Odontoid Fracture with Accompanying Severe Atlantoaxial Instability in Elderly Patients-Analysis of Treatment, Adverse Events, and Outcome.

(1) Background: In elderly patients with type II odontoid fractures, accompanying severe atlantoaxial instability (AAI) is discussed as a marker possibly warranting more aggressive surgical therapy. This study aimed to characterize adverse events as well as the radiological and functional outcomes of surgical vs. conservative therapy in patients with odontoid fracture and AAI. (2) Methods: Patients aged 65 years and older with type II odontoid fracture and AAI treated were included. AAI was assumed if the mean subluxation across both atlantoaxial facet joints in the sagittal plane was greater than 50%. Data on demographics, comorbidities, treatment, adverse events, radiological, and functional outcomes were analyzed. (3) Results: Thirty-nine patients were included. Hospitalization time was significantly shorter in conservatively treated patients compared to patients with ventral or dorsal surgery. Adverse events occurred in 11 patients (28.2%), affecting 10 surgically treated patients (35.7%), and 1 conservatively treated patient (9.1%). Moreover, 25 patients were followed-up (64.1%). One secondary dislocation occurred in the conservative group (11.1%) and three in the surgical group (18.8%). (4) Conclusions: Despite the potential for instability in this injury, conservative treatment does not seem to lead to unfavorable short-term results, less adverse events, and a shorter hospital stay and should thus be considered and discussed with patients as a treatment option, even in the presence of severe AAI.

Secondary Dislocations in Type B and C Injuries of the Subaxial Cervical Spine: Risk Factors and Treatment.

INTRODUCTION: This study analyzed the incidence of secondary dislocations (sDLs) after surgical stabilization of AO Spine type B and C injuries of the subaxial cervical spine (sCS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated for injuries of the sCS from 2010 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed for the incidence of sDL within 60 days after first surgery. A univariate analysis of variables potentially influencing the risk of sDL was performed. Patients with solitary anterior stabilization underwent subgroup analysis. The treatment of sDLs was described. RESULTS: A total of 275 patients were included. sDLs occurred in 4.0% of patients (n = 11) in the total sample, most frequently after solitary anterior stabilization with 8.0% (n = 10, p = 0.010). Only one sDL occurred after combined stabilization and no sDLs after posterior stabilization. In the total sample and the anterior subgroup, variables significantly associated with sDL were older age (p = 0.001) and concomitant unstable facet joint injury (p = 0.020). No neurological deterioration occurred due to sDL and most patients were treated with added posterior stabilization. sDL is frequent after solitary anterior stabilization and rare after posterior or combined stabilization. DISCUSSION: Patients of higher age and with unstable facet joint injuries should be followed up diligently to detect sDLs in time. Neurological deterioration does not regularly occur due to sDL, and most patients can be treated with added posterior stabilization.

Adverse events after surgery for injuries to the subaxial cervical spine: analysis of incidence and risk factors.

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of severe surgical adverse events (sSAE) after surgery of patients with subaxial cervical spine injury (sCS-Fx) and to identify patient, treatment, and injury-related risk factors. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of clinical and radiological data of sCS-Fx patients treated surgically between 2010 and 2020 at a single national trauma center. Baseline characteristics of demographic data, preexisting conditions, treatment, and injury morphology were extracted. Incidences of sSAEs within 60 days after surgery were analyzed. Univariate analysis and binary logistic regression for the occurrence of one or more sSAEs were performed to identify risk factors. P-values < .05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-two patients were included. At least one sSAE occurred in 49 patients (16.8%). Most frequent were sSAEs of the surgical site (wound healing disorder, infection, etc.) affecting 29 patients (9.9%). Independent potential risk factors in logistic regression were higher age (OR 1.02 [1.003-1.04], p = .022), the presence of one or more modifiers in the AO Spine Subaxial Injury Classification (OR 2.02 [1.03-3.96], p = .041), and potentially unstable or unstable facet injury (OR 2.49 [1.24-4.99], p = .010). Other suspected risk factors were not statistically significant, among these Injury Severity Score, the need for surgery for concomitant injuries, the primary injury type according to AO Spine, and preexisting medical conditions. CONCLUSION: sSAE rates after treatment of sCS-Fx are high. The identified risk factors are not perioperatively modifiable, but their knowledge should guide intra and postoperative care and surgical technique.

Survival and Clinical Outcomes after Unconstrained Total Knee Arthroplasty for Tibial Plateau Fractures-A Retrospective Study with Minimum 4-Year Follow-Up.

This study investigated survival, complications, revisions, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for unconstrained total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTO) caused by intraarticular tibial plateau fractures with minimum four years follow-up. Forty-nine patients (71.4% male; 58.7 years) were included. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed with failure defined as TKA removal. Patients without failure underwent pre- and postoperative evaluation (range of motion (ROM), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Society Score (KSS), anatomical femorotibial angle (aFTA), proximal tibial slope (PTS)) and Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) assessment at final follow-up. Fifteen (30.6%) patients had a complication, and eight (16.3%) patients underwent prosthesis removal at median 2.5 years. Cumulative survival rate of TKA was 79.6% at 20 years. A total of 32 patients with a mean follow-up of 11.8 years underwent further analyses. ROM (p = 0.028), aFTA (p = 0.044), pPS (p = 0.009), OKS (p < 0.001) and KSS (p < 0.001) improved significantly. SF-12 PCS was 42.3 and MCS was 54.4 at final follow-up. In general, one third of patients suffer a complication, and one in six patients has their prosthesis removed after TKA for PTO due to tibial plateau fractures. In patients who do not fail, TKA significantly improves clinical and radiographic outcomes at long-term follow-up.

Effect of changing the acquisition trajectory of the 3D C-arm (CBCT) on image quality in spine surgery: experimental study using an artificial bone model.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative 3D imaging using cone-beam CT (CBCT) provides improved assessment of implant position and reduction in spine surgery, is used for navigated surgical techniques, and therefore leads to improved quality of care. However, in some cases the image quality is not sufficient to correctly assess pedicle screw position and reduction, especially due to metal artifacts. The aim of this study was to investigate whether changing the acquisition trajectory of the CBCT in relation to the pedicle screw position during dorsal instrumentation of the spine can reduce metal artifacts and consequently improve image quality as well as clinical assessability on the artificial bone model. METHODS: An artificial bone model was instrumented with pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar spine region (Th10 to L5). Then, the acquisition trajectory of the CBCT (Cios Spin, Siemens, Germany) to the pedicle screws was systematically changed in 5° steps in angulation (- 30° to + 30°) and swivel (- 30° to + 30°). Subsequently, radiological evaluation was performed by three blinded, qualified raters on image quality using 9 questions (including anatomical structures, implant position, appearance of artifacts) with a score (1-5 points). For statistical evaluation, the image quality of the different acquisition trajectories was compared to the standard acquisition trajectory and checked for significant differences. RESULTS: The angulated acquisition trajectory increased the score for subjective image quality (p < 0.001) as well as the clinical assessability of pedicle screw position (p < 0.001) highly significant with particularly strong effects on subjective image quality in the vertebral pedicle region (d = 1.06). Swivel of the acquisition trajectory significantly improved all queried domains of subjective image quality (p < 0.001) as well as clinical assessability of pedicle screw position (p < 0.001). The data show that maximizing the angulation or swivel angle toward 30° provides the best tested subjective image quality. Angulation and swivel of the acquisition trajectory result in a clinically relevant improvement in image quality in intraoperative 3D imaging (CBCT) during dorsal instrumentation of the spine.

Odontoid fracture in geriatric patients - analysis of complications and outcome following conservative treatment vs. ventral and dorsal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Different treatment options are discussed for geriatric odontoid fracture. The aim of this study was to compare the treatment options for geriatric odontoid fractures. METHODS: Included were patients with the following criteria: age ≥ 65 years, identification of seniors at risk (ISAR score ≥ 2), and odontoid fracture type A/B according to Eysel and Roosen. Three groups were compared: conservative treatment, surgical therapy with ventral screw osteosynthesis or dorsal instrumentation. At a follow-up examination, the range of motion and the trabecular bone fracture healing rate were evaluated. Furthermore, demographic patient data, neurological status, length of stay at the hospital and at the intensive care unit (ICU) as well as the duration of surgery and occurring complications were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were included and 43 patients could be re-examined (range: 2.7 ± 2.1 months). Patients with dorsal instrumentation had a better rotation. Other directions of motion were not significantly different. The trabecular bone fracture healing rate was 78.6%. The patients with dorsal instrumentation were hospitalized significantly longer; however, their duration at the ICU was shortest. There was no significant difference in complications. CONCLUSION: Geriatric patients with odontoid fracture require individual treatment planning. Dorsal instrumentation may offer some advantages.

Radiation exposure for pedicle screw placement with three different navigation system and imaging combinations in a sawbone model.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that pedicle screw placement using navigation can potentially reduce radiation exposure of surgical personnel compared to conventional methods. Spinal navigation is based on an interaction of a navigation software and 3D imaging. The 3D image data can be acquired using different imaging modalities such as iCT and CBCT. These imaging modalities vary regarding acquisition technique and field of view. The current literature varies greatly in study design, in form of dose registration, as well as navigation systems and imaging modalities analyzed. Therefore, the aim of this study was a standardized comparison of three navigation and imaging system combinations in an experimental setting in an artificial spine model. METHODS: In this experimental study dorsal instrumentation of the thoracolumbar spine was performed using three imaging/navigation system combinations. The system combinations applied were the iCT/Curve, cCBCT/Pulse and oCBCT/StealthStation. Referencing scans were obtained with each imaging modality and served as basis for the respective navigation system. In each group 10 artificial spine models received bilateral dorsal instrumentation from T11-S1. 2 referencing and control scans were acquired with the CBCTs, since their field of view could only depict up to five vertebrae in one scan. The field of view of the iCT enabled the depiction of T11-S1 in one scan. After instrumentation the region of interest was scanned again for evaluation of the screw position, therefore only one referencing and one control scan were obtained. Two dose meters were installed in a spine bed ventral of L1 and S1. The dose measurements in each location and in total were analyzed for each system combination. Time demand regarding screw placement was also assessed for all system combinations. RESULTS: The mean radiation dose in the iCT group measured 1,6 ± 1,1 mGy. In the cCBCT group the mean was 3,6 ± 0,3 mGy and in the oCBCT group 10,3 ± 5,7 mGy were measured. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant (p < 0.0001) difference between the three groups. The multiple comparisions by the Kruskall-Wallis test showed no significant difference for the comparison of iCT and cCBCT (p1 = 0,13). Significant differences were found for the direct comparison of iCT and oCBCT (p2 < 0,0001), as well as cCBCT and oCBCT (p3 = 0,02). Statistical analysis showed that significantly (iCT vs. oCBCT p = 0,0434; cCBCT vs. oCBCT p = 0,0083) less time was needed for oCBCT based navigated pedicle screw placement compared to the other system combinations (iCT vs. cCBCT p = 0,871). CONCLUSION: Under standardized conditions oCBCT navigation demanded twice as much radiation as the cCBCT for the same number of scans, while the radiation exposure measured for the iCT and cCBCT for one scan was comparable. Yet, time effort was significantly less for oCBCT based navigation. However, for transferability into clinical practice additional studies should follow evaluating parameters regarding feasibility and clinical outcome under standardized conditions.

Analysis of the cost-efficiency of the vascular impulse technology (VIT) in the perioperative management of complex ankle fractures: results of a prospective randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Posttraumatic swelling causes a delay in surgery, a prolonged hospital stay and a higher risk of complications. Thus, soft tissue conditioning following complex ankle fractures is of central importance in their perioperative management. Since the clinical benefit of VIT usage on the clinical course has been shown, it should now be investigated whether it is also cost-efficient in doing so. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Included are published clinical results of the prospective, randomised, controlled, monocentric VIT study that have proven the therapeutic benefit in complex ankle fractures. Participants were allocated in a 1:1 ratio into the intervention group (VIT) and the control group (elevation). In this study, the required economic parameters of these clinical cases were collected on the data of the financial accounting and an estimation of annual cases had been performed to extrapolate the cost-efficiency of this therapy. The primary endpoint was the mean savings (in €). RESULTS: Thirty-nine cases were studied in the period from 2016 to 2018. There was no difference in the generated revenue. However, due to lower incurred costs in the intervention group, there were potential savings of about €2000 (pITT = 0.073) to 3000 (pAT = 0.008) per patient compared to the control group with therapy costs decreasing as the number of patients treated increases from €1400 in one case to below €200 per patient in 10 cases. There were 20% more revision surgeries in the control group or 50 min more OR time, respectively, and an increased attendance by staff and medical personnel of more than 7 h. CONCLUSIONS: VIT therapy has been shown to be a beneficial therapeutic modality, but it is so not only in regard to soft-tissue conditioning but also cost efficiency.

[Computer-assisted procedures in orthopedics and trauma surgery-Where do we stand?] / Computergestützte Verfahren in der Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie ­ wo stehen wir?

Computer-assisted procedures are becoming increasingly more relevant in orthopedics and trauma surgery. The data situation on these systems has improved in recent years but still has a low level of evidence. In particular, data on short-term or medium-term results on the use of these procedures are currently available. These could show that improved precision and reproducibility of the surgical procedures can be achieved by the use of computer-assisted procedures. Nevertheless, there is still no recommendation in the current guidelines for routine use.

Vascular impulse technology versus elevation for reducing the swelling of upper and lower extremity joint fractures.

Soft-tissue conditioning due to posttraumatic oedema after complicated joint fractures is a central therapeutic aspect both pre- and postoperatively. On average, 6-10 days pass until the patient is suitable for surgery. This study compares the decongestant effect of vascular impulse technology (VIT) with that of conventional elevation. In this monocentric RCT, 68 patients with joint fractures of the upper (n = 36) and lower (n = 32) extremity were included and randomized after consent in a 1:1 ratio. Variables were evaluated for all fractures together and additionally subdivided into upper or lower extremity for better clinical comparability. Primary endpoint was the time in days from hospital admission to operability. Secondary endpoints were total length of stay, oedema reduction, pain intensity, complications, and revisions. The time from admission until operability was reduced by 1.4 (95% CI - 0.4; 3.1) days in the mITT analysis (p = 0.120) and was statistically significant with 1.7 (95% CI 0.1; 3.3) days in the as-treated sensitivity analysis (pAT = 0.038). Significantly less pain and a faster oedema reduction were found in the intervention group. Due to rare occurrences, nothing can be concluded regarding complications and revisions. Administration of VIT therapy did not lead to a significant reduction in time until operability in the whole population but was superior to elevation for soft-tissue conditioning and pain reduction. However, there was a significant reduction by 2.5 days (95% CI 0.7; 4.3) in the subgroup of lower extremity fractures. VIT therapy therefore seems to be a helpful tool in the treatment of posttraumatic oedema after complex joint fractures of the lower and upper extremity, especially in tibial head and lower leg fractures.

Is the postoperative pedicle screw position after dorsal instrumentation with or without intraoperative cone beam CT imaging worse in patients with obesity than in normal-weight patients?

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative cone beam CT (CBCT) imaging in dorsal instrumentation facilitates pedicle screw positioning. However, in patients with obesity, the benefit may be reduced due to artifacts that affect image quality. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether intraoperative CBCT leads to an improved postoperative screw position compared to conventional fluoroscopy independent of body weight. METHODS: A total of 71 patients (18 patients with a BMI > 30 kg/m2, 53 patients with a BMI < 30 kg/m2) who underwent dorsal instrumentation with intraoperative CBCT imaging were included in study groups one (SG1) and two (SG2). Two control groups (CG1 and CG2) were randomly sampled to include 22 patients with a BMI > 30 kg/m2 and 60 patients with a BMI < 30 kg/m2 who underwent dorsal instrumentation without intraoperative CBCT imaging. The pedicle screw position in postoperative computed tomography was assessed using the Gertzbein-Robbins classification. RESULTS: In SG1 (BMI > 30 kg/m2), a total of 107 (83.6%) pedicle screws showed no relevant perforation (type A + B), and 21 (16.4%) pedicle screws showed relevant perforation (type C - E). In SG2 (BMI < 30 kg/m2), 328 (90.9%) screws were classified as type A + B, and 33 (9.1%) screws were classified as type C - E. In CG1 (BMI > 30 kg/m2), 102 (76.1%) pedicle screws showed no relevant perforation (type A + B), and 32 (23.9%) pedicle screws showed relevant perforation (type C - E). In CG2 (BMI < 30 kg/m2), 279 (76.9%) screws were classified as type A + B, and 84 (23.1%) screws were classified as type C - E. There were significant differences between the values of SG1 and SG2 (p = 0.03) and between the values of SG2 and CG2 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: CBCT imaging in dorsal instrumentation can lead to an improved pedicle screw position among both patients with obesity and normal-weight patients. However, patients with obesity showed significantly worse pedicle screw positions postoperatively after dorsal instrumentation with intraoperative CBCT imaging than normal-weight patients.

Comparison of three imaging and navigation systems regarding accuracy of pedicle screw placement in a sawbone model.

3D-navigated pedicle screw placement is increasingly performed as the accuracy has been shown to be considerably higher compared to fluoroscopy-guidance. While different imaging and navigation devices can be used, there are few studies comparing these under similar conditions. Thus, the objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of two combinations most used in the literature for spinal navigation and a recently approved combination of imaging device and navigation system. With each combination of imaging system and navigation interface, 160 navigated screws were placed percutaneously in spine levels T11-S1 in ten artificial spine models. 470 screws were included in the final evaluation. Two blinded observers classified screw placement according to the Gertzbein Robbins grading system. Grades A and B were considered acceptable and Grades C-E unacceptable. Weighted kappa was used to calculate reliability between the observers. Mean accuracy was 94.9% (149/157) for iCT/Curve, 97.5% (154/158) for C-arm CBCT/Pulse and 89.0% for CBCT/StealthStation (138/155). The differences between the different combinations were not statistically significant except for the comparison of C-arm CBCT/Pulse and CBCT/StealthStation (p = 0.003). Relevant perforations of the medial pedicle wall were only seen in the CBCT group. Weighted interrater reliability was found to be 0.896 for iCT, 0.424 for C-arm CBCT and 0.709 for CBCT. Under quasi-identical conditions, higher screw accuracy was achieved with the combinations iCT/Curve and C-arm CBCT/Pulse compared with CBCT/StealthStation. However, the exact reasons for the difference in accuracy remain unclear. Weighted interrater reliability for Gertzbein Robbins grading was moderate for C-arm CBCT, substantial for CBCT and almost perfect for iCT.

Development and first application testing of a new protocol for CT-based stability evaluation of the injured upper cervical spine.

PURPOSE: For trauma surgeons, the evaluation of the stability of the upper cervical spine may be demanding. The aim of this study was to develop a protocol for decision-making on upper cervical spine stability in trauma patients based on established parameters obtained by CT imaging as well as testing the protocol by having it applied by trauma surgeons. METHODS: A structured literature search on upper cervical spine stability was performed. The best evaluated instability criteria in CT imaging were determined. Based on these parameters a protocol for stability evaluation of the injured upper cervical spine was developed. A first application testing was performed. In addition to the assessment of instability, the time required for the assessment was analyzed. RESULTS: A protocol for CT-based stability evaluation of the injured upper cervical spine based on the current literature was developed and displayed in a flow chart. Testing of the protocol found the stability of the cervical spine was correctly assessed in 55 of 56 evaluations (98.2%). In one test run, a stable upper cervical spine was judged to be unstable. Further analysis showed that this case was based on a measurement error. The assessment time of CT-images decreased significantly during repeat application of the protocol (p < 0.0001), from 336 ± 108 s (first case) to 180 ± 30 s (fourth case). CONCLUSION: The protocol can be applied quickly and safely by non-specialized trauma surgeons. Thus, the protocol can support the decision-making process in CT-based evaluation of the stability of the injured upper cervical spine.

Cervical Spine Immobilization in Patients With a Geriatric Facial Structure: The Influence of a Geriatric Mandible Structure on the Immobilization Quality Using a Cervical Collar.

INTRODUCTION: Demographic changes have resulted in an increase in injuries among geriatric patients. For these patients, a rigid cervical collar is crucial for immobilizing the cervical spine. However, evidence suggests that patients with a geriatric facial structure require a different means of immobilization than patients with an adult facial structure. This study aimed to analyze the remaining motion of the immobilized cervical spine based on facial structure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was performed on 8 fresh human cadavers. Facial structure was evaluated via ascertaining the mandibular angle by computer tomography. A mandibular angle below 130°, belongs to the adult facial structure group (n = 4) and a mandibular angle above 130°, belongs to the geriatric facial structure group (n = 4). The flexion and lateral bending of the immobilized cervical spine were analyzed in both groups using a wireless motion tracker system. RESULTS: A flexion of up to 19.0° was measured in the adult facial structure group. The mean flexion in the adult vs. geriatric facial structure groups were 14.5° vs. 6.5° (ranges: 9.0-19.0 vs. 5.0-7.0°), respectively. Thus, cervical spine motion was (p = 0.0286) significantly more reduced in the adult facial structure group. No (p = 0.0571) significant difference was oberserved in the mean lateral bending of the adult facial structure group (14.5°) compared to the geriatric facial structure group (7.5°). CONCLUSION: Emergency medical service personnel should therefore follow current guidelines and recommendations and perform cervical spine immobilization with a cervical collar, including in patients with a geriatric facial structure.

Analysis of diagnostics, therapy and outcome of patients with traumatic atlanto-occipital dislocation.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Patients' outcome following traumatic atlanto-occipital dislocation (AOD) has been poor. In recent years, an increasing number of patients surviving the initial trauma are admitted to hospital. In order to further improve the management of these patients, the knowledge of diagnostics and therapy as well as possible complications should be increased. PURRPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic parameters, therapy, early complications and outcome of patients with traumatic AOD. STUDY DESIGN: Monocentric retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 12 patients were included in this study. OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was functional patient outcome. Furthermore, radiographic and treatment data were analyzed. METHODS: All patients suffering from traumatic AOD within an 8-year time period were included. Demographic data, radiological diagnostic parameters (condylar sum, basion dens interval, basion axis interval, power´s ratio, x-line method), as well as treatment data and complications of every patient were analyzed. Radiological parameters were compared with each other. Outcome was analyzed by a follow up examination. RESULTS: The accident mechanisms were motor vehicle accidents (MVA), fall from high and low height. Basion dens interval, basion axis interval, power's ratio and x-line method were not reliable in identifying traumatic AOD (only up to 33% of the patients were identified). Twelve patients could be reviewed. Three patients were treated with surgery, five patients were treated nonsurgically. Four patients died before surgical therapy. All seven surviving patients (survival rate: 58.3%) were re-examined (mean follow-up time: 6.7 months). All patients had a GCS of 15. Three surviving patients suffered from persisting neurological deficits. CONCLUSIONS: The most reliable way to diagnose AOD in Computer Topography is using the condylar sum. Surgical and nonsurgical measures can be employed with reasonable outcomes. Patient specific injury burden and clinical presentation should be taken into account when making treatment decisions for AOD.

Risk Factors for Revision Surgery Following Radial Head Arthroplasty without Cement for Unreconstructible Radial Head Fractures: Minimum 3-Year Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Revision rates following radial head arthroplasty (RHA) for unreconstructible radial head fractures (RHFs) differ vastly in the literature, and little is known about the risk factors that are associated with revision surgery. The purposes of this study were to assess the revision rate following RHA and to determine the associated risk factors. METHODS: A total of 122 patients (mean age, 50.7 years; range, 18 to 79 years) with 123 RHAs who underwent RHA for unreconstructible RHFs between 1994 and 2014 and were ≥3 years out from surgery were included. Demographic variables, injury and procedure-related characteristics, radiographic findings, complications, and revision procedures were assessed. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors that were associated with revision surgery following RHA. RESULTS: The median follow-up for the study cohort was 7.3 years (interquartile range [IQR], 5.1 to 10.1 years). All of the patients had unreconstructible RHFs: Mason-Johnston type-IV injuries were the most prevalent (80 [65%]). One or more associated osseous or ligamentous injuries were seen in 89 elbows (72.4%). The median time to surgery was 7 days (IQR, 3 to 11 days). Implanted prostheses were categorized as rigidly fixed (65 [52.8%]) or loosely fixed (58 [47.2%]). A total of 28 elbows (22.8%) underwent revision surgery at a median of 1.1 years (IQR, 0.3 to 3.8 years), with the majority of elbows (17 [60.7%]) undergoing revision surgery within the first 2 years. The most common reason for revision surgery was painful implant loosening (14 [29.2% of 48 complications]). Univariate Cox regression suggested that Workers' Compensation claims (hazard ratio [HR], 5.48; p < 0.001) and the use of an external fixator (HR, 4.67; p = 0.007) were significantly associated with revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Revision rates following RHA for unreconstructible RHFs are high; the most common cause for revision surgery is painful implant loosening. Revision surgeries are predominantly performed within the first 2 years after implantation, and surgeons should be aware that Workers' Compensation claims and the use of an external fixator in management of the elbow injury are associated with revision surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Long-term outcome and survival rate of monopolar radial head replacement.

BACKGROUND: The purposes of this study were (1) to report functional outcomes; (2) to assess complications, revisions, and survival rate; and (3) to assess differences in functional outcomes between removed and retained radial head arthroplasties (RHAs), early and delayed treatment, and type of RHA used at long-term follow-up after monopolar RHA for unreconstructible radial head fractures or their sequelae. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients (mean age, 59.2 years) who were at least 6 years postoperatively after monopolar RHA for unreconstructible RHFs or their sequelae were included. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS); Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score; visual analog scale; postoperative satisfaction (1-6, 6 = highly unsatisfied); range of motion; complications; and revisions were assessed. Radiographic findings were reported. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Subgroups (RHA type, early vs. delayed surgery, RHA removed vs. retained) were compared. RESULTS: At a median clinical follow-up of 9.5 years (range: 6.0-28.4 years), median MEPS was 80.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 60.0-97.5), median QuickDASH was 22.0 (IQR: 4.6-42.6), median visual analog scale was 1 (IQR: 0-4), median postoperative satisfaction was 2 (IQR: 1-3), and median arc of extension/flexion was 110° (IQR: 80°-130°). Radiographic follow-up was available for 48 patients at a median of 7.0 years (range: 2.0-15.0 years). Heterotopic ossifications were seen in 14 (29.2%), moderate-to-severe capitellar osteopenia/abrasion in 3 (6.1%), moderate-to-severe ulnohumeral degeneration in 3 (6.1%), and periprosthetic radiolucencies in 17 (35.4%) patients. Twenty-nine patients (37.2%) had complications and 20 patients (25.6%) underwent RHA exchange or removal. Kaplan-Meier analysis with failure defined as RHA exchange or removal demonstrated survival of 75.1% (95% confidence interval: 63.7-83.3) at 18 years. The highest annual failure rate was observed in the first year in which the RHAs of 7 patients (9%) were exchanged or removed. No significant differences were detected between type of RHA in MEPS (Mathys: 82.5 [75.0-100] vs. Evolve: 80.0 [60.0-95.0]; P = .341) and QuickDASH (Mathys: 12.5 [0-34.4] vs. Evolve: 26.7 [6.9-46.2]; P = .112). Early surgery (≤3 weeks) yielded significantly superior MEPS (80.0 [70.0-100.0] vs. 52.5 [30.0-83.8]; P = .014) and QuickDASH (18.6 [1.5-32.6] vs. 46.2 [31.5-75.6]; P = .002) compared with delayed surgery (>3 weeks). Patients with retained RHAs had significantly better MEPS (80.0 [67.5-100] vs. 70.0 [32.5-82.5]; P = .016) and QuickDASH (18.1 [1.7-31.9] vs. 49.1 [22.1-73.8]; P = .007) compared with patients with removed RHAs. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term outcomes for RHA are satisfactory; however, there is a high complication and revision rate, resulting in implant survival of 75.1% at 18 years with the highest annual failure rate observed in the first postoperative year.

Evaluation of image quality and assessability of a new flat-panel 3D C-arm compared to mobile and fixed computed tomography in posterior spinal fixation.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates image quality of a new flat-panel three-dimensional (3D) C-arm to the current generation and to intraoperative and stationary computed tomography (CT) in spinal surgery. METHODS: Three-dimensional-imaging of 44 posterior screws acquired with two generations of 3D C-arms (Arcadis Orbic, AO and Cios Spin, CS, Siemens, Germany) and CT scans (mobile intraoperative CT Airo, iCT, Brainlab, Germany and stationary CT Aquilion 32, sCT, Toshiba, Japan) were performed. Evaluation regarded assessability and measurements of implant position. RESULTS: Assessability score was 0.11 in AO, 0.56 in sCT, 0.91 in iCT and 1.46 in CS (p < 0.0005). AO and CS showed a significant difference in accuracy (p = 0.001) as well as CS and iCT (p < 0.001). Measurements of protrusion over the anterior edge did not show a significant difference (p = 0.341). CONCLUSIONS: Image quality of the new generation of flat-panel 3D C-arms competes with CT imaging and offers significant advantages compared to the former generation.

Comparison of pedicle screw misplacement following open vs. percutaneous dorsal instrumentation after traumatic spinal fracture.

OBJECTIVE: Dorsal stabilization is a frequently used procedure in the treatment of acute traumatic vertebral body fractures. Besides the traditional open surgical procedure, the percutaneous positioning of pedicle screws is now widely used. The aim of the current study is to compare pedicle screw misplacement following open vs. percutaneous dorsal instrumentation after traumatic spinal fracture of the thoracic and lumbar spine and to assess possible risk factors associated with pedicle screw misplacement. METHODS: All patients who suffered a traumatic spinal fracture that were treated with dorsal stabilization in our level I trauma center in the period from 01/2007 to 03/2014 were included in this retrospective therapeutic cohort study. From 01/2007 to 06/2009, an open surgical procedure was used, and from 06/2009 to 03/2014, the percutaneous procedure was used for all types of fractures. Retrospectively, the positioning of every single pedicle screw was evaluated in the post-operative computed tomography scan and classified. Epidemiological data were also documented to compare the two treatment groups. RESULTS: A total of 491 patients with 681 vertebral body fractures were included. Of 733 pedicle screws placed during the open surgery procedure, 96.0% were within the safe zone. There was no significant difference compared with pedicle screws placed percutaneously (95.3% of 1884 screws). In all other categories, the number of misplaced pedicle screws also showed no differences between the two treatment groups. There is a positive correlation between pedicle screw misplacement and duration of the operation. Most pedicle screws are misplaced at the levels T12, L1 and T7, T8. CONCLUSION: The current study shows that percutaneous surgery using dorsal stabilization allows the positioning of pedicle screws in an equivalently safe manner compared with an open surgical procedure in the acute care of spinal trauma.

First experiences with intraoperative CT in navigated sacroiliac (SI) instrumentation: An analysis of 25 cases and comparison with conventional intraoperative 2D and 3D imaging.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative imaging is regularly used for intraoperative reduction control and evaluation of the implant position in trauma surgery. 2D imaging is limited, especially in complex anatomical regions such as the pelvis. The introduction of mobile 3D C-arms (CBCT: cone-beam computed tomography) has significantly improved intraoperative assessment. Nevertheless, there are still limitations regarding the field of view and metal artifacts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) in surgical treatment of sacroiliac (SI) injuries. METHODS: Twenty-five cases with injuries of the posterior pelvic ring involving the SI region that were surgically treated with navigated SI screws using the mobile iCT Airo (Brainlab, Munich, Germany) were analysed. Subsequently, the data were compared with historical control groups (CBCT with and without navigation; 2D fluoroscopy only). RESULTS: The average score for subjective image quality achieved using the Likert scale is significantly higher for the iCT (4.48 ± 0.65) than for the CBCT (3.04 ± 0.69) with p = 0.00. The average duration of surgery using iCT was 189.32 ± 88.64 min, which was not significantly different from the control groups (p = 0.14 - 0.70). The average fluoroscopy time using iCT was 81.96 ± 97.34 s, which was significantly shorter than in all of the control groups (p = 0.00 - 0.03). The rate for postoperatively detected complications after using iCT was 0% (n = 0). Compared with the 2D-only control group (25%; n = 1), there is a significant difference (p = 0.01). The remaining two control groups showed no significant differences (p = 0.09 - 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: The iCT provides excellent image quality that allows reliable assessment of fracture reduction and implant placement even in complex anatomical regions. The radiation exposure for the medical staff is reduced by decreasing the fluoroscopy time without significantly prolonging the surgical time. Overall, the possibility of intraoperative correction improves clinical outcome and patient treatment in the long term.