Corrigendum: Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with an endoscopic surgical monitoring system for the management of renal stones: A retrospective evaluation.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.773270.].

Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With an Endoscopic Surgical Monitoring System for the Management of Renal Stones: A Retrospective Evaluation.

Purpose: To compare the outcomes and postoperative quality of life of patients with renal calculi who underwent standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (sPNL), mini-invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPNL) or mPNL with an endoscopic surgical monitoring system (ESMS) using a retrospective clinical trial. Methods: Eighty-six adult patients with renal stones who were treated with sPNL were retrospectively compared to ninety-two patients who were treated with mPNL between July 2014 and December 2017. Next, further studies were retrospectively conducted using a matched paired method. The ninety-two patients treated with mPNL were divided into two groups based on whether the endoscopic surgical monitoring system (ESMS) was used (ESMS-mPNL vs. non-ESMS-mPNL). The ESMS used strain gauge transducers to measure the inflow and outflow of irrigation solution. Bleeding and fluid absorption during endoscopic surgery could be accurately calculated by computer program in ESMS. Results: The fluoroscopy time, complication rate, stone-free status and clinically insignificant residual fragment (CIRF) rate were not significantly different between the two groups (sPNL vs. mPNL). The mPNL group had a significantly longer operation time than the sPNL group, and the mPNL group exhibited a markedly reduced 12-h postoperative visual analogue pain scale (VAS) score, mean hospitalization time, and return to work time, had slightly reduced haemoglobin loss, and underwent more tubeless operations. Moreover, among the 92 patients who underwent mPNL, the operation time (P = 0.090), complication rate (P = 0.996), stone-free status (P = 0.731), CIRF rates (P = 0.125) and number of tubeless operations (P = 0.760) were not significantly different between the two subgroups (non-ESMS-mPNL vs. ESMS-mPNL); however, the patients in the ESMS-mPNL group had significantly longer operation times than those in the non-ESMS-mPNL subgroup, along with marked reductions in irrigation fluid absorption, blood loss, haemoglobin loss, 12 h postoperative VAS score, mean hospitalization time, and return to work time. Conclusions: mPNL is less painful than sPNL in patients undergoing treatment for 20-40 mm renal stones. Similar stone-free rates were achieved by the two procedures, but mPNL was superior to sPNL in terms of blood loss, discomfort, hospitalization time and return to work time. We think that ESMS-mPNL is less painful for patients and more efficacious than non-ESMS-mPNL, and ESMS-mPNL achieves a stone-free rate that is similar to non-ESMS-mPNL in patients receiving treatment for 20-40 mm kidney stones.

Prognostic value of preoperative inflammation-based predictors in patients with bladder carcinoma after radical cystectomy.

AIMS: Emerging evidence has related inflammation-based biomarkers to numerous carcinomas, including bladder carcinoma (BC). However, the role of inflammatory biomarkers in the prognosis of BC remains inconclusive. This study aimed to compare preoperative plasma fibrinogen (PF) and other inflammatory biomarkers such as the platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and serum albumin level to predict the prognosis of patients with BC. METHODS: This article focused on a retrospective analysis of 175 patients with newly diagnosed BC who were admitted to our hospital from March 2005 to March 2016. Of these BC patients, 136 had undergone radical cystectomy (RC). RESULTS: According to multivariate analysis, high PF level was an independent predictor of overall survival (OS) in 136 BC patients receiving RC (HR = 3.759; P = 0.011), but not for all 175 BC patients. Combining the NLR and PF values showed higher predictive accuracy for OS than NLR or PF alone (P < 0.05). Additionally, for 136 BC patients who had undergone RC, a close relationship was found between high PF levels (≥3.39 g/L) and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.011) and clinical T stage (P = 0.015). Furthermore, PF was a superior prognostic factor compared with the LMR, PLR, CRP, and albumin values in 136 BC patients who had undergone RC (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative PF level may be a prognostic biomarker; and when combined with the NLR, it can improve the predictive ability of the survival of BC patients, particularly of BC patients who underwent RC.

Comparative Efficacy of Combined Radiotherapy, Systemic Therapy, and Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Background: Recent randomized clinical trials have examined the efficacy of different combinations of systemic and local treatment approaches for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). We compared the efficacy of these combined regimens in order to identify the optimal therapy for specific patient subgroups. Methods: The treatments were abiraterone (ABI), apalutamide (APA), docetaxel (DOC), enzalutamide (ENZ), and radiotherapy (RT) combined with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). Five electronic databases were searched up to May 7, 2020 for relevant trials. The risk of bias in the included trials was evaluated with the Cochrane tool. The hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was determined for the included trials and indirect comparisons were performed using the R software. Results: In total, 10 randomized, controlled trials with 11,194 patients were included in the meta-analysis. ADT + RT was superior to ADT monotherapy in terms of overall survival (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.85-1.1) and conferred a survival benefit in a subgroup of low-volume patients (HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.54-0.87). Combined systemic treatments were significantly superior to ADT monotherapy in comparisons of survival and prostate-specific antigen response, including in the high-volume subgroup; meanwhile, in the low-volume subgroup only ADT + ENZ (HR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.21-0.69) showed a significant clinical benefit. In the Gleason score <8 subgroup, all combined systemic treatments were superior to ADT monotherapy, but the results were only significant for ADT + APA (HR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.33-0.95) and ADT + DOC (HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.54-0.92). In the Gleason score ≥8 subgroup, ADT monotherapy was inferior (albeit not significantly) to combined treatments. In a ranking of performed comparisons, ADT + ENZ was the optimal regimen, although this was non-significant. Combined therapies also demonstrated superiority in quality-of-life indicators such as time to skeletal events and pain progression. Conclusion: ADT + radiotherapy led to superior outcomes in mHSPC patients with low-volume disease. While all combined systemic regimens confer a survival advantage over ADT monotherapy, the optimal treatment approach for certain mHSPC patient subgroups remains to be determined.

Reevaluation of metanephric stromal tumor two decades after it was named: A narrative review.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview and update of metanephric stromal tumor (MST). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All English language studies published from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2019 in PubMed, EBSCO, Elsevier ScienceDirect, Springer Link and Taylor & Francis databases were searched with the search terms "metanephric stromal tumor" for this review. RESULTS: Seventeen eligible case reports representing 47 patients according to inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in this study. The average age of the patients was under 4 years (range from 2 d to 56 y) and over half of the cases (52.1%, 25/47) are were diagnosed as MST by accident or during examinations for other diseases. Morphologically, tumor specimens of almost all cases presented concentric "onion-skin cuffing" or characteristic collarettes around renal tubules under low power. There were 79.2% (18/25) of patients exhibited BRAF V600E mutations. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is characterized by CD34 (+), Vimentin (+), Desmin (-), S-100 (-), SMA (-). Most patients underwent surgeries, and no metastasis or recurrence was found except for one case. CONCLUSION: MST is a rare benign pediatric renal tumor with surgical treatment as the first choice. CT examinations and ultrasonography are two widely accepted techniques for the diagnosis of MST. Percutaneous renal biopsy (PRB) is an effective and accurate way of preoperative diagnosis, however, it is not recommended for children under 10 years or with a cystic mass in CT images. The relationship between BRAF V600E mutations and mild clinical manifestations of MST is in need of further verification by biological experiments and clinical studies.

Rapamycin inhibits AR signaling pathway in prostate cancer by interacting with the FK1 domain of FKBP51.

Reactivation of the androgen receptor signaling pathway in the emasculated environment is the main reason for the occurrence of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The immunophilin FKBP51, as a co-chaperone protein, together with Hsp90 help the correct folding of AR. Rapamycin is a known small-molecule inhibitor of FKBP51, but its effect on the FKBP51/AR signaling pathway is not clear. In this study, the interaction mechanism between FKBP51 and rapamycin was investigated using steady-state fluorescence quenching, X-ray crystallization, MTT assay, and qRT-PCR. Steady-state fluorescence quenching assay showed that rapamycin could interact with FKBP51. The crystal of the rapamycin-FKBP51 complex indicated that rapamycin occupies the hydrophobic binding pocket of FK1 domain which is vital for AR activity. The residues involving rapamycin binding are mainly hydrophobic and may overlap with the AR interaction site. Further assays showed that rapamycin could inhibit the androgen-dependent growth of human prostate cancer cells by down-regulating the expression levels of AR activated downstream genes. Taken together, our study demonstrates that rapamycin suppresses AR signaling pathway by interfering with the interaction between AR and FKBP51. The results of this study not only can provide useful information about the interaction mechanism between rapamycin and FKBP51, but also can provide new clues for the treatment of prostate cancer and castration-resistant prostate cancer.