Implant-associated Infection After Pediatric Spine Deformity Surgery: Is Removal of Hardware Indicated?

BACKGROUND: Postoperative spinal implant infection following pediatric spinal surgery often presents a management dilemma. We aimed to characterize our experience in this cohort of patients, hoping to provide further insight when approaching these challenging cases. METHODS: A retrospective, observational study was performed of all children who underwent spinal surgery from January 2015 to June 2021 in a tertiary pediatric spinal surgery referral center in Queensland, Australia. Records were reviewed to identify cases of postoperative surgical site infection, with particular focus on children with infection directly involving implants. Preoperative prophylaxis, microbiology, clinical course and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 580 children underwent 933 procedures during the study period. The most common pathology requiring surgery was idiopathic scoliosis in 257 children (44.3%) followed by neuromuscular scoliosis in 192 children (33.1%). There were 35 cases of surgical site infection (6.03%), and 9 were implant-associated (1.55%). Infection rate among children with neuromuscular spinal deformity was almost 3-fold higher (11.5%) than idiopathic (3.89%). Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus was the most commonly isolated organism (n = 15). Four implant-associated infections were successfully managed with retention of implant; all were diagnosed within 32 days (median = 20 days) and cultured either Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Conversely, infections that necessitated implant removal had a more indolent onset (median = 175 days), and more often cultured Cutibacterium acnes and coagulase-negative Staphylococci . CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative spinal implant infection can be treated successfully with hardware retention in select cases. Earlier presentation and recognition appear to be associated with better rates of retention and are linked to certain organisms. Further exploration of specific preventative strategies may be key in preventing devastating late-onset infections.

Comparison of midline catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters to reduce the need for general anesthesia in children with respiratory disease: A feasibility randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The optimal intravenous device for antibiotic administration for children with respiratory disease is uncertain. We assessed the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial comparing midline catheters with peripherally inserted central catheters. METHODS: Prospective, two-arm, feasibility randomized controlled trial in an Australian tertiary, pediatric hospital. Random assignment of 110 children (<18 years) to receive (i) midline catheter and (ii) peripherally inserted central catheters. Primary outcome was feasibility (eligibility, recruitment, retention, protocol adherence, and acceptability), and the primary clinical outcome was general anesthesia requirement for intravenous catheter insertion. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: insertion time, treatment delays, infusion efficiency, device failure, complications, and cost. RESULTS: There was 80% recruitment, 100% retention, no missing data, and high patient/staff acceptability. Mean patient experience assessed on a 0-10 numeric rating scale was 8.0 peripherally inserted central catheters and 9.0 (midline catheters), respectively. Participant eligibility was not achieved (49% of screened patients) and moderate protocol-adherence across groups (89% peripherally inserted central catheters vs. 76% midline catheter). Insertion of midline catheter for pulmonary optimization reduced the requirement for general anesthesia compared to peripherally inserted central catheters (10% vs. 69%; odds ratio = 0.01, 95% confidence interval: 0.00-0.09). Midline catheters failed more frequently (18.1 vs. 5.5 peripherally inserted central catheters per 1000 catheter-days); however, this reduced over trial duration. Midline catheter insertion compared to peripherally inserted central catheters saved AUD$1451 per pulmonary optimization episode. CONCLUSIONS: An efficacy trial is feasible with expanded eligibility criteria and intensive staff training when introducing a new device. Midline catheter for peripherally compatible infusions is acceptable to patients and staff, might negate the need for general anesthesia and results in significant cost savings.

Fosfomycin--investigation of a possible new route of administration of an old drug. A case study.

Patients with cystic fibrosis can develop multi-resistant organisms and may have poor intravenous access making antibiotic treatment difficult. This case discusses the successful use of fosfomycin via the subcutaneous route in a paediatric patient with cystic fibrosis.