Factors Associated with Esthetic Outcomes of Flapless Immediate Placed and Loaded Implants in the Maxillary Incisor Region-Three-Year Results of a Prospective Case Series.

Flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization (FIIPP) is often associated with an increased risk of buccal soft-tissue recession. This study aims to assess the 3-year esthetic outcome. In 100 consecutive patients, one maxillary incisor, with or without a pre-extraction buccal bone defect (≤5 mm), was replaced by an implant installed in a maximal palatal position (buccal gap ≥2 mm). The created gaps were filled with bovine bone substitute. Patient satisfaction (PS), pink esthetic scores (PES/modPES), and white esthetic score (WES) were calculated at different time points. A multilevel regression analysis (MRA) was performed to analyze which factors may be associated with the esthetics. After three years, PS scored 8.9 ± 0.84 on a scale of 10 (n = 83), and the soft-tissue esthetics were high (PES = 12.2; modPES = 8.5), as was the WES (8.2), showing no decrease from one year. Buccal bone defect size and smoking could not be associated with the soft-tissue outcome; however, implant location, gap size, and emergence profiles could. Performing FIIPP, the final crown (WES) scored highest when it was cemented, the soft tissue (PES/modPES) in central-incisor positions, and all (WES/PES/modPES) with concave emergence profiles.

Does the pre-operative buccal soft tissue level at teeth or gingival phenotype dictate the aesthetic outcome after flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization? Analysis of a prospective clinical case series.

BACKGROUND: Immediate implant placement (IIP) often is related to mid-buccal recession in literature. To draw conclusions about the behavior of the soft tissues following IIP, pre-operative aesthetic measurements have to be taken into account. The aim of analysis of these prospective clinical case series data was to elucidate whether the pre-operative buccal soft tissue level (STL) or gingival phenotype influence the 1-year pink aesthetic outcome after performing flapless immediate implant placement and provisionalization (FIIPP) maxillary incisor cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 97 patients, a maxillary incisor was replaced performing FIIPP. STL and phenotype were analyzed on light-photographs made pre-operatively (T0), direct post-operatively (T1), after placement of the permanent crown (T2), and 1 year post-operatively (T3). To investigate if a pre-operative buccal soft tissue deficiency or excess influenced the total pink esthetic score (total-PES) per patient at T3, PES-3 was modified by adding a minus ("-") or plus ("+") in case of a STL-deficiency or excess, respectively. RESULTS: Pre-operatively, 40% of the cases showed a mid-buccal recession (STL-deficiency), 19% STL-excess, while in 41% an equal level in comparison with the contra-lateral tooth was observed (STL-neutral). One year post-operatively, 79% (31/39) of the recession cases showed soft tissue gain, while STL-excess cases showed the highest rate of soft tissue reduction (94%; 17/18). This resulted in a decrease of soft tissue recessions and excesses (to 26% and 4%, respectively), and an increase of ideal STL (PES-3-score 2) to 70%. The 1-year aesthetic outcome was not statistically different (p = 0.577) between patients with a pre-operative soft tissue recession (mean T3 total-PES = 12.18) or STL excess (mean T3 total-PES = 11.94). Of the total population, 71 patients with a thin, and 26 with a thick phenotype were evaluated. No statistical difference (p = 0.08) was present in aesthetic outcome between the two phenotypes (thin mean T3 total-PES = 12.30, thick mean T3 total-PES = 11.65). CONCLUSION: Regardless of phenotype, preoperative soft tissue recession, or excess, comparable high aesthetic outcomes were achieved 1 year post-operatively. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Ethical approval was obtained and registered on 20 October 2015 ( NTR5583/NL4170 ).

Microbiological and clinical effects of chlorhexidine enclosed in fixtures of 3I-Titamed implants.

This double-blind study used a split-mouth design to investigate the microbiological and clinical effects of 0.2% chlorhexidine enclosed in fixtures. Twelve patients had 46 fixtures implanted. At second-stage surgery, a microbiological sample (baseline sample) of the inner parts of the fixtures was taken. Then, a 0.2% chlorhexidine solution was applied into the inner space of 23 fixtures (test group), and in 23 fixtures saline was applied (control group). Abutments were installed and gingival index, plaque index and crevicular fluid flow were monitored weekly. After 6 weeks, a second microbiological sample of the inner part of the fixtures was taken. At baseline, viable bacteria were detected within 46% of the fixtures. After weeks, bacteria were found in 87% of the fixtures. The numbers of bacteria in the control group were significantly higher than those in the test group. The results indicate that, after first-stage surgery, contamination of the inner spaces of the fixtures is commonplace. Application of a 0.2% chlorhexidine solution at second-stage surgery inhibits growth or acquisition of bacteria in the fixtures. In both test and control groups, the crevicular fluid flow as well as the gingival index decreased during the experimental period. At 4, 5, and 6 weeks after chlorhexidine application, these values in the test group appeared lower, but did not attain statistical significance.