Unique risk factors for unplanned preterm delivery in the uterus transplant recipient.

STUDY QUESTION: Do characteristics of the lower uterine segment and cervix modify the risk of preterm delivery in uterus transplant (UTx) recipients? SUMMARY ANSWER: The cervical length showed little association with preterm delivery, however, cervical inflammation deserves further exploration as a cause of preterm delivery. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: UTx recipients do not have the risk factors normally used to stratify pregnancies that would benefit from cervical length assessment. In addition, unique factors related to absent tissues, a different blood supply, inflammatory processes of rejection, cervical biopsies, and a different microbiome challenge the normal progressive remodeling of the cervix and thus cervical competence. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a subanalysis of a clinical trial of 20 women undergoing uterus transplantation at Baylor University Medical Center from 2016 to 2020, in addition to two women who received transplantation outside of a research protocol at our institution through September 2022. In this report, the first 16 UTx recipients that achieved live birth are included. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The focus of this study was 20 pregnancies that reached the second trimester in 16 women following UTx. We analyzed recipient, transplant, and donor factors to determine if characteristics were associated with delivery outcome. We compared obstetrical outcomes, including planned versus unplanned delivery, by factors such as number of superior venous anastomoses, warm ischemia and cold ischemia times, donor factors including cesarean sections, cervical biopsy results, and cervical ultrasound results. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Planned term deliveries occurred in 44% (8/18) of live births. Of the preterm births, 30% (3/10) were planned and 70% (7/10) were unplanned. Unplanned deliveries occurred in women with spontaneous preterm labor, severe rejection, subchorionic hematoma, and placenta previa. Cervical length in UTx recipients averaged 33.5 mm at 24 weeks and 31.5 mm at 28 weeks, comparable to values from the general population. No relationship was seen between delivery outcome and number of veins used, ischemic time, or number of previous cesarean sections. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The study's small size allows limited conclusions. The obstetric history of all donors was limited to mode of delivery. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Cervical length measurements in the UTx population are not expected to deviate from those with a native uterus. While cervical length surveillance remains important, attention must be paid to the results of cervical biopsies which are obtained to monitor rejection. Inflammatory processes seem most predictive of preterm delivery. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding was provided for this study. The authors report no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02656550.

Screening for autosomal recessive and X-linked conditions during pregnancy and preconception: a practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Carrier screening began 50 years ago with screening for conditions that have a high prevalence in defined racial/ethnic groups (e.g., Tay-Sachs disease in the Ashkenazi Jewish population; sickle cell disease in Black individuals). Cystic fibrosis was the first medical condition for which panethnic screening was recommended, followed by spinal muscular atrophy. Next-generation sequencing allows low cost and high throughput identification of sequence variants across many genes simultaneously. Since the phrase "expanded carrier screening" is nonspecific, there is a need to define carrier screening processes in a way that will allow equitable opportunity for patients to learn their reproductive risks using next-generation sequencing technology. An improved understanding of this risk allows patients to make informed reproductive decisions. Reproductive decision making is the established metric for clinical utility of population-based carrier screening. Furthermore, standardization of the screening approach will facilitate testing consistency. This practice resource reviews the current status of carrier screening, provides answers to some of the emerging questions, and recommends a consistent and equitable approach for offering carrier screening to all individuals during pregnancy or preconception.

The Evolution of Transplantation From Saving Lives to Fertility Treatment: DUETS (Dallas UtErus Transplant Study).

OBJECTIVE: We report the results of the first 20 uterus transplants performed in our institution. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Uterus transplantation (UTx) aims at giving women affected by absolute uterine-factor infertility the possibility of carrying their own pregnancy. UTx has evolved from experimental to an established surgical procedure. METHODS: The Dallas Uterus Transplant Study (DUETS) program started in 2016. The uterus was transplanted in orthotopic position with vascular anastomoses to the external iliac vessels and removed when 1 or 2 live births were achieved. Immunosuppression lasted only for the duration of the uterus graft. RESULTS: Twenty women, median age 29.7 years, enrolled in the study, with 10 in phase 1 and 10 in phase 2. All but 2 recipients had a congenital absence of the uterus. Eighteen recipients received uteri from living donors and 2 from deceased donors. In phase 1, 50% of recipients had a technically successful uterus transplant, compared to 90% in phase 2. Four recipients with a technical success in phase 1 have delivered 1 or 2 babies, and the fifth recipient with a technical success is >30 weeks pregnant. In phase 2, 2 recipients have delivered healthy babies and 5 are pregnant. CONCLUSIONS: UTx is a unique type of transplant; whose only true success is a healthy child birth. Based on results presented here, involving refinement of the surgical technique and donor selection process, UTx is now an established solution for absolute uterine-factor infertility.

CFTR variant testing: a technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Pathogenic variants in the CFTR gene are causative of classic cystic fibrosis (CF) as well as some nonclassic CF phenotypes. In 2001, CF became the first target of pan-ethnic universal carrier screening by molecular methods. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recommended a core panel of 23 disease-causing variants as the minimal set to be included in pan-ethnic carrier screening of individuals with no family history of the disease, and these variants were usually assessed using targeted methods. The original recommendation also left open the option for laboratories to offer expanded CFTR variant panels; however, at the time, expanded CFTR variant panels were met with some controversy on the basis of the available technologies and the limited phenotypic knowledge of rare variants. Both of those aspects have now evolved, prompting this update of the ACMG technical standards for CFTR variant testing.

Laboratory screening and diagnosis of open neural tube defects, 2019 revision: a technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Open neural tube defects (ONTDs) include open spina bifida (OSB) and anencephaly. These defects are caused by incomplete closure of the neural tube at about 4 weeks of pregnancy. Levels of early second-trimester maternal serum (ms) alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) are sufficiently elevated in affected pregnancies to be used as a population-based screening test. The basic screening methodology was described in the late 1970s and screening programs were active a few years later. By identifying pregnancies with the highest msAFP levels, about 80% of OSB and 95% of anencephaly can be identified as early as 16 weeks gestation. The interpretation of msAFP levels is complicated by the need to consider multiple factors such as gestational age, maternal weight, maternal race, multiple gestations, and more. Testing for AFP and acetylcholinesterase in amniotic fluid and/or identification of the lesion by targeted ultrasound is considered diagnostic of ONTD. When a diagnosis is made, options include termination, surgery after delivery, or in utero surgery, depending on factors such as location and size of the defect, and the presence of any additional anomalies. Screening for ONTD should be performed as part of a comprehensive program linking primary obstetrical care providers, laboratorians, and high-risk clinicians.

Expanded Carrier Screening.

Prenatal carrier screening has expanded to include a larger number of genes and variants offered to all couples considering or with an ongoing pregnancy. Panethnic screening for cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy and screening for a limited number of conditions based on ethnicity are recommended by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Residual risk calculations have become an obsolete part of posttest counseling when expanded carrier screening (ECS) is selected. The Perception of Uncertainties in Genome Sequencing scale offers a useful understanding of the pretest and posttest counseling concerns that should be considered as part of ECS implementation.

Revisiting the challenges of training Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows in chorionic villus sampling.

BACKGROUND: More than a decade ago, researchers described a survey of Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows that showed that chorionic villus sampling training was limited for Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows in the United States. Prenatal screening and diagnosis have rapidly evolved since then and include the introduction of noninvasive aneuploidy screening that uses cell-free fetal DNA. Yet, chorionic villus sampling remains the only method available for first-trimester genetic diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the chorionic villus sampling training of Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows with respect to availability, competency standards, and education methods. STUDY DESIGN: In November 2015, an electronic survey was sent to Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows and fellowship directors of accredited Maternal Fetal Medicine fellowship programs in the United States. RESULTS: Fifty-eight percent of fellows (179/310) and 46% of program directors (35/76) responded. Ninety-five percent of Maternal Fetal Medicine fellows think that invasive diagnostic testing is essential to their training; 100% of fellows have amniocentesis training; and 65% have chorionic villus sampling training. The median number of chorionic villus sampling procedures that are expected during a fellowship in those who trained was 10. Eighty-eight percent of fellows and 89% of program directors state that chorionic villus sampling training could be better; 89% of fellows and 97% of directors would like access to simulated models. Barriers to training included lack of patients (71%) and lack of proficient attending supervisors (43%). CONCLUSION: Since the last survey, >10 years ago, chorionic villus sampling training has declined further. A decrease in the number of procedures that are performed is the leading barrier to this training.

Expanded carrier screening in reproductive medicine-points to consider: a joint statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, National Society of Genetic Counselors, Perinatal Quality Foundation, and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine.

The Perinatal Quality Foundation and the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, in association with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and the National Society of Genetic Counselors, have collaborated to provide education for clinicians and laboratories regarding the use of expanded genetic carrier screening in reproductive medicine. This statement does not replace current screening guidelines, which are published by individual organizations to direct the practice of their constituents. As organizations develop practice guidelines for expanded carrier screening, further direction is likely. The current statement demonstrates an approach for health care providers and laboratories who wish to or who are currently offering expanded carrier screening to their patients.

ACMG position statement on prenatal/preconception expanded carrier screening.

For years, clinicians have offered gene-by-gene carrier screening to patients and couples considering future pregnancy or those with an ongoing pregnancy early in gestation. Examples include ethnic-specific screening offered to Ashkenazi Jewish patients and panethnic screening for cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy. Next-generation sequencing methods now available permit screening for many more disorders with high fidelity, quick turnaround time, and lower costs. However, instituting these technologies carries with it perils that must be addressed. The basis for the selection of disorders on expanded carrier screening panels should be disclosed. The information provided about disorders with mild phenotypes, variable expression, low penetrance, and/or characterized by an adult onset should be complete and transparent, allowing patients to opt out of receiving these test results. Patients also must be made aware of the concept of residual risk following negative test results. Laboratories have a duty to participate in and facilitate this information transfer.

Screening, testing, or personalized medicine: where do inherited thrombophilias fit best?

Inherited thrombophilias present an opportunity to review population-based screening paradigms. Inherited thrombophilias are a group of complex conditions, and women who carry mutations in implicated genes have an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes as well as venous thromboembolism. That asymptomatic carriers are at risk of manifesting phenotypes moves these conditions out of the traditional molecular genetic "screening" paradigm. Like most complex disorders, residual risk remains after molecular testing for thrombophilia, and the magnitude of this risk has not been quantified. Family and personal history are important factors to consider when providing personal risk assessment to patients. Overall, "testing" for thrombophilias according to a personalized medicine model is more appropriate than population "screening" as performed in other mendelian genetic conditions.

Genetic screening for cystic fibrosis.

The importance of the recent recommendations that address cystic fibrosis carrier screening cannot be overemphasized. For the first time, a systematic approach to offering or making screening available to all pregnant women in the hopes of providing refined risk estimates for a genetic disease has been established. Caucasian of European or Ashkenazi-Jewish descent should be offered screening. Within the proposed guidelines are ethnic-specific carrier frequencies (1/29) used to establish who should be offered testing and to whom testing should be made available. Recent recommendations have made clear that in a pan-ethnic population a frequency of 1/1,000 is required for inclusion into the cystic fibrosis mutation panel. A general framework for screening during pregnancy has been established (either concurrent or sequential). It will be interesting to watch as the fruits of the human genome project are inspected and applied to everyday clinical practice. No doubt the cost of screening will be reduced through advances in technology. The combined efforts of NIH, ACOG, and ACMG have provided the first set of comprehensive standards for screening of recessive diseases. How time changes these guidelines deserves following.