Evaluation of direct oral anticoagulants versus low molecular weight heparins for venous thromboembolism treatment in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use in cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CA-VTE) has increased due to updates in recent guidelines and literature. However, select guidelines caution against DOAC use in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies due to reported increased bleeding events. The objective of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of DOACs versus low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) for CA-VTE treatment in patients with GI malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients with primary GI malignancies who received therapeutic anticoagulation with a DOAC or LMWH for CA-VTE between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. The primary outcome was the incidence rate of bleeding events (major, clinically relevant non-major, or minor bleeding events) within a 12-month period following the initiation of therapeutic anticoagulation. The secondary endpoint was the incidence rate of recurrent VTE events within a 12-month period following the start of therapeutic anticoagulation. RESULTS: After screening, 141 patients met inclusion criteria. The incidence rate of all bleeding events significantly differed between DOAC (4.98 events/100 person-months) and LWMH (10.2 events/100 person-months) recipients. The corresponding incidence rate ratio (IRR) with the DOAC group serving as the reference was 2.05 (p = 0.01), with the majority of bleeds in both groups presenting as minor bleeds. No difference was found between the incidence rate of recurrent VTE within a 12-month period of starting therapeutic anticoagulation between groups (IRR 3.08, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that DOACs do not pose an additional bleeding risk compared to LMWH in patients with certain GI malignancies. Careful selection of DOAC therapy with respect to bleeding risk is still warranted.

Complete response following treatment of plasma cell leukemia with venetoclax and dexamethasone: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is a rare but aggressive variant of multiple myeloma (MM) with a poor prognosis. Due to the limited number of prospective clinical trials studying PCL, treatment options are often extrapolated from data available for the treatment of MM. Venetoclax has recently demonstrated antimyeloma activity in patients with relapsed/refractory MM carrying the t(11;14) translocation. However, few cases have reported the analogous efficacy of venetoclax in PCL. CASE REPORT: A 64-year-old Caucasian male developed relapsed PCL despite treatment with hyperCD (hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone) and Dara-KRd (daratumumab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone). Due to the refractory nature of his disease and the presence of a t(11:14) translocation, the patient was subsequently initiated on venetoclax 400 mg daily and dexamethasone 4 mg once weekly. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: The patient achieved a complete response by International Myeloma Working Group criteria three months after initiating venetoclax-dexamethasone, including a repeat bone marrow biopsy that showed no abnormal plasma cells. He successfully underwent consolidation with melphalan-based autologous stem cell transplantation. He remains disease-free 9 months after venetoclax initiation. DISCUSSION: Combination all-oral therapy with venetoclax and dexamethasone can induce deep hematologic responses in patients with relapsed/refractory PCL carrying the t(11;14) translocation.