British Thoracic Society Quality Standard for Clinically Significant Bronchiectasis in Adults 2022.

This British Thoracic Society Quality Standard for Clinically Significant Bronchiectasis in Adults 2022 aims to encourage good practice by setting standards of high-quality respiratory care that services should follow.

Primary care implications of the British Thoracic Society Guidelines for bronchiectasis in adults 2019.

The British Thoracic Society (BTS) Guidelines for Bronchiectasis in adults were published in January 2019, and comprise recommendations for treatment from primary to tertiary care. Here, we outline the practical implications of these guidelines for primary care practitioners. A diagnosis of bronchiectasis should be considered when a patient presents with a recurrent or persistent (>8 weeks) productive cough. A definitive diagnosis is made by using thin-section chest computed tomography (CT). Once diagnosed, patients should be initially assessed by a specialist respiratory team and a shared management plan formulated with the patient, the specialist and primary care teams. The cornerstone of primary care management is physiotherapy to improve airway sputum clearance and maximise exercise capacity, with prompt treatment of acute exacerbations with antibiotics.

Managing multimorbidity in primary care in patients with chronic respiratory conditions.

The term multimorbidity is usually defined as the coexistence of two or more chronic conditions within an individual, whereas the term comorbidity traditionally describes patients with an index condition and one or more additional conditions. Multimorbidity of chronic conditions markedly worsens outcomes in patients, increases treatment burden and increases health service costs. Although patients with chronic respiratory disease often have physical comorbidities, they also commonly experience psychological problems such as depression and anxiety. Multimorbidity is associated with increased health-care utilisation and specifically with an increased number of prescription drugs in individuals with multiple chronic conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine Education Section case study involves a patient in a primary care consultation presenting several common diseases prevalent in people of this age. The patient takes nine different drugs at this moment, one or more pills for each condition, which amounts to polypharmacy. The problems related with polypharmacy recommend that a routine medication review by primary care physicians be performed to reduce the risk of adverse effects of polypharmacy among those with multiple chronic conditions. The primary care physician has the challenging role of integrating all of the clinical problems affecting the patient and reviewing all medicaments (including over-the-counter medications) taken by the patient at any point in time, and has the has the key to prevent the unwanted consequences of polypharmacy. Multimorbid chronic disease management can be achieved with the use of care planning, unified disease templates, use of information technology with appointment reminders and with the help of the wider primary care and community teams.

The distribution of COPD in UK general practice using the new GOLD classification.

The new Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2011 document recommends a combined assessment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) based on current symptoms and future risk. A large database of primary-care COPD patients across the UK was used to determine COPD distribution and characteristics according to the new GOLD classification. 80 general practices provided patients with a Read code diagnosis of COPD. Electronic and hand searches of patient medical records were undertaken, optimising data capture. Data for 9219 COPD patients were collected. For the 6283 patients with both forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and modified Medical Research Council scores (mean±sd age 69.2±10.6 years, body mass index 27.3±6.2 kg·m(-2)), GOLD 2011 group distributions were: A (low risk and fewer symptoms) 36.1%, B (low risk and more symptoms) 19.1%, C (high risk and fewer symptoms) 19.6% and D (high risk and more symptoms) 25.3%. This is in contrast with GOLD 2007 stage classification: I (mild) 17.1%, II (moderate) 52.2%, III (severe) 25.5% and IV (very severe) 5.2%. 20% of patients with FEV1 ≥50% predicted had more than two exacerbations in the previous 12 months. 70% of patients with FEV1 <50% pred had fewer than two exacerbations in the previous 12 months. This database, representative of UK primary-care COPD patients, identified greater proportions of patients in the mildest and most severe categories upon comparing 2011 versus 2007 GOLD classifications. Discordance between airflow limitation severity and exacerbation risk was observed.

A woman with breathlessness: a practical approach to diagnosis and management.

Worsening breathless in a patient with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common diagnostic and management challenge in primary care. A systematic approach to history-taking and examination combined with targeted investigation of pulmonary, cardiovascular, thromboembolic and systemic causes is essential if co-morbidities are to be identified and managed. Distinguishing between heart failure and COPD is a particular challenge as symptoms and signs overlap. In low and middle income countries additional priorities are the detection of infections such as tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Clinicians need to be alert to the possibility of atypical presentations (such as pain-free variants of angina) and less common conditions (including chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension) in order not to overlook important potentially treatable conditions.

GOLD guidelines 2011: what are the implications for primary care?

A major revision of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines was published in December 2011, which takes account of the fact that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a multi-system disease with effects on the patient beyond the effects of airflow limitation alone. The guidelines present a novel way of assessing the patient with COPD, linked to the major goals of stable COPD management of reducing symptoms (measured by the modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Score and/or COPD Assessment Tool) and reducing future risk (measured by the severity of airflow limitation and/or exacerbation history in the previous 12 months). Four patient groups are identified on the basis of their symptom/risk profile and a pharmacotherapy strategy is described using this profile. Emphasis is still placed on three pivotal features of non-pharmacological management: (1) reduction of exposure to risk factors (principally tobacco smoke); (2) promotion of exercise; and (3) immunisation against influenza and pneumococcal disease. In addition, there is a new chapter on the importance of assessing and treating co-morbid disease. The guidelines are a welcome advance in the management of COPD, but need further development to guide the more holistic approach to the management of patients with COPD in primary care.

The 2010 NICE COPD Guidelines: how do they compare with the GOLD guidelines?

The UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has produced a 2010 partial update of its original 2004 Guidelines on COPD management. The definition of airflow obstruction has been altered to a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio < 0.7 and the severity of airflow obstruction has been similarly aligned with the Global initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guideline definition. However, patients with GOLD Stage 1 (i.e. FEV1 predicted ≥ 80%) must be symptomatic for a diagnosis of COPD to be made under the new NICE criteria. Recent large scale trials have resulted in a new inhaled pharmacotherapy algorithm which includes early use of inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting ß2-agonist combination therapy for patients with an FEV1 < 50% predicted. In spite of an apparent emphasis on pharmacotherapy, both GOLD and NICE Guidelines emphasise that COPD is a multi-system disease requiring a multidimensional approach to treatment. In particular, the importance of smoking cessation and pulmonary rehabilitation is reiterated, the latter not only being of use in managing stable disease but also following hospital discharge.

Summary of the consultation on a strategy for services for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in England.

The Consultation on a Strategy for Services for COPD in England is the culmination of five years' work by respiratory specialists from all disciplines, as well as representatives from the voluntary sector, patients, carers and planners. It has been led by the Department of Health in England and the joint National Directors for the programme, Professor Sue Hill and Dr Robert Winter. The Strategy outlines service standards for providers of COPD care and is complementary to the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines on the management of COPD. Its key elements are: • preventing the development and progression of COPD • diagnosing COPD accurately and at an early stage • developing structured care based on national guidance • promoting self-management education • reducing the number of people admitted to hospital • improving access to end-of-life care • promoting good asthma services. In essence this is an aspirational strategy which aims to change the way that the NHS in England delivers care for people with COPD by identifying them earlier and managing them optimally in order to reduce the likelihood of progression to the more severe stages of the disease. An economic impact assessment shows that implementing the Strategy will save approximately £1billion over 10 years as well as sparing many people from a debilitating illness. This supplement is based on the Strategy Consultation document as well as the NICE guidelines for COPD management. It aims to elucidate practical implementation of the COPD Strategy, and includes verbatim the Strategy recommendations as well as highly relevant clinical information from the NICE guidelines. Implementation of the Strategy recommendations should lead to optimum care for patients with COPD.

The use of exhaled nitric oxide monitoring in primary care asthma clinics: a pilot study.

AIM: Although asthma is defined as a chronic inflammatory disease, inflammation is rarely assessed. The fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a biomarker of airways inflammation. We assessed the feasibility of FeNO monitoring in general practice. METHODS: Prospective observational study of volunteers attending primary care asthma clinics. Consenting subjects were seen at their own surgery for 2-weekly reviews over 12 weeks, with assessment of FeNO, lung function, symptoms and health status. RESULTS: 22 adults and 15 children provided informed consent. Two subjects were unable to perform the FeNO expiratory manoeuvre. In the remaining subjects, measurements conforming to highest ERS/ATS recommendations were made on 211 of 236 occasions, and on 21 further occasions acceptable readings were made. Acceptability was high to subjects and staff. Correlations between FeNO readings and other parameters were weak and non-significant except for statistically significant correlation between longitudinal FeNO changes and changes in lung function (r= -0.33, p<0.001) and health status (r= -0.22, p=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Exhaled nitric oxide monitoring is technically feasible and acceptable to staff and patients within the context of a primary care asthma clinic.

Can asthma control be improved by understanding the patient's perspective?

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials show that asthma can be controlled in the majority of patients, but poorly controlled asthma still imposes a considerable burden. The level of asthma control achieved reflects the behaviour of both healthcare professionals and patients. A key challenge for healthcare professionals is to help patients to engage in self-management behaviours with optimal adherence to appropriate treatment. These issues are particularly relevant in primary care, where most asthma is managed. An international panel of experts invited by the International Primary Care Respiratory Group considered the evidence and discussed the implications for primary care practice. DISCUSSION: Causes of poor control: Clinical factors such as exposure to triggers and concomitant rhinitis are important but so are patient behavioural factors. Behaviours such as smoking and nonadherence may reduce the efficacy of treatment and patients' perceptions influence these behaviours. Perceptual barriers to adherence include doubting the need for treatment when symptoms are absent and concerns about potential adverse effects. Under-treatment may also be related to patients' underestimation of the significance of symptoms, and lack of awareness of achievable control. IMPLICATIONS: Three key implications for healthcare professionals emerged from the debate. First, the need for simple tools to assess asthma control. Two approaches considered were the monitoring of biometric markers of control and questionnaires to record patient-reported outcomes. Second, to understand the reasons for poor control for individual patients, identifying both clinical (e.g. rhinitis) and behavioural factors (e.g. smoking and nonadherence to treatment). Third was the need to incorporate, within asthma review, an assessment of patient perspectives including their goals and aspirations and to elicit their beliefs and concerns about asthma and its treatment. This can be used as a basis for agreement between the healthcare professional and patient on a predefined target regarding asthma control and a treatment plan to achieve this. SUMMARY: Optimum review of asthma is essential to improve control. A key priority is the development of simple and effective tools for identifying poor control for individual patients coupled with a tailored approach to treatment to enable patients to set and achieve realistic goals for asthma control.

Targeted routine asthma care in general practice using telephone triage.

BACKGROUND: There is a high non-attendance rate for traditional clinic-based routine asthma care in general practice. Alternative methods of providing routine asthma care need to be examined. AIM: To examine the cost and effectiveness of targeted routine asthma care in general practice using telephone triage, compared to usual clinic care. DESIGN OF STUDY: An open randomised controlled trial. SETTING: A single semi-rural practice in the southwest of England. METHOD: Adult patients with asthma were randomised to receive either their routine asthma care in the surgery or care by telephone triage. Asthma control parameters, health status and NHS resource utilisation were measured over the 12-month study period. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-four patients were randomised and 35% per cent more patients (n = 84 versus n = 62) received more than one consultation in the telephone group. Asthma control as measured by the asthma control questionnaire (ACQ) was similar in the clinic and telephone groups: mean change in ACQ = -0.11 (95% CI = -0.32 to 0.11) versus -0.18 (95% CI = -0.38 to 0.02). Mean NHS costs were 210 pounds sterling per patient per year in the telephone group compared to 334 pounds sterling in the clinic group (P-value of bootstrapped difference = 0.071). CONCLUSION: Targeted routine asthma care by telephone triage of adult asthmatics can lead to more asthma patients being reviewed, at less cost per patient and without loss of asthma control compared to usual routine care in the surgery.