Evaluation of the genotoxicity of cell phone radiofrequency radiation in male and female rats and mice following subchronic exposure.

The National Toxicology Program tested two common radiofrequency radiation (RFR) modulations emitted by cellular telephones in a 2-year rodent cancer bioassay that included interim assessments of additional animals for genotoxicity endpoints. Male and female Hsd:Sprague Dawley SD rats and B6C3F1/N mice were exposed from Gestation day 5 or Postnatal day 35, respectively, to code division multiple access (CDMA) or global system for mobile modulations over 18 hr/day, at 10-min intervals, in reverberation chambers at specific absorption rates of 1.5, 3, or 6 W/kg (rats, 900 MHz) or 2.5, 5, or 10 W/kg (mice, 1,900 MHz). After 19 (rats) or 14 (mice) weeks of exposure, animals were examined for evidence of RFR-associated genotoxicity using two different measures. Using the alkaline (pH > 13) comet assay, DNA damage was assessed in cells from three brain regions, liver cells, and peripheral blood leukocytes; using the micronucleus assay, chromosomal damage was assessed in immature and mature peripheral blood erythrocytes. Results of the comet assay showed significant increases in DNA damage in the frontal cortex of male mice (both modulations), leukocytes of female mice (CDMA only), and hippocampus of male rats (CDMA only). Increases in DNA damage judged to be equivocal were observed in several other tissues of rats and mice. No significant increases in micronucleated red blood cells were observed in rats or mice. In conclusion, these results suggest that exposure to RFR is associated with an increase in DNA damage. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 61:276-290, 2020. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Comparison of invasive and non-invasive pressure gradients in aortic arch obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Aortic arch obstruction can be evaluated by catheter peak-to-peak gradient or by Doppler peak instantaneous pressure gradient. Previous studies have shown moderate correlation in discrete coarctation, but few have assessed correlation in patients with more complex aortic reconstruction. METHODS: We carried out retrospective comparison of cardiac catheterisations and pre- and post-catheterisation echocardiograms in 60 patients with native/recurrent coarctation or aortic reconstruction. Aortic arch obstruction was defined as peak-to-peak gradient ⩾25 mmHg in patients with native/recurrent coarctation and ⩾10 mmHg in aortic reconstruction. RESULTS: Diastolic continuation of flow was not associated with aortic arch obstruction in either group. Doppler peak instantaneous pressure gradient, with and without the expanded Bernoulli equation, weakly correlated with peak-to-peak gradient even in patients with a normal cardiac index (r=0.36, p=0.016, and r=0.49, p=0.001, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified an area under the curve of 0.61 for patients with all types of obstruction, with a cut-off point of 45 mmHg correctly classifying 64% of patients with arch obstruction (sensitivity 39%, specificity 89%). In patients with aortic arch reconstruction who had a cardiac index ⩾3 L/min/m², a cut-off point of 23 mmHg correctly classified 69% of patients (71% sensitivity, 50% specificity) with an area under the curve of 0.82. CONCLUSION: The non-invasive assessment of aortic obstruction remains challenging. The greatest correlation of Doppler indices was noted in patients with aortic reconstruction and a normal cardiac index.

A strategy for atrial septal defect closure in small children that eliminates long-term wall erosion risk.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate feasibility, efficacy, and safety of an approach to atrial septal defect (ASD) occlusion in children ≤20 kg that eliminates cardiac wall erosion risk. BACKGROUND: Cardiac wall erosion is a potentially catastrophic complication of ASD device closure. The HELEX Septal Occluder (HSO) is a compliant device with no reports of erosion. The HSO is technically difficult to deploy in smaller children and cannot be used to close larger defects. To eliminate wall erosion risk, we use the HSO when feasible and surgery for larger defects. METHODS: Retrospective review of ASD procedures performed in children ≤20 kg. RESULTS: Between January 2006 and January 2011, 60 children underwent ASD closure. HSO placement was successful in 32 of 34 patients, and surgical closure was successful in all of 28 patients. Surgical patients were younger (35.1 ± 12.6 vs. 47.4 ± 15.3 months, P < 0.01) and smaller (15.3 ± 3.2 vs. 12.6 ± 4.3 kg; P < 0.01) with larger ASDs (15.8 ± 4.5 vs. 9.8 ± 3.0 mm; P < 0.01). No surgical patients demonstrated residual leak. Residual leak was seen in 14 of 32 (44%) HSO patients on postprocedure day #1 and in 1 of 26 (3.8%) with ≥6 months follow-up. Indications for surgery included: deficient inferior/superior rims (n = 17), provider preference (n = 2), and HSO device not feasible (n = 9). Serious adverse events included device embolization with percutaneous retrieval (n = 1) and postpericardiotomy syndrome without intervention (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: The HSO can be safely used in most children ≤20 kg. Our approach to ASD closure is associated with minimal morbidity and good short-term results. This approach requires no more than a 15% increase in surgical referrals and eliminates risk of cardiac wall erosion.