Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis ; 18(1): 13-7, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25311766

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: With the increasing use of robotic surgery in the United States, the comparative effectiveness and differences in reimbursement of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (MIRP) and open prostatectomy (ORP) in privately insured patients are unknown. Therefore, we sought to assess the differences in perioperative outcomes and hospital reimbursement in a privately insured patient population who were surgically treated for prostate cancer. METHODS: Using a large private insurance database, we identified 17,610 prostate cancer patients who underwent either MIRP or ORP from 2003 to 2010. The primary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), perioperative complications, 90-day readmissions rates and hospital reimbursement. Multivariable regression analyses were used to evaluate for differences in primary outcomes across surgical approaches. RESULTS: Overall, 8981 (51.0%) and 8629 (49.0%) surgically treated prostate cancer patients underwent MIRP and ORP, respectively. The proportion of patients undergoing MIRP markedly rose from 11.9% in 2003 to 72.5% in 2010 (P<0.001 for trend). Relative to ORP, MIRP was associated with a shorter median LOS (1.0 day vs 3.0 days; P<0.001) and lower adjusted odds ratio of perioperative complications (OR: 0.82; P<0.001). However, the 90-day readmission rates of MIRP and ORP were similar (OR: 0.99; P=0.76). MIRP provided higher adjusted mean hospital reimbursement compared with ORP (US $19,292 vs. US $17,347; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among privately insured patients diagnosed with prostate cancer, robotic surgery rapidly disseminated with over 70% of patients undergoing MIRP by 2009-2010. Although MIRP was associated with shorter LOS and modestly better perioperative outcomes, hospitals received higher reimbursement for MIRP compared with ORP.


Assuntos
Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/economia , Prostatectomia/economia , Neoplasias da Próstata/economia , Adulto , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Perioperatório , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis ; 17(2): 163-9, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24566445

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Given the importance of physician attitudes about different treatments and the quality of life (QOL) in prostate cancer, we performed a national survey of specialists to assess treatment recommendations and perceptions of treatment-related survival and QOL. METHODS: We mailed a self-administered survey instrument to a random sample of 1366 specialists in the U.S. Respondents were asked for treatment recommendations and survival that varied by PSA levels and Gleason scores and estimate QOL outcomes. Pearson's chi-square and multivariable regression models were used to test for differences in each outcome. RESULTS: Response rates were similar for radiation oncologists (52.6%) and urologists (52.3%; P=0.92). Across all risk strata, urologists were more likely to recommend surgery than were radiation oncologists, for conditions ranging from PSA>20 and Gleason score 8-10 (35.2 vs. 0.2%; P<0.001) to PSA 4-10 and Gleason score 7 (87.5 vs. 20.9%; P<0.001). Radiation oncologists were also more likely to recommend radiation therapy relative to urologists (all P<0.001). From low- to high-risk prostate cancer, radiation oncologists and urologists perceived their treatment as being better for improving survival (all P<0.001). Each specialty also viewed their treatment as having less urinary incontinence (all P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Radiation oncologists and urologists both prefer the treatment modalities they offer, perceive them to be more effective and to lead to a better QOL. Patients may be receiving biased information, and a truly informed consent process with shared decision-making may be possible only if they are evaluated by both specialties before deciding upon a treatment course.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Padrões de Prática Médica , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Adulto , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores/métodos , Médicos , Próstata/metabolismo , Próstata/patologia , Próstata/cirurgia , Antígeno Prostático Específico/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Próstata/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Qualidade de Vida , Radioterapia (Especialidade)/métodos , Urologia/métodos
3.
J Gen Intern Med ; 21(2): 158-64, 2006 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16390511

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although the use of mammography on at regular intervals can save lives, not all women obtain the repeat mammography recommended in guidelines. OBJECTIVE: To assess the associations between routine mammography use, perceived cancer risk, and actual projected cancer risk. METHODS: We include women who were 45 to 75 years of age and who had responded to the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Women who reported that they believed their risk of getting cancer in the future was "medium" or "high" were considered jointly as "medium/high-risk perception.""Routine mammography use" was defined as having > or =3 mammograms in the previous 6 years. We used logistic regression to determine the independent relation between cancer risk perception, projected breast cancer risk, and routine mammography use. RESULTS: Of the 6,002 women who met our inclusion criteria, 63.1% reported routine mammography use. About 76% of women in the highest quartile of projected breast cancer risk reported routine mammography use, compared with only 68%, 64%, and 51% in the third, second, and first quartiles, respectively (P<.001 chi-square test for trend). After adjusting for indicators of access to care, sociodemographic and behavioral factors, and perceived cancer risk, women in the highest quartiles of projected cancer risk were significantly more likely to report routine mammogram use than women in the lowest quartile (odds ratio [OR] of women in third and fourth quartiles were 1.57 [1.24 to 1.99], and 2.23 [1.73 to 2.87] vs the lowest quartile, respectively). Women with a higher perceived cancer risk were significantly more likely to undergo routine mammography (adjusted OR: 1.29 [1.12 to 1.48] P=.001). Cancer risk perceptions tended to be higher among women who were younger age, obese, smokers, depressed, or reported one of the following breast cancer risk factors: family breast cancer history, prior abnormal mammogram, and early age at menarche. CONCLUSION: Actual and perceived risk were independent predictors of routine mammography use, suggesting that efforts to incorporate risk profiles into clinical decision making may need to involve more than just relaying information about projected risks to patients, but also to explore how risk perceptions can be affected by this information.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/etiologia , Mamografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Autoavaliação (Psicologia) , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , National Center for Health Statistics, U.S. , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos
4.
J Clin Oncol ; 23(16): 3811-8, 2005 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15923575

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between managed care market activity and cancer trial enrollment. METHODS: Trial participant data were obtained from the National Cancer Institute. Participants in cooperative group trials of breast, colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer during the years 1996 through 2001 were assigned to counties based on their zip code of residence. Linear regression was used to determine the relationship between county enrollment rate and two measures of county managed care activity (penetration and index of competition [IOC]), adjusting for other county characteristics. RESULTS: In bivariate analysis, there was a strong inverse correlation between trial enrollment rate and IOC (r = -0.23; P < .001) as well as the proportion of the population uninsured (-0.31; P < .001) and the percentage below poverty (-0.16; P < .001). In the multivariate model, greater county managed care competition (IOC) was inversely related to trial enrollment rate (P < .008 for comparison of each quartile v lowest quartile) after accounting for managed care penetration, proportion uninsured, and other county characteristics. Counties in the lowest quartile of managed care penetration tended to have lower enrollment rates than the remaining counties (r = -0.05; P = .048), while counties in the second, third, and fourth quartiles of penetration all had similar enrollment rates to one another. CONCLUSION: Cancer trial enrollment rates were suboptimal across all counties, and counties with higher levels of managed care competition had significantly lower enrollment rates. The relationship between managed care penetration and trial enrollment was less consistent. Future efforts to enhance trial participation should address the potential negative influence of market factors.


Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Sistema de Registros
5.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 96(14): 1063-9, 2004 Jul 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15265967

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recruitment of patients into cancer research studies is exceedingly difficult, particularly for early phase trials. Payer reimbursement policies are a frequently cited barrier. We examined whether state policies that ensure coverage of routine medical care costs for cancer trial participants are associated with an increase in clinical trial enrollment. METHODS: We used logistic Poisson regressions to analyze enrollment in National Cancer Institute phase II and phase III Clinical Trials Cooperative Group trials and compared changes in trial enrollment rates between 1996 and 2001 of privately insured cancer patients who resided in the four states that enacted coverage policies in 1999 with enrollment rates in states without such policies. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Trial enrollment rates increased in the coverage and noncoverage states by 24.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 22.8% to 27.0%) and 28.8% (95% CI = 27.7% to 29.8%) per year, respectively, from 1996 through 2001. After implementation of the coverage policies in 1999 in four states, there was a 21.7% (95% CI = 3.8% to 42.6%) annual increase in phase II trial enrollment in coverage states, compared with a 15.6% (95% CI = 8.8% to 21.8%) annual decrease in noncoverage states (P<.001). After accounting for secular trend, cancer type, and race in multivariable analyses, the odds ratio (OR) for a phase II trial participant residing in a coverage versus a noncoverage state after 1999 was 1.59 per year (95% CI = 1.22 to 2.07; P =.001). In a multivariable analysis of phase III trial participation, there was a decrease in the odds of residing in a coverage state after 1999 (OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.98; P =.011). CONCLUSION: State coverage policies were associated with a statistically significant increase in phase II cancer trial participation and did not increase phase III cancer trial enrollment.


Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Regulamentação Governamental , Seleção de Pacientes , Mecanismo de Reembolso/legislação & jurisprudência , Governo Estadual , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto/economia , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto/legislação & jurisprudência , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto/economia , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto/legislação & jurisprudência , Neoplasias Colorretais/economia , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Modelos Logísticos , Estudos Longitudinais , Neoplasias Pulmonares/economia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Masculino , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto/economia , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto/legislação & jurisprudência , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Neoplasias/economia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Distribuição de Poisson , Neoplasias da Próstata/economia , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
6.
Arch Intern Med ; 161(21): 2588-95, 2001 Nov 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11718590

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Surveillance of patients with Barrett esophagus (BE) is recommended to detect dysplasia and early cancer. In 1998, practice guidelines for the surveillance of patients with BE were developed under the auspices of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG). Our objective is to assess physicians' awareness of agreement with and adherence to these guidelines. METHODS: A national prospective cohort study of practicing gastroenterologists who completed a self-administered questionnaire containing case studies prior to the release of the guidelines and another survey 18 months later. Analysis of adherence to the guidelines was done using the McNemar chi(2) test. RESULTS: Of the 154 gastroenterologists (66%) who responded to the follow-up survey, more than half (55%) were aware of the guidelines, and members of the ACG were more likely to know of their existence than nonmembers (61% vs 38%; P =.01). Overall, about 27% of physicians reported practicing in accordance with the guidelines at baseline; adherence increased modestly to 38% in the 18-month follow-up (P =.04) and was inversely related to fee-for-service reimbursement. Awareness was not associated with an increased likelihood of adherence, but agreement with the guidelines was strongly correlated with adherence (P<.001). The most frequent reasons for disagreement were concerns about liability, cancer risk, and inadequate evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of the guidelines published by the ACG was low. Guideline awareness did not predict adherence. Improvement in guideline adherence will require steps beyond mere dissemination and promotion. Addressing disagreements about liability, disease risk, and scientific evidence as well as restructuring payment incentives may help achieve optimal practice.


Assuntos
Esôfago de Barrett/diagnóstico , Esôfago de Barrett/terapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Adulto , Idoso , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Conscientização , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Prática Médica , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários
7.
Arch Intern Med ; 160(21): 3209-14, 2000 Nov 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11088080

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the regular source of care (RSOC) among physicians, a group whose self-care may reflect the attitudes and recommendations they convey to their patients. METHODS: We performed a cohort study of physicians who graduated from the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine from 1948 through 1964 to identify predictors of not having an RSOC, and to determine whether not having an RSOC was associated with subsequent receipt of preventive services. The RSOC was assessed in a 1991 survey; use of cancer screening tests and the influenza vaccine was assessed in 1997. RESULTS: The response rate in 1991 was 77% (915 respondents); 35% (312) had no RSOC. Internists (odds ratio [OR], 3.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58-6.74), surgeons (OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.17-5.02), and pathologists (OR, 5.46; 95% CI, 2.09-14.29) were significantly more likely to not have an RSOC than pediatricians. Not having an RSOC was inversely related to the belief that health is determined by health professionals (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.29-0.68) and directly related to the belief that chance (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.28-2.82) determines health. Not having an RSOC in 1991 predicted not being screened for breast, colon, and prostate cancer, as well as not receiving an influenza vaccine at 6 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A large percentage of physicians in our sample had no RSOC, and this was associated with both medical specialty and beliefs about control of health outcomes. Not having an RSOC was significantly associated with failure to use preventive services several years later. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:3209-3214.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Autocuidado/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório , Feminino , Humanos , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Mamografia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Sangue Oculto , Razão de Chances , Médicos/psicologia , Medicina Preventiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Estados Unidos
8.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 94(12): 3440-7, 1999 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10606300

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The optimal management of Barrett's esophagus (BE) is controversial. Little is known about current practice patterns or associated direct medical costs. METHODS: In a national cross-sectional survey, we asked a random sample of gastroenterologists how they would manage patients with BE and various degrees of dysplasia. We used logistic regression to identify factors associated with so-called "frequent" (at least every 12 months) surveillance. We calculated direct medical costs using Medicare payments and population-based estimates of the number of BE patients under surveillance. RESULTS: Approximately 50% of 555 gastroenterologists responded. More than 96% of respondents recommended endoscopic surveillance for BE. For BE without dysplasia, 30% would perform frequent surveillance; this was the case particularly gastroenterologists older than age 45 yr (odds ratio = 1.91, p = 0.038) or those receiving primarily fee-for-service reimbursement (odds ratio = 2.57, p = 0.004). For BE with low-grade dysplasia, the frequency of endoscopy was highly variable (range, 1-24 months). For BE with high-grade dysplasia, 73% of gastroenterologists recommended esophagectomy and the remainder recommended endoscopic surveillance. Approximately 95% of the gastroenterologists who recommended surveillance for high-grade dysplasia, however, were not in agreement with recommended protocols. We estimated the national annual expenditure for surveillance endoscopy every 24 months for BE without dysplasia to be at least $22 million. Increase in surveillance intensity from low frequency (every 36 months) to high frequency (every 12 months) strategies would escalate costs by $29 million annually. CONCLUSIONS: Physician age and reimbursement influence BE surveillance practice, suggesting the influence of nonclinical factors on clinical decision making. The majority of clinicians who would recommend surveillance for high-grade dysplasia may not be using an appropriately aggressive strategy. Variations in surveillance strategies can have large cost implications.


Assuntos
Esôfago de Barrett/economia , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Adenocarcinoma/economia , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Esôfago de Barrett/terapia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos e Análise de Custo , Estudos Transversais , Neoplasias Esofágicas/economia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicare/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/economia , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/terapia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economia , Estados Unidos
9.
Obstet Gynecol ; 94(6): 962-8, 1999 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10576183

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Prophylactic oophorectomy performed concomitantly with hysterectomy may prevent ovarian cancer. Our goal was to better understand the basis for performing concomitant oophorectomy and to determine whether this procedure is associated with increased morbidity. METHODS: Our cross-sectional study used a hospital discharge database to identify women 50 years and older who, between 1994-1996, had hysterectomies in Maryland for a benign condition. We used multiple logistic regression to examine the independent effect of physician and patient factors on the likelihood of receiving a concomitant oophorectomy. RESULTS: Concomitant oophorectomy was performed in 61% of the 6227 women in our sample. Patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy (odds ratio [OR] 11.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.65, 13.51) and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (OR 11.34; 95% CI 8.13, 15.81) were substantially more likely to have an oophorectomy than patients treated with vaginal hysterectomy, after adjusting for diagnosis and other covariates. We also found significant variation in the likelihood of receiving oophorectomy for women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy in different geographic regions. Additionally, physicians who performed many vaginal hysterectomies were significantly more likely to perform a concomitant oophorectomy. After adjusting for type of procedure, diagnosis, comorbidities, and age, oophorectomy was not associated with increased surgical morbidity. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that there are marked variations in physician practice style for concomitant oophorectomy. The variation across geographic regions and with case volume suggests the influence of nonclinical factors on oophorectomy rates.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/prevenção & controle , Ovariectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Idoso , Comorbidade , Feminino , Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/epidemiologia , Humanos , Leiomioma/cirurgia , Maryland , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pós-Menopausa , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirurgia , Prolapso Uterino/cirurgia
10.
N Engl J Med ; 340(24): 1881-7, 1999 06 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10369852

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Institute of Medicine has proposed that the amount of disease-specific research funding provided by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) be systematically and consistently compared with the burden of disease for society. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study comparing estimates of disease-specific funding in 1996 with data on six measures of the burden of disease. The measures were total mortality, years of life lost, and number of hospital days in 1994 and incidence, prevalence, and disability-adjusted life-years (one disability-adjusted life-year is defined as the loss of one year of healthy life to disease) in 1990. With the use of these measures as explanatory variables in a regression analysis, predicted funding was calculated and compared with actual funding. RESULTS: There was no relation between the amount of NIH funding and the incidence, prevalence, or number of hospital days attributed to each condition or disease (P=0.82, P=0.23, and P=0.21, respectively). The numbers of deaths (r=0.40, P=0.03) and years of life lost (r=0.42, P=0.02) were weakly associated with funding, whereas the number of disability-adjusted life-years was strongly predictive of funding (r=0.62, P<0.001). When the latter three measures were used to predict expected funding, the conclusions about the appropriateness of funding for some diseases varied according to the measure used. However, the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, breast cancer, diabetes mellitus, and dementia all received relatively generous funding, regardless of which measure was used as the basis for calculating support. Research on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, perinatal conditions, and peptic ulcer was relatively underfunded. CONCLUSIONS: The amount of NIH funding for research on a disease is associated with the burden of the disease; however, different measures of the burden of disease may yield different conclusions about the appropriateness of disease-specific funding levels.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Doença/classificação , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/economia , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Alocação de Recursos , Estudos Transversais , Doença/economia , Governo Federal , Alocação de Recursos para a Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Morbidade , Mortalidade , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/organização & administração , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/estatística & dados numéricos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto/organização & administração , Perfil de Impacto da Doença , Mudança Social , Valores Sociais , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA