Nutrition and Physical Activity Clinical Practice Guidelines for Older Adults Living with Frailty.

BACKGROUND: We developed clinical practice guidelines to provide health care providers with evidence-based recommendations for decisions related to the effective management of frailty and pre-frailty using nutrition and physical activity interventions. METHODS: We based the recommendations on two systematic reviews with meta-analyses. Nutrition, physical activity, and combined nutrition and physical activity interventions for adults ≥65y were considered if study populations were identified as frail using a frailty tool or assessment. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were evaluated. We included physical outcomes, mobility, frailty, cognitive function, activities of daily living, falls, quality of life, diet quality, energy/fatigue levels, health services use, and caregiver outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, mobility improvements were moderate with nutritional strategies that optimize dietary intake, various types of physical activity interventions, and interventions that combine nutrition and physical activity. Physical outcomes, such as body mass and muscle strength, improved moderately with nutritional strategies and interventions that combined nutrition with physical activity. Frailty status improved with multi-component physical activity interventions. Strong recommendations include optimizing dietary intake, performing physical activity, and adopting interventions that combine nutrition and physical activity. We strongly recommend various types of physical activity including muscle strengthening activities, mobilization or rehabilitation exercises, and multi-component physical activity interventions. INTERPRETATION: Tailored nutrition and physical activity interventions based on individual goals and health status are associated with improved clinical and physical outcomes. While the recommendations facilitate shared decision-making, we identified sparse application of validated frailty assessments and lack of standardized research outcomes as critical gaps in knowledge.

Malnutrition modifies the response to multimodal prehabilitation: a pooled analysis of prehabilitation trials.

Patients with colorectal cancer are at risk of malnutrition before surgery. Multimodal prehabilitation (nutrition, exercise, stress reduction) readies patients physically and mentally for their operation. However, it is unclear whether extent of malnutrition influences prehabilitation outcomes. We conducted a pooled analysis from five 4-week multimodal prehabilitation trials in colorectal cancer surgery (prehabilitation: n = 195; control: n = 71). Each patient's nutritional status was evaluated at baseline using the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA; higher score, greater need for treatment of malnutrition). Functional walking capacity was measured with the 6-minute walk test distance (6MWD) at baseline and before surgery. A multivariable mixed effects logistic regression model evaluated the potential modifying effect of PG-SGA on a clinically meaningful change of ≥19 m in 6MWD before surgery. Multimodal prehabilitation increased the odds by 3.4 times that colorectal cancer patients improved their 6MWD before surgery as compared with control (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6 to 7.3; P = 0.001, n = 220). Nutritional status significantly modified this outcome (P = 0.007): Neither those patients with PG-SGA ≥9 (adjusted odds ratio: 1.3; 95% CI: 0.23 to 7.2, P = 0.771, n = 39) nor PG-SGA <4 (adjusted odds ratio: 1.3; 95% CI: 0.5 to 3.8, P = 0.574, n = 87) improved in 6MWD with prehabilitation. In conclusion, baseline nutritional status modifies prehabilitation effectiveness before colorectal cancer surgery. Patients with a PG-SGA score 4-8 appear to benefit most (physically) from 4 weeks of multimodal prehabilitation. Novelty: Nutritional status is an effect modifier of prehabilitation physical function outcomes. Patients with a PG-SGA score 4-8 benefited physically from 4 weeks of multimodal prehabilitation.

GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition - A consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community.

RATIONALE: This initiative is focused on building a global consensus around core diagnostic criteria for malnutrition in adults in clinical settings. METHODS: In January 2016, the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) was convened by several of the major global clinical nutrition societies. GLIM appointed a core leadership committee and a supporting working group with representatives bringing additional global diversity and expertise. Empirical consensus was reached through a series of face-to-face meetings, telephone conferences, and e-mail communications. RESULTS: A two-step approach for the malnutrition diagnosis was selected, i.e., first screening to identify "at risk" status by the use of any validated screening tool, and second, assessment for diagnosis and grading the severity of malnutrition. The malnutrition criteria for consideration were retrieved from existing approaches for screening and assessment. Potential criteria were subjected to a ballot among the GLIM core and supporting working group members. The top five ranked criteria included three phenotypic criteria (weight loss, low body mass index, and reduced muscle mass) and two etiologic criteria (reduced food intake or assimilation, and inflammation or disease burden). To diagnose malnutrition at least one phenotypic criterion and one etiologic criterion should be present. Phenotypic metrics for grading severity as Stage 1 (moderate) and Stage 2 (severe) malnutrition are proposed. It is recommended that the etiologic criteria be used to guide intervention and anticipated outcomes. The recommended approach supports classification of malnutrition into four etiology-related diagnosis categories. CONCLUSION: A consensus scheme for diagnosing malnutrition in adults in clinical settings on a global scale is proposed. Next steps are to secure further collaboration and endorsements from leading nutrition professional societies, to identify overlaps with syndromes like cachexia and sarcopenia, and to promote dissemination, validation studies, and feedback. The diagnostic construct should be re-considered every 3-5 years.

GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition - A consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community.

RATIONALE: This initiative is focused on building a global consensus around core diagnostic criteria for malnutrition in adults in clinical settings. METHODS: In January 2016, the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) was convened by several of the major global clinical nutrition societies. GLIM appointed a core leadership committee and a supporting working group with representatives bringing additional global diversity and expertise. Empirical consensus was reached through a series of face-to-face meetings, telephone conferences, and e-mail communications. RESULTS: A two-step approach for the malnutrition diagnosis was selected, i.e., first screening to identify "at risk" status by the use of any validated screening tool, and second, assessment for diagnosis and grading the severity of malnutrition. The malnutrition criteria for consideration were retrieved from existing approaches for screening and assessment. Potential criteria were subjected to a ballot among the GLIM core and supporting working group members. The top five ranked criteria included three phenotypic criteria (non-volitional weight loss, low body mass index, and reduced muscle mass) and two etiologic criteria (reduced food intake or assimilation, and inflammation or disease burden). To diagnose malnutrition at least one phenotypic criterion and one etiologic criterion should be present. Phenotypic metrics for grading severity as Stage 1 (moderate) and Stage 2 (severe) malnutrition are proposed. It is recommended that the etiologic criteria be used to guide intervention and anticipated outcomes. The recommended approach supports classification of malnutrition into four etiology-related diagnosis categories. CONCLUSION: A consensus scheme for diagnosing malnutrition in adults in clinical settings on a global scale is proposed. Next steps are to secure further collaboration and endorsements from leading nutrition professional societies, to identify overlaps with syndromes like cachexia and sarcopenia, and to promote dissemination, validation studies, and feedback. The diagnostic construct should be re-considered every 3-5 years.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in gynecologic oncology: System-wide implementation and audit leads to improved value and patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Enhanced recovery pathways have been shown to reduce length of stay without increasing readmission or complications in numerous areas of surgery. Uptake of gynecologic oncology ERAS guidelines has been limited. We describe the effect of ERAS guideline implementation in gynecologic oncology on length of stay, patient outcomes, and economic impact for a province-wide single-payer system. METHODS: We compared pre- and post-guideline implementation outcomes in consecutive staging and debulking patients at two centers that provide the majority of surgical gynecologic oncology care in Alberta, Canada between March 2016 and April 2017. Clinical outcomes and compliance were obtained using the ERAS Interactive Audit System. Patients were followed until 30 days after discharge. Negative binomial regression was employed to adjust for patient characteristics. RESULTS: We assessed 152 pre-ERAS and 367 post-ERAS implementation patients. Mean compliance with ERAS care elements increased from 56% to 77.0% after implementation (p < 0.0001). Median length of stay for all surgeries decreased from 4.0 days to 3.0 days post-ERAS (p < 0.0001), which translated to an adjusted LOS decrease of 31.4% (95% CI = [21.7% - 39.9%], p < 0.0001). In medium/high complexity surgery median LOS was reduced by 2.0 days (p = 0.0005). Complications prior to discharge decreased from 53.3% to 36.2% post-ERAS (p = 0.0003). There was no significant difference in readmission (p = 0.6159), complications up to 30 days (p = 0.6274), or mortality (p = 0.3618) between the cohorts. The net cost savings per patient was $956 (95%CI: $162 to $1636). CONCLUSIONS: Systematic implementation of ERAS gynecologic oncology guidelines across a healthcare system improves patient outcomes and saves resources.

Cost impact analysis of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program implementation in Alberta colon cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (eras) colorectal guideline has been implemented widely across Alberta. Our study examined the clinical and cost impacts of eras on colon cancer patients across the province. METHODS: We first used both summary statistics and multivariate regression methods to compare, before and after guideline implementation, clinical outcomes (length of stay, complications, readmissions) in consecutive elective colorectal patients 18 or more years of age and in colon cancer and non-cancer patients treated at the Peter Lougheed Centre and the Grey Nuns Hospital between February 2013 and December 2014. We then used the differences in clinical outcomes for colon cancer patients, together with the average cost per hospital day, to estimate cost impacts. RESULTS: The analysis considered 790 patients (398 cancer and 392 non-cancer patients). Mean guideline compliance increased to 60% in cancer patients and 57% in non-cancer patients after eras implementation from 37% overall before eras implementation. From pre- to post-eras, mean length of stay declined to 8.4 ± 5 days from 9.5 ± 7 days in cancer patients, and to 6.4 ± 4 days from 8.8 ± 5.5 days in non-cancer patients (p = 0.0012 and p = 0.0041 respectively). Complications declined significantly in the renal, hepatic, pancreatic, and gastrointestinal groups (difference in proportions: 13% in cancer patients; p < 0.05). No significant change in the risk of readmission was observed. The net cost savings attributable to eras implementation ranged from $1,096 to $2,771 per cancer patient and from $3,388 to $7,103 per non-cancer patient. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of eras not only resulted in clinical outcome improvements, but also had a significant beneficial impact on scarce health system resources. The effect for cancer patients was different from that for non-cancer patients, representing an opportunity for further refinement and study.

Validity and reliability of the new Canadian Nutrition Screening Tool in the 'real-world' hospital setting.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Nutrition screening should be initiated on hospital admission by non-dietitians. This research aimed to validate and assess the reliability of the Canadian Nutrition Screening Tool (CNST) in the 'real-world' hospital setting. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Adult patients were admitted to surgical and medical wards only (no palliative patients). Study 1--Nutrition Care in Canadian Hospitals (n=1014): development of the CNST (3 items: weight loss, decrease food intake, body mass index (BMI)) and exploratory assessment of its criterion and predictive validity. Study 2--Inter-rater reliability and criterion validity assessment of the tool completed by untrained nursing personnel or diet technician (DT) (n=150). Subjective Global Assessment performed by site coordinators was used as a gold standard for comparison. RESULTS: Study 1: The CNST completed by site coordinators showed good sensitivity (91.7%) and specificity (74.8%). Study 2: In the subsample of untrained personnel (160 nurses; one DT), tool's reliability was excellent (Kappa=0.88), sensitivity was good (>90%) but specificity was low (47.8%). However, using a two-item ('yes' on both weight change and food intake) version of the tool improved the specificity (85.9%). BMI was thus removed to promote feasibility. The final two-item tool (study 1 sample) has a good predictive validity: length of stay (P<0.001), 30-day readmission (P=0.02; X(2) 5.92) and mortality (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The simple and reliable CNST shows good sensitivity and specificity and significantly predicts adverse outcomes. Completion by several untrained nursing personnel confirms its utility in the nursing admission assessment.

The prognosis of incurable cachectic cancer patients on home parenteral nutrition: a multi-centre observational study with prospective follow-up of 414 patients.

BACKGROUND: The role of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) in incurable cachectic cancer patients unable to eat is extremely controversial. The aim of this study is to analyse which factors can influence the outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied prospectively 414 incurable cachectic (sub)obstructed cancer patients receiving HPN and analysed the association between patient or clinical characteristics and surviving status. RESULTS: Median weight loss, versus pre-disease and last 6-month period, was 24% and 16%, respectively. Median body mass index was 19.5, median KPS was 60, median life expectancy was 3 months. Mean/median survival was 4.7/3.0 months; 50.0% and 22.9% of patients survived 3 and 6 months, respectively. At the multivariable analysis, the variables significantly associated with 3- and 6-month survival were Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) and KPS, and GPS, KPS and tumour spread, respectively. By the aggregation of the significant variables, it was possible to dissect several classes of patients with different survival probabilities. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of cachectic incurable cancer patients on HPN is not homogeneous. It is possible to identify groups of patients with a ≥6-month survival (possibly longer than that allowed in starvation). The indications for HPN can be modulated on these clinical/biochemical indices.

Canadian home parenteral nutrition (HPN) registry: validation and patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: In Canada, there are an estimated 400 home parenteral nutrition (HPN) patients. In 2006, a registry was created to gather patient outcome information. The aim of this study was to validate the registry and report on HPN patient outcomes. METHODS: Several demographic, clinical parameters were collected. For the validation, paired t test and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to assess agreement between repeat entries. For the outcome report, paired t test was used to assess changes, and survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. RESULTS: On validation, there was high correlation/agreement (P < .05) for most parameters except vascular access/line sepsis, liver disease (ultrasound, biopsy, diagnoses), and hospitalizations. For the outcome report, 96 patients had their data entered at 2.24 ± 0.11 years after baseline. Over the period, there was a significant reduction in PN calories (P = .001) and proteins (P < .001). There were no significant changes in nutrition parameters and laboratory results except for lower platelet counts (P = .028), lower plasma potassium (P = .030), and a trend toward an increase in bilirubin from 19.29 ± 4.65 to 29.06 ± 8.73 µmol/L (P = .071). The QOL decreased significantly over time (P < .001) and the survival on HPN was 17.67 ± 1.89 years. CONCLUSIONS: The registry is a valid tool to assess several clinical parameters. On follow-up, HPN patients maintain good nutrition status while PN is reduced but do have a reduced quality of life.

Maintenance of clinical benefit in Crohn's disease patients after discontinuation of infliximab: long-term follow-up of a single centre cohort.

BACKGROUND: Tumour necrosis factor-blockade with infliximab has advanced the treatment of Crohn's disease. While infliximab is efficacious, it remains to be determined whether patients who enter clinical remission with an anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy can have their treatment stopped and retain the state of remission. AIM: To assess in patients with Crohn's disease who obtained infliximab-induced remission, the proportion who relapsed after infliximab discontinuation. METHODS: This longitudinal cohort study examined patients from a University-based IBD referral centre. Forty eight patients with Crohn's disease in full clinical remission and who then discontinued infliximab were followed up for up to 7 years. Crohn's disease relapse was defined as an intervention with Crohn's disease medication or surgery. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier analysis of the proportion of patients with sustained clinical benefit demonstrated that 50% relapsed within 477 days after infliximab discontinuance. In contrast, 35% of patients remained well, and without clinical relapse, up to the end of the nearly 7-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with Crohn's disease with an infliximab-induced remission, stopping infliximab results in a predictable relapse in a majority of patients. Nevertheless, a small percentage of patients sustain a long-term remission.

Intravenous fish oil emulsion attenuates total parenteral nutrition-induced cholestasis in newborn piglets.

Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) causes intrahepatic cholestasis and membrane phospholipid changes. Fatty acid (FA) composition of bile and hepatocyte phospholipid is influenced by dietary FA composition. We hypothesized that altering FA composition of i.v. lipid emulsions modifies 1) severity of TPN-induced cholestasis; 2) hepatocyte membrane composition and function; 3) bile flow and composition. Newborn piglets received either sow's milk, TPN with i.v. soybean oil or TPN with i.v. fish oil (FO). After 3 wk, basal and stimulated bile flow were measured after bolus injections of 20, 50, and 100 micromol/kg of taurocholate (TCA). Bile was analyzed for bile acids, cholesterol, phospholipids, and phospholipid-FA. Sinusoidal and canalicular membrane PL-FA, fluidity, and Na+/K+-ATPase were measured. Although the soybean oil-fed animals developed cholestasis, the FO and milk group had similar liver and serum bilirubin. Basal and stimulated bile flow rates were impaired in the soybean oil but not in the FO group. Hepatocyte membrane FA composition reflected dietary FA. Changes in sinusoidal and canalicular membrane fluidity and sinusoidal Na+/K+-ATPase activity did not explain the effect of FO on TPN-induced cholestasis. Intravenous FO reduces TPN-induced cholestasis by unknown mechanisms.

Intravenous ursodeoxycholic acid reduces cholestasis in parenterally fed newborn piglets.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Cholestasis complicates total parenteral nutrition (TPN) in preterm infants. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is used for several cholestatic problems. The hypothesis of this study was that intravenous UDCA prevents TPN-induced cholestasis by (1) maintaining normal basal and stimulated bile flow, (2) altering bile composition, and (3) changing hepatocyte membrane composition and Na+,K(+)-adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) activity. METHODS: Three groups of piglets were studied: group 1 received sow's milk, groups 2 and 3 received TPN, and group 3 also received 100 mumol.kg-1.day-1 UDCA intravenously. After 3 weeks, basal and stimulated bile flow were measured. Cholesterol, bile acids, phospholipids, and phospholipid fatty acids were analyzed in bile, and fluidity, phospholipid fatty acid composition, and Na+,K(+)-ATPase were analyzed in hepatocyte membranes. RESULTS: Bile acid secretion and basal and stimulated bile flow were similar in control and UDCA-treated animals but reduced to < 50% in the TPN group. Bile acid-dependent and -independent bile flow were lower in the TPN group. UDCA did not normalize abnormalities in TPN-induced bile composition. Sinusoidal but not canalicular membrane fluidity was different in TPN than in control and UDCA-treated animals. UDCA also increased Na+,K(+)-ATPase activity. Bile and membrane phospholipid fatty acids reflected dietary fatty acids. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous UDCA improves bile flow and reduces bilirubin levels in the serum and liver in piglets with TPN-induced cholestasis.