[Influence of percutaneous coronary intervention in non ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes on prescription of secondary prevention medications. Data from the S-Témoin Registry]. / Prevention secondaire après syndrome coronaire aigu sans sus-décalage de ST en fonction de l'utilisation de l'angioplastie coronaire: l'étude S-Témoin.

BACKGROUND: The interaction between the use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes and the use of secondary prevention medications was analysed in the French S-Témoin Registry. METHODS: The population consisted of 2433 patients seen by their cardiologists at an outpatient clinic 2-12 months after non ST-elevation ACS; the survey was carried out from September 2004 to April 2005. RESULTS: Overall, patients undergoing PCI (75% of the population) had higher levels of prescription of recommended secondary prevention medications. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the use and type of coronary intervention (drug eluting versus bare metal stents) was an independent correlate of the use of dual antiplatelet therapy. In addition, time from the acute episode was also a strong correlate of dual antiplatelet therapy. Statins were also more often used in patients with PCI. CONCLUSION: Patients not treated with PCI are less likely to receive appropriate secondary prevention medications after non ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. Specific efforts should be directed towards these patients, in particular as regards the prescription of dual antiplatelet therapy.

[Factors influencing secondary prevention of atherothrombotic disease in the private outpatient cardiology setting: results of the Prisma survey]. / Etude sur les facteurs influençant les prescriptions en prévention secondaire de la maladie athérothrombotique en pratique de ville: résultats de l'étude Prisma.

From March to July 1999, 940 private cardiologists in France recruited 100,429 patients of whom 30,430 (30%) had a previous history of atherothrombotic disease. The prevalence of patients with a previous history of Myocardial Infarction (MI), Ischemic Stroke (IS) or Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) was 19.7%, 7.2% and 10.7% respectively. Among patients with a history of atherothrombotic disease, myocardial infarction was the most frequent diagnosis responsible for 65% of all consultations. Each cardiologist described the secondary prevention treatment for 3 consecutive patients among whom 1 corresponded to each of the 3 atherothrombotic territories. The most frequent cardiovascular risk factors were hypercholesterolemia for myocardial infarction (77.9%), smoking for PAD (32.5%) and hypertension for IS (73.2%). Diabetes mellitus (1/4 patients), obesity (1/3) and sedentary way of life (1/3) were equally prevalent for each of the atherothrombotic territories. More than 90% of the patients received an antithrombotic drug. Antiplatelet agents were largely prescribed, anticoagulants being more frequently used for patients with atrial fibrillation, symptomatic cardiac heart failure or stroke of embolic origin. Thienopyridines represent 17.9% of the prescriptions. The prescription rate of statins after MI (58.9%) is lower than in published studies in secondary prevention. The lack of lipid measurement and the delay since last measurement are non-prescription factors. The rates of prescription are even lower in case of PAD (44.6%) or IS history (33.3%). More than half of the patients (56.6%) are treated with beta-blockers and 40.1% with ACE inhibitors. These rates are similar to what has been published. Atherothrombotic disease represents a large part of the daily activity of private cardiologists and is not limited to coronary heart disease. Despite their proven efficacy, drugs for secondary prevention for MI, except antithrombotic drugs, are insufficiently prescribed. This under-prescription is even higher in patients with PAD or IS history and may be related to the lack of clinical trials in these specific territories.

Use of secondary preventive drugs in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated medically or with coronary angioplasty: results from the nationwide French PREVENIR survey.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that several classes of drugs are beneficial for secondary prevention in patients with coronary artery disease. OBJECTIVE: To compare the use of secondary preventive drugs in patients with acute coronary syndromes given conservative treatment or percutaneous coronary interventions. DESIGN: The PREVENIR survey was designed to assess the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes admitted to hospital in France in January 1998. Drugs prescribed at hospital discharge were recorded retrospectively from the hospital records, and treatment at six months was assessed prospectively. SETTING: University hospitals, general hospitals, and private clinics throughout the country. RESULTS: Of 1394 patients participating in the survey, 668 underwent coronary angioplasty during the initial hospital stay and 706 had medical treatment only. At hospital discharge, aspirin, beta blockers, and statins were prescribed significantly more often in patients undergoing angioplasty. Using multivariate logistic regression, coronary angioplasty was an independent predictor of treatment with aspirin (odds ratio 3.55), statins (1.92), and beta blockers (1.41). Compared with treatment at discharge, only statin use differed at six months, with a significant increase both in patients treated medically and in those who had undergone angioplasty. Increased use of statins, aspirin, and beta blockers was significantly correlated with coronary angioplasty during the initial hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: In this national French survey, patients treated with percutaneous coronary interventions were more likely to receive secondary preventive drugs than patients receiving medical treatment alone.

[Distribution and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors in coronary patients: the Prevenir Study]. / Distribution et prise en charge des facteurs de risque cardiovasculaires chez des patients coronariens: étude Prévenir.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution and hospital treatment of cardiovascular risk factors in coronary patients. A transverse observational study was carried out in 77 cardiological centres throughout France. All patients with a history of myocardial infarction or of unstable angina during the month of January 1998 were enrolled. The clinical features of 1334 patients (71.4% men, 746 myocardial infarction, 588 unstable angina) on hospital admission were analysed. The prevalence of smoking, dyslipidaemia, hypertension and obesity was 49, 45, 42, 19 and 11% respectively in the men and 17, 46, 63, 23 and 10% respectively in the women. The number of treatable risk factors slightly decreased in the oldest age group. The prevalence of hypertension increased with age whereas smoking and dyslipidaemia decreased in both men and women. Obese and diabetic patients had more risk factors than the others. A little less than half of patients with dyslipidaemia were under no preventive measures (diet and/or lipid-lowering drugs) and 40% of men with a previous history of coronary artery disease continued to smoke. The authors conclude that men over 85 and women over 75 years of age have fewer risk factors than other age groups and the type of risk factor varies with age. The treatment of dyslipidaeamia and smoking is still inadequate and should be improved.