Serum Metal Ions in Contemporary Monoblock and Modular Dual Mobility Articulations.

BACKGROUND: Questions exist about the release of cobalt and chromium ions from dual mobility (DM) cups. Modular implants, with potential backside wear between the cobalt-chromium liner and titanium cup, are of particular concern. This study compares the metal ion profile of patients with contemporary monoblock and modular DM articulations from two commonly used designs. METHODS: Cobalt and chromium serum levels were measured one year after surgery in a prospective cohort of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty with a DM construct. Ion levels were detected above 1 µg/L. Clinical and surgical data were correlated with the ion levels for analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 29% of the patients had levels above 1 µg/L of either ion. More patients with modular cups had detectable ions than patients with monoblock cups (39% vs 20%, P = .05). Cobalt was more commonly detected in the monoblock group, and chromium was more commonly detected in the modular group (P = .05). There were no differences in the actual ion levels between the groups (1.35 µg/L vs 1.64 µg/L, P = .44, for cobalt and 1.35 µg/L vs 1.31 µg/L, P = .77, for chromium). No patient underwent revision during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: We found similar cobalt and chromium levels in patients with monoblock and modular DM cups. More patients in the modular group had detectable ions. Cobalt was more frequently detected in the monoblock group. These results suggest that both implants are performing well in the short term, but further follow-up is needed to determine whether the differences found are of clinical significance.

Preoperative Opioid Use Is Associated With Higher Revision Rates in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Although preoperative opioid use has been associated with poor postoperative patient-reported outcome measures and delayed return to work in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty, direct surgery-related complications in patients on chronic opioids are still not clear. Thus, we sought to perform a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the influence of preoperative opioid use on postoperative complications and revision following primary total joint arthroplasty. METHODS: Following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, we queried PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the ISI Web of Science for studies investigating the influence of preoperative opioid use on postoperative complications following total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty up to May 2020. RESULTS: After applying exclusion criteria, 10 studies were included in the analysis which represented 87,165 opioid users (OU) and 5,214,010 nonopioid users (NOU). The overall revision rate in the OU group was 4.79% (3846 of 80,303 patients) compared to 1.21% in the NOU group (43,719 of 3,613,211 patients). There was a higher risk of aseptic loosening (odds ratio [OR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-1.53, P = .002), periprosthetic fractures (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.53-2.34, P < .00001), and dislocations (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.14-1.39, P < .00001) in the OU group compared to the NOU group. Overall, 5 of 6 studies reporting on periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rates showed statistically significant correlation between preoperative opioid use and higher PJI rates. CONCLUSION: There is strong evidence that preoperative opioid use is associated with a higher overall revision rate for aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fractures, and dislocation, and an increased risk for PJI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, systematic review.

Muscle activity while ambulating on stairs and slopes: A comparison between individuals scheduled and not scheduled for knee arthroplasty and healthy controls.

OBJECTIVE: To examine muscle activity patterns of the lower limbs while ascending and descending stairs and slope in adults with knee Osteoarthritis (knee-OA), who were scheduled or not scheduled for Total Knee Replacement (TKR) and healthy controls. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included three groups: knee-OA subjects scheduled for TKR (TKR group; N = 15) and not scheduled for TKR (NTKR group; N = 15) and age-matched controls (N = 11). Outcome measures included: joint range of motion (ROM), Timed Up and Go (TUG), joint pain levels, and functional disability (Oxford) score. Also, durations of muscle activity (rectus femoris, semitendinosus, medial gastrocnemius, bilaterally, and soleus, and tibialis anterior of the OA limb) were recorded while the subjects ascended and descended stairs and a level surface. RESULTS: Both knee-OA groups had significantly higher Oxford scores and bilateral knee pain levels compared to the control group. The TKR group had higher TUG score compared to the NTKR group. The activation duration of the Tibialis Anterior of the OA limb while ascending and descending stairs and slope were higher in the TKR group compared to the NTKR group. No differences in muscle activity durations were found when comparing the OA limb to contralateral limb. CONCLUSION: The muscle activity strategies differentiated between individuals scheduled and not scheduled for TKR. The longer duration of muscle activity of Tibialis Anterior muscle in the TKR group compared to the NTKR group suggest that customized prehabilitation program is required for these groups.

Reconstruction options and outcomes for acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty.

Revision total hip arthroplasty in the setting of acetabular bone loss is a challenging procedure and requires a solid understanding of current acetabular reconstruction options. Despite major developments in the field of revision hip surgery in recent decades, reconstruction of acetabular defects remains a major problem in order to achieve primary stability and durable fixation without sacrificing additional bone stock. Although there are several ways to classify acetabular bone defects, the Paprosky classification system is the most commonly used to describe the defects and guide treatment strategy. An understanding of the bone defects associated with detailed pre-operative assessment and planning are essential elements in order to achieve satisfactory outcomes. Multiple acetabular reconstructive options are currently available including impaction bone grafting with metal mesh, reinforcement rings and antiprotrusio cage, structural allografts, cementless hemispherical cups, extra-large "jumbo cups", oblong cups, modular porous metal augments, cup-cage constructs, custom- made triflange cups, and acetabular distraction. To date, debate continues as to which technique is most effective due to the lack of long-term studies of modern reconstruction systems. Further long-term studies are necessary to assess the longevity of the different implants. The purpose of this study was to review the current literature and provide a comprehensive understanding of the available reconstruction options with their clinical outcomes.

Serum metal ion levels in modular dual mobility acetabular components: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Dual mobility (DM) constructs effectively reduce the risk of dislocation in revision and high risk primary total hip arthroplasty. However, modular DM designs require the use of a cobalt-chrome liner against a titanium cup which may induce corrosion, metal ions release, and associated biologic response. The purpose of this systematic review study was to collect all reported cases of serum metal ions after DM in the literature and ask the following questions: 1) what is the overall rate of significantly elevated Cobalt and Chromium metal ions and how do these levels change over time? 2) Does femoral head material composition influence serum metal ion levels? and 3) were there any atypical lymphocytic associated lesions after modular DM that required revision surgery? METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. In addition to patient demographics, information specific to the performance of the DM implant were recorded including: cobalt and chromium serum ion levels and all reported timepoints, the material composition of the femoral head, all revision and reoperations and any failure related to corrosion of the DM bearing. A significant elevation in cobalt or chromium was defined as >1.0 or >1.6 mcg/L. RESULTS: 248 modular DM THAs were analyzed. The cumulative mean cobalt and chromium levels for all included studies was 0.47mcg/L and 0.53mcg/L, respectively. At final follow-up 13 patients (5.2%) had elevated cobalt ion levels and 4 patients (1.6%) had elevated chromium ion levels. Femoral head material composition trended towards but did not significantly increase serum ion levels. Ceramic heads had elevated cobalt and chromium ions in 4/135 (3%) of patients compared to metal heads which had elevated cobalt ions in 9/113 (8%) and elevated chromium ions in 0/113 (0%), (p = 0.09). There were no reoperations or revisions for metal related reactions at final follow-up (mean 27.4 months). CONCLUSION: In this systematic review including 248 modular DM THAs, elevated serum cobalt ions were present in 5.2% of patients at a mean follow-up of 27.4 months. While a trend towards increased Cobalt serum ions with the use of cobalt chrome femoral heads, femoral head composition was not significantly associated with increased serum metal ion levels. At final follow-up, metal ion levels appear to decrease in the majority of patients between 1 and 2 years and no patient was revised for metal ion related complications. Continued serum metal ion surveillance is recommended to ensure the safety of DM constructs in THA with longer term follow-up.

Kinematics following gait perturbation in adults with knee osteoarthritis: Scheduled versus not scheduled for knee arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: To compare recovery kinematics following trip-simulated perturbation during gait between three groups: adults without knee Osteoarthritis (OA) and adults with OA, scheduled and not scheduled for Total Knee Replacement (TKR). METHODS: People with OA scheduled for TKR (TKR group; N = 19) and not scheduled (NTKR group; N = 17) were age-matched with People without OA (N = 19). Outcome measures included: joint range of motion (ROM), Timed Up and Go (TUG), joint pain levels, Oxford score, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire, and the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale. Also, spatiotemporal gait parameters and joint kinematics were recorded during perturbed and unperturbed gait. The perturbed gait data were normalized by unperturbed gait data. RESULTS: There were no differences between the two OA groups in the four questionnaire scores and joint ROM. The TUG score of the TKR group was higher than that of the NTKR group. There were no statistically significant between-group differences in the normalized spatiotemporal parameters. The OA groups showed statistically significant lower anterior pelvic tilt ranges and higher maximal hip adduction of the contralateral limb compared to the Non-OA group. When the contralateral limb was perturbed, the TKR group showed significantly lower pelvic rotation range compared to the NTKR and Non-OA groups. When the OA limb was perturbed, the maximal hip flexion of the injured limb was significantly lower and the maximal knee flexion higher in the OA groups compared with the Non-OA group. CONCLUSION: The recovery strategy from trip-simulated perturbation of individuals with OA differs from that of individuals without OA. This may emphasize the importance of devising a treatment plan that focuses on improving balance and reactions to gait perturbation.

Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head and Hip Arthritis in an Adolescent Following an Isolated Fracture of the Greater Trochanter: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

CASE: A healthy adolescent sustained an isolated fracture of the greater trochanter after falling from a height. He was treated nonoperatively. After 10 weeks of improvement, the pain recurred, and osteonecrosis of the femoral head was diagnosed. Core decompression and a bone-marrow injection were performed. Transient relief was achieved, followed by deterioration to end-stage hip arthritis. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, 19 other cases of isolated fractures of the greater trochanter in adolescents have been reported since 1905. All high-energy injuries (10 cases) progressed to osteonecrosis, independent of the intervention; none of the low-energy cases progressed to osteonecrosis. We advocate vigilance and early magnetic resonance imaging for these injuries to detect and treat osteonecrosis in its early stages.

Computerized navigation for length and rotation control in femoral fractures: a preliminary clinical study.

OBJECTIVE: Operative treatment of femoral fractures yields a predictably high union rate, but residual malrotation and leg length discrepancy remain a clinically significant problem. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of using computerized navigation in controlling the length and rotation in femoral fracture surgery. DESIGN: Prospective consecutive case series of 16 skeletally mature patients with femoral fractures undergoing surgical fixation; 14 were fixed with intramedullary nails and 2 with plates. SETTING: An Academic Level I trauma center. INTERVENTION: Computerized navigation was used to determine the length and rotation of the operated extremity as compared with the intact healthy contralateral side. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: All patients underwent postoperative computed tomography scanogram for determining the length and rotation. RESULTS: All fractures healed. Mean rotational difference between the treated and nontreated sides was 3.45 degrees (range, 0-7.7 degrees). Mean length difference between the 2 extremities as calculated by the computed tomography scan was 5.83 mm (range, 0-13 mm). Additional operative time required for computerized navigation was measured in 2 of the cases and totaled ∼30-35 min/case. CONCLUSION: Computerized navigation was accurate and precise at restoring femoral length and rotation during femoral fracture fixation when the intact contralateral femur was used for reference. Further, large-scale randomized studies are required. Additionally, improvements aimed at decreasing operative time and improving user interface of these systems are recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level IV. See instructions for authors for a complete description of the levels of evidence.