Dabigatran etexilate: a possible replacement for heparinoids and vitamin K antagonists?

Dabigatran etexilate is the first oral anticoagulant to be approved in the United States in decades. It works directly by inhibiting clot-bound and free factor IIa (ie, thrombin) and indirectly by inhibiting platelet aggregation induced by thrombin. It is approved in the United States for stroke prophylaxis in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. There is evidence to suggest that it is also effective for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after knee and hip replacement surgery. Dabigatran etexilate therapy does not require laboratory monitoring, an advantage over warfarin. Unlike the earlier direct thrombin inhibitor, ximelagatran, it has demonstrated no potential for serious hepatotoxicity. It is also subject to a much lower degree of interpatient variability in dose response, has no diet-drug interactions, and has fewer clinically significant drug-drug interactions compared with warfarin. Dabigatran etexilate appears to be a valuable addition to our anticoagulant armamentarium.

Oral hydromorphone extended-release.

OBJECTIVE: To review the chemistry, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, tolerability, dosing, and role of the Osmotic-controlled Release Oral delivery System (OROS) hydromorphone extended-release (ER) tablets. DATA SOURCE: A MEDLINE/PUBMED search (1986-August 2010) was conducted to identify studies in the English language, with additional references being obtained from their bibliographies. STUDY SELECTION: All studies of hydromorphone ER were reviewed. DATA SYNTHESIS: This is the second long-acting hydromorphone formulation to receive approval by the Food and Drug Administration (a twice-daily formulation was approved in September 2004, but was subsequently withdrawn in July 2005). Hydromorphone is a semi-synthetic mu-opioid receptor agonist structurally similar to morphine, hydrocodone, and oxymorphone. OROS ER technology allows once-daily dosing. Clinical trials have focused on the convertibility of (an) other opioid(s) to hydromorphone ER in chronic malignant and nonmalignant pain. This product displays the expected opioid side effects, being comparable to oxycodone controlled-release. Coadministration with ethanol does not produce the degree of "dose-dumping" seen with the former hydromorphone twice-daily product or oxymorphone ER. Hydromorphone ER is indicated for the management of moderate-to-severe pain in opioidtolerant patients requiring continuous, around-the-clock opioid analgesia for an extended period of time. Dosage adjustment is recommended in patients with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class B) and moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance of 30-60 mL/min). CONCLUSION: Hydromorphone ER is the newest oral opioid to enter a crowded marketplace now totaling 15 different Schedule 2 opioids (including tapentadol), and tramadol, available in oral, parenteral, rectal, transdermal, transmucosal, and intranasal formulations. It does not appear to have any unique assets or liabilities and should be considered as one of many oral opioids available for the management of persistent pain of moderate-to-severe intensity.

Tetrabenazine, a monoamine-depleting drug used in the treatment of hyperkinetic movement disorders.

BACKGROUND: Few drugs are available for the management of hyperkinetic movement disorders such as the dystonias, choreas, dyskinesias, and tics. Those that are available (primarily neuroleptics) are associated with a wide range of potentially serious adverse effects, including induction of tardive movement disorders. Tetrabenazine (TBZ) is a monoamine-depleting agent initially studied in the 1950s and currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of chorea in Huntington's disease. OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, therapeutic use, tolerability, drug-interaction potential, and dosing and administration of TBZ. METHODS: MEDLINE was searched (1950-February 2010) for English-language articles investigating any aspect of TBZ. Search terms included tetrabenazine, Ro 1-9569, Nitoman, benzoquinolizines, and reserpine. The reference lists of the identified articles were searched for other pertinent publications, particularly those that were not indexed in the 1950s and 1960s. RESULTS: In the search for a chemical compound that was simpler than reserpine while preserving reserpine-like psychotropic activity, TBZ was identified in the 1950s as one member of a large group of benzoquinolizine derivatives. TBZ acts by depletion of the monoamines serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine in the central nervous system (CNS). It does this by reversibly inhibiting vesicle monoamine transporter type 2 and thus preventing monoamine uptake into presynaptic neurons. Clinical studies suggest that TBZ may have therapeutic applications in a wide range of hyperkinetic movement disorders. TBZ has been associated with numerous adverse effects, some of them serious and potentially fatal; these include parkinsonism, other extrapyramidal symptoms (particularly akathisia), depression and suicidality, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, and sedation. TBZ is subject to important drug-drug interactions with inhibitors and inducers of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6, reserpine, and lithium. It is one of very few drugs whose dosing is based, in part, on the results of genotyping (in its case, genotyping for CYP2D6 metabolizer status). CONCLUSIONS: TBZ is a complicated drug in terms of its mechanism of action and its activities against the 3 major monoamines in the CNS, making it difficult to predict its efficacy and tolerability in patients with hyperkinetic movement disorders. It is associated with numerous adverse effects and several important drug-drug interactions. Much work remains to be done to determine the therapeutic potential of TBZ in the treatment of hyperkinetic movement disorders.

Cranberry and urinary tract infections.

Urinary tract infection (UTI) refers to the presence of clinical signs and symptoms arising from the genitourinary tract plus the presence of one or more micro-organisms in the urine exceeding a threshold value for significance (ranges from 102 to 103 colony-forming units/mL). Infections are localized to the bladder (cystitis), renal parenchyma (pyelonephritis) or prostate (acute or chronic bacterial prostatitis). Single UTI episodes are very common, especially in adult women where there is a 50-fold predominance compared with adult men. In addition, recurrent UTIs are also common, occurring in up to one-third of women after first-episode UTIs. Recurrences requiring intervention are usually defined as two or more episodes over 6 months or three or more episodes over 1 year (this definition applies only to young women with acute uncomplicated UTIs). A cornerstone of prevention of UTI recurrence has been the use of low-dose once-daily or post-coital antimicrobials; however, much interest has surrounded non-antimicrobial-based approaches undergoing investigation such as use of probiotics, vaccines, oligosaccharide inhibitors of bacterial adherence and colonization, and bacterial interference with immunoreactive extracts of Escherichia coli. Local (intravaginal) estrogen therapy has had mixed results to date. Cranberry products in a variety of formulations have also undergone extensive evaluation over several decades in the management of UTIs. At present, there is no evidence that cranberry can be used to treat UTIs. Hence, the focus has been on its use as a preventative strategy. Cranberry has been effective in vitro and in vivo in animals for the prevention of UTI. Cranberry appears to work by inhibiting the adhesion of type I and P-fimbriated uropathogens (e.g. uropathogenic E. coli) to the uroepithelium, thus impairing colonization and subsequent infection. The isolation of the component(s) of cranberry with this activity has been a daunting task, considering the hundreds of compounds found in the fruit and its juice derivatives. Reasonable evidence suggests that the anthocyanidin/proanthocyanidin moieties are potent antiadhesion compounds. However, problems still exist with standardization of cranberry products, which makes it extremely difficult to compare products or extrapolate results. Unfortunately, most clinical trials have had design deficiencies and none have evaluated specific key cranberry-derived compounds considered likely to be active moieties (e.g. proanthocyanidins). In general, the preventive efficacy of cranberry has been variable and modest at best. Meta-analyses have established that recurrence rates over 1 year are reduced approximately 35% in young to middle-aged women. The efficacy of cranberry in other groups (i.e. elderly, paediatric patients, those with neurogenic bladder, those with chronic indwelling urinary catheters) is questionable. Withdrawal rates have been quite high (up to 55%), suggesting that these products may not be acceptable over long periods. Adverse events include gastrointestinal intolerance, weight gain (due to the excessive calorie load) and drug-cranberry interactions (due to the inhibitory effect of flavonoids on cytochrome P450-mediated drug metabolism). The findings of the Cochrane Collaboration support the potential use of cranberry products in the prophylaxis of recurrent UTIs in young and middle-aged women. However, in light of the heterogeneity of clinical study designs and the lack of consensus regarding the dosage regimen and formulation to use, cranberry products cannot be recommended for the prophylaxis of recurrent UTIs at this time.

Drug treatment of paraphilic and nonparaphilic sexual disorders.

BACKGROUND: Paraphilias are characterized by recurrent, intense, sexually arousing fantasies, urges, or behaviors, over a period of > or =6 months, generally involving nonhuman objects, suffering or humiliation of oneself or one's partner, or children or other nonconsenting persons. These fantasies, urges, and behaviors produce clinically significant distress or impairments in social, occupational, and other important areas of functioning. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this article was to provide an in-depth review of the clinical pharmacology of the main antiandrogens (cyproterone acetate, medroxyprogesterone acetate [MPA], and the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone [LHRH] agonists) used in the treatment of the paraphilias, as well as a discussion of the relevant clinical case reports, case series, and controlled trials. Treatment recommendations are also provided. METHODS: Relevant publications were identified through a search of the English-language literature indexed on MEDLINE/PubMed (1966-September 2008) using the search terms paraphilia, sex offender, hypersexuality, sexual behaviors, fetish, transvestic fetishism, sexual addiction, sexual compulsivism, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, antiandrogens, cyproterone acetate, medroxyprogesterone acetate, LHRH agonists, and estrogens. Additional publications were identified from the bibliographies of retrieved publications. RESULTS: In vitro and in vivo (animal) studies have revealed that serotonin and prolactin inhibit sexual arousal, while norepinephrine (via alpha(1)-adrenoceptor activation), dopamine, acetylcholine (via muscarinic receptor activation), enkephalins, oxytocin, gonadotropin-releasing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, testosterone/dihydrotestosterone, and estrogen/progesterone stimulate it. Most of the currently used pharmacologic treatments of the paraphilias have serotonin and testosterone/dihydrotestosterone as their targets. Cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy should be initiated in all offenders. In those at the highest risk of reoffending, psychotherapy should be initiated at the same time as drug therapy because their combination is associated with better results compared with either as monotherapy (especially in pedophiles). In offenders committing non-"hands-on" or violent paraphilias and those at low risk of reoffending, serotoninergic monotherapies (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs] or tricyclic antidepressants) are reasonable choices (SSRIs are preferred). In other offenders, initial dual combination therapy (serotoninergic plus antiandrogenic) is recommended. Progestogens should be used before LHRH agonists or estrogens. Cyproterone acetate and MPA are preferred as oral and IM progestogens, respectively. Failure of dual combination serotoninergic/ progestogen therapy should prompt a change in one or both of the components (eg, SSRI to tricyclic antidepressants or vice versa, or cyproterone acetate to MPA or vice versa) or the addition or substitution of an LHRH agonist (leuprolide or triptorelin) for the progestogen. Estrogens are second- or third-line agents. Rarely, triple combination therapy is necessary (serotoninergic plus LHRH agonist or progestogen plus estrogen). It appears that recidivism rates are reduced by the use of psychotherapy alone, drug therapy alone, and more so by their combination. CONCLUSIONS: Although some progress has been made in the therapy of paraphilic and nonparaphilic sexual disorders, much work remains to be done. The development of more specific, more effective, and better-tolerated medications for these disorders should be recognized as a program worthy of greater support from government and pharmaceutical industry sources. Clinical studies performed to date have largely been of poor design, making the recommendations provided in this review tentative at best.

Ibandronate, an experimental intravenous bisphosphonate for osteoporosis, bone metastases, and hypercalcemia of malignancy.

Ibandronate is an experimental intravenous bisphosphonate under study for the prevention or treatment of osteoporosis and skeletal complications of bone metastases, as well as hypercalcemia of malignancy. To review the data on this drug, PubMed/MEDLINE was searched for pertinent studies in English; data from January 1986-October 2005 were reviewed. In preclinical studies, ibandronate was an extremely potent bisphosphonate compared with its predecessors and was active in all animal models of human postmenopausal and corticosteroid-associated osteoporosis. Similar to other bisphosphonates, ibandronate exhibits antitumor activity and prevents or reduces bone metastases. Forty to fifty percent of the dose is bound to bone; renal clearance of unchanged drug accounts for 70% of total body clearance. Early clinical trials demonstrated efficacy and tolerability of intravenous ibandronate in the prevention or treatment of postmenopausal and corticosteroid-associated osteoporosis when administered once every 3 months. Intravenous ibandronate also reduces skeletal complications of bone metastases, including pain, although the cumulative dose used is much higher than that used in osteoporosis, as the drug is administered every 3-4 weeks. Single doses of intravenous ibandronate are probably also effective in the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy. The major tolerability issue with intravenous bisphosphonates is renal safety, thus the drugs generally require infusion (e.g., 0.25 hr for zoledronic acid, 2-24 hrs for pamidronate). However, intravenous ibandronate can be administered by bolus injection over a few minutes without an elevated risk of nephrotoxicity. The experimental intravenous dosage is 2 mg every 3 months for treatment or prevention of osteoporosis, and 2-6 mg every 3-4 weeks or in a single dose for treatment of bone metastases or hypercalcemia of malignancy, respectively. Ibandronate can be used in the presence of severe renal impairment with proper dosage adjustment. The drug will be an interesting addition to the available drugs for osteoporosis, bone metastases, and hypercalcemia of malignancy. Studies of intravenous ibandronate as an adjunctive treatment for cancers that tend to metastasize to bone are under way. Whether intravenous ibandronate will be a therapeutic advance is best answered by randomized, controlled trials. These are ongoing and should provide data with which to make better-informed choices concerning intravenous bisphosphonates.

Ibandronate: a new oral bisphosphonate for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE: To review a new oral bisphosphonate, ibandronate, recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment and prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis. DATA SOURCE: A MEDLINE/PUBMED search was conducted to identify pertinent studies in the English language. Additional references were obtained from the bibliographies of these studies. Data over the time period of 1986 through July 2005 were reviewed. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All studies evaluating any aspect of ibandronate in animals and humans. Studies in humans focused on the oral drug formulation. DATA SYNTHESIS: Preclinical studies established that ibandronate was an extremely potent bisphosphonate compared with its predecessors and that it was active in all animal models of human postmenopausal and corticosteroid-associated osteoporosis. Similar to other selected bisphosphonates, preclinical studies also showed that ibandronate exhibits antitumor activity and prevents and/or reduces bone metastases. As with other oral bisphosphonates, oral bioavailability is very poor (less than 1%) and substantially reduced by administration with or proximal to cations (e.g., food, antacids, mineral supplements). Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and tolerability of oral ibandronate in the treatment and prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis when administered once daily, once weekly, and even once monthly. Ibandronate also reduces the skeletal complications of bone metastases in patients with cancer, including pain, although the dosage used is much higher than that used in osteoporosis. As with other bisphosphonates, the major tolerability issue with ibandronate is upper gastrointestinal (GI) distress (dyspepsia, pain, esophagitis, esophageal and gastric ulcers). The dosage regimen for the treatment or prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis (the only currently approved use in the United States) is 2.5 mg once a day or 150 mg once monthly (on the same date each month). Ibandronate should not be used in the presence of severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance below 30 mL/min). The usual complex administration instructions for other oral bisphosphonates apply to ibandronate as well. CONCLUSION: Oral ibandronate is an interesting addition to the therapeutic armamentarium for osteoporosis and cancer metastatic to bone. In fact, studies of ibandronate as an adjunctive treatment for cancers with a predilection to metastasize to bone are under way. Ibandronate has taken advantage of a complex pharmacodynamic profile in which its antiresorptive activity is independent of the frequency of dosing provided that a minimum dose-per-unit time is exceeded. Studies with every three-month dosing (and even less frequently) are under way. Whether or not the less frequent dosing of oral ibandronate will translate into a therapeutic advantage over older oral agents such as alendronate and risedronate is open to speculation. This is a difficult question to answer in the absence of head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Older agents are still preferred until RCTs demonstrate that ibandronate is as safe and effective as these older agents.

Extended-release alfuzosin hydrochloride: a new alpha-adrenergic receptor antagonist for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia.

BACKGROUND: Extended-release (ER) alfuzosin hydrochloride is the most recently approved alpha-adrenergic receptor antagonist (AARA) for the management of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Although new to the United States, alfuzosin has been available in immediate-release (IR) and sustained-release (SR) formulations in other countries for many years. OBJECTIVE: This article reviews data on the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, tolerability, drug-interaction potential, and dosing of alfuzosin ER. METHODS: Relevant articles were identified through MEDLINE, EMBASE, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts searches of the English-language literature published between 1986 and September 2003 using the terms alfuzosin, alpha-adrenergic receptor antagonists, and quinazolines. The reference lists of identified articles were also searched, as were abstracts from annual meetings of the American Urological Association for the past 5 years. Data regarding the ER formulation were emphasized, and data involving the IR/SR formulations were included only when data for the ER formulation were not available or as needed for clarification. RESULTS: In comparative trials with its IR counterpart (alfuzosin ER 10 mg QD vs alfuzosin IR 2.5 mg TID), alfuzosin ER was an equieffective once-daily AARA. No comparative trials of alfuzosin ER with the SR (BID) formulation or with other AARAs were identified. Food has been found to exert a clinically important effect by enhancing the bioavailability of the ER formulation; thus, the drug should be taken on a full stomach. Hepatic impairment has been found to significantly delay the elimination of alfuzosin IF, which constitutes a contraindication to use of the ER formulation. Renal impairment does not appear to exert clinically important effects on the pharmacokinetics of alfuzosin ER. Adverse events with alfuzosin ER include dizziness, upper respiratory tract infection, headache, and fatigue, with hypotension and syncope reported rarely. Concurrent use of inhibitors of the cytochrome P450 3A4 isozyme (eg, ketoconazole, diltiazem, cimetidine, atenolol) can significantly elevate serum concentrations of alfuzosin and enhance its pharmacodynamic effects. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of direct head-to-head comparative trials, the role of alfuzosin ER in the management of symptomatic BPH relative to that of other AARAs is unclear. Because the effect size (drug response minus placebo response) of alfuzosin ER is comparable to that of other AARAs, marked differences in efficacy are unlikely. Extrapolating from direct comparative trials between these agents and alfuzosin IR/SR, alfuzosin ER would be expected to have better cardiovascular tolerability (eg, in terms of dizziness and orthostasis) than prazosin, terazosin, or doxazosin, and to have similar tolerability to tamsulosin. However, the existing data do not suggest that alfuzosin ER is likely to represent a significant advance over tamsulosin.