How Does the Number of Brain Metastases Correlate With Normal Brain Exposure in Single-Isocenter Multitarget Multifraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

Purpose: To investigate the relationship between normal brain exposure in LINAC-based single-isocenter multitarget multifraction stereotactic radiosurgery or stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) and the number or volume of treated brain metastases, especially for high numbers of metastases. Methods and Materials: A cohort of 44 SRT patients with 709 brain metastases was studied. Renormalizing to a uniform prescription of 27 Gy in 3 fractions, normal brain dose volume indices, including V23 Gy (volume receiving >23 Gy), V18 Gy (volume receiving >18 Gy), and mean dose, were evaluated on these plans against the number and the total volume of targets for each plan. To compare with exposures from whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), the SRT dose distributions were converted to equivalent dose in 3 Gy fractions (EQD3) using an alpha-beta ratio of 2 Gy. Results: With increasing number of targets and increasing total target volume, normal brain exposures to dose ≥18 Gy increases, and so does the mean normal brain dose. The factors of the number of targets and the total target volume are both significant, although the number of targets has a larger effect on the mean normal brain dose and the total target volume has a larger effect on V23 Gy and V18 Gy. The EQD3 mean normal brain dose with SRT planning is lower than conventional WBRT. On the other hand, SRT results in higher hot spot (ie, maximum dose outside of tumor) EQD3 dose than WBRT. Conclusions: Based on clinical SRT plans, our study provides information on correlations between normal brain exposure and the number and total volume of targets. As SRT becomes more greatly used for patients with increasingly extensive brain metastases, more clinical data on outcomes and toxicities is necessary to better define the normal brain dose constraints for high-exposure cases and to optimize the SRT management for those patients.

A quick guide on implementing and quality assuring 3D printing in radiation oncology.

As three-dimensional (3D) printing becomes increasingly common in radiation oncology, proper implementation, usage, and ongoing quality assurance (QA) are essential. While there have been many reports on various clinical investigations and several review articles, there is a lack of literature on the general considerations of implementing 3D printing in radiation oncology departments, including comprehensive process establishment and proper ongoing QA. This review aims to guide radiation oncology departments in effectively using 3D printing technology for routine clinical applications and future developments. We attempt to provide recommendations on 3D printing equipment, software, workflow, and QA, based on existing literature and our experience. Specifically, we focus on three main applications: patient-specific bolus, high-dose-rate (HDR) surface brachytherapy applicators, and phantoms. Additionally, cost considerations are briefly discussed. This review focuses on point-of-care (POC) printing in house, and briefly touches on outsourcing printing via mail-order services.