Feasibility study of a novel portable digital radiography system modified for fluoroscopy in the neonatal intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: A portable radiographic system capable of fluoroscopic imaging in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) potentially benefits critically ill neonates by eliminating the need to transport them to a fluoroscopy suite. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a portable bedside fluoroscopy system in the NICU can deliver comparable image quality at a similar dose rate to a standard system in a fluoroscopy suite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In phase A, 20 patients <3 years of age and scheduled to undergo upper gastrointestinal series (upper GI) or voiding cystourethrograms (VCUG) in the radiology fluoroscopy suite were recruited to evaluate a portable fluoroscopic unit. A modified portable radiographic system with a cassette-sized detector and an in-room fluoroscopy system were sequentially used in the same examination. Four radiologists compared the image quality of 20 images from each system using the Radlex score (1-4) for five image quality attributes. The radiation dose rates for the portable and in-suite systems were collected. In phase B, fluoroscopy studies were performed in 5 neonates in the NICU and compared to the 20 previous neonatal studies performed in the department. Clinical workflow, examination time, fluoroscopy time, scattered radiation dose and patient radiation dose were evaluated. RESULTS: In phase A, average dose rates for in-room and portable systems were equivalent, (0.322 mGy/min and 0.320 mGy/min, respectively). Reader-averaged Radlex scores for in-room and portable systems were statistically significantly greater (P<0.05) for all attributes on the portable system except for image contrast. In phase B, scattered radiation from the average fluoroscopy time (26 s) was equivalent to the scattered radiation of 2.6 portable neonatal chest radiographs. Procedure time and diagnostic quality were deemed equivalent. The average dose rate in the NICU with the portable system was 0.21 mGy/min compared to 0.29 mGy/min for the in-room system. CONCLUSION: The portable fluoroscopy unit is capable of providing comparable image quality at equivalent dose levels to an in-room system for neonates with minimal risks to the staff and other patients in the NICU.

Identification of clinical parameters to increase the diagnostic yield of the non-emergent upper gastrointestinal series in pediatric outpatients.

BACKGROUND: Outpatient, non-emergent upper gastrointestinal (GI) series are frequently requested in children with no surgical history who have nonspecific symptoms such as abdominal pain, failure to thrive and vomiting. The positive yield of an upper GI series in these patients, and, thus, its utility, has not been studied. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the incidence of positive upper GI findings in children without a history of GI pathology or abdominal surgery in order to identify clinical indications associated with a greater diagnostic yield. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Findings of upper GI series performed between October 2015 and October 2017 in three institutions in children younger than 18 years of age were retrospectively reviewed. The upper GI series protocol for each institution was also reviewed. Children with a medical or surgical GI history, children with insufficient history in the chart and those with an incomplete upper GI series were excluded from the study. Exam indications, patient demographics and clinical history were obtained from the electronic medical records. RESULTS: Of 1,267 children who underwent outpatient upper GI series, 720 (median age: 2 years) had no GI history and were included in the study. The most common indications were non-bilious vomiting (62%), reflux symptoms (28%) and abdominal pain (20%). Upper GI series were normal in 605/720 cases (84%), including 25/26 children with reported bilious emesis. Of the 115 positive studies, 78 (68%) showed only gastroesophageal reflux (GER) (median age: 11 months). Of the remaining 37 studies, 19 demonstrated esophageal findings. One case of malrotation without midgut volvulus was identified in a patient who presented with dysphagia and reflux symptoms. Using a multinomial logistic regression model and adjusting for other variables, reflux symptoms and younger patient age were independent predictors of GER on upper GI series (relative risk ratios of 2.2 and 0.9, respectively). Dysphagia and/or foreign body sensation and older patient age were independent predictors of the presence of esophageal findings (relative risk ratios of 3.3 and 1.1, respectively). CONCLUSION: The yield of routine upper GI series in children with nonspecific symptoms, such as abdominal pain and vomiting, and no surgical history is low. Diagnostic yield was improved in older children and in those complaining of dysphagia and/or foreign body sensation. Routine upper GI series should be avoided in clinically well children with symptoms only of uncomplicated GER and no significant GI history. In children with a history of dysphagia and/or foreign body sensation, an esophagram/barium swallow can suffice.