A scoping review of endoscopic and robotic techniques for lateral neck dissection in thyroid cancer.

Introduction: Lateral neck dissection (LND) in thyroid cancer has traditionally been performed by a transcervical technique with a large collar incision. With the rise of endoscopic, video-assisted, and robotic techniques for thyroidectomy, minimally invasive LND is now being performed more frequently, with better cosmetic outcomes. Methods: The purpose of this paper is to review the different minimally invasive and remote access techniques for LND in thyroid cancer. A comprehensive literature review was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar search terms "thyroid cancer" and "lateral neck dissection" and "endoscopy OR robot OR endoscopic OR video-assisted". Results: There are multiple surgical options now available within each subset of endoscopic, video-assisted, and robotic LND. The approach dictates the extent of the LND but almost all techniques access levels II-IV, with variability on levels I and V. This review provides an overview of the indications, contraindications, surgical and oncologic outcomes for each technique. Discussion: Though data remains limited, endoscopic and robotic techniques for LND are safe, with improved cosmetic results and comparable oncologic and surgical outcomes. Similar to patient selection in minimally invasive thyroidectomy, it is important to consider the extent of the LND and select appropriate surgical candidates.

Incidence, Presentation, and Natural History of Adrenal Hemorrhage: An Institutional Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Adrenal hemorrhage (AH) can occur due to multiple etiologies with variable radiographic appearance, often indistinguishable from underlying adrenal neoplasms. There is a lack of AH literature and evidence-based guidelines. Our study aimed to understand the prevalence and etiology of AH, follow-up, and incidence of underlying neoplasm. METHODS: An institutional database was queried from January 2006 to October 2021 for patients with AH on imaging, excluding patients with known malignancies, adrenal masses, or prior adrenal surgery. Demographics, medical history, hematoma size, laterality, biochemical evaluation, intervention, and additional imaging were reviewed. RESULTS: Of 490,301 imaging reports queried, 530 (0.11%) with AH met inclusion criteria. Most imaging (n = 485, 91.5%) was performed during trauma evaluation. Two patients underwent dedicated intervention at presentation. Interval imaging was performed in 114 (21.5%) patients at a median of 2.6 (interquartile range 0.99-13.4) mo, with resolution (n = 84, 73.7%) or decreased size of AH (n = 21, 18.4%) in most patients. Only 10 patients (1.9%) saw an outpatient provider in our system to address AH or evaluate for underlying mass, and 9 (1.7%) underwent biochemical screening. Thirteen patients (11% of 118 patients with any follow-up) had evidence of an adrenal mass, confirmed on serial imaging (n = 10) or adrenalectomy (n = 3). Scans performed for nontrauma indications were significantly more likely to have an underlying mass (n = 6/26 [23.1%]) than those performed for trauma evaluation (n = 7/92 [7.6%], P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: AH is a rare finding associated with an increased rate of underlying adrenal mass, particularly when unrelated to trauma. Most AH resolves spontaneously without intervention. Follow-up imaging at 6 mo can help distinguish mass-associated AH from simple hemorrhage.

Who Serves Where: A Geospatial Analysis of Access to Endocrine Surgeons in the United States and Puerto Rico.

BACKGROUND: The association between surgical volume and patient outcome is well established, with higher case volume associated with a lower risk of complications. We hypothesized that the geographic distribution of endocrine/head and neck surgeons with an endocrine focus in the United States and Puerto Rico may limit access to many potential patients, particularly in rural areas. METHODS: We used web-based directories from the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons, American Head and Neck Society, and the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery to identify endocrine surgery specialists in the United States and Puerto Rico. Using geographic coordinates and OpenStreetMap and Valhalla software, we calculated the areas within a 60-, 90-, or 120-minute driving distance from specialist offices. We used 2020 U.S. Census Data to calculate census tract populations inside or outside the accessible areas. RESULTS: Excluding duplicate providers across organizations, we geocoded 603 specialist addresses in the United States and Puerto. We found that 23.76% (78.3 million) of Americans do not have access to a society-affiliated endocrine/head and neck surgeon with an endocrine focus within a 60-minute drive, 14.37% (47.4 million) within a 90-minute drive, and 8.38% (27.6 million) within a 120-minute drive. We observed that the areas of coverage are primarily focused on metropolitan areas. CONCLUSION: Nearly one-third of Americans do not have access to a society-affiliated endocrine/head and neck surgeon with an endocrine focus within a 1-hour drive, highlighting a concerning geographic barrier to care. Further work is needed to facilitate patient access and mitigate disparities in quality care.

Limited disease progression in endocrine surgery patients with treatment delays due to COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly impacted the delivery of care and timing of elective surgical procedures. Most endocrine-related operations were considered elective and safe to postpone, providing a unique opportunity to assess clinical outcomes under protracted treatment plans. METHODS: American Association of Endocrine Surgeon members were surveyed for participation. A Research Electronic Data Capture survey was developed and distributed to 27 institutions to assess the impact of COVID-19-related delays. The information collected included patient demographics, primary diagnosis, resumption of care, and assessment of disease progression by the surgeon. RESULTS: Twelve out of 27 institutions completed the survey (44.4%). Of 850 patients, 74.8% (636) were female; median age was 56 (interquartile range, 44-66) years. Forty percent (34) of patients had not been seen since their original surgical appointment was delayed; 86.2% (733) of patients had a delay in care with women more likely to have a delay (87.6% vs 82.2% of men, χ2 = 3.84, P = .05). Median duration of delay was 70 (interquartile range, 42-118) days. Among patients with a delay in care, primary disease site included thyroid (54.2%), parathyroid (37.2%), adrenal (6.5%), and pancreatic/gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (1.3%). In addition, 4.0% (26) of patients experienced disease progression and 4.1% (24) had a change from the initial operative plan. The duration of delay was not associated with disease progression (P = .96) or a change in operative plan (P = .66). CONCLUSION: Although some patients experienced disease progression during COVID-19 delays to endocrine disease-related care, most patients with follow-up did not. Our analysis indicated that temporary delay may be an acceptable course of action in extreme circumstances for most endocrine-related surgical disease.

CT of hemorrhagic adrenal adenomas: radiologic-pathologic correlation.

PURPOSE: To describe the appearance of chronically hemorrhagic adenomas on adrenal protocol CT and correlate imaging with pathologic findings. METHODS: Retrospective case series of adult patients with resected adrenal adenomas showing internal hemorrhage at histology. Seven of nine patients underwent pre-operative adrenal protocol CT and 2/7 underwent unenhanced CT with portal venous phase CT. Two abdominal radiologists in consensus assessed the CT images for the presence of calcifications, macroscopic fat, cystic/necrotic appearance, and the presence, pattern, and percent nodule volume of areas < 10 HU on unenhanced CT. Absolute washout was calculated using a large ROI, and ROIs on the highest and lowest attenuating regions on the portal venous phase. RESULTS: Mean adenoma length was 4.9 cm. All adenomas had areas measuring < 10 HU on unenhanced CT, ranging from < 20 to > 80% nodule volume. Calcifications were present in 4/9 adenomas and gross fat in 4/9 on CT. Of the seven cases with adrenal protocol CT, the absolute washout was < 60% in 5/7 using the large ROI, 5/7 using the low attenuation ROI, and 7/7 using the high attenuation ROI. At histology, all nine cases had microscopic evidence of hemorrhage, lipid rich adenoma cells, and fibrosclerosis. Myelolipomatous changes were identified in 4/9 cases, with the remaining five cases showing lipomatous metaplasia without a myeloid component. CONCLUSION: Chronically hemorrhagic adrenal adenomas demonstrated variable areas < 10 HU on unenhanced CT corresponding to lipid rich adenoma cells. Absolute washout was most often < 60%, hypothesized to be due to fibrosclerosis within the adenomas.

Innovations in Parathyroid Localization Imaging.

During cervical surgery, localization and identification of parathyroid glands is key to both the removal of abnormal hyperfunctioning glands and the preservation of normal glands. The challenging nature of parathyroid localization has fostered innovation in imaging techniques to localize glands both before and during cervical operations. Advances in preoperative imaging include PET-based imaging modalities paired with computed tomography or MRI for anatomic correlation. During surgery, both parathyroid autofluorescence and contrast-enhanced fluorescence techniques are useful adjuncts for intraoperative identification.

Anxiety During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Web-Based Survey of Thyroid Cancer Survivors.

OBJECTIVE: Cancer patients and survivors may be disproportionately affected by COVID-19. We sought to determine the effects of the pandemic on thyroid cancer survivors' health care interactions and quality of life. METHODS: An anonymous survey including questions about COVID-19 and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System profile (PROMIS-29, version 2.0) was hosted on the Thyroid Cancer Survivors' Association, Inc website. PROMIS scores were compared to previously published data. Factors associated with greater anxiety were evaluated with univariable and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: From May 6, 2020, to October 8, 2020, 413 participants consented to take the survey; 378 (92%) met the inclusion criteria: diagnosed with thyroid cancer or noninvasive follicular neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features, located within the United States, and completed all sections of the survey. The mean age was 53 years, 89% were women, and 74% had papillary thyroid cancer. Most respondents agreed/strongly agreed (83%) that their lives were very different during the COVID-19 pandemic, as were their interactions with doctors (79%). A minority (43%) were satisfied with the information from their doctor regarding COVID-19 changes. Compared to pre-COVID-19, PROMIS scores were higher for anxiety (57.8 vs 56.5; P < .05) and lower for the ability to participate in social activities (46.2 vs 48.1; P < .01), fatigue (55.8 vs 57.9; P < .01), and sleep disturbance (54.7 vs 56.1; P < .01). After adjusting for confounders, higher anxiety was associated with younger age (P < .01) and change in treatment plan (P = .04). CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, thyroid cancer survivors reported increased anxiety compared to a pre-COVID cohort. To deliver comprehensive care, providers must better understand patient concerns and improve communication about potential changes to treatment plans.

Implications of radiofrequency ablation in patients undergoing thyroid surgery for benign disease in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation is an alternative strategy for the management of benign thyroid conditions. We analyzed the proportion of patients who underwent thyroid surgery for benign conditions who would be potentially eligible for radiofrequency ablation. METHODS: We identified patients who underwent thyroid surgery from 2015 to 2019 at the study institution for Bethesda II cytopathology or toxic adenoma. Patients were considered potentially eligible for radiofrequency ablation if they had a dominant nodule >2 cm with or without compression symptoms, a dominant nodule <2 cm with compression symptoms, or a toxic adenoma. RESULTS: Of 411 patients in total, 284 (69.1%) would be eligible to consider thyroid radiofrequency ablation. In the radiofrequency ablation-eligible group, 20 (7.0%) experienced voice change after surgery, and 2 (0.7%) were dissatisfied or concerned about their scar. In the radiofrequency ablation-eligible group, 70 patients (24.6%) had malignancy diagnosed by final pathology, and 23 patients (8.1%) had cancers that were equal to or larger than 1 cm in size. CONCLUSION: Many patients who undergo surgery for benign thyroid disease could be considered for radiofrequency ablation as an alternative treatment modality. Given the rate of occult malignancy, optimal evaluation of nondominant nodules before radiofrequency ablation and long-term thyroid surveillance for patients who undergo radiofrequency ablation should be further studied.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the practice of endocrine surgery.

BACKGROUND: This study investigates the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on endocrine surgeons. METHODS: A survey on the professional, educational, and clinical impact was sent to active and corresponding members of the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons (AAES) in September 2020. Chi-square and paired t-test were used for analysis. RESULTS: 77 surgeons responded (14.8 %). All reported suspension of elective surgeries; 37.7 % were reassigned to other duties during this time. The median number of cases backlogged was 30 (IQR 15-50). Most surgeons reported decreased clinical volume (74.6 %). The use of virtual platforms for clinical and educational purposes increased from pre-COVID-19 levels (all p < 0.001). Use of in-office procedures (p < 0.001) and length of observation prior to discharge for thyroid surgery (p < 0.05) decreased. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic led to suspension of operations and decreased practice volume for endocrine surgeons. Surgeons increased use of virtual platforms, decreased in-office procedures, and decreased duration of observation for thyroid surgery in response.

A cost-utility analysis of 18F-fluorocholine-positron emission tomography imaging for localizing primary hyperparathyroidism in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Primary hyperparathyroidism historically necessitated bilateral neck exploration to remove abnormal parathyroid tissue. Improved localization allows for focused parathyroidectomy with lower complication risks. Recently, positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 18F-fluorocholine demonstrated high accuracy in detecting these lesions, but its cost-effectiveness has not been studied in the United States. METHODS: A decision tree modeled patients who underwent parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism using single preoperative localization modalities: (1) positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 18F-fluorocholine, (2) 4-dimensional computed tomography, (3) ultrasound, and (4) sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). All patients underwent either focused parathyroidectomy versus bilateral neck exploration, with associated cost ($) and clinical outcomes measured in quality-adjusted life-years gained. Model parameters were informed by literature review and Medicare costs. Incremental cost-utility ratios were calculated in US dollars/quality-adjusted life-years gained, with a willingness-to-pay threshold set at $100,000/quality-adjusted life-year. One-way, 2-way, and threshold sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 18F-fluorocholine gained the most quality-adjusted life-years (23.9) and was the costliest ($2,096), with a total treatment cost of $11,245 or $470/quality-adjusted life-year gained. Sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography and ultrasound were dominated strategies. Compared with 4-dimentional computed tomography, the incremental cost-utility ratio for positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 18F-fluorocholine was $91,066/quality-adjusted life-year gained in our base case analysis, which was below the willingness-to-pay threshold. In 1-way sensitivity analysis, the incremental cost-utility ratio was sensitive to test accuracy, positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 18F-fluorocholine price, postoperative complication probabilities, proportion of bilateral neck exploration patients needing overnight hospitalization, and life expectancy. CONCLUSION: Our model elucidates scenarios in which positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 18F-fluorocholine can potentially be a cost-effective imaging option for primary hyperparathyroidism in the United States. Further investigation is needed to determine the maximal cost-effectiveness for positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 18F-fluorocholine in selected populations.

Superior sensitivity of 18F-fluorocholine: PET localization in primary hyperparathyroidism.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative parathyroid imaging guides surgeons during parathyroidectomy. This study evaluates the clinical impact of 18F-fluorocholine positron emission tomography for preoperative parathyroid localization on patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. METHODS: Patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and indications for parathyroidectomy had simultaneous 18F-fluorocholine positron emission tomography imaging/magnetic resonance imaging. In patients who underwent subsequent parathyroidectomy, cure was based on lab values at least 6 months after surgery. Location-based sensitivity and specificity of 18F-fluorocholine positron emission tomography imaging was assessed using 3 anatomic locations (left neck, right neck, and mediastinum), with surgery as the gold standard. RESULTS: In 101 patients, 18F-fluorocholine positron emission tomography localized at least 1 candidate lesion in 93% of patients overall and in 91% of patients with previously negative imaging, leading to a change in preoperative strategy in 60% of patients. Of 76 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy, 58 (77%) had laboratory data at least 6 months postoperatively, with 55/58 patients (95%) demonstrating cure. 18F-fluorocholine positron emission tomography successfully guided curative surgery in 48/58 (83%) patients, compared with 20/57 (35%) based on ultrasound and 13/55 (24%) based on sestamibi. In a location-based analysis, sensitivity of 18F-fluorocholine positron emission tomography (88.9%) outperformed both ultrasound (37.1%) and sestamibi (27.5%), as well as ultrasound and sestamibi combined (47.8%). CONCLUSION: Long-term results in the first cohort in the United States to use 18F-fluorocholine positron emission tomography for parathyroid localization confirm its utility in a challenging cohort, with better sensitivity than ultrasound or sestamibi.

PTH after Thyroidectomy as a Predictor of Post-Operative Hypocalcemia.

Post-thyroidectomy hypocalcemia is a frequent complication with significant morbidity, and has been shown to increase hospital stay and readmission rates. The evaluation of serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels after thyroidectomy represents a reliable method to predict post-thyroidectomy hypocalcemia, but it remains infrequently used. This retrospective study investigates serum PTH values 3 h after thyroidectomy as a predictor of hypocalcemia. In this study, we enrolled 141 patients aged between 27 and 71 years eligible for total thyroidectomy who presented with multinodular goiter, suspicious nodule on cytological examination, Graves' disease, or toxic multinodular goiter. Three hours after total thyroidectomy, 53 patients (37.6%) showed a reduction in serum PTH. Of these patients 75.5% developed hypocalcemia by 24 h after surgery and 100% were hypocalcemic after 48 h (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference attributable to the different thyroid diseases, nor to the age of the patients. PTH at 3 h after total thyroidectomy accurately predicts post-operative hypocalcemia. The early detection of patients at risk of developing post-operative hypocalcemia allows for prompt supplementation of calcium and Vitamin D in order to prevent symptoms and allows for a safe and timely discharge.

Accuracy of 18F-Fluorocholine PET for the Detection of Parathyroid Adenomas: Prospective Single-Center Study.

The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the correct localization rate (CLR) of 18F-fluorocholine PET for the detection of parathyroid adenomas in comparison to 99mTc-sestamibi imaging. Methods: This was a single-arm prospective trial. Ninety-eight patients with biochemical evidence of primary hyperparathyroidism were imaged before parathyroidectomy using 18F-fluorocholine PET/MRI. 99mTc-sestamibi imaging performed separately from the study was evaluated for comparison. The primary endpoint of the study was the CLR on a patient level. Each imaging study was interpreted by 3 masked readers on a per-region basis. Lesions were validated by histopathologic analysis of surgical specimens. Results: Of the 98 patients who underwent 18F-fluorocholine PET, 77 subsequently underwent parathyroidectomy and 60 of those had 99mTc-sestamibi imaging. For 18F-fluorocholine PET in patients who underwent parathyroidectomy, the CLR based on the masked reader consensus was 75% (95% CI, 0.63-0.82). In patients who underwent surgery and had an available 99mTc-sestamibi study, the CLR increased from 17% (95% CI, 0.10-0.27) for 99mTc-sestamibi imaging to 70% (95% CI, 0.59-0.79) for 18F-fluorocholine PET. Conclusion: In this prospective study using masked readers, the CLR for 18F-fluorocholine PET was 75%. In patients with a paired 99mTc-sestamibi study, the use of 18F-fluorocholine PET increased the CLR from 17% to 70%. 18F-fluorocholine PET is a superior imaging modality for the localization of parathyroid adenomas.

The effect of chronic kidney disease on intraoperative parathyroid hormone: A linear mixed model analysis.

BACKGROUND: Reduced creatinine clearance is an indication for surgery in asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism, and a significant proportion of patients undergoing parathyroidectomy have chronic kidney disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the kinetics of intraoperative parathyroid hormone decline during parathyroidectomy in patients who have chronic kidney disease compared with those with who have normal renal function. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective study of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism undergoing parathyroidectomy (n = 646). Patients were grouped based on estimated glomerular filtration rate greater than (normal renal function) or less than (chronic kidney disease) 60 mL/min/1.73m2. All patients had intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring and ≥6-month postoperative serum studies to confirm surgical cure. Intraoperative parathyroid hormone kinetic curves were analyzed using a linear mixed model. RESULTS: Despite similar pre-excision values, patients with chronic kidney disease had significantly higher intraoperative parathyroid hormone values at 5 minutes (76 vs 58 pg/mL, P = .02) and 10 minutes (54 vs 37 pg/mL, P = .004) postexcision. No significant difference was observed in whether patients met Miami criterion by 5 minutes (chronic kidney disease 71%, normal renal function 78%, P = .255) or by 10 minutes (chronic kidney disease 95%, normal renal function 96%, P = .751) postexcision. Using a linear mixed model, glomerular filtration rate did not have a significant effect on the change in intraoperative parathyroid hormone over time. CONCLUSION: Patients with chronic kidney disease had significantly higher postexcision intraoperative parathyroid hormone levels. However, renal function did not affect the change in intraoperative parathyroid hormone over time, nor did renal function ultimately affect the likelihood of meeting the Miami criterion. Intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring remains useful in this population, although additional time points may be needed to observe normalization of values.