Safety of ultrasound contrast agents in patients with known or suspected cardiac shunts.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging is a radiation-free diagnostic tool that uses biocompatible ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) to improve image clarity. UCAs, which do not contain dye, often salvage "technically difficult" ultrasound scans, increasing the accuracy and reliability of a front-line ultrasound diagnosis, reducing unnecessary downstream testing, lowering overall health care costs, changing therapy, and improving patient care. Two UCAs currently are approved and regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration. They have favorable safety profiles and risk/benefit ratios in adult and pediatric populations, including compromised patients with severe cardiovascular diseases. Nevertheless, these UCAs are contraindicated in patients with known or suspected right-to-left, bidirectional, or transient right-to-left cardiac shunts. These patients, who constitute 10% to 35% of the general population, typically receive no UCAs when they undergo echocardiography. If their echocardiographic images are suboptimal, they may receive inappropriate diagnosis and treatment, or they may be referred for additional diagnostic testing, including radiation-based procedures that increase their lifetime risk for cancer or procedures that use contrast agents containing dye, which may increase the risk for kidney damage. An exhaustive review of current peer-reviewed research demonstrated no scientific basis for the UCA contraindication in patients with known or suspected cardiac shunts. Initial safety concerns were based on limited rodent data and speculation related to macroaggregated albumin microspheres, a radioactive nuclear imaging agent with different physical and chemical properties and no relation to UCAs. Radioactive macroaggregated albumin is not contraindicated in adult or pediatric patients with cardiac shunts and is routinely used in these populations. In conclusion, the International Contrast Ultrasound Society Board recommends removal of the contraindication to further the public interest in safe, reliable, radiation-free diagnostic imaging options for patients with known or suspected cardiac shunts and to reduce their need for unnecessary downstream testing.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: what is the evidence and what are the obstacles?

OBJECTIVE: Although ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) are popular and widely used in Europe and Asia, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not approved a microbubble agent for radiology imaging in the United States. Herein, we discuss the evidence for and the obstacles to using UCAs for contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). CONCLUSION: Despite the obstacles to the use of UCAs for CEUS including regulatory and practice patterns, the evidence indicates that radiologists and patients will be missing an effectual imaging option if we do not encourage the use of CEUS and strongly support the approval of UCAs by the FDA. The evidence outweighs the obstacles: CEUS is cost-effective; can be performed at the bedside; uses no ionizing radiation; has no nephrotoxicity; and, most importantly, can provide accurate diagnostic information comparable to CT and MRI.