Nailing of proximal ulna fractures: biomechanical comparison of a new locked nail with angular stable plating.

PURPOSE: Proximal ulna fractures are common injuries and frequently treated with angular stable plating. This surgical option shows good functional results. Relevant drawbacks such as large soft tissue exposure, compromised blood supply of fracture fragments and disturbing osteosynthetic material are described. The aim of this study was to compare a new locked proximal ulna nail with angular stable plating in a biomechanical testing setup for extraarticular proximal ulna fractures. METHODS: Ten pairs of sawbones with a Jupiter type IIB proximal ulna fracture (OTA 2U1A3.1) were tested after osteosynthesis with the mentioned implants in a servo-pneumatic testing machine. The testing setup simulates physiological joint motion (0°-90°) under cyclic loading (30-300 N). Primary stability and loosening of both constructs were quantified using micromotion video-analysis after 608 test cycles. RESULTS: The micromotion analysis showed significantly higher primary stability of the locked nail (0.29 ± 0.13 mm) compared to the angular stable plate (0.97 ± 0.30 mm, p < 0.001). Both implants showed a low amount of loosening after completion of the test cycles. The construct with the locked nail (0.08 ± 0.06 mm) showed significantly lower dislocation of the fragments measured at the anterior cortex (plate 0.24 ± 0.13 mm, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Nailing of proximal ulna fractures shows significantly higher primary stability and lower loosening compared to angular stable plating in our testing setup.

Nailing of diaphyseal ulna fractures in adults-biomechanical evaluation of a novel implant in comparison with locked plating.

BACKGROUND: Adult forearm fractures require surgical treatment in most cases. Open reduction and internal fixation with plate osteosynthesis is the therapy of choice. Intramedullary fixation offers several advantages compared to plate fixation but is not routinely used. The aim of our study was to compare a newly designed ulna nail with angular stable plating in a biomechanical testing setup of an ulna shaft fracture with a diaphyseal defect. METHODS: Ten pairs of sawbones with a defect osteotomy of the ulna shaft (OTA 2U2C3) were fixed with an interlocked nail or locked plate osteosynthesis. The constructs were tested under four-point bending, torsional loading and axial loading in a servo-pneumatic testing machine to compare the stiffness of both stabilization methods. RESULTS: The nail constructs show lower yet sufficient bending stiffness (62.25 ± 6.64 N/mm) compared to the plate constructs (71.2 ± 5.98 N/mm, p = 0.005). The torsional loading test shows superior stiffness of the plate constructs (0.24 ± 0.03 Nm/deg vs. 0.1 ± 0.01 Nm/deg; p < 0.001), while the axial loading shows superior stiffness of the nail constructs (1028.9 ± 402.1 N/mm vs. 343.9 ± 112.6 N/mm; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intramedullary nailing of ulna shaft fractures obtains sufficient but lower stability in bending and torsional loading when compared to rigid angular stable plating and could be an alternative technique to plate fixation. The lower stability and the closed stabilization technique allow for a rapid periosteal healing, which is not present in stiffer constructs.

Space available for trans-sacral implants to treat fractures of the pelvis assessed by virtual implant positioning.

INTRODUCTION: The use of trans-sacral implants to treat fractures of the sacrum is limited by the variable pelvic anatomy. We were interested in how many trans-sacral implants can be placed per pelvis? If a trans-sacral implant cannot be placed in S1, where is the cortex perforated, and is the use of sacroiliac screws safe in these pelves? MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3D pelvic models were created from CT scans of 156 individuals without fractures (92 European and 64 Japanese, 79 male and 77 female, mean age 66.7 ± 13.7 years). Trans-sacral implants with a diameter of 7.3 mm were positioned virtually with and without a surrounding safe zone of 12 mm diameter. RESULTS: Fifty-one percent of pelves accommodated trans-sacral implants in S1 with a safe zone. Twenty-two percent did not offer enough space in S1 for an implant even when ignoring the safe zone. Every pelvis had sufficient space for a trans-sacral implant in S2, in 78% including a safe zone as well. In S1, implant perforation was observed in the sacral ala and iliac fossa in 69%, isolated iliac fossa perforation in 23% and perforation of the sacral ala in 8%. Bilateral sacroiliac screw placement was always possible in S1. CONCLUSIONS: The use of trans-sacral implants in S1 requires meticulous preoperative planning to avoid injury of neurovascular structures. S2 more consistently offers space for trans-sacral implants.

Complex radial head and neck fractures treated with modern locking plate fixation.

BACKGROUND: Internal fixation of complex radial head and neck (CRHN) fractures is difficult, and postoperative complications are common. This study evaluated elbow function and patient clinical status after internal fixation of CRHN fractures with modern locking plates. METHODS: We included 40 patients with 41 fractures (1 bilateral lesion). In 25 patients (61%), a concomitant injury was found. Patients were an average age of 46 years (range, 22-70 years). The mean follow-up time was 36 months (range, 2-70 months). Postoperative assessments included evaluation of range of motion, functional scores, and radiologic findings. We assessed fracture healing, surgical complications, revision surgery, and the need for metal removal. RESULTS: Of the 34 fractures available for follow-up, 33 (97%) healed well. The mean extension deficit was 6° (range, 0°-30°). The average elbow flexion was 134° (range, 90°-160°), pronation was 70° (range, 30°-90°), and supination was 64° (range, 20°-90°). The Mayo Elbow Performance Score showed a mean of 90 points (range, 65-100 points). We observed no "poor" results. The mean Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 16.5 (range, 2.5-58.3; n = 29). All patients continued activity without daily analgesics. There were 12 (34%) complications. In 11 (32%) patients, the plate was removed. CONCLUSIONS: CRHN fractures fixed with modern locking plates and treated as an osseoligamentous lesion exhibited promising midterm results. The new fixation devices represent an improvement in the treatment of this difficult and common fracture while reducing the need for joint replacement or radial head resection. Diagnosis and treatment of concomitant injuries should be emphasized.

Fragility fractures of the sacrum occur in elderly patients with severe loss of sacral bone mass.

INTRODUCTION: Patients suffering from osteoporosis-associated fragility fractures of the sacrum (FFS; also termed sacral insufficiency fractures) are increasingly observed. They have typical fracture patterns with fracture lines located in the sacral ala. When treating these patients operatively, iliosacral screw loosening is not uncommon. We aimed to study the sacral bone mass in patients presenting with a FFS using 3D statistical models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3D models of averaged Hounsfield units (HU) were generated based on CT scans from 13 patients with a unilateral FFS (mean age 79.6 years; 11 females, 2 males). The control group without fractures consisted of 28 males and 32 females (mean age of 68.3 years). A virtual bone probe along the trans-sacral corridors S1 and S2 was taken. RESULTS: The bone mass distribution in the fractured sacra was similar to the control group, however, with overall lower HU. Large zones of negative HU were located in the sacral ala. In the fractured sacra, the HU in the sacral ala was significantly lower on the non-injured side when comparing to the fractured side (p < 0.001) as well as compared to the non-fractured group (p < 0.001). Low bone mass was observed in sacral body S1 (40 HU) and S2 (20 HU). CONCLUSIONS: The extensive area of negative HU may explain the fracture location in the sacral ala. The low HU in the sacral bodies advocates the use of trans-sacral implants or augmented iliosacral screws to enhance the strength of fracture fixation. The increased HU in the fractured ala could be explained by fracture-asssociated hemorrhage and can be used as a diagnostic tool.

Is the novel olecranon tension plate a valid alternative to tension band wiring of olecranon fractures? A biomechanical study on cadaver bones.

INTRODUCTION: Tension band wiring (TBW) used for olecranon fractures is afflicted with a high rate of complications. The aim of this study was to compare the stability of the TBW versus an alternative, novel low-profile olecranon tension plate (OTP) with angular stable screws in a simulated complex fracture model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine fresh-frozen pairs of cadaver proximal ulnae with an oblique osteotomy and an additional wedge fragment simulating an unstable fracture were tested. The TBW and OTP were implanted pairwise. The elbow motion was simulated in a single-muscle model and ranged from full extension to 90° of flexion. The pulling force of the triceps tendon ranged from 50 to 200 N. The displacement of the fracture fragments was measured with a video motion analysis system over 304 cycles. Data were assessed statistically using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: The cyclic loading tests showed mean loosening of the fracture fragments at the articular surface of 0.56 mm using TBW (SD 0.65) and 0.15 mm for OTP (SD 0.39). There was no statistical significance in loosening between the two constructs (p = 0.31). No plate breakage or screw loosening occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The low-profile OTP, using the principles of pre-tensioning, lag, cortical, and angular stable screws together, demonstrated similar stability after olecranon fracture fixation when compared with the TBW technique and a lag screw in the olecranon fracture model with a third wedge fragment.

Results Of The Treatement Of Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures With A New Dynamic Locking Plate.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes in patients with intracapsular femoral neck fractures treated with the novel Targon FN implant. Sixty two patients (mean age: 57 years) were included. The clinical and radiological results were investigated. Radiological and clinical followup (mean time: 21,2 months) was available for 51 patients; in 36 patients, Harris Hip Score (HHS) outcome data were additionally assessed. The overall complication rate was 8%. The median Harris Hip Score was 92 (range 30-100). The results of the Harris Hip Score were rated excellent or good in 26 (72%) patients and fair or poor in 10 (28%). The HHS was correlated significantly with age at trauma, time from admission to operation, preexisting cardiovascular risk factors and disease of the ipsilateral leg. The positive experience with Targon FN suggests that this implant is an advance in treatment of intracapsular femoral neck fractures with head-preserving surgery.