International urogynecological consultation chapter 4.1: definition of outcomes for pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This manuscript of Chapter 4 of the International Urogynecological Consultation (IUC) on Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) reviews the literature and makes recommendations on the definition of success in the surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. METHODS: An international group containing seven urogynecologists performed an exhaustive search of the literature using two PubMed searches and using PICO methodology. The first search was from 01/01/2012-06/12/2022. A second search from inception to 7/24/2022 was done to access older references. Publications were eliminated if not relevant to the clinical definition of surgical success for the treatment of POP. All abstracts were reviewed for inclusion and any disagreements were adjudicated by majority consensus of the writing group. The resulting list of articles were used to inform a comprehensive review and creation of the definition of success in the surgical treatment of POP. OUTCOMES: The original search yielded 12,161 references of which 45 were used by the writing group. Ultimately, 68 references are included in the manuscript. For research purposes, surgical success should be primarily defined by the absence of bothersome patient bulge symptoms or retreatment for POP and a time frame of at least 12 months follow-up should be used. Secondary outcomes, including anatomic measures of POP and related pelvic floor symptoms, should not contribute to a definition of success or failure. For clinical practice, surgical success should primarily be defined as the absence of bothersome patient bulge symptoms. Surgeons may consider using PASS (patient acceptable symptom state) or patient goal attainment assessments, and patients should be followed for a minimum of at least one encounter at 6-12 weeks post-operatively. For surgeries involving mesh longer-term follow-up is recommended.

Urogynecology Section of the Polish Society of Gynecologists and Obstetricians Guidelines on the management of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the publication was to present the Guideline of the Urogynecology Section of the Polish Society of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (PSGO) for the management of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse, based on the available literature, expert knowledge and opinion, as well as everyday practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 2005, 2006 and 2010, the panel of PSGO experts published guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). This publication presents an update of those recommendations and concerns recurrent POP treatment. MAIN CONCLUSION: The analysis of data revealed that sacrocolpopexy with the use of commercial sets or polypropylene hernia mesh is the method of choice for the surgical repair of recurrent vaginal vault prolapse. However, a significantly higher risk of surgical and postoperative complications after sacrocolpopexy, as compared to vaginal surgeries, should be considered when making treatment decisions. In other types of recurrent POP, the choice of surgery method should be tailored to the individual needs of each patient and may depend on the medical center.

Predictive value of classification systems and single fistula-related factors in surgical management of vesicovaginal fistula.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to find the most clinically useful vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) classification system or single fistula-related factor, which would be helpful in determining the most proper management leading to successful treatment. METHODS: Between 2018 and 2020, 30 patients were diagnosed with VVF and underwent the Latzko procedure. Nineteen patients, after previously failed surgery, were injected with platelet-rich-plasma (PRP) before a final attempt to close VVF. Patients with primary VVF were included into the surgery only group and patients with secondary VVF were included into PRP and surgery group. Each patient was classified according to 13 different classification systems. RESULTS: Statistical evaluation revealed some significant differences between the patients who required PRP injection and repeated surgery, compared with patients who were successfully treated at first surgery but only with Lawson, Waaldijk, Arrowsmith, and Tafesse classifications. Patients who succeded with the fistula closure after the first surgical procedure had significantly higher body mass index (BMI) when compared with patients who required PRP injection prior surgical procedure (30.9 vs. 25.7, respectively; p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: None of the classification systems allows to precisely predict VVF surgery outcome. There are several factors such as previous surgery, lack of urethral involvement, lack of circumferential defect which might suggest that PRP injection would help to preserve watertightness of the closure. The most important finding is that overweight is the most positive predicting demographic feature of surgical success. Thus we may conclude that Martius flap technique should be taken into consideration in patients with low BMI.