Assessment of the soluble proteins HMGB1, CD40L and CD62P during various platelet preparation processes and the storage of platelet concentrates: The BEST collaborative study.

BACKGROUND: Structural and biochemical changes in stored platelets are influenced by collection and processing methods. This international study investigates the effects of platelet (PLT) processing and storage conditions on HMGB1, sCD40L, and sCD62P protein levels in platelet concentrate supernatants (PCs). STUDY DESIGN/METHODS: PC supernatants (n = 3748) were collected by each international centre using identical centrifugation methods (n = 9) and tested centrally using the ELISA/Luminex platform. Apheresis versus the buffy coat (BC-PC) method, plasma storage versus PAS and RT storage versus cold (4°C) were investigated. We focused on PC preparation collecting samples during early (RT: day 1-3; cold: day 1-5) and late (RT: day 4-7; cold: day 7-10) storage time points. RESULTS: HMGB1, sCD40L, and sCD62P concentrations were similar during early storage periods, regardless of storage solution (BC-PC plasma and BC-PC PAS-E) or temperature. During storage and without PAS, sCD40L and CD62P in BC-PC supernatants increased significantly (+33% and +41%, respectively) depending on storage temperature (22 vs. 4°C). However, without PAS-E, levels decreased significantly (-31% and -20%, respectively), depending on storage temperature (22 vs. 4°C). Contrastingly, the processing method appeared to have greater impact on HMGB1 release versus storage duration. These data highlight increases in these parameters during storage and differences between preparation methods and storage temperatures. CONCLUSIONS: The HMGB1 release mechanism/intracellular pathways appear to differ from sCD62P and sCD40L. The extent to which these differences affect patient outcomes, particularly post-transfusion platelet increment and adverse events, warrants further investigation in clinical trials with various therapeutic indications.

Clinical and in vitro evaluation of red blood cells collected and stored in a non-DEHP plasticized bag system.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Di-ethyl-hexyl-phthalate (DEHP) is currently the main plasticizer used for whole blood collection systems. However, in Europe, after May 2025, DEHP may no longer be used above 0.1% (w/w) in medical devices. DEHP stabilizes red cell membranes, thereby suppressing haemolysis during storage. Here we compared in vitro quality parameters of red cell concentrates (RCCs) collected and stored in DEHP-, DINCH- or DINCH/BTHC-PVC hybrid blood bags with saline-adenine-glucose-mannitol (SAGM) or phosphate-adenine-glucose-guanosine-saline-mannitol (PAGGSM) storage solution. Last, we performed haemovigilance surveillance for RCC collected in DINCH-PVC and stored in PAGGSM/BTHC-PVC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro quality parameters of RCC were determined during 42 days of storage. Haemovigilance surveillance was conducted to compare the frequency and type of transfusion reaction. RESULTS: Haemolysis levels were increased in SAGM/BTHC-PVC as compared to SAGM/DEHP-PVC (0.66% ± 0.18% vs. 0.36% ± 0.17%). PAGGSM storage solution was able to adequately suppress haemolysis to levels observed during storage in SAGM/DEHP-PVC, both in BTHC-PVC (0.38% ± 0.12%), and to a slightly lesser extent in DINCH-PVC (0.48% ± 0.17%). A total of 1650 PAGGSM/BTHC-PVC and 5662 SAGM/DEHP-PVC RCC were transfused yielding a transfusion reaction frequency of 0.24% (95% CI 0.0000-0.0048) and 0.44% (95% CI 0.0027-0.0061) respectively. CONCLUSION: The in vitro quality of RCC stored in PAGGSM/BTHC-PVC and SAGM/DEHP-PVC is comparable. There is no indication that transfusion of erythrocytes stored in PAGGSM/BTHC-PVC results in increased transfusion reaction frequency. These initial results provide a basis for further clinical evaluation to narrow down the confidence interval of transfusion reaction frequency.

In vitro evaluation of the quality of blood products collected and stored in systems completely free of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate-plasticized materials.

BACKGROUND: The plasticizer di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) is a common component in blood bags. DEHP is noncovalently bound to polyvinylchloride (PVC) polymer and can leach into the blood product. There are public concerns that exposure to DEHP might induce developmental and reproductive toxicity in humans. The aim of this study was to evaluate an alternative plasticizer, di(isononyl) cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate (Hexamoll DINCH, BASF SE), for its use in blood bags. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Whole blood (WB) was collected into DEHP-containing and DEHP-free collection systems. After overnight hold, WB was centrifuged and separated in plasma, buffy coat, and red blood cells (RBCs). Buffy coats and plasma were used to make platelet (PLT) concentrates in DEHP-free systems. After addition of additive solution (AS), SAG-M, PAGGS-M, AS-3, or PAGGG-M, RBCs were leukoreduced and analyzed for in vitro characteristics and plasticizer levels during storage. RESULTS: The use of DINCH-based systems had no effect on WB composition, blood processing, and plasma quality. PLT in vitro quality variables were maintained during storage in DEHP-free systems. During storage in SAG-M, hemolysis was significantly higher in DINCH-PVC while potassium leakage and adenosine triphosphate content were comparable. During storage in alternative ASs, hemolysis was reduced compared to storage in SAG-M. CONCLUSIONS: The complete absence of DEHP in the collection system had no effect on WB composition, processing, or plasma and PLT quality. During storage in SAG-M, the absence of DEHP resulted in increased hemolysis. With alternative ASs like PAGGS-M, AS-3, or PAGGG-M, the absence of DEHP had no effect on hemolysis. Leakage of DINCH into the blood product was less pronounced than that of DEHP.