RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Limbal stem cells (LSCs) are essential for maintaining corneal transparency and ocular surface integrity. Many external factors or genetic diseases can lead to corneal limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD), resulting in the loss of barrier and corneal epithelial cell renewal functions. Stem cell transplantation is one of the primary treatments for LSCD, including limbal transplantation and cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation. In addition, a variety of non-limbal stem cell lines have been experimented with for LSCD treatment. Biological scaffolds are also used to support in vitro stem cell culture and transplantation. Here, we review the mechanisms of corneal maintenance by LSCs, the clinical stage and surgical treatment of LSCD, the source of stem cells, and the biological scaffolds required for in vitro culture. METHODS: This study is a narrative retrospective study aimed at collecting available information on various aspects of surgical treatments for LSCD. Relevant literature was searched in a range of online databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed from 2005 to March, 2023. RESULTS: A total of 397 relevant articles were found, and 49 articles with strong relevance to the studies in this paper were obtained and analyzed. Moreover, 11 of these articles were on the concept of LSCD and the mechanism of LESCs maintaining the corneal epithelium, 3 articles on the staging and grading of LSCD, 17 articles on cell transplantation methods and donor cell sources, and 18 articles on scaffolds for delivering stem cells. We also summarized the advantages and disadvantages of different cell transplantation methods and the benefits and limitations of scaffolds based on the above literature. CONCLUSION: The treatment of LSCD is determined by the clinical stage and whether it involves monocular or binocular eyes. Appropriate surgical techniques should be taken for LSCD patients in order to reconstruct the ocular surface, relieve symptoms, and restore visual function. Meanwhile, biological scaffolds assist in the ex vivo culture and implantation of stem cells.
RESUMO
Although corneal refractive surgery has been proven to be excellent in terms of safety and effectiveness, the reduction of postoperative corneal ectasia remains one of the most concerned topics for surgeons. Forme fruste keratoconus (FFKC) is the most important factor that leads to postoperative corneal ectasia, and common preoperative screenings of the condition include corneal morphology examination and corneal biomechanical examination. However, there are limitations to the single morphological examination or biomechanical examination, and the advantages of the combination of the two have been gradually emerging. The combined examination is more accurate in the diagnosis of FFKC and can provide a basis for determining suspected keratoconus. It allows one to measure the true intraocular pressure (IOP) before and after surgery and is recommended for older patients and those with allergic conjunctivitis. This article aims to discuss the application, advantages, and disadvantages of single examination and combined examination in the preoperative screening of refractive surgery, so as to provide a certain reference value for choosing suitable patients for surgery, improving surgical safety, and reducing the risk of postoperative ectasia.