Prevalence and disparities in influenza vaccination among patients with COPD: A French nationwide population study.

INTRODUCTION: Despite concordant international recommendations, many surveys found disappointing rates of influenza vaccination in at-risk populations, ranging from 23% in overall COPD population to more than 70% in more severe COPD subjects. Therefore, we assessed the proportion of French COPD patients non-vaccinated for influenza and their clinical and socio-demographic factors. MATERIEL AND METHODS: This was a national retrospective study based on the French health insurance database. We identified "diagnosed COPD", defined as subjects hospitalized at least once in 2017 with a principal or associated diagnosis of COPD, and "suspected COPD" as those who were prescribed at least thrice long-acting bronchodilators (LAB), after exclusion of patients with a principal diagnosis or secondary associated diagnosis of asthma or cystic fibrosis, patients deceased before the influenza season and patients hospitalized in long-term or in palliative care unit. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the association between patients' characteristics and the lack of influenza vaccination. RESULTS: From the national database, 1 474 396 subjects were identified as "suspected COPD" of whom 528 114 were excluded because of previous diagnosis of asthma or cystic fibrosis, and 350 566 as "diagnosed COPD". Among the 1 296 848 patients included, 646 687 patients (53.3%) were vaccinated against influenza. Non-vaccinated subjects were significantly younger (62.1 vs 71.6 years old), more often women (47.9% vs 43.1%) and had fewer comorbidities assessed by Charlson's index (3.0 ± 2.2 vs 4.3 ± 2.1). Lack of vaccination was also associated with a lower LAB usage. Also, non-vaccinated subjects neither had severe exacerbation during the study period. Besides there was a significant heterogeneity in vaccination rate by geographic region, from 47% to 57%. In multivariate analysis, variables independently associated with the lack of influenza vaccination were female gender, younger age, fewer comorbidities and lower socio-economic level. CONCLUSIONS: This study using the French exhaustive health insurance database shows that influenza vaccination among COPD patients remains dramatically low and must become a high-priority public-health strategy.

Brief Report: Severe Sotorasib-Related Hepatotoxicity and Non-Liver Adverse Events Associated With Sequential Anti-Programmed Cell Death (Ligand)1 and Sotorasib Therapy in KRASG12C-Mutant Lung Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Sequential anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) followed by small targeted therapy use is associated with increased prevalence of adverse events (AEs) in NSCLC. KRASG12C inhibitor sotorasib may trigger severe immune-mediated hepatotoxicity when used in sequence or in combination with anti-PD-(L)1. This study was designed to address whether sequential anti-PD-(L)1 and sotorasib therapy increases the risk of hepatotoxicity and other AEs. METHODS: This is a multicenter, retrospective study of consecutive advanced KRASG12C-mutant NSCLC treated with sotorasib outside clinical trials in 16 French medical centers. Patient records were reviewed to identify sotorasib-related AEs (National Cancer Institute Common Classification Criteria for Adverse Events-Version 5.0). Grade 3 and higher AE was considered as severe. Sequence group was defined as patients who received an anti-PD-(L)1 as last line of treatment before sotorasib initiation and control group as patients who did not receive an anti-PD-(L)1 as last line of treatment before sotorasib initiation. RESULTS: We identified 102 patients who received sotorasib, including 48 (47%) in the sequence group and 54 (53%) in the control group. Patients in the control group received an anti-PD-(L)1 followed by at least one treatment regimen before sotorasib in 87% of the cases or did not receive an anti-PD-(L)1 at any time before sotorasib in 13% of the cases. Severe sotorasib-related AEs were significantly more frequent in the sequence group compared with those in the control group (50% versus 13%, p < 0.001). Severe sotorasib-related AEs occurred in 24 patients (24 of 48, 50%) in the sequence group, and among them 16 (67%) experienced a severe sotorasib-related hepatotoxicity. Severe sotorasib-related hepatotoxicity was threefold more frequent in the sequence group compared with that in the control group (33% versus 11%, p = 0.006). No fatal sotorasib-related hepatotoxicity was reported. Non-liver severe sotorasib-related AEs were significantly more frequent in the sequence group (27% versus 4%, p < 0.001). Severe sotorasib-related AEs typically occurred in patients who received last anti-PD-(L)1 infusion within 30 days before sotorasib initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential anti-PD-(L)1 and sotorasib therapy are associated with a significantly increased risk of severe sotorasib-related hepatotoxicity and severe non-liver AEs. We suggest avoiding starting sotorasib within 30 days from the last anti-PD-(L)1 infusion.

Second-line lurbinectedin as a new treatment option for small-cell lung cancer: Preliminary results in real-clinical practice.

INTRODUCTION: Few strategies exist for treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) extended-stage after failure of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Lurbinectedin is a novel RNA-polymerase-II inhibitor investigated as a second-line therapy for SCLC. However, its efficacy and safety profile in real clinical practice remain to be determined. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of lurbinectedin in real-life among patients with SCLC previously treated with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients who received at least one dose of lurbinectedin (3.2 mg/m2 ) between March 2020 and November 2021, in the pulmonary department of Bordeaux University Hospital. Endpoints were time to treatment discontinuation, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety profile. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were included. The median age was 60 years (range: 42-77), seven (54%) were females, nine (69%) having a performance status of 0-1. Lurbinectedin was given as second-line treatment before platinum rechallenge in four (31%) patients. After a mean follow-up of 4.1 months, the objective response rate (ORR) was 17%. The median time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) was 2.3 months (interquartile range [IQR], 1.2-3.6). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were, respectively, 1.9 (IQR, 0.1.8) and 4.1 (IQR, 2.0-3.5) months. No significant difference regarding TTD, PFS or OS was found in the two groups according to treatment history or according to chemotherapy-free intervall (CMI) 〈1 or 〉1 month. The most common adverse events (AEs) were asthenia, nausea, and anemia in nine (70%) patients. Grade 3 AEs were reported, fatigue, vomiting, nausea, anorexia, and neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: Lurbinectedin in real clinical practice could have had a lower efficacy than in phase II trial, but a better hematological and bioclinical tolerance than previously reported. Early relapse after platinum-based chemotherapy seems to have a lower response to lurbinectedin.