Variability in the recovery of a virus concentration procedure in water: Implications for QMRA.

Methods for analysing water for viruses are known to have variable and relatively poor recovery efficiencies. Quantitative method recovery data are needed to correct virus enumeration results so that estimates of virus concentrations in surface waters for QMRA are not too low. Obtaining quantitative data representing method recoveries for different pathogenic viruses is a significant challenge. In this study, we investigated the use of mengovirus process control data for quantifying recovery efficiency of human adenovirus (AdV) and noroviruses GI (NoVGI) and GII (NoVGII) from surface waters. Samples were collected from the inlet to a drinking water treatment plant on the Glomma River, Norway. Performance of the sample concentration procedure was quantified by comparing the virus concentrations found in concentrated and unconcentrated samples. The mean recovery of viruses (1.2%, 0.31%, 0.15% and 0.053% for mengovirus (n = 86), AdV (n = 20), NoVGI (n = 33) and NoVGII (n = 21) respectively) estimated in this study were lower than expected, and the between sample variability in estimated recovery was very high, spanning around 6 orders of magnitude for mengovirus. Within-sample correlation between the estimated recovery of mengovirus and human viruses was poor, and therefore sample specific mengovirus data could not be used to correct all human virus concentrations. Instead beta distributions were fitted to human virus-specific recovery estimates. The magnitude and variability of virus concentration when corrected for the variable recovery efficiency was orders of magnitude higher than the uncorrected concentration. Better estimates of virus concentration could be achieved if a sample-specific spiking control could be developed that mimicked closely the behaviour of human viruses in environmental samples.

A One Year Study on the Concentrations of Norovirus and Enteric Adenoviruses in Wastewater and A Surface Drinking Water Source in Norway.

Enteric viruses transmitted via the faecal-oral route occur in high concentrations in wastewater and may contaminate drinking water sources and cause disease. In order to quantify enteric adenovirus and norovirus genotypes I and II (GI and GII) impacting a drinking source in Norway, samples of surface water (52), wastewater inlet (64) and outlet (59) were collected between January 2011 and April 2012. Samples were concentrated in two steps, using an electropositive disc filter and polyethylene glycol precipitation, followed by nucleic acid extraction and analysis by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Virus was detected in 47/52 (90.4%) of surface water, 59/64 (92%) of wastewater inlet and 55/59 (93%) of wastewater outlet samples. Norovirus GI occurred in the highest concentrations in surface water (2.51e + 04) and adenovirus in wastewater (2.15e + 07). While adenovirus was the most frequently detected in all matrices, norovirus GI was more frequently detected in surface water and norovirus GII in wastewater. This study is the first in Norway to monitor both sewage and a drinking water source in parallel, and confirms the year-round presence of norovirus and adenovirus in a Norwegian drinking water source.