Nasal Intubation is not Associated with "Smoother" Emergence from General Anesthesia for Carotid Endarterectomy: A Case-Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative hematoma after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a devastating complication and may be more likely in patients with uncontrolled hypertension and coughing on emergence from anesthesia. We sought to determine if intubation with a nasal endotracheal tube (ETT)-instead of an oral ETT-is associated with "smoother" (i.e., less hemodynamic instability) emergence from general anesthesia for CEA. METHODS: Patients receiving CEA between December 2015 and September 2021 at a single tertiary academic medical center were included. We examined the electronic anesthesia records for 323 patients who underwent CEA during the 6-year study period and recorded consecutive systolic blood pressure (SBP) values during the 10 minutes before extubation as a surrogate for "smoothness" of the emergence. RESULTS: Intubation with a nasal ETT, when compared with intubation with an oral ETT, was not associated with any difference in maximum, minimum, average, median, or standard deviation of serial SBP values in the 10 minutes before extubation. The average SBP on emergence for patients with an oral ETT was 141 mm Hg and with a nasal ETT was 144 mm Hg (P = 0.562). The maximum SBP for patients with oral and nasal ETTs were 170 mm Hg and 174 mm Hg, respectively (P = 0.491). There were also no differences in the qualitative "smoothness" of emergence or in the percentage of patients who required an intravenous dose of 1 or more antihypertensive medications. The incidence of postoperative complications was similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: When SBP is used as a surrogate for smoothness of emergence from general anesthesia for CEA, intubation with a nasal ETT was not associated with better hemodynamic stability compared to intubation with an oral ETT.

Role of Cardiac Anesthesiologists in Intraoperative Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery (ERACS) Protocol: A Retrospective Single-Center Study Analyzing Preliminary Results of a Yearlong ERACS Protocol Implementation.

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery (ERACS) has been gaining rapid acceptance after multiple studies have demonstrated promising results in improved outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery in other surgical fields (eg, colorectal, orthopedic, thoracic, etc). Cardiac surgery has several unique challenges, including sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass and associated coagulopathy, blood transfusion, and postoperative intensive care requirement. Nonetheless, selective cardiac surgical patients can still benefit from ERACS. Guidelines for perioperative care in cardiac surgery, previously published by the ERACS Society, are weighted heavily in preoperative and postoperative management without much focus on intraoperative care provided by anesthesiologists. To address this gap and to explore anesthesiology's contribution in achieving ERACS, the study authors' cardiac anesthesiology division, in collaboration with cardiac surgery, introduced the ERACS protocol in their institution in February 2020. METHODS: The cardiac anesthesiology division, in collaboration with cardiac surgery, introduced the ERACS protocol consisting of multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia, including the introduction of regional blocks, hemostasis management protocol, reversal of neuromuscular blockade, and administration of antiemetics in the authors' institution in February 2020. They have conducted a retrospective chart review study comparing patients who have received ERACS measures with a similar historic cohort who underwent cardiac surgery prior to initiation of an ERACS protocol. The primary outcomes of the study were to determine patients' time to extubation, postoperative opioid consumption, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), and incidence of postoperative complications (eg, postoperative nausea vomiting [PONV], bleeding, ICU readmission, delirium. RESULTS: The ERACS patients showed reduced opioid consumption (intraoperative fentanyl; postoperative fentanyl, as well as oxycodone, in the first 6 hours postoperatively), lesser mechanical ventilation (2.5 hours less), shorter ICU stays (5 hours less), shorter hospital LOS (1 day), and lesser incidence of PONV. None of the ERACS patients required blood transfusion. The study authors performed an anonymous survey among the anesthesiologists and ICU providers to assess providers' satisfaction, which showed 92% of survey takers agreed that the ERACS protocol should be continued for future cardiac patients, and 61% of survey takers reported superior pain control in ERACS group of patients while managing those patients. DISCUSSION: The ERACS is achievable after the careful implementation of a series of measures. It does not signify only fast-track extubation and opioid-sparing analgesia, and must be implemented in the entire perioperative period beginning from preoperative clinic to postoperative rehabilitation. Cardiac anesthesiologists play a vital role in execution of intraoperative ERACS measures. Both providers and patients themselves are key stakeholders. A larger randomized prospective trial is warranted to solidify the inference.

Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Postoperative Kidney Dysfunction in Cardiac Surgery Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) in adult cardiac surgery patients and its association with postoperative kidney dysfunction. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Single tertiary-care university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-two adult patients having cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. INTERVENTIONS: Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was measured preoperatively, immediately after surgery, and at the following time points after surgery: 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours. Urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) levels were measured as a marker of kidney dysfunction at the following time points: prior to surgery, immediately after surgery, 4 to 6 hours after surgery, and 16-to-18 hours after surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-two IAPs were measured, and 90 (35.7%) showed IAH. Thirty-five of 42 patients (83.3%) had IAH at 1 time point or more. Peak urine NGAL levels were lower in patients with normal IAP (mean difference = -130.6 ng/mL [95% CI = -211.2 to -50.1], p = 0.002). There was no difference in postoperative kidney dysfunction by risk, injury, failure, loss of kidney function, and end-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) criteria in patients with normal IAP (mean difference = -31.4% [95% CI = -48.0 to 6.3], p = 0.09). IAH was 100% sensitive for predicting postoperative kidney dysfunction by RIFLE criteria, but had poor specificity (54.8%). CONCLUSIONS: IAH occurs frequently during the perioperative period in cardiac surgery patients and may be associated with postoperative kidney dysfunction.