An acute increase in Left Atrial volume and left ventricular filling pressure during Adenosine administered myocardial hyperaemia: CMR First-Pass Perfusion Study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether left atrial (LA) volume and left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) change during adenosine delivered myocardial hyperaemia as part of a first-pass stress perfusion study. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 33 patients who had stress CMR. These patients had a baseline four-chamber cine and stress four-chamber cine, which was done at peak myocardial hyperaemic state after administering adenosine. The left and right atria were segmented in the end ventricular diastolic and systolic phases. Short-axis cine stack was segmented for ventricular functional assessment. At peak hyperaemic state, left atrial end ventricular systolic volume just before mitral valve opening increased significantly from baseline in all (91 ± 35ml vs. 81 ± 33ml, P = 0.0002), in males only (99 ± 35ml vs. 88 ± 33ml, P = 0.002) and females only (70 ± 26ml vs. 62 ± 22ml, P = 0.02). The right atrial end ventricular systolic volume increased less significantly from baseline (68 ± 21ml vs. 63 ± 20ml, P = 0.0448). CMR-derived LVFP (equivalent to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure) increased significantly at the peak hyperaemic state in all (15.1 ± 2.9mmHg vs. 14.4 ± 2.8mmHg, P = 0.0002), females only (12.9 ± 2.1mmHg vs. 12.3 ± 1.9mmHg, P = 0.029) and males only (15.9 ± 2.8mmHg vs. 15.2 ± 2.7mmHg, P = 0.002) cohorts. CONCLUSION: Left atrial volume assessment by CMR can measure acute and dynamic changes in preloading conditions on the left ventricle. During adenosine administered first-pass perfusion CMR, left atrial volume and LVFP rise significantly.

The Role of High-Fidelity Simulation in the Acquisition of Endovascular Surgical Skills: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The widespread introduction of minimally invasive endovascular techniques in cardiovascular surgery has necessitated a transition in the psychomotor skillset of trainees and surgeons. Simulation has previously been used in surgical training; however, there is limited high-quality evidence regarding the role of simulation-based training on the acquisition of endovascular skills. This systematic review aimed to systematically appraise the currently available evidence regarding endovascular high-fidelity simulation interventions, to describe the overarching strategies used, the learning outcomes addressed, the choice of assessment methodology, and the impact of education on learner performance. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement using relevant keywords to identify studies evaluating simulation in the acquisition of endovascular surgical skills. References of review articles were screened for additional studies. RESULTS: A total of 1,081 studies were identified (474 after removal of duplicates). There was marked heterogeneity in methodologies and reporting of outcomes. Quantitative analysis was deemed inappropriate due to the risk of serious confounding and bias. Instead, a descriptive synthesis was performed, summarizing key findings and quality components. Eighteen studies were included in the synthesis (15 observational, 2 case-control and 1 randomized control studies). Most studies measured procedure time, contrast usage, and fluoroscopy time. Other metrics were recorded to a lesser extent. Significant reductions were noted in both procedure and fluoroscopy times with the introduction of simulation-based endovascular training. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence regarding the use of high-fidelity simulation in endovascular training is very heterogeneous. The current literature suggests simulation-based training leads to improvements in performance, mostly in terms of procedure and fluoroscopy time. High-quality randomized control trials are needed to establish the clinical benefits of simulation training, sustainability of improvements, transferability of skills and its cost-effectiveness.

Mitral regurgitation quantified by CMR 4D-flow is associated with microvascular obstruction post reperfused ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: Mitral regurgitation (MR) and microvascular obstruction (MVO) are common complications of myocardial infarction (MI). This study aimed to investigate the association between MR in ST-elevation MI (STEMI) subjects with MVO post-reperfusion. STEMI subjects undergoing primary percutaneous intervention were enrolled. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging was performed within 48-hours of initial presentation. 4D flow images of CMR were analysed using a retrospective valve tracking technique to quantify MR volume, and late gadolinium enhancement images of CMR to assess MVO. RESULTS: Among 69 patients in the study cohort, 41 had MVO (59%). Patients with MVO had lower left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (42 ± 10% vs. 52 ± 8%, P < 0.01), higher end-systolic volume (98 ± 49 ml vs. 73 ± 28 ml, P < 0.001) and larger scar volume (26 ± 19% vs. 11 ± 9%, P < 0.001). Extent of MVO was associated with the degree of MR quantified by 4D flow (R = 0.54, P = 0.0003). In uni-variate regression analysis, investigating the association of CMR variables to the degree of acute MR, only the extent of MVO was associated (coefficient = 0.27, P = 0.001). The area under the curve for the presence of MVO was 0.66 (P = 0.01) for MR > 2.5 ml. We conclude that in patients with reperfused STEMI, the degree of acute MR is associated with the degree of MVO.

Diagnostic intervals in oropharyngeal cancers from a primary care perspective: a ten-year case note review.

Background Rates of oropharyngeal (OP) cancer are increasing and mortality is related to stage at diagnosis. Early diagnosis is vital to improving patient outcomes.Aim To describe current general practice pathways and time intervals in OP cancer and: a) compare to current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance to refer from general practitioners (GPs) to general medical dentists (dentists); and b) referral pathways for pharyngeal cancers.Design and setting A ten-year retrospective study of patients diagnosed with OP cancer in one suburban general practice in England using GP notes, including secondary care correspondence.Results There were 12 cases of OP cancer; six oral and six pharyngeal. There were marked differences in referral pathways and time intervals for people with visible, or palpable, oral cancers and those with non-visible, or impalpable, pharyngeal cancers. No one had GP to dentist referral. General practice 'safety-netting' or follow-up was not commonly recorded.Conclusion GPs are pivotal in diagnosing symptomatic OP cancers. General practice and dental teams encountering symptoms of uncertain aetiology (for example, pharyngitis) should offer safety-netting to shorten patient intervals to re-attendance. Pathways for oral cancer referral were usually clear and linear. Pathways for pharyngeal cancer were usually complex, with much longer time intervals in primary and secondary care, and would benefit from a single national referral pathway to ENT.

Long saphenous vein harvesting techniques and their effect on graft patency.

Coronary artery bypass grafting is a key cardiac surgery procedure and is the main treatment for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. The most frequently used conduit for this procedure is the long saphenous vein (LSV). The technique of harvesting the LSV has evolved over the last 30 years from total open harvesting to endoscopic with minimal access technique. The most important determining factor for success in coronary artery surgery is the graft patency rate. The literature evidence behind each technique has been reported at different levels and there is an ongoing debate about which technique can provide optimum vein patency over the long term. This literature review aims to summarize the current evidence, the implications involved with the use of each technique for harvesting LSV and the patency rate at variable follow-up intervals.

Concomitant severe carotid and coronary artery diseases: a separate management or concomitant approach.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically compare outcomes between patients with asymptomatic carotid artery diseases (>80% stenosis) that had undergone staged carotid endarterectomy (CEA) before coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs simultaneous CEA and CABG. METHODS: A comprehensive electronic search of MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, and Ovid from their inception up till August 2018 was performed to identify all studies comparing staged CEA followed by CABG to simultaneous CEA and CABG. Primary outcome measure was postoperative stroke, and secondary measures were myocardial infarction (MI) and 30-day mortality rates. RESULTS: A total of 67 953 patients were analyzed from 11 articles. There was higher rate of previous stroke in the staged cohort (2.64% vs 2.32%; odds ratio [OR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI; 0.66, 0.99]; P = .040). There was no difference in previous MI (P = .57) or unstable angina (P = .08) among both cohorts. Postoperatively, there were higher stroke rates (3.64% vs 2.83%; OR, 0.72; 95% CI [0.62-0.89]; P < .0001), operative mortality (4.32% vs 3.58%; OR, 0.90; 95% CI [0.83-0.98]; P = .02), and 30-day mortality (4.40% vs 3.58%; OR, 0.86; 95% CI [0.78-0.96]; P = .006) in the simultaneous cohort. However, length of stay was significantly shorter in the simultaneous cohort (11.9 days vs 12.6 days; weighted mean difference 3.14 [0.77-5.51]; P = .009). There were no significant differences in 1-year mortality (P = .33), MI rates (P = .08), and rates of transient neurological deficits (P = .06). CONCLUSION: The results from this study favors staged CEA with CABG with lower incidence of postoperative stroke, operative, and 30-day mortality. A larger study, ideally a randomized controlled trial, is required to address the superiority of each technique.

In thoracic aortic surgery, is innominate artery cannulation a safe and effective alternative to axillary artery cannulation?

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: in a patient undergoing thoracic aortic surgery, is innominate artery cannulation superior to axillary artery cannulation in terms of postoperative outcomes? Five hundred and thirty-one papers were found using the reported search strategy, of which 5 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. A total of 1338 participants were included across the 5 studies. Seven hundred and twenty-two patients were cannulated via the axillary artery and 616 were cannulated via the innominate artery. The included 5 studies were 2 prospective observational cohorts, 2 retrospective case-series analysis and a single-blinded randomized trial. Thirty-day or in-hospital mortality rates were reported in all 5 studies. There were no significant differences in mortality with innominate artery cannulation compared to axillary artery cannulation (P > 0.05), with slightly lower mortality rates in 2 studies, slightly higher mortality rates in 2 and equal in 1 study. Though statistical significance was not demonstrated (P > 0.05), a stroke occurred slightly less frequently in patients receiving innominate artery cannulation compared to axillary artery cannulation in 3 of the 4 studies. Innominate artery cannulation is non-inferior to axillary artery cannulation for thoracic aortic surgery, with a similar level of neuroprotection and is not associated with increased levels of mortality.

Is local anaesthesia superior to general anaesthesia in endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm?

A best evidence topic in cardiovascular surgery was written in accordance to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: in patients undergoing endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR), is local anaesthetic (LA) superior to general anaesthetic in terms of perioperative outcomes? Altogether, 630 publications were found using the reported search protocol, of which 3 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type and primary outcomes were tabulated. The 3 included studies are systematic reviews with meta-analyses, with no randomized trials identified. Within the studies, there is a degree of heterogeneity in terms of surgical case-mix (elective or emergency EVAR or both) and anaesthetic technique (LA, regional anaesthetic, local-regional anaesthetic and general anaesthetic). With 1 study not providing pooled estimates, the second study demonstrated statistical significance in favour of local-regional anaesthetic within the elective setting in terms of mortality [pooled odds ratio (OR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52-0.95; P = 0.02], morbidity (pooled OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.96; P = 0.0006) and total length of hospital admission (pooled mean difference: -1.53, 95% CI -2.53 to -0.53; P = 0.00001). The third study failed to demonstrate a statistically significant mortality benefit with LA (pooled OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.21-1.41; P = 0.211). While the results of these studies fail to provide a clear answer to a complex surgical problem, it would be appropriate, in the light of current evidence, to recommend LA as non-inferior to general anaesthetic in both emergency and elective settings.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of acute type B thoracic aortic dissection, open, or endovascular repair.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare perioperative and mortality outcomes of endovascular aortic repair against open repair in acute type B thoracic aortic dissection. METHODS: A comprehensive search was undertaken among the four major databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Ovid) to identify all published data comparing open vs endovascular repair in management of acute type B aortic dissection. Databases where evaluated and assessed to July 2017. The 95% confidence intervals were analyzed from the extracted data using relevant statistical methods. RESULTS: Overall, 18,193 patients were found in a combination of nine studies. Patients undergoing open repair were younger (mean, 61.3 ± 9.3 years vs 66.6 ± 12.5 years; P < .00001). Postoperative stroke and paraplegia were similar in both groups (P = .71 and P = .81 respectively); however, the rate of all neurologic complications were more common in the traditional open repair group (6.9% vs 4.8%; P = .006). The all-cause operative and 1-year death was reported as higher in the open repair group (18.6% vs 7.4% [P < .0001] and 24.3% vs 14.3% [P < .0001], respectively); however, at 5 years this rate is almost similar between both groups (46.7% vs 49.7%; P = .21). At 1 year, the rate of reintervention was reported to be higher in endovascular repair group of patients (15.4% vs 5.5%; P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: This study concludes that endovascular repair, in the setting of acute type B thoracic aortic dissection, provides an early surgical benefit; however, this finding has not yet been supported by long-term data. There seems to be a benefit with respect to all-neurologic events in favor of endovascular repair. Long-term comparative data and studies are required to give a better understanding of these two approaches.

Diagnosis and referral delays in primary care for oral squamous cell cancer: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of oral cancer is increasing. Guidance for oral cancer from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) is unique in recommending cross-primary care referral from GPs to dentists. AIM: This review investigates knowledge about delays in the diagnosis of symptomatic oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in primary care. DESIGN AND SETTING: An independent multi-investigator literature search strategy and an analysis of study methodologies using a modified data extraction tool based on Aarhus checklist criteria relevant to primary care. METHOD: The authors conducted a focused systematic review involving document retrieval from five databases up to March 2018. Included were studies looking at OSCC diagnosis from when patients first accessed primary care up to referral, including length of delay and stage of disease at time of definitive diagnosis. RESULTS: From 538 records, 16 articles were eligible for full-text review. In the UK, more than 55% of patients with OSCC were referred by their GP, and 44% by their dentist. Rates of prescribing between dentists and GPs were similar, and both had similar delays in referral, though one study found greater delays attributed to dentists as they had undertaken dental procedures. On average, patients had two to three consultations before referral. Less than 50% of studies described the primary care aspect of referral in detail. There was no information on inter-GP-dentist referrals. CONCLUSION: There is a need for primary care studies on OSCC diagnosis. There was no evidence that GPs performed less well than dentists, which calls into question the NICE cancer option to refer to dentists, particularly in the absence of robust auditable pathways.

Music therapy following cardiac surgery-is it an effective method to reduce pain and anxiety?

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, is postoperative music therapy effective in reducing pain and anxiety? Altogether, 153 papers were found using the reported search method, of which 7 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. Six of the included studies were randomized trials, with 1 further non-randomized trial. The specific music protocols utilized widely varied, ranging from 1 short session on day 1 postoperatively to multiple sessions per day over a 72-h period. Most therapies involved music of a relaxing type, typically between 50 and 60 dB. All 7 studies reported on pain, with 4 demonstrating significant differences in pain score; however, 3 of these were not associated with reduction in analgesia requirements. Five studies reported on anxiety, with 2 demonstrating a statistically significant improvement in levels of anxiety. These results need to be contextualized by the small number of participants within each study and the heterogeneity in the therapy protocols utilized. The current best available evidence fails to support the benefits of music therapy as an effective non-pharmacological option in reducing pain and anxiety following open-heart surgery. While there is scarce evidence demonstrating efficacy, the current literature contains very small-sample-sized studies in utilizing music therapy protocols which in turn have wide range of variability in terms of duration, frequency, timing in the postoperative period and specific choice of music utilized in each protocol.

Can postoperative massage therapy reduce pain and anxiety in cardiac surgery patients?

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was, 'In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, is postoperative massage therapy effective in reducing pain, anxiety and physiological parameters?' Altogether, 287 papers were found using the reported search, of which 7 papers represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and the results of these papers are tabulated. The specific therapy protocols widely varied between studies, with differences in frequency, specific timing in the postoperative period, techniques used and experience of therapy provider. These variations limit the generalization and transferability of the conclusions. The effect of massage therapy on anxiety levels was reported in 5 studies. All but one demonstrated a significant improvement in anxiety. Pain was also reported in 5 studies, with significant improvement demonstrated in 4 studies. Importantly, a number of these studies failed to report on analgesic requirements nor demonstrate a reduction in opioid requirements, thus limiting the validity of the drawn conclusions. There is significant heterogeneity in randomized trials reporting on the effects of massage therapy. Although there is evidence to suggest that massage therapy reduces pain and anxiety following cardiac surgery, there are often caveats to the conclusions drawn with other studies reporting no significant difference. Therefore, in light of this, it would not be logical to recommend massage therapy as an effective therapy. There is no current evidence to suggest that massage therapy improves physiological parameters, including the onset of atrial fibrillation postoperatively.

Severe Bradycardia Prior to Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Case Report.

Intraventricular conduction abnormalities following cardiac surgery have been thoroughly described, especially after valvular surgery. It is also widely known that several anesthetic factors can cause autonomic disturbances resulting in the unmasking of sinus node dysfunction, significant bradycardia, and cardiovascular collapse during the intraoperative period. However, little is known about asymptomatic episodes, especially those occurring prior to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We report a rare occurrence of an intraventricular conduction defect that presented in an asymptomatic patient following non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction prior to urgent CABG. Our patient presented with sudden-onset chest pain, and following coronary angiography he was found to have triple-vessel coronary disease. During anesthetic induction for inpatient CABG surgery, he developed episodes of acute sinus tachy-brady episodes, requiring a stat dose of adrenaline to maintain the heart rate prior to the establishment of cardiopulmonary bypass. The arrhythmia persisted postoperatively, necessitating the insertion of a permanent dual-chamber pacemaker for complete heart block. The patient was later discharged without further complications, and upon follow-up 12 months later, he remains in good health.