 1/5th human dose of RTS,S/AS02A (coded as R). Immunization regimens, including a numeral to denote weeks between immunizations, were D-4-R, D-16-R, D-4-D-4-R, D-4-D-16-R, D-16-D-4-R and D-16-D-16-R. A control group (N = 5) received a single 1/5th dose of RTS,S/AS02A. Endpoints were antibody (Ab) to homologous CSP repeat and C-terminus regions and delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) to CSP peptides. FINDINGS: Monkeys immunized twice with DNA, 16 weeks apart (D-16-D-4-R and D-16-D-16-R), developed higher levels of anti-C-terminus Abs than control monkeys (p<0.02). No CSP DNA priming regimen increased RTS,S/AS02A-induced Ab to CSP repeats. At 16 months after first immunization, D-R and D-D-R, but not control, monkeys had histologically confirmed DTH reactions against CSP C-terminus, which persisted at repeat testing 12 months later. INTERPRETATION: Two optimally spaced, particle-mediated epidermal deliveries of CSP DNA improved the humoral immunogenicity of a single dose of RTS,S/AS02A. Further, CSP DNA prime followed by one dose of RTS,S/AS02A gave biopsy proven DTH reactions against CSP C-terminus of up to 2 years duration, implying the induction of CD4+ memory T cells. Heterologous prime-boost strategies for malaria involving gene gun delivered DNA or more potent vectors, administered at optimal intervals, warrant further investigation.