A pilot randomized-controlled trial evaluating the erector spinae plane block in thoracic and breast surgery.

PURPOSE: This pilot study evaluated the feasibility of investigating the effect of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block on the patient-centred outcomes of quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15), and brief pain inventory (BPI) in thoracic and breast surgery patients. METHODS: In this randomized-controlled pilot trial, 82 patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (n = 77) and mastectomy (n = 5) received either continuous ESP block with ropivacaine (ropivacaine group) or the same procedure with 0.9% saline (saline group). All patients received surgical intercostal block (thoracic surgery) or local anesthetic infiltration (breast surgery). Feasibility as the primary outcome was evaluated on recruitment (three patients per week), catheter retention (above 90% at 24 hr), and patient attrition (less than 10%). Secondary outcomes comprised of QoR-15, BPI, and opioid consumption. RESULTS: Recruitment rate was 1.8 patients per week. Catheters were retained in 77 patients (94%) at 24 hr. At three months, five patients were lost to follow-up (6%). At 24 hr compared with baseline, the ropivacaine group had a smaller decline in QoR-15 score (median difference, 14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2 to 26; P = 0.02) and a smaller increase in BPI global score (median difference, 14; 95% CI, 0 to 24; P = 0.048). There was no difference in opioid consumption (P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, the target recruitment rate was not met, but catheter retention and patient attrition rates were both satisfactory. A definitive trial with QoR-15 as the primary outcome would require 300 study participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ID12618000701224); registered 30 April 2018.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Cette étude pilote a évalué la faisabilité d'explorer l'effet d'un bloc du plan des muscles érecteurs du rachis sur des résultats centrés sur le patient, soit la qualité de récupération (QoR-15) et le Questionnaire concis de la douleur (QCD ou BPI 'Brief Pain Inventory'), chez les patients de chirurgie thoracique et mammaire. MéTHODE: Dans cette étude pilote randomisée contrôlée, 82 patients subissant une chirurgie thoracoscopique (n = 77) ou une mastectomie (n = 5) ont reçu soit un bloc continu du plan des muscles érecteurs du rachis avec de la ropivacaïne (groupe ropivacaïne), ou la même intervention avec une solution saline à 0,9 % (groupe salin). Tous les patients ont reçu un bloc intercostal chirurgical (chirurgie thoracique) ou une infiltration d'anesthésique local (chirurgie mammaire). La faisabilité a été évaluée par les critères de recrutement (trois patients par semaine), de la rétention du cathéter (plus de 90 % à 24 h), et du taux d'attrition des patients (moins de 10 %). Les critères d'évaluation secondaires comportaient la QoR-15, le QCD et la consommation d'opioïdes. RéSULTATS: Le taux de recrutement était de 1,8 patients par semaine. Les cathéters sont restés en place chez 77 patients (94 %) à 24 h. À trois mois, cinq patients ont été perdus au suivi (6 %). Après 24 h, par rapport aux valeurs de base, le groupe ropivacaïne présentait un déclin plus léger du score de QoR-15 (différence médiane, 14; intervalle de confiance [IC] 95 %, 2 à 26; P = 0,02) ainsi qu'une augmentation moindre du score global de QCD (différence médiane, 14; IC 95 %, 0 à 24; P = 0,048). Aucune différence n'a été observée en matière de consommation d'opioïdes (P = 0,08). CONCLUSION: Dans cette étude pilote, le taux de recrutement cible n'a pas été atteint, mais les taux de rétention des cathéters et d'attrition des patients étaient tous deux satisfaisants. Une étude définitive de la QoR-15 en tant que critère d'évaluation principal nécessiterait le recrutement de 300 participants. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ID12618000701224); enregistrée le 30 avril 2018.

Weightbearing Cone-Beam Computed Tomography of Acute Ankle Syndesmosis Injuries.

Syndesmotic injuries are common, but only a subset of these injuries are unstable. A noninvasive tool for identifying instability would aid in the selection of patients for surgery. Weightbearing computed tomography (CT) data have been reported for healthy patients, but there are limited data on unstable syndesmoses. We evaluated the syndesmotic area of arthroscopically proven unstable ankles after acute injury. This is a prospective comparative study of consecutive patients recruited to a weightbearing CT database. Thirty-nine patients were included for analysis with arthroscopically proven unstable syndesmoses and an uninjured contralateral ankle. The syndesmosis area was measured for both ankles, in non-weightbearing and weightbearing positions, and compared. Syndesmosis area of the unstable ankle was significantly greater than the uninjured ankle of the same patient, by a mean of 22.9 ± 10.5 mm2. This was a significantly greater difference than that observed with non-weightbearing CT (9.8 ± 10.2 mm2, p < .001). Dynamic change in area, from non-weightbearing to weightbearing, of the unstable ankle (13.7% [16.6 ± 9.9 mm2]) was significantly greater than that of the uninjured ankle (3.1% [3.4 ± 6.7 mm2], p < .001). The intraobserver and interobserver correlations were good with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.983 and 0.970, respectively. Weightbearing CT demonstrated significantly greater diastasis in unstable ankles than did conventional non-weightbearing CT. Syndesmosis area measurement was reliable and reproducible. Dynamic change in area and weightbearing comparison with the contralateral uninjured ankle are 2 parameters that may prove useful in the future for predicting syndesmotic instability.

Quality of Recovery After Breast Surgery: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Pectoral Nerves Interfascial Plane (Pectoral Nerves II) Block With Surgical Infiltration.

BACKGROUND: Pectoral nerves (PECS II) block is a popular regional analgesia technique for breast surgery. PECS II block or local infiltration by surgeon may improve outcomes including quality of recovery (QoR). METHODS: In this multicenter randomized clinical trial, 104 female patients undergoing breast surgery received: (1) PECS II block with local anesthetic and surgical infiltration with 0.9% saline (PECS group) or (2) PECS II block with 0.9% saline and surgical infiltration with local anesthetic (infiltration group). Patients, anesthetists, surgeons, nursing staff, and research assistants were blinded to group allocation. Patients received standardized general anesthesia and multimodal analgesia. The primary outcome was the global score (maximum score, 150; good recovery, 118) of the multidimensional (pain, comfort, independence, psychological, emotional) QoR-15 questionnaire measured 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were pain, and its functional interference measured 24 hours and 3 months postoperatively using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) short form (0, optimal; 120, worst possible). Randomly assigned groups were compared on outcomes using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and the results were reported as median difference with 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: One hundred eight patients were recruited from August 17, 2016 to June 8, 2018, and 4 patients were withdrawn. Twelve patients from 104 had mastectomy, with the remainder having less invasive surgery. Baseline QoR-15 global scores reported as median [quartiles] were 135 [129, 143] in the PECS group and 139 [127, 143] in the infiltration group. The 24-hour QoR-15 global score reported as median [quartiles] was 131 [116, 140] in the PECS group and 123 [117, 143] in the infiltration group (P = .60), with median difference (95% confidence interval) of -2 (-9 to 5). The median difference reported as infiltration minus PECS for QoR-15 domains was pain 0 (-2 to 1), physical comfort -1 (-3 to 2), physical independence 0 (-2 to 1), psychological support 0 (0-0), and emotions 0 (-1 to 2) (P > .28). The BPI pain subscale at 24 hours (0-40, lower score indicates less pain), reported as median [quartiles], was 7 [2, 13] in the PECS group and 10 [5, 17] in the infiltration group (P = .15). The BPI global score at 24 hours, reported as median [quartiles], was 20 [7, 36] in the PECS group and 23 [10, 43] in the infiltration group (P = .34) and at 3 months was 0 [0, 14] and 0 [0, 11] (P = .85). CONCLUSIONS: After mostly minor surgery for breast cancer, PECS II block was not superior to local infiltration by the surgeon.

Impact of Local Infiltration Analgesia on the Quality of Recovery After Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Triple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) is commonly used in anterior total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery; however, evidence for its efficacy is lacking. We hypothesized that LIA with 0.2% ropivacaine when compared with injection of placebo (0.9% saline) would improve patient quality of recovery on postoperative day (POD) 1, as measured by the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score. METHODS: Patients scheduled to have a primary unilateral anterior THA with a single surgeon in a tertiary level metropolitan hospital were randomized to receive LIA with either 2.5 mL/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine or 0.9% saline as placebo. Patients and clinical and study personnel were blinded to group allocation. Perioperative care was standardized and this included spinal anesthesia and oral multimodal analgesia. The primary outcome was a multidimensional (pain, physical comfort, physical independence, emotions, and psychological support) patient-reported quality of recovery scale, QoR-15, measured on POD 1. RESULTS: One hundred sixty patients were randomized; 6 patients were withdrawn after randomization and 2 patients had incomplete outcome data. The intention-to-treat analysis included 152 patients. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) QoR-15 score on POD 1 of the ropivacaine group was 119.5 (102-124), compared with the placebo group which had a median (IQR) of 115 (98-126). The median difference of 2 (95% confidence interval [CI], -4 to 7; P = .56) was not statistically or clinically significant. An as-per-protocol sensitivity analysis of 146 patients who received spinal anesthesia without general anesthesia, and the allocated intervention, also showed no evidence of a significant difference between groups. Secondary outcomes (worst pain numerical rating scale at rest and with movement on POD 1, opioid consumption on PODs 1 and 2, mobilization on POD 1, Brief Pain Inventory severity and interference on POD 90, and length of stay) were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: LIA with 0.2% ropivacaine when compared with 0.9% saline as placebo did not improve quality of recovery 1 day after anterior THA.

Minimizing Propionibacterium acnes contamination in shoulder arthroplasty: use of a wound protector.

BACKGROUND: Propionibacterium acnes may be transmitted from the subdermal tissues to the deeper tissues during shoulder arthroplasty surgery, resulting in deep infection. The aim of this prospective, clinical study was to determine whether the use of a wound protector drape can lower the incidence of P. acnes in the wound during shoulder arthroplasty surgery. METHODS: For a consecutive series of 47 patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty, a wound protector drape was used during surgery, to isolate the subdermal layer from the surgeons' hands, retractors and other instruments. Microbiological swabs were taken both from the subdermal layer and the exposed drape to determine the incidence of P. acnes at both sites. RESULTS: The overall incidence of P. acnes in the subdermal layer was 23%. A fivefold decrease in the incidence of P. acnes in the exposed superficial layer was demonstrated by use of the wound protector drape. CONCLUSION: Use of a wound protector drape to isolate the superficial tissue layer from the surgeons' gloves, instruments and retractors decreases the incidence of P. acnes in the surgical field. This may result in a decreased rate of transmission to the deeper tissues, and a decreased rate of P. acnes deep infection.

Platelet transfusion is not associated with increased mortality or morbidity in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Transfusion of platelets is common in cardiac surgery, and while there are guidelines for their use, there are concerns about potential risks. We aimed to assess the impact of platelet transfusion on mortality, thrombosis, and infection in this patient group. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all patients at St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne who underwent a first cardiac surgery procedure from June 2001 to June 2014 was conducted. A propensity-weighted analysis was performed to examine the association between intraoperative platelet transfusion and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 5233 patients met inclusion criteria, and 531 (10.15%) received intraoperative platelet transfusion (median two platelet doses, interquartile range, 1-17). Patients receiving platelets were older, had higher body mass index, lower rates of diabetes and dyslipidemia, higher rates of infective endocarditis, recent myocardial infarction and unstable angina, and exposure to aspirin or clopidogrel. On univariable analysis, platelet transfusion was associated with increased 30-day mortality (2.4% vs. 10.55%, p < 0.001), return to theatre for bleeding (3.23% vs. 13.37%, p < 0.001), and rates of any infection (9.26% vs. 19.17%, p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, platelet transfusion was not associated with increased risk of 30-day mortality or infective complications. Platelet transfusion was associated with higher rates of return to theatre (relative risk [RR], 2.46; confidence interval [CI], 1.42, 4.04; p = 0.001) and decreased risk of thromboembolic events (RR, 0.28; CI, 0.15, 0.51; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Platelet transfusion was not associated with increased mortality or infective complications following first cardiac surgery. Further prospective studies are required to identify patients most likely to benefit from platelet transfusion.