Exploring Gut Microbiota Alterations with Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole and Dexamethasone in a Humanized Microbiome Mouse Model.

Along with the standard therapies for glioblastoma, patients are commonly prescribed trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) and dexamethasone for preventing infections and reducing cerebral edema, respectively. Because the gut microbiota impacts the efficacy of cancer therapies, it is important to understand how these medications impact the gut microbiota of patients. Using mice that have been colonized with human microbiota, this study sought to examine how TMP-SMX and dexamethasone affect the gut microbiome. Two lines of humanized microbiota (HuM) Rag1-/- mice, HuM1Rag and HuM2Rag, were treated with either TMP-SMX or dexamethasone via oral gavage once a day for a week. Fecal samples were collected pre-treatment (pre-txt), one week after treatment initiation (1 wk post txt), and three weeks post-treatment (3 wk post txt), and bacterial DNA was analyzed using 16S rRNA-sequencing. The HuM1Rag mice treated with TMP-SMX had significant shifts in alpha diversity, beta diversity, and functional pathways at all time points, whereas in the HuM2Rag mice, it resulted in minimal changes in the microbiome. Likewise, dexamethasone treatment resulted in significant changes in the microbiome of the HuM1Rag mice, whereas the microbiome of the HuM2Rag mice was mostly unaffected. The results of our study show that routine medications used during glioblastoma treatment can perturb gut microbiota, with some microbiome compositions being more sensitive than others, and these treatments could potentially affect the overall efficacy of standard-of-care therapy.

Evaluation of tissue- and plasma-derived tumor mutational burden (TMB) and genomic alterations of interest in CheckMate 848, a study of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab and nivolumab alone in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors with high TMB.

BACKGROUND: An accumulation of somatic mutations in tumors leads to increased neoantigen levels and antitumor immune response. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) reflects the rate of somatic mutations in the tumor genome, as determined from tumor tissue (tTMB) or blood (bTMB). While high tTMB is a biomarker of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment efficacy, few studies have explored the clinical utility of bTMB, a less invasive alternative for TMB assessment. Establishing the correlation between tTMB and bTMB would provide insight into whether bTMB is a potential substitute for tTMB. We explored the tumor genomes of patients enrolled in CheckMate 848 with measurable TMB. The correlation between tTMB and bTMB, and the factors affecting it, were evaluated. METHODS: In the phase 2 CheckMate 848 (NCT03668119) study, immuno-oncology-naïve patients with advanced, metastatic, or unresectable solid tumors and tTMB-high or bTMB-high (≥10 mut/Mb) were prospectively randomized 2:1 to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab monotherapy. Tissue and plasma DNA sequencing was performed using the Foundation Medicine FoundationOne CDx and bTMB Clinical Trial Assays, respectively. tTMB was quantified from coding variants, insertions, and deletions, and bTMB from somatic base substitutions. Correlations between tTMB and bTMB were determined across samples and with respect to maximum somatic allele frequency (MSAF). Assay agreement and variant composition were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 1,438 and 1,720 unique tissue and blood samples, respectively, were obtained from 1,954 patients and included >100 screened disease ontologies, with 1,017 unique pairs of tTMB and bTMB measurements available for assessment. Median tTMB and bTMB were 3.8 and 3.5 mut/Mb, respectively. A significant correlation between tTMB and bTMB (r=0.48, p<0.0001) was observed across all sample pairs, which increased to r=0.54 (p<0.0001) for samples with MSAF≥1%. Assay concordance was highest for samples with MSAF≥10% across multiple disease ontologies and observed for both responders and non-responders to ICI therapy. The variants contributing to tTMB and bTMB were similar. CONCLUSIONS: We observed that tTMB and bTMB had a statistically significant correlation, particularly for samples with high MSAF, and that this correlation applied across disease ontologies. Further investigation into the clinical utility of bTMB is warranted.

Fibrotic activity quantified in serum by measurements of type III collagen pro-peptides can be used for prognosis across different solid tumor types.

Due to activation of fibroblast into cancer-associated fibroblasts, there is often an increased deposition of extracellular matrix and fibrillar collagens, e.g. type III collagen, in the tumor microenvironment (TME) that leads to tumor fibrosis (desmoplasia). Tumor fibrosis is closely associated with treatment response and poor prognosis for patients with solid tumors. To assure that the best possible treatment option is provided for patients, there is medical need for identifying patients with high (or low) fibrotic activity in the TME. Measuring unique collagen fragments such as the pro-peptides released into the bloodstream during fibrillar collagen deposition in the TME can provide a non-invasive measure of the fibrotic activity. Based on data from 8 previously published cohorts, this review provides insight into the prognostic value of quantifying tumor fibrosis by measuring the pro-peptide of type III collagen in serum of a total of 1692 patients with different solid tumor types and discusses the importance of tumor fibrosis for understanding prognosis and for potentially guiding future drug development efforts that aim at overcoming the poor outcome associated with a fibrotic TME.

Development and Performance of a CD8 Gene Signature for Characterizing Inflammation in the Tumor Microenvironment across Multiple Tumor Types.

Across multiple tumor types, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated clinical benefit to patients with cancer, yet there is a need to identify predictive biomarkers of response to these therapies. A multiparameter gene expression profiling-based tumor inflammation assay may offer robust characterization of the tumor microenvironment, thereby extending the utility of single-gene analysis or immunohistochemistry (IHC) in predicting response to ICIs. The authors interrogated 1778 commercially procured, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples using gene expression profiling and pathology-assisted digital CD8 IHC. A machine-learning approach was used to develop gene expression signatures that predicted CD8+ immune cell abundance as surrogates for tumor inflammation in melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck samples. An assay for a 16-gene CD8 signature was developed and analytically validated across 12 tumor types. CD8 signature scores correlated with CD8 IHC in a platform-independent manner, and inflammation prevalence was similar between assay methods for all tumor types except prostate cancer and small cell lung cancer. In retrospective analyses, CD8 signature scores were associated with progression-free survival and overall survival with nivolumab in patients with urothelial carcinoma from CheckMate 275. This study demonstrated that the CD8 signature assay can be used to accurately quantify CD8+ immune cell abundance in the tumor microenvironment and has potential clinical utility for determining patients with cancer likely to respond to ICIs.

Bioinformatic Methods and Bridging of Assay Results for Reliable Tumor Mutational Burden Assessment in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Tumor mutational burden (TMB) has emerged as a clinically relevant biomarker that may be associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy. Standardization of TMB measurement is essential for implementing diagnostic tools to guide treatment. OBJECTIVE: Here we describe the in-depth evaluation of bioinformatic TMB analysis by whole exome sequencing (WES) in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples from a phase III clinical trial. METHODS: In the CheckMate 026 clinical trial, TMB was retrospectively assessed in 312 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (58% of the intent-to-treat population) who received first-line nivolumab treatment or standard-of-care chemotherapy. We examined the sensitivity of TMB assessment to bioinformatic filtering methods and assessed concordance between TMB data derived by WES and the FoundationOne® CDx assay. RESULTS: TMB scores comprising synonymous, indel, frameshift, and nonsense mutations (all mutations) were 3.1-fold higher than data including missense mutations only, but values were highly correlated (Spearman's r = 0.99). Scores from CheckMate 026 samples including missense mutations only were similar to those generated from data in The Cancer Genome Atlas, but those including all mutations were generally higher. Using databases for germline subtraction (instead of matched controls) showed a trend for race-dependent increases in TMB scores. WES and FoundationOne CDx outputs were highly correlated (Spearman's r = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Parameter variation can impact TMB calculations, highlighting the need for standardization. Encouragingly, differences between assays could be accounted for by empirical calibration, suggesting that reliable TMB assessment across assays, platforms, and centers is achievable.

First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (CheckMate 568): Outcomes by Programmed Death Ligand 1 and Tumor Mutational Burden as Biomarkers.

PURPOSE: CheckMate 568 is an open-label phase II trial that evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus low-dose ipilimumab as first-line treatment of advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We assessed the association of efficacy with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred eighty-eight patients with previously untreated, recurrent stage IIIB/IV NSCLC received nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) in patients with 1% or more and less than 1% tumor PD-L1 expression. Efficacy on the basis of TMB (FoundationOne CDx assay) was a secondary end point. RESULTS: Of treated patients with tumor available for testing, 252 patients (88%) of 288 were evaluable for PD-L1 expression and 98 patients (82%) of 120 for TMB. ORR was 30% overall and 41% and 15% in patients with 1% or greater and less than 1% tumor PD-L1 expression, respectively. ORR increased with higher TMB, plateauing at 10 or more mutations/megabase (mut/Mb). Regardless of PD-L1 expression, ORRs were higher in patients with TMB of 10 or more mut/Mb (n = 48: PD-L1, ≥ 1%, 48%; PD-L1, < 1%, 47%) versus TMB of fewer than 10 mut/Mb (n = 50: PD-L1, ≥ 1%, 18%; PD-L1, < 1%, 5%), and progression-free survival was longer in patients with TMB of 10 or more mut/Mb versus TMB of fewer than 10 mut/Mb (median, 7.1 v 2.6 months). Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 29% of patients. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab plus low-dose ipilimumab was effective and tolerable as a first-line treatment of advanced/metastatic NSCLC. TMB of 10 or more mut/Mb was associated with improved response and prolonged progression-free survival in both tumor PD-L1 expression 1% or greater and less than 1% subgroups and was thus identified as a potentially relevant cutoff in the assessment of TMB as a biomarker for first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab.

After 50 years, a personal reflection on the development of internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafting.

It has been 50 years since the first publications of evidence that internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafts successfully bypassed obstructions of coronary arteries in dogs and in humans. The evidence consisted of in vivo measurements of blood flow through the grafts and selective angiograms of the grafts months following operation. It may be of interest to recount how that success came about.

Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Lung Cancer with a High Tumor Mutational Burden.

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab showed promising efficacy for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a phase 1 trial, and tumor mutational burden has emerged as a potential biomarker of benefit. In this part of an open-label, multipart, phase 3 trial, we examined progression-free survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy among patients with a high tumor mutational burden (≥10 mutations per megabase). METHODS: We enrolled patients with stage IV or recurrent NSCLC that was not previously treated with chemotherapy. Those with a level of tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of at least 1% were randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1 ratio, to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab monotherapy, or chemotherapy; those with a tumor PD-L1 expression level of less than 1% were randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1 ratio, to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy. Tumor mutational burden was determined by the FoundationOne CDx assay. RESULTS: Progression-free survival among patients with a high tumor mutational burden was significantly longer with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with chemotherapy. The 1-year progression-free survival rate was 42.6% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus 13.2% with chemotherapy, and the median progression-free survival was 7.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.5 to 13.2) versus 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.4 to 5.8) (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.58; 97.5% CI, 0.41 to 0.81; P<0.001). The objective response rate was 45.3% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 26.9% with chemotherapy. The benefit of nivolumab plus ipilimumab over chemotherapy was broadly consistent within subgroups, including patients with a PD-L1 expression level of at least 1% and those with a level of less than 1%. The rate of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was 31.2% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 36.1% with chemotherapy. ical; CheckMate 227 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02477826 .). CONCLUSIONS: Progression-free survival was significantly longer with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with chemotherapy among patients with NSCLC and a high tumor mutational burden, irrespective of PD-L1 expression level. The results validate the benefit of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in NSCLC and the role of tumor mutational burden as a biomarker for patient selection. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceut

Comparative assessment of clinical response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis between PF-05280586, a proposed rituximab biosimilar, and rituximab.

AIMS: To evaluate potential differences between PF-05280586 and rituximab sourced from the European Union (rituximab-EU) and USA (rituximab-US) in clinical response (Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints [DAS28] and American College of Rheumatology [ACR] criteria), as part of the overall biosimilarity assessment of PF-05280586. METHODS: A randomised, double-blind, pharmacokinetic similarity trial was conducted in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy on a background of methotrexate. Patients were treated with 1000 mg of PF-05280586, rituximab-EU or rituximab-US on days 1 and 15 and followed over 24 weeks for pharmacokinetic, clinical response and safety assessments. Key secondary end points were the areas under effect curves for DAS28 and ACR responses. Mean differences in areas under effect curves were compared against respective reference ranges established by observed rituximab-EU and rituximab-US responses using longitudinal nonlinear mixed effects models. RESULTS: The analysis included 214 patients. Demographics were similar across groups with exceptions in some baseline disease characteristics. Baseline imbalances and group-to-group variation were accounted for by covariate effects in each model. Predictions from the DAS28 and ACR models tracked the central tendency and distribution of observations well. No point estimates of mean differences were outside the reference range for DAS28 or ACR scores. The probabilities that the predicted differences between PF-05280586 vs. rituximab-EU or rituximab-US lie outside the reference ranges were low. CONCLUSIONS: No clinically meaningful differences were detected in DAS28 or ACR response between PF-05280586 and rituximab-EU or rituximab-US as the differences were within the pre-specified reference ranges. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01526057.

A phase I pharmacokinetics trial comparing PF-05280586 (a potential biosimilar) and rituximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.

AIMS: Pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity was assessed among PF-05280586 (a proposed biosimilar) vs. rituximab sourced from the European Union (rituximab-EU) and the United States (rituximab-US). Pharmacodynamics (PD), overall safety and immunogenicity were also evaluated. METHODS: Patients with active rheumatoid arthritis on a background of methotrexate and inadequate response to one or more tumour necrosis factor antagonist therapies were randomized to intravenous PF-05280586, rituximab-EU or rituximab-US 1000 mg doses on study days 1 and 15. RESULTS: A total of 220 patients were randomized to receive study treatment as assigned. Of these, 198 met per-protocol population criteria for inclusion in the PK data analysis. PF-05280586, rituximab-EU and rituximab-US exhibited similar PK profiles following administration of assigned study drug on days 1 and 15. The 90% confidence intervals of test-to-reference ratios for Cmax , AUCT , AUC0-∞ and AUC2-week were within the bioequivalence margin of 80.00-125.00% for comparisons of PF-05280586 with rituximab-EU, PF-05280586 with rituximab-US, and rituximab-EU with rituximab-US. All treatments resulted in a rapid and profound reduction in CD19+ B cells and sustained profound B cell suppression up to week 25. The incidence of antidrug antibody (ADA) response (n = 7, 10 and 9 for PF-05280586, rituximab-EU and rituximab-US, respectively), time to ADA emergence and ADA titres were similar across treatments. None of the ADA-positive samples was positive for neutralizing activity. No clinically meaningful differences in adverse events were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated PK similarity among PF-05280586, rituximab-EU and rituximab-US. In addition, all treatments showed comparable CD19+ B cell depletion PD responses, as well as safety and immunogenicity profiles.

Amidation inhibitors 4-phenyl-3-butenoic acid and 5-(acetylamino)-4-oxo-6-phenyl-2-hexenoic acid methyl ester are novel HDAC inhibitors with anti-tumorigenic properties.

4-Phenyl-3-butenoic acid (PBA) is an inhibitor of peptidylglycine alpha-amidating monooxygenase with anti-inflammatory properties that has been shown to inhibit the growth of ras-mutated epithelial and human lung carcinoma cells. In this report, we show that PBA also increases the acetylation levels of selected histone subtypes in a dose and time dependent manner, an effect that is attributable to the inhibition of histone deacetylase (HDAC) enzymes. Comparison studies with the known HDAC inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) using high resolution two-dimensional polyacrylamide gels and Western analysis provide evidence that PBA acts as an HDAC inhibitor within cells. PBA and a more potent amidation inhibitor, 5-(acetylamino)-4-oxo-6-phenyl-2-hexenoic acid methyl ester (AOPHA-Me), inhibit HDAC enzymes in vitro at micromolar concentrations, with IC50 values approximately 30 fold lower for AOPHA-Me than PBA for selected HDAC isoforms. Overall, these results indicate that PBA and AOPHA-Me are novel anti-tumorigenic HDAC inhibitors.

Comparison of KRAS genotype: therascreen assay vs. LNA-mediated qPCR clamping assay.

BACKGROUND: Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS) wild-type status determined using a locked nucleic acid (LNA)-mediated quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) clamping assay (LNA assay) predicted response to therapy in the CRYSTAL (Cetuximab Combined With Irinotecan in First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer) study. A companion KRAS diagnostic tool has been developed for routine clinical use (QIAGEN therascreen kit) (QIAGEN Manchester Ltd, Manchester, UK). We wanted to assess the concordance between the validated US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therascreen assay and the LNA assay in determining the KRAS status of a subset of patients enrolled in the CRYSTAL study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: DNA extracted from paraffin-embedded tumor sections was tested for KRAS status using the therascreen assay. Efficacy data from the CRYSTAL study were assessed to determine if the overall survival (OS) hazard ratio for cetuximab in patients identified as having KRAS wild-type status using the therascreen assay was equivalent to that in patients identified as KRAS wild-type using the LNA assay. This was determined by assessing if the concordance between the therascreen assay and the LNA assay met the minimum threshold (prespecified as 0.8) to achieve a significant difference in the OS hazard ratio in favor of the cetuximab + FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin [folinic acid], irinotecan) arm in the KRAS wild-type population as identified using the therascreen assay. RESULTS: Of the 148 samples determined to be KRAS wild-type (therascreen assay), 141 (95.3%) samples were also KRAS wild-type (LNA assay) and 7 samples (4.7%) were KRAS mutant (LNA assay). The prespecified primary concordance measure p was 141/148 = 0.953 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.905-0.981). The concordance was statistically significantly higher than the prespecified threshold of 0.8 for concordance between the therascreen assay and the LNA assay. Consistent with the concordance exceeding the prespecified threshold, the OS hazard ratio (cetuximab + FOLFIRI arm vs. FOLFIRI arm) in the KRAS wild-type population, determined by the therascreen assay, supported a significant benefit for cetuximab (ie, the 95% CI excluded 1) and was comparable to the OS hazard ratio observed in the CRYSTAL study KRAS wild-type population (LNA assay) even after adjustment for potentially confounding baseline variables. CONCLUSION: These results support the utility of the therascreen assay for identifying patients who may benefit from cetuximab therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Results of a phase IIa study of VX-809, an investigational CFTR corrector compound, in subjects with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the F508del-CFTR mutation.

BACKGROUND: VX-809, a cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator, has been shown to increase the cell surface density of functional F508del-CFTR in vitro. METHODS: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the safety, tolerability and pharmacodynamics of VX-809 in adult patients with cystic fibrosis (n=89) who were homozygous for the F508del-CFTR mutation. Subjects were randomised to one of four VX-809 28 day dose groups (25, 50, 100 and 200 mg) or matching placebo. RESULTS: The type and incidence of adverse events were similar among VX-809- and placebo-treated subjects. Respiratory events were the most commonly reported and led to discontinuation by one subject in each active treatment arm. Pharmacokinetic data supported a once-daily oral dosing regimen. Pharmacodynamic data suggested that VX-809 improved CFTR function in at least one organ (sweat gland). VX-809 reduced elevated sweat chloride values in a dose-dependent manner (p=0.0013) that was statistically significant in the 100 and 200 mg dose groups. There was no statistically significant improvement in CFTR function in the nasal epithelium as measured by nasal potential difference, nor were there statistically significant changes in lung function or patient-reported outcomes. No maturation of immature F508del-CFTR was detected in the subgroup that provided rectal biopsy specimens. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, VX-809 had a similar adverse event profile to placebo for 28 days in F508del-CFTR homozygous patients, and demonstrated biological activity with positive impact on CFTR function in the sweat gland. Additional data are needed to determine how improvements detected in CFTR function secondary to VX-809 in the sweat gland relate to those measurable in the respiratory tract and to long-term measures of clinical benefit. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT00865904.

Predicting prostate biopsy result in men with prostate specific antigen 2.0 to 10.0 ng/ml using an investigational prostate cancer methylation assay.

PURPOSE: The inadequacies of prostate specific antigen testing have created a need for novel markers for prostate cancer screening. The investigational ProCaM™ prostate cancer methylation assay detects aberrant methylation of DNA in cells associated with prostate cancer. We describe a large, prospective, multicenter study done to verify the performance of this assay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The assay is designed to detect epigenetic modifications in the 3 markers GSTP1, RARß2 and APC, which are indicative of prostate cancer. A total of 232 men with cancer and 283 without cancer from 18 clinical sites were evaluated by trained operators at central testing laboratories. Study inclusion criteria were age 40 to 75 years, total prostate specific antigen between 2.0 and 10.0 ng/ml, and a digital rectal examination result. All participants signed an informed consent form and underwent transrectal ultrasound guided needle biopsy with 10 or more cores. RESULTS: Assay sensitivity was 60%, specificity was 80% and the informative rate was 97%. Assay predictive accuracy was higher than that of age, digital rectal examination, family history, prostate specific antigen, prior negative biopsy and prostate volume (AUC 0.73 vs 0.52 to 0.66, p <0.038). Risk factors plus the assay improved overall predictive power (AUC 0.79, p = 0.001). A man with a positive prostate cancer methylation result was 7.7 times more likely to have high grade cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The prostate cancer methylation assay correlated with positive biopsy and with Gleason score. This assay has the potential to add value to the biopsy decision making process by improving current prostate cancer screening algorithms to more accurately identify men with prostate cancer.

Development of albumin microspheres containing Sp H1-DNA complexes: a novel gene delivery system.

This study investigated the stability and transfection efficiency of plasmid DNA (pDNA) and sea urchin sperm histone H1 (Sp H1) complexes embedded in albumin microsphere formulations. Sp H1 increased the stability and transfection efficiency of pDNA, while providing a favourable sustained pDNA release profile. Encapsulating Sp H1-complexed pDNA into albumin microspheres further protected the pDNA from physical stress and heparin treatment. When compared with free pDNA encapsulated in albumin microspheres, the Sp H1-pDNA microsphere formulations exhibited decreased hydrophilicity, slower pDNA release profiles, protection against heparin-induced degradation of embedded pDNA and increased stability against physical stress. These results indicate that complex formation of pDNA with Sp H1 facilitates intracellular DNA transfer and that albumin microspheres-Sp H1-pDNA gene delivery formulations are suitable for controlled-release delivery of pDNA while offering protection of the pDNA from degradation and maintaining pDNA biological activity.

The utility of rapid diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer using a multiplex real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay.

BACKGROUND: Lymph node metastasis is the most important prognostic factor in gastric cancer. However, diagnosis by hematoxylin and eosin staining or immunohistochemistry is not always sufficient for the detection of cancer cells because only representative number of slices are examined. Cancer cells may, therefore, be missed by traditional histological methods. Recently, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) methods have been introduced for improved detection of cancer cells. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of a prototype RT-PCR assay run on the Cepheid SmartCycler system compared to conventional RT-PCR using the LightCycler system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-seven overt metastatic lymph nodes from 8 patients with advanced gastric cancer and 22 benign lymph nodes from patients without malignant tumor who received surgery were obtained with informed consent. We examined the lymph nodes by RT-PCR, using markers for CEA and CK19 and the LightCycler and SmartCycler systems. RESULTS: In the singlex assay, the sensitivity of CEA and CK19 was 91.5 and 70.2% in the LightCycler system, and 97.9 and 95.7% in the SmartCycler system, respectively. In the multiplex assay, the sensitivity was 91.5% in the LightCycler system and 100% in the SmartCycler system, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this study, rapid diagnosis using RT-PCR by the SmartCycler system had higher accuracy for detecting lymph node metastasis than the conventional LightCycler system. The SmartCycler system is more effective for the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer when run with the prototype assay.

Multicenter evaluation of an investigational prostate cancer methylation assay.

PURPOSE: Prostate specific antigen tests have low specificity, which frequently results in unnecessary biopsy and typically limits screening to patients with prostate specific antigen greater than 4.0 ng/ml. We evaluated an investigational prostate cancer methylation specific polymerase chain reaction assay that detects aberrant methylation in 3 markers (GSTP1, RARbeta2 and APC) that indicate the presence of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The assay was evaluated in 337 post-digital rectal examination urine samples (178 cancer and 159 noncancer) collected prospectively at a total of 9 clinical sites. Samples were processed wholly or after division into equal portions. Subject prostate specific antigen was 2.0 to 10.0 ng/ml. All subjects underwent transrectal ultrasound guided needle biopsy with 6 or greater cores sampled. Detection of 1 or greater markers indicated positivity. RESULTS: Methylation specific polymerase chain reaction assay performance was better in whole than in divided urine cohorts (p = 0.035). Assay AUC was 0.72 in the whole urine cohort and 0.67 in the combined population. These values were higher than those of prostate specific antigen alone using 4.0 ng/ml as the cutoff (p = 0.00 and 0.01, respectively). Moreover, the assay together with the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator or a standard nomogram significantly improved AUC in the whole urine cohort and the combined population vs predictive algorithms alone (p <0.05). Assay positive predictive value was 54% in whole urine cohort with prostate specific antigen 2.0 to 4.0 ng/ml and negative predictive value was 87% with prostate specific antigen 4.1 to 10.0 ng/ml. Assay positive predictive value was higher in subjects with all 3 methylation markers positive. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that this investigational assay used in conjunction with current screening algorithms may potentially add value to the biopsy decision making process.

Efficacy, pharmacodynamics, and safety of VX-702, a novel p38 MAPK inhibitor, in rheumatoid arthritis: results of two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical studies.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of VX-702, a p38 MAPK inhibitor, in patients with active, moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Two 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of VX-702 were conducted in patients with active, moderate-to-severe RA. In the VeRA study, 313 patients received placebo or 2 daily doses of VX-702. In Study 304, 117 patients received placebo, daily VX-702, or twice weekly VX-702 in addition to concomitant methotrexate (MTX). Study end points included the proportion of patients meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (an ACR20 response), ACR50 and ACR70 responses, changes in the serum levels of biomarkers of inflammation, and safety assessments. RESULTS: The numerically superior ACR20 response rates among patients receiving VX-702 compared with those receiving placebo in both studies did not reach pairwise statistical significance at the highest doses in either study. At week 12 in the VeRA study, ACR20 response rates were 40%, 36%, and 28% among patients receiving 10 mg of VX-702, 5 mg of VX-702, and placebo, respectively. In Study 304, the response rates were 40%, 44%, and 22% for patients receiving 10 mg VX-702 daily plus MTX, 10 mg VX-702 twice weekly plus MTX, and placebo, respectively. Reductions in the levels of C-reactive protein, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor p55, and serum amyloid A were observed as early as week 1 in both studies, but these levels rapidly returned to baseline values by week 4. The overall frequency of adverse events was similar between the VX-702 and placebo groups. In the VeRA study, serious infections were more frequent in the VX-702 groups compared with the placebo group (2.4% versus 0%) but not in Study 304 (2.6% versus 4.9%). CONCLUSION: The modest clinical efficacy plus the transient suppression of biomarkers of inflammation observed in this study suggest that p38 MAPK inhibition may not provide meaningful, sustained suppression of the chronic inflammation seen in RA.

Comparative evaluation of an extensive histopathologic examination and a real-time reverse-transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay for mammaglobin and cytokeratin 19 on axillary sentinel lymph nodes of breast carcinoma patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of a commercially available real-time reverse-transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay for mammaglobin and cytokeratin 19 mRNAs [GeneSearch Breast Lymph Node (BLN) Assay, Veridex LLC, Warren, NJ] in the detection of axillary sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) metastases in patients with breast carcinoma. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Because of the lack of standardized and widely accepted protocols for a truly accurate histopathologic examination of SLN, the relative merits of alternative assays based on the identification of tumor specific mRNA markers deserve further assessment. METHODS: : A prospective series of 293 consecutive SLNs from 293 patients was evaluated. The BLN assay results were compared with those of an extensive histopathologic examination of the entire SLNs performed on serial frozen sections cut at 40 to 50 microm intervals. RESULTS: The BLN assay correctly identified 51 of 52 macrometastatic and 5 of 20 micrometastatic SLNs, with a sensitivity of 98.1% to detect metastases larger than 2 mm, 94.7% for metastases larger than 1 mm, and 77.8% for metastases larger than 0.2 mm. The overall concordance with histopathology was 90.8%, with specificity of 95.0%, positive predictive value of 83.6%, and negative predictive value of 92.9%. When the results were evaluated according to the occurrence of additional metastases to non-SLN in patients with histologically positive SLNs, the assay was positive in 33 (91.7%) of the 36 patients with additional metastases and in 22 (66.6%) of the 33 patients without further echelon involvement. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of the reverse-transcription -polymerase chain reaction assay is comparable to that of the histopathologic examination of the entire SLN by serial sectioning at 1.5 to 2 mm.

Toxic anterior segment syndrome and possible association with ointment in the anterior chamber following cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To report clinical and laboratory findings of 8 cases of toxic anterior segment syndrome (TASS) related to an oily substance in the anterior chamber of patients following cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. SETTING: John Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. METHODS: Eight patients had uneventful phacoemulsification by the same surgeon via clear corneal incisions with implantation of the same 3-piece silicone IOL design. Postoperative medications included antibiotic/steroid ointment and pilocarpine gel; each eye was firmly patched at the end of the procedure. On the first postoperative day, some patients presented with diffuse corneal edema, increased intraocular pressure, and an oily film-like material within the anterior chamber coating the corneal endothelium. The others presented with an oily bubble floating inside the anterior chamber, which was later seen coating the IOL. Additional surgical procedures required included penetrating keratoplasty, IOL explantation, and trabeculectomy. Two corneal buttons were analyzed histopathologically. Two explanted IOLs had gross and light microscopic analyses (as well as surface analyses of 1 of them), and 4 other explanted IOLs had gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Pathological examination of the corneas showed variable thinning of the epithelium with edema. The stroma was diffusely thickened and the endothelial cell layer was absent. Evaluation of the explanted IOLs confirmed the presence of an oily substance coating large areas of their anterior and posterior optic surfaces. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry of the lens extracts identified a mixed chain hydrocarbon compound that was also found in the gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analyses of the ointment used postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the ointment gained access to the eye, causing the postoperative complications described. These cases highlight the importance of appropriate wound construction and integrity, as well as the risks of tight eye patching following placement of ointment.