Benign thyroid nodules with RAS mutation grow faster.

CONTEXT: The management of a benign thyroid nodule includes follow-up until its size requires a surgical or alternative treatment. To date, it is difficult or impossible to predict the size changes of a benign nodule in a given patient because no specific growth parameters exist. RAS mutations have been described in thyroid adenomas and hyperplastic benign nodules. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish whether the volume changes of benign nodules are associated with the presence of RAS mutation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Genomic DNA obtained by fine-needle aspiration of 78 thyroid nodules with benign cytology was analysed by pyrosequencing for the presence of NRAS(61) and KRAS(13) mutations. Ultrasonographic features were obtained. The volume of nodules at baseline and their changes after a mean follow-up of 25 months were evaluated according to the presence of RAS mutation. RESULTS: A RAS mutation was found in 24 thyroid aspirates (30·8%, 8 NRAS(61) and 16 KRAS(13) ). RAS mutation was not associated with ultrasonographic features, but was significantly associated with a larger size at baseline (P = 0·017). After a 25-month mean follow-up, RAS mutation-positive nodules displayed faster growth (RAS mutation-positive vs RAS mutation-negative % annual growth 27·6% ±32·2% vs 1·0% ±17·0%, P < 0·001). CONCLUSIONS: Benign thyroid nodules bearing RAS mutation grow more rapidly than those with wild-type RAS. Searching for RAS mutations in thyroid nodules with benign cytology might be useful to the clinician in choosing a more appropriate and timely surgical management.

Detection of RAS mutation by pyrosequencing in thyroid cytology samples.

INTRODUCTION: Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is the primary means to distinguish benign from malignant thyroid nodules. However, adjunctive diagnostic tests are needed as 20-40% of FNAC are inconclusive. RAS mutations have been described in differentiated thyroid cancer and they could be used as tumor markers. However, their prevalence varies widely among studies, probably as a result of the detection methods used. We investigated whether the pyrosequencing method can be applied to detect NRAS and KRAS mutations in thyroid aspirates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 37 thyroid aspirates, including benign hyperplastic nodules (HBN, N = 16) and follicular thyroid carcinomas (FTC, N = 21) were analyzed for the presence of NRAS(61) and KRAS(13) mutations. RESULTS: A RAS mutation was found in 31% and 62% of BN and FTC respectively. Most samples displayed a percentage of mutated alleles lower than 50% (median = 30.8% and 15.3% in FTC and HBN respectively), a result compatible with the presence of extra-nodular cells contaminating the FNA or with the subclonal nature of both types of thyroid nodules. DISCUSSION: Pyrosequencing is a reliable assay to detect RAS mutations in fine-needle thyroid aspirates. CONCLUSIONS: The low specificity and sensitivity limit the power of this test to distinguish between FTC and benign nodules in inconclusive FNACs.

Concomitant BRAF(V600E) mutation and RET/PTC rearrangement is a frequent occurrence in papillary thyroid carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The tyrosine kinase receptors/RAS/RAF/MAPK cascade is a site of mutational events associated with thyroid carcinogenesis. Some studies suggest the reciprocal exclusion of different oncogenes in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade, whereas others suggest that BRAF mutations and RET rearrangements can simultaneously occur in sporadic cases. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of concomitant BRAF(V600E) mutation and RET/PTC rearrangements in the same tumor and its association with some clinicopathological features. METHODS: The percentage of mutant BRAF alleles and the presence of RET/PTC rearrangements were determined by means of pyrosequencing and Southern blot analysis of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction products in a series of 72 conventional papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTCs). Then, the associations between clinicopathological characteristics and mutation status were assessed. RESULTS: BRAF(V600E) alleles were present in 32 out of 72 PTCs (44.4%) in the range of 5.1-44.7% of total BRAF alleles. RET/PTC was present in 26 tumors (36.1%). Concomitant subclonal BRAF and RET/PTC were demonstrated in 14 PTCs (19.4%), and none of the oncogenes was detected in 22 tumors (30.5%). Only BRAF(V600E) was associated with a more advanced tumor staging. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that concomitant BRAF mutation and RET/PTC rearrangement is a frequent event in PTC.

BRAF(V600E) assessment by pyrosequencing in fine needle aspirates of thyroid nodules with concurrent Hashimoto's thyroiditis is a reliable assay.

Detection of BRAF mutation in cytology specimens has been proposed as a diagnostic adjunctive tool in evaluation of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology findings. Concurrent papillary thyroid carcinoma and Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT), a disease characterized by thyroid lymphocytic infiltration, is a frequent occurrence. A large lymphocytic infiltrate might reduce the sensitivity of methods employed to detect BRAF mutation in thyroid cytology specimens. To determine whether testing for BRAF mutational status in fine needle aspirates (FNA) is reliable also in the presence of HT lymphocytic infiltration, we assessed the BRAF status by direct sequencing and pyrosequencing in a series of FNAs with and without concomitant HT lymphocytic infiltration. We also performed the same assessment by pyrosequencing in the corresponding tissue samples. Pyrosequencing demonstrated to be more sensitive than direct sequencing. The percentage of mutant BRAF(V600E) alleles was higher in FNAs than in the corresponding tissues, probably because of the lower stromal contamination in FNA than in the sections. In the presence of lymphocytic infiltration, the percentage of mutant BRAF(V600E) alleles determined by pyrosequencing was higher in FNAs than in the corresponding tissue samples (P < 0.0001), indicating a minor lymphocytic contamination in FNA. The diagnostic value of BRAF(V600E) in inconclusive FNAs was not hampered by thyroid lymphocytic infiltration. These results indicate that BRAF(V600E) assessment by pyrosequencing is a reliable assay useful to refine inconclusive cytology of thyroid nodules also in the presence of concurrent HT.

Diagnostic utility of BRAFV600E mutation testing in thyroid nodules in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: Thyroid cancer is a rare disease characterized by the subtle appearance of a nodule. Fine-needle cytology (FNC) is the first diagnostic procedure used to distinguish a benign from a malignant nodule. However, FNC yields inconclusive results in about 20% of cases. BRAF(V600E) mutation is the most frequent genetic alteration in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC); its high prevalence makes this oncogene a useful marker to refine inconclusive FNC results. However, the prevalence of the BRAF(V600E) mutation depends on detection methods, geographical factors, and age. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of BRAF(V600E) mutation and its utility as a diagnostic tool in elderly subjects. METHODS: FNC from 92 PTC patients were subjected to the analysis of BRAF mutation by pyrosequencing and direct sequencing; age-dependent prevalence was also determined. RESULTS: BRAF mutation analysis was successful in all FNC specimens. BRAF(V600E) was documented in 62 (67.4%) and in 58 (63.0%) PTCs by pyrosequencing and direct sequencing, respectively. BRAF(V600E) prevalence did not correlate with patient's age at diagnosis. Twenty out of 32 PTCs (62.5%) were correctly diagnosed by BRAF mutation analysis in inconclusive FNC results. CONCLUSIONS: Detection of BRAF(V600E) in cytology specimens by pyrosequencing is a useful diagnostic adjunctive tool in the evaluation of thyroid nodules also in elderly subjects.

Genetic mutations in the treatment of anaplastic thyroid cancer: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is a rare, lethal disease associated with a median survival of 6 months despite the best multidisciplinary care. Surgical resection is not curative in ATC patients, being often a palliative procedure. Multidisciplinary care may include surgery, loco-regional radiotherapy, and systemic therapy. Besides conventional chemotherapy, multi kinase-targeted inhibitors are emerging as novel therapeutic tools. The numerous molecular alteration detected in ATC are targets for these inhibitors. The aim of this review is to determine the prevalence of the major genetic alterations occurring in ATC and place the results in the context of the emerging kinase-targeted therapies. METHODS: The study is based on published PubMed studies addressing the prevalence of BRAF, RAS, PTEN, PI3KCA and TP53 mutations and RET rearrangements in ATC. RESULTS: 21 articles dealing with 652 genetic analyses of the selected genes were used. The overall prevalence determined were the following: RET/PTC, 4%; BRAF, 23%; RAS, 60%; PTEN, 16%; PI3KCA, 24%; TP53, 48%. Genetic alterations are sometimes overlapping. CONCLUSIONS: Mutations of BRAF, PTEN and PI3KCA genes are common in ATC, with RAS and TP53 being the most frequent. Given ATC genetic complexity, effective therapies may benefit from individualized therapeutic regimens in a multidisciplinary approach.

[Diagnostic value of BRAFV600E and RET/PTC oncogenes in thyroid nodule aspirates]. / Valore diagnostico degli oncogeni BRAFV600E e RET/PTC nei noduli tiroidei.

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNC) is the primary means to distinguish benign form malignant nodules. Aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of BRAF(V600E) and RET/PTC oncogenes in a large cohort of thyroid nodules with inconclusive FNC. We searched for BRAF(V600E) and RET/PTC in 299 thyroid nodule aspirates then removed by surgery. RET/PTC demonstrated a poor specificity. The search for BRAF(V600E) demonstrated to be useful in 25 cases, identifying a PTC in 2 false negative, 2 inadequate, 11 indeterminate and 10 suspicious FNC. Detection of BRAF(V600E) revealed to be a useful tool to refine inconclusive cytology.

Radioiodide induces apoptosis in human thyroid tissue in culture.

Radioiodide ((131)I) is routinely used for the treatment of toxic adenoma, Graves' disease, and for ablation of thyroid remnant after thyroidectomy in patients with thyroid cancer. The toxic effects of ionizing radiations on living cells can be mediated by a necrotic and/or apoptotic process. The involvement of apoptosis in radiation-induced cell death in the thyrocytes has been questioned. The knowledge of the mechanisms that underlie the thyrocyte death in response to radiations can help to achieve a successful treatment with the lowest (131)I dose. We developed a method to study the effects of (131)I in human thyroid tissue in culture, by which we demonstrated that (131)I induces thyroid cell apoptosis. Human thyroid tissues of about 1 mm(3) were cultured in vitro and cell viability was determined up to 3 weeks by the MTT assay. Radioiodide added to the culture medium was actively taken up by the tissues. The occurrence of apoptosis in the thyrocytes was assessed by measuring the production of a caspase-cleavage fragment of cytokeratin 18 (M30) by an enzyme-linked immunoassay. Neither variation of cell number nor spontaneous apoptosis was revealed after 1 week of culture. (131)I added to the culture medium induced a dose-dependent and a time-dependent generation of M30 fragment. The apoptotic process was confirmed by the generation of caspase-3 and PARP cleavage products. These results demonstrate that (131)I induces apoptosis in human thyrocytes. Human thyroid tissue cultures may be useful to investigate the cell death pathways induced by (131)I.

BRAF mutation positive papillary thyroid carcinoma is less advanced when Hashimoto's thyroiditis lymphocytic infiltration is present.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) and Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT) is a frequent occurrence. Whether these two conditions are linked and whether PTC with concurrent HT has distinct clinicopathological characteristics are still debated issues. Lymphocytic infiltration is abundant in HT and might be relevant in the pathogenesis and progression of PTC. BRAF(V600E) mutation is associated with a more advanced PTC at diagnosis; however, its role in the clinicopathological characteristics of PTC with concurrent HT is unknown. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: We enrolled 146 patients with histological diagnosis of PTC. Microscopic assessment of histology samples was performed to identify the presence of lymphocytic infiltration. Detection of BRAF(V600E) was performed on cytology samples by both direct sequencing and pyrosequencing, and results were correlated with clinical parameters. RESULTS: Concurrent HT lymphocytic infiltration was associated with the female gender, smaller tumour size, a less frequent extracapsular extension and a lower grade of TNM staging. BRAF(V600E) was more frequent in PTC with concomitant lymphocytic infiltration. In PTC harbouring BRAF(V600E) , concurrent lymphocytic infiltration was still associated with the female gender, a less frequent extracapsular extension and a lower TNM staging. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that lymphocytic infiltration of HT is a protective factor against PTC progression, and it is independent of BRAF mutational status.

BRAF (V600E) associates with cytoplasmatic localization of p27kip1 and higher cytokeratin 19 expression in papillary thyroid carcinoma.

The genetic alterations are responsible for the altered protein expression in tumors. The knowledge of the link between the altered protein expression and genetic alterations may provide potentially important biological and clinical information. In this study, the expression of some protein markers (Gal-3, p21Kip1, CK19) known to be associated to the papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) was assessed in a series of surgical samples by immunohistochemistry, and the association between expression of these markers and the BRAF (V600E) mutation was investigated. Gal-3 positive staining was evident in 26 % of benign nodules. The BRAF (V600E) mutation and Gal-3 expression, were found in 55.5 and 87 % of PTC respectively, and were unlinked. The expression of CK19 in benign nodules was weak and limited to scattered follicular cells. Diffuse cytoplasmatic expression of CK19 was present in malignant tumors in a variable percentage of cells. A higher percentage of CK19 expressing cells was associated with BRAF (V600E) (P ≤ 0.001). All benign nodules displayed nuclear p27kip1 in more than 15 % of the cells. Twenty-nine PTC showed a cytoplasmatic staining with negative nuclei. PTC with cytoplasmatic or 0-5 % of cells with nuclear staining, 6-15 % or >15 % of cells with nuclear staining were 72 (66.7 %), 24 (22.2 %), and 12 (11.1 %) respectively. In BRAF (V600E) positive tumors, the cytoplasmatic localization of p27kip1 was significantly more frequent (P = 0.024). In conclusion, we provide evidences that BRAF (V600E) is non-associated with Gal-3 expression, whereas it is associated with cytoplasmatic localization of p27kip1 and higher CK19 expression in PTC.

A high percentage of BRAFV600E alleles in papillary thyroid carcinoma predicts a poorer outcome.

CONTEXT: BRAF(V600E) is considered a negative prognostic marker in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), but unexplained conflicting results are present in the literature. In light of the new finding that most PTC consist of a mixture of tumor cells with wild-type and mutant BRAF, we examined the associations between the percentage of BRAF(V600E) alleles and both the clinicopathological parameters at time of diagnosis and the disease outcome in a large series of PTCs. STUDY DESIGN: Tumors from 168 patients with PTC were genotyped for BRAF(V600E) using BigDye Terminator sequencing and pyrosequencing, and the clinical parameters were analyzed. The associations between clinicopathological characteristics, including disease recurrence at follow-up (median 5.1 yr) and the percentage of mutant BRAF alleles were assessed. RESULTS: The observed prevalence of BRAF(V600E) was higher when using pyrosequencing then when using BigDye Terminator sequencing (53.6 vs. 36.9%). In the PTC positive for BRAF(V600E), the percentage of mutant alleles ranged from 5.1 to 44.7% of the total BRAF alleles, with a median of 20.6%. The presence or the percentage of BRAF(V600E) alleles did not correlate significantly with sex, multicentricity, lymph node metastasis, or tumor stage. The percentage of BRAF(V600E) alleles directly correlated with age at diagnosis and tumor volume (R(2) = 0.223, P = 0.039, and R(2) = 0.166, P < 0.001, respectively). The percentage of BRAF(V600E) alleles (P = 0.014), tumor volume (P = 0.012), and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.008) predicted the disease outcome. The odds ratio of recurrence for PTC with BRAF(V600E) alleles of 30% or greater, compared with that for PTC with BRAF(V600E) alleles of less than 30%, was 5.31 (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of BRAF(V600E) alleles defines a PTC molecular subtype and predicts a poorer disease outcome. The analysis of BRAF mutations by pyrosequencing is useful to refine the risk stratification of patients with PTC.

The primary occurrence of BRAF(V600E) is a rare clonal event in papillary thyroid carcinoma.

CONTEXT: BRAF(V600E) is considered a primary event, a negative prognostic marker, and a site for pharmacological intervention in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). We asked whether BRAF(V600E) can occur as a subclonal event in PTC and whether this and other oncogenes can coexist in the same tumor. STUDY DESIGN: We determined by pyrosequencing the percentage of mutant BRAF, NRAS, and KRAS alleles in a series of conventional PTC. We also analyzed the BRAF mutation status in PTC cell clones in culture. RESULTS: BRAF(V600E) alleles were present in 41 of 72 PTC (56.9%) in the range 44.7 to 5.1% of total BRAF alleles. In four PTC samples, mutant BRAF alleles were about 50%, being therefore compatible with a clonal heterozygous mutation. In 27 PTC samples, BRAF(V600E) alleles were in the range of 25 to 5.1%. This finding was confirmed after exclusion of the presence of a large contamination by lymphoreticular cells and by the analysis of PTC cells selected by laser capture. Analysis of clones derived from a single cell confirmed the presence of two distinct PTC populations with wild-type or mutated BRAF. Simultaneous subclonal BRAF and KRAS mutations were demonstrated in two PTC. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that clonal BRAF(V600E) is a rare occurrence in PTC, although frequently this cancer consists of a mixture of tumor cells with wild-type and mutant BRAF. These results suggest that BRAF mutation in PTC is a later subclonal event, its intratumoral heterogeneity may hamper the efficacy of targeted pharmacotherapy, and its association with a more aggressive disease should be reevaluated.

RET/PTC rearrangement in benign and malignant thyroid diseases: a clinical standpoint.

Cytological examination of fine needle aspiration biopsy is the primary means for distinguishing benign from malignant nodules. However, as inconclusive cytology is very frequent, the introduction of molecular markers in the preoperative diagnosis of thyroid nodules has been proposed in recent years. In this article, we review the clinical implications of preoperative detection of rearrangements of the RET gene (RET/papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC)) in thyroid nodules. The prevalence of RET/PTC in PTC depends on the histological subtypes, geographical factors, radiation exposure, and detection method. Initially, RET/PTC was considered an exclusive PTC hallmark and later it was also found sporadically in benign thyroid lesions. More recently, the very sensitive detection methods, interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and Southern blot on RT-PCR amplicons, demonstrated that the oligoclonal occurrence of RET rearrangement in benign thyroid lesions is not a rare event and suggested that it could be associated with a faster enlargement in benign nodules. For this reason, RET/PTC cannot be considered as an absolute marker of PTC, and its diagnostic application must be limited to assays able to distinguish between clonal and oligoclonal expression. Detection of RET/PTC by quantitative assays will be useful for diagnostic purposes in cytology specimens when a precise cutoff will be fixed in a clinical setting. Until that time, less sensitive RET/PTC detection methods and FISH analysis remain the most appropriate means to refine inconclusive cytology. Future studies with a long follow-up will further clarify the clinical significance of low level of RET rearrangements in benign nodules.

High growth rate of benign thyroid nodules bearing RET/PTC rearrangements.

CONTEXT: Benign thyroid nodules display a broad range of behaviors from a stationary size to a progressive growth. The RET/PTC oncogene has been documented in a fraction of benign thyroid nodules, besides papillary thyroid carcinomas, and it might therefore influence their growth. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present work was to evaluate whether RET/PTC in benign thyroid nodules associates with a different nodular growth rate. STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective multicentric study, 125 subjects with benign nodules were included. RET rearrangements were analyzed in cytology samples; clinical and ultrasonographic nodule characteristics were assessed at the start and at the end of the study. RESULTS: RET/PTC was present in 19 nodules. The difference between the mean baseline nodular volume of the RET/PTC- and RET/PTC+ nodules was not significant. After 36 months of follow-up, the RET/PTC+ group (n = 16) reached a volume higher than the RET/PTC- group (n = 90) (5.04 ± 2.67 vs. 3.04 ± 2.26 ml; P = 0.0028). We calculated the monthly change of nodule volumes as a percentage of baseline. After a mean follow-up of 36.6 months, the monthly volume increase of nodules bearing a RET rearrangement was 4.3-fold that of nodules with wild-type RET (1.83 ± 1.2 vs. 0.43 ± 1.0% of baseline volume; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Benign thyroid nodules bearing RET rearrangements grow more rapidly than those with wild-type RET. Searching for RET rearrangements in benign thyroid nodules might be useful to the clinician in choosing the more appropriate and timely therapeutic option.

Prevalence of RET/PTC rearrangement in benign and malignant thyroid nodules and its clinical application.

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is the primary means to distinguish benign thyroid nodules from malignant ones. About 20% of FNAC yields indeterminate results leading to unnecessary or delayed surgery. Many studies of tissue samples, the majority of which are retrospective advocate testing for RET rearrangements as a diagnostic adjunctive tool in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytological findings. Because of the uncertain prevalence of RET rearrangements, its utility as a tumor marker is still controversial. The goal of this study was to establish the prevalence and the utility of testing for RET rearrangements in FNAC suspicious of cancer in a clinical setting. In this prospective study, we analysed a large series of thyroid aspirates by RT-PCR only and Southern blot on RT-PCR products for type 1 and 3 RET rearrangements. Results were compared with clinical findings, cytological diagnosis and final histopathology. By the higher sensitive Southern-blot on RT-PCR method, RET rearrangements were present in 36% of papillary thyroid carcinomas (RET/PTC-1, 12%; RET/PTC-3, 20%; both, 4%) and of 13.3% of benign nodules. By means of RT-PCR only, RET rearrangements were disclosed only in 14.3% of PTC and in 3.6% of benign nodules. No significant correlation was found between RET rearrangements and clinicopathological features of patients. These results indicate that molecular testing of thyroid nodules for RET/PTC must take into account of its high prevalence in benign nodules, inducing false positive diagnoses when the highly sensitive assay Southern-blot on RT-PCR is used. Its searching by means of RT-PCR only, has a specificity superior of conventional cytology and can be used to refine inconclusive FNAC.

BRAF mutation in cytology samples as a diagnostic tool for papillary thyroid carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Thyroid cancer is a rare disease that needs to be differentiated from the more frequent benign nodular goiter. The current, primary technique for distinguishing between benign and malignant nodules is by a fine-needle biopsy (FNB) cytological examination. This type of examination, unfortunately, often provides inconclusive results, and in recent years the introduction of molecular markers for the preoperative diagnosis of thyroid nodules has been proposed. AREAS COVERED: This review covers current and emerging research in the diagnostic application of the BRAF mutation in papillary thyroid carcinomas. It considers the available literature related to the usefulness of preoperative BRAF mutation analysis as a diagnostic tool to refine inconclusive cytology. It also considers the available techniques used to detect this specific mutation. EXPERT OPINION: Many effective methods are now available to detect BRAF mutation in FNB material. Thanks to its high specificity, this genetic alteration is now considered a useful diagnostic marker for patients who have indeterminate thyroid nodule cytology and is a useful tool for thyroid nodule management despite its low sensitivity limiting its application. The authors believe that, in the future, the screening of genetic alterations will enter standard clinical practice as an adjunctive tool to conventional cytology, and larger studies will provide a better definition of the best, most cost-effective combinations of markers and methods.

Growing thyroid nodules with benign histology and RET rearrangement.

Some benign thyroid nodules are stationary in size over time while others grow progressively, indicating that there is a broad individual variability within benign nodules. To date, it is very difficult to predict if a benign thyroid nodule will grow in size and which will be its trend over time. While BRAF(V600E) is a highly specific marker of thyroid cancer, RET rearrangements have been disclosed also in non malignant thyroid lesions and their biological significance is debated. We compared the clinical history of three histologically benign thyroid nodules harboring RET rearrangements with that of 6 benign nodules bearing wild type RET. The nodules negative for RET rearrangements were followed for 10 years by ultrasonographic evaluation, showing a slow, constant enlargement. Three patients with benign nodules diagnosed at FNAC, were followed for 11, 9 and 7 years by annual ultrasonographic evaluation. After several years of latency, the nodules had an unexpected and gradual increase in their dimensions, reaching a large final size. A second FNAC confirmed the previous cytologic diagnosis of benign lesion. Because of the increasing size of the nodules, the patients were advised to surgery. Before undergoing thyroidectomy, we performed molecular diagnostic tests that revealed the absence of BRAF(V600E) and the presence of RET/PTC-1 in one nodule and RET/PTC-3 in the two others. Despite the presence of this oncogene, the samples were histologically classified as benign hyperplastic nodules. These findings lead us to speculate that histologically benign hyperplastic thyroid nodules containing RET rearrangements might represent a subgroup of nodules with a rapid size increase.

Combined analysis of galectin-3 and BRAFV600E improves the accuracy of fine-needle aspiration biopsy with cytological findings suspicious for papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Ten to fifteen percent of fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of thyroid nodules are indeterminate. Galectin-3 (Gal-3) and the oncogene BRAFV600E are markers of malignancy useful to improve FNAB accuracy. The objective of this study was to determine whether the combined analysis of Gal-3 and BRAFV600E expression in thyroid aspirates could improve the diagnosis in FNAB with suspicious cytological findings. Two hundred and sixty-one surgical thyroid tissues and one hundred and forty-four thyroid aspirates were analyzed for the presence of the two markers. In surgical specimens, Gal-3 expression was present in 27.4% benign nodules, 91.9% papillary (PTC) and 75% follicular (FTC) thyroid carcinomas. BRAFV600E was not detected in 127 benign nodules, as well as in 32 FTCs, while was found in 42.9% PTC. No correlation was found between BRAF mutation and Gal-3 expression. Forty-seven consecutive FNAB suspicious for PTC were analyzed for the presence of the two markers. Of these nodules, 23 were benign at histology, 6 were positive for Gal-3, none displayed BRAFV600E, and 17 were negative for both the markers. Twenty suspicious nodules were diagnosed as PTC and four FTCs at histology. Of these 24 carcinomas, 9 resulted positive for BRAFV600E, 17 for Gal-3, and 22 for one or both the markers. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the presence of Gal-3 and/or BRAFV600E were significantly higher than those obtained for the two markers alone. Notably, the negative predictive value increased from 70.8 to 89.5%. In conclusion, the combined detection of Gal-3 and BRAFV600E improves the diagnosis in FNAB with cytological findings suspicious for PTC and finds clinical application in selected cases.