PCL Preservation vs. PCL Sacrifice: Comparing Patient Outcomes in Medial Congruent Total Knee Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare outcomes and complication rates between posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retention and excision utilizing a medial congruent (MC) polyethylene insert in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a specialized ambulatory surgery center (ASC) dedicated to hip and knee arthroplasty. MATERIALS & METHODS: A retrospective review was performed between May 2023 and October 2023 analyzing 398 patients who underwent primary MC TKA by high-volume joint arthroplasty surgeons (n=9) with either PCL preservation (n=264) or sacrifice (n=134) in a single free-standing ASC. Patients were matched chronologically on a 2:1 basis. Demographics, baseline function, 90 day complications, and patient reported outcomes were recorded for each patient. RESULTS: There were no differences in pre-op baseline function or patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), Charlson Comorbidity Index (COI), or American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class amongst patient groups. The PCL-preserve and PCL-sacrifice cohorts showed significant variation in 12 week post-op Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome, Junior (KOOS, JR.) scores. Specifically, the number of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in KOOS, JR. scores was higher in the PCL-sacrifice group (p<0.05). Yet, no complications within the 90 day period were associated with PCL status and other patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSION: This manuscript comparing outcomes between MC TKAs with PCL retention and sacrifice suggests that both techniques are viable options with similar functional outcomes, pain scores and complication rates which may have benefits in an ASC setting. The PCL-sacrifice group exhibited a statistically significant increase in patients who achieved the MCID in KOOS, JR. score compared to the PCL-preserving at early follow up. Future research should employ prospective, randomized designs to further validate these findings and explore long-term implications.

Total Hip Arthroplasty With Subtrochanteric Osteotomy for Crowe IV Dysplasia Using an Extensile Direct Anterior Approach: A Surgical Technique.

The direct anterior approach (DAA) has been increasing in popularity for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Despite previously documented anatomic limitations to its direct distal extension, alternative exposure methods have been described to safely access the femoral diaphysis and facilitate increasingly complex primary and revision THA scenarios. The DAA has several purported advantages compared to alternative approaches (eg, posterior and lateral-based), including its muscle-sparing nature, use of an internervous plane, and preservation of posterior stabilizing structures. Proponents of the DAA cite decreased postoperative pain, quicker recovery times, potentially lower dislocation rates, ease of intraoperative fluoroscopy, and improved implant placement/restoration of leg lengths. The current literature, however, is sparse when considering the use of this approach in the setting of severely dysplastic hips necessitating a concurrent subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy. When utilizing a posterior approach in this population, previous work from Ollivier and colleagues demonstrated high rates of cementless implant osseointegration and significantly improved clinical outcomes at long-term follow-up. Although relatively few reports of addressing this pathology via the DAA currently exist, initial results are promising. This study seeks to provide a detailed description of a surgical technique for performing primary THA and ipsilateral subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy in this patient population utilizing an extensile DAA.

AI-Generated Graduate Medical Education Content for Total Joint Arthroplasty: Comparing ChatGPT Against Orthopaedic Fellows.

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine has primarily focused on diagnosing and treating diseases and assisting in the development of academic scholarly work. This study aimed to evaluate a new use of AI in orthopaedics: content generation for professional medical education. Quality, accuracy, and time were compared between content created by ChatGPT and orthopaedic surgery clinical fellows. Methods: ChatGPT and 3 orthopaedic adult reconstruction fellows were tasked with creating educational summaries of 5 total joint arthroplasty-related topics. Responses were evaluated across 5 domains by 4 blinded reviewers from different institutions who are all current or former total joint arthroplasty fellowship directors or national arthroplasty board review course directors. Results: ChatGPT created better orthopaedic content than fellows when mean aggregate scores for all 5 topics and domains were compared (P ≤ .001). The only domain in which fellows outperformed ChatGPT was the integration of key points and references (P = .006). ChatGPT outperformed the fellows in response time, averaging 16.6 seconds vs the fellows' 94 minutes per prompt (P = .002). Conclusions: With its efficient and accurate content generation, the current findings underscore ChatGPT's potential as an adjunctive tool to enhance orthopaedic arthroplasty graduate medical education. Future studies are warranted to explore AI's role further and optimize its utility in augmenting the educational development of arthroplasty trainees.

Early Versus Late Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Do Patient Differences Exist?

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Little evidence exists comparing those with early versus late PJI. The purpose of the study was to determine comorbidity profile differences between patients developing early and late PJI. METHODS: There were 72,659 patients undergoing primary TKA from 2009 to 2021, who were identified from a commercial claims and encounters database. Subjects diagnosed with PJI were categorized as either 'early' (within 90 days of index procedure) or 'late' (> 2 years after index arthroplasty). Non-infected patients within these periods served as control groups following 4:1 propensity score matching on other extraneous variables. Logistic regression analyses were performed comparing comorbidities between groups. RESULTS: Patients were significantly younger in the late compared to the early infection group (58.1 versus 62.4 years, P < .001). When compared to those with early PJI, patients who had chronic kidney disease (13.3 versus 4.1%; OR [odds ratio] 5.17, P = .002), malignancy (20.4 versus 10.5%; OR 2.53, P = .009), uncomplicated diabetes (40.8 versus 30.6%; OR 2.00, P = .01), rheumatoid arthritis (9.2 versus 3.3%; OR 2.66, P = .046), and hypertension (88.8 versus 81.6%; OR 2.17, P = .04), were all significant predictors of developing a late PJI. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to patients diagnosed with early PJI following primary TKA, the presence of chronic kidney disease, malignancy, uncomplicated diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and hypertension, were independent risk factors for the development of late PJI. Younger patients who have these comorbidities may be targets for preoperative optimization interventions that minimize the risk of PJI.

Should All Patients Receive Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis? Defining Its Role in Patients Undergoing Primary and Aseptic Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have demonstrated reduced periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rates following extended oral antibiotics (EOAs) for high-risk patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This study compared 3-month PJI rates in all patients undergoing primary or aseptic revision TJA with or without EOA prophylaxis. METHODS: In total, 2,982 consecutive primary (n = 2,677) and aseptic revision (n = 305) TJAs were performed by a single, fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeon from 2016 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Beginning January 2020, all patients received 7 days of 300 mg oral cefdinir twice daily immediately postoperatively. Rates of PJI at 3 months were compared between patients who received or did not receive EOA. RESULTS: Rates of PJI at 3 months in patients undergoing primary and aseptic revision TJA were significantly lower in those receiving EOA prophylaxis compared to those who did not (0.41 versus 1.13%, respectively; P = .02). After primary TJA, lower PJI rates were observed with EOA prophylaxis utilization (0.23 versus 0.74%, P = .04; odds ratio [OR] 3.85). Following aseptic revision TJA, PJI rates trended toward a significant decrease with the EOA compared to without (1.88 versus 4.83%, respectively; P = .16; OR 2.71). CONCLUSIONS: All patients undergoing primary or aseptic revision TJA who received EOA prophylaxis were 3.85 and 2.71 times less likely, respectively, to develop PJI at 3 months compared to those without EOA. Future studies are needed to determine if these results are maintained at postoperative time periods beyond 3 months following primary TJA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Retrospective review.

Complications Rates Among Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients Diagnosed With COVID-19 Postoperatively.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic introduced a new set of challenges for the arthroplasty community, including the management of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 following revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and its potential impact on postoperative recovery. This study sought to characterize the risks of postoperative COVID-19 infection among rTKA patients. METHODS: A large national database was utilized to query 8,022 total patients who underwent rTKA between 2018 and 2021, of which 60 had a COVID diagnosis within 90 days after surgery (rTKA/COVID positive). These patients were 1:10 propensity-score matched to 600 rTKA patients who did not have a 90-day postoperative COVID diagnosis (rTKA/COVID negative) and 600 COVID positive patients who did not undergo rTKA. Controlling for potential confounders, multivariate logistic regressions were utilized to compare 90-day postoperative complications between groups. RESULTS: Compared to rTKA/COVID negativepatients, the rTKA/COVID positive cohort had significantly higher rates of pneumonia (odds ratio [OR] = 6.1, P < .001), pulmonary embolism (PE) (OR = 32.4, P < .001), deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (OR = 32.4, P < .001), and 90-day readmissions (OR = 2.1, P = .02). Similarly, the rTKA/COVID positive cohort had significantly higher rates of pneumonia (OR = 4.3, P = .001), PE (OR = 36.8, P < .001), and DVT (OR = 36.8, P < .001) compared to COVID positive patients who did not undergo rTKA. CONCLUSIONS: Revision total knee arthroplasty patients diagnosed with COVID-19 postoperatively had increased rates of thromboembolic events, pneumoniae, and 90-day readmissions. Risk mitigation efforts would suggest extending the prophylactic anticoagulation period for rTKA patients diagnosed with postoperative COVID-19.

Trends in Costs and Professional Reimbursements for Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: With increasing numbers of revision total hip and total knee arthroplasties (rTHAs and rTKAs), understanding trends in related out-of-pocket (OOP) costs, overall costs, and provider reimbursements is critical to improve patient access to care. METHODS: A large database was used to identify 92,116 patients who underwent rTHA or rTKA between 2009 and 2018. The OOP costs associated with the surgery and related inpatient care were calculated as the sum of copayment, coinsurance, and deductible payments. Professional reimbursement was calculated as total payments to the principal physician. All monetary data were adjusted to 2018 dollars. Multivariate regressions evaluated the associations between costs and procedure type, insurance type, and region of service. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2018, overall costs for rTHA significantly increased by 35.0% and overall costs for rTKA significantly increased by 32.3%. The OOP costs for rTHA had no significant changes, while OOP costs for rTKA increased by 20.1%, with patients on Medicare plans having the lowest OOP costs. Professional reimbursements, when measured as a percentage of overall costs, decreased significantly by 4.4% for rTHA and 4.0% for rTKA, with the lowest reimbursements from Medicare plans. CONCLUSION: From 2009 to 2018, total costs related to rTHA and rTKA significantly increased. The OOP costs significantly increased for rTKA, and professional reimbursements for both rTHA and rTKA decreased relative to total costs. Overall, these trends may combine to create greater financial burden to patients and the healthcare system, as well as further limit patients' access to revision arthroplasty care.

Periprosthetic Joint Infection Risk After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Are All Preoperative Corticosteroid Injections the Same?

BACKGROUND: Previous evidence has demonstrated an increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients receiving corticosteroid injection (CSI) within 3 months of surgery. The study aimed to determine if PJI risk after TKA varied among different corticosteroid agents. METHODS: A total of 85,073 patients undergoing primary TKA from 2009 to 2019 were identified from a large national database. Of these, 1,092 (1.3%) received an ipsilateral, intra-articular CSI within 90 days of TKA. These patients were compared to those not receiving CSI using multivariate logistic regressions following 1:4 propensity score matching, with PJI development as the primary outcome. RESULTS: Patients given an injection of any corticosteroid within 90 days of TKA had significantly higher PJI rates compared to controls (1.6 versus 0.41%; P < .001). This finding was driven by patients receiving methylprednisolone acetate (n = 543) or betamethasone (n = 153), with prevalence rates of 1.7 and 2.6%, respectively (P = .003 and P = .01, respectively). No significant increase in the rate of PJI was observed for patients receiving triamcinolone (1.2%; P = .08; n = 342) or dexamethasone (0.0%; P = 1; n = 54) within 90 days preceding TKA. PJI risk for all agents, administered more than 90 days preoperatively normalized to control levels (0.51 versus 0.34%). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that PJI risk varies with CSI type. In this large database study, only patients given methylprednisolone acetate or betamethasone injections within 90 days of surgery had significantly higher PJI rates compared to controls.

Does the Primary Surgical Approach Matter When Choosing the Approach for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Multiple surgical approaches are used for primary total hip arthroplasty (pTHA) and revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). This study sought to investigate prevalence of discordance of pTHA and rTHA surgical approaches and to evaluate how approach concordance impacts postoperative outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent rTHA from 2000 to 2021 was conducted at 3 large urban academic centers. Patients who had minimum 1-year follow-up post-rTHA were included and grouped based on whether they received pTHA via a posterior (PA), direct anterior (DA), or laterally based (DL) approach, and by concordance of index rTHA approach with their pTHA approach. Of the 917 patients studied, 839 (91.5%) were included in the concordant cohort and 78 (8.5%) in the discordant cohort. Patient demographics, operative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Discordance was most prevalent in the DA-pTHA subset (29.5%), compared to the DL-pTHA subset (14.7%) or PA-pTHA subset (3.7%). Discordance varied significantly between primary approaches among all revisions, with DA-pTHA patients having the highest discordance rate for patients revised for aseptic loosening (46.3%, P < .001), fracture (22.2%, P < .001), and dislocation (33.3%, P < .001). There were no differences between groups in dislocation rate, re-revision for infection, or re-revision for fracture. CONCLUSION: The results of this multicenter study showed patients who received pTHA via the DA were more likely to receive rTHA via a discordant approach compared to other primary approaches. Since approach concordance did not impact dislocation, infection, or fracture rates after rTHA, surgeons can feel reassured using a separate approach for rTHA. LEVEL III EVIDENCE: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Distal Femoral Replacement versus Operative Fixation for Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and distal femoral replacement (DFR) have been utilized in the management of periprosthetic distal femur fractures. At present, much of the literature has been limited to small retrospective series. The purpose of the current investigation was to present the results of pooled data to determine the complication rates associated with ORIF and DFR. METHODS: Publications from 2010 to 2020 describing 10 or more periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated with ORIF (ie, single plate, intramedullary nail, and dual fixation) or DFR were included, resulting in 32 publications and 1,258 fractures (977 ORIF and 281 DFR). Occurrence of surgical complications, reoperations, and medical complications were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: The rate of surgical complications (ORIF versus DFR, 20.5 versus 14.9%, P = 1.0) and reoperations (12.9 versus 12.5%, P = 1.0) following DFR were similar. However, pooled analyses demonstrated that patients treated with DFR had a higher medical complication rate (ORIF versus DFR, 8.5 versus 23.1%, P = .0006). CONCLUSION: ORIF and DFR for the treatment of periprosthetic distal femur fractures have similar surgical complication and reoperation profiles. While this review found an increased rate of medical complication following DFR, there are limitations in quality reporting in the literature, which should be considered when interpreting the study's findings. Failed ORIF can be salvaged with DFR, but the difficulty of this reoperation is dependent on the ORIF technique that was used. With future prospective studies, this review can help guide management of these fractures.

Hepatitis C Is Associated With Higher Short-Term Complication Rates After Initial Aseptic and Septic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear if hepatitis C virus (HCV) negatively impacts outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). The purpose of this study is to trend recent rTHA utilization in patients who have HCV and compare postoperative complication rates versus a matched cohort. METHODS: All patients who underwent rTHA were retrospectively identified in a national database. Patients who had HCV (n = 1,746) were matched 1:3 with a matching group (n = 5,238) for age, gender, and several comorbidities. Cochran-Armitage tests were used to analyze trends in the annual proportion of rTHA performed in patients who had HCV from 2010 to 2019. Rates of 90-day medical and prosthesis-related complications within 2 years postoperatively were compared with multivariable logistic regressions. RESULTS: The annual proportion of rTHA performed in patients who had HCV significantly increased from 2010 to 2019 (P < .001). Patients who had HCV exhibited significantly higher rates of acute kidney injuries (7.6% versus 4.4%; odds ratio [OR] 1.50), transfusions (20.6% versus 14.6%; OR 1.38), and re-revisions for prosthetic joint infection (10.9% versus 6.5%; OR 1.73). In subgroup analyses, rates of re-revision for prosthetic joint infection after initial aseptic rTHA (7.1% versus 3.8%; OR 1.82) and periprosthetic fracture after initial septic rTHA (4.5% versus 1.6%; OR 2.77) were significantly higher in the HCV cohort. CONCLUSION: Similar to primary THA, patients who have HCV exhibit significantly increased complication rates after rTHA. With growing utilization in recent years, these data suggest that this population will comprise an increasingly larger proportion of rTHA procedures performed in the coming years.

Medicaid Payer Status Is Associated With Increased 90-Day Resource Utilization, Reoperation, and Infection Following Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Background: Prior literature has demonstrated increased resource utilization and perioperative complications in patients with a Medicaid payor status undergoing primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. This relationship has yet to be explored in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Methods: The National Readmissions Database was queried from 2010 to 2015 for all patients undergoing aseptic rTHA. 90-day complication data were collected, and patients were separated into two cohorts based on insurance payor type: Medicaid and non-Medicaid. Patients were propensity score matched 2:1 on a number of comorbid and operative characteristics. The relationship between Medicaid payor status and postoperative outcomes was then assessed using binomial logistic regression analysis. Results: 3,110 Medicaid patients were identified and matched to 6,175 non-Medicaid patients. Medicaid patients had increased odds of an early prosthetic joint infection (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.29, p=0.019), superficial surgical site infection (OR: 1.48, p=0.003), and early reoperation (OR: 1.18, p=0.045). Medicaid patients also experienced higher odds of readmissions, extended length of stay, non-home discharge status, and medical complications. Finally, the Medicaid cohort had a $3,332 (95% CI: 2,412-4,253, p<0.001) increased adjusted total cost of care when compared to the non-Medicaid cohort. Conclusion: This study identifies the Medicaid payor status as an independent risk factor for increased resource utilization, reoperation, and infection in the early postoperative period for patients undergoing rTHA. This relationship is likely due to an interplay of multiple variables, including socioeconomic status and access to care. Level of Evidence: IV.

Preoperative opioid use is a risk factor for complication following revision total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The demand for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures continues to increase. A growing body of evidence in primary THA suggests that preoperative opioid use confers increased risk for complication. However, it is unknown whether the same is true for patients undergoing revision procedures. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether or not there was a relationship between preoperative opioid use and surgical complications, medical complications, and healthcare utilisation following revision THA. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using the Truven Marketscan database. Patients undergoing revision THA were identified. Preoperative opioid prescriptions were queried for 1 year preoperatively and were used to divide patients into cohorts based on temporality and quantity of opioid use. This included an opioid naïve group as well as an "opioid holiday" group (6 months opioid naïve period after chronic use). Demographic and complication data were collected and both univariate and multivariate analysis was then performed. RESULTS: 62.5% of patients had received an opioid prescription in the year preceding surgery. Patients with continuous preoperative opioid use had higher odds of the following: infection (superficial or deep surgical site infection; OR 1.29; 95% CI, 1.03-1.62, p = 0.029), wound complication (OR 1.36; 95% CI, 1.02-1.82, p = 0.037), sepsis (OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.08-3.34, p = 0.026), and revision surgery (OR 1.54, 95% CI, 1.28-1.85, p < 0.001). This group also had higher care utilisation including extended length of stay, non-home discharge, 90-day readmission, and emergency room visits (p < 0.001). An opioid holiday mitigated some of this increased risk as this cohort has baseline (i.e. same as opioid naïve) risk (p > 0.05 for all comparison). CONCLUSIONS: Opioid use prior to revision THA is common and is associated with increased risk of postoperative complication. Given that risk was reduced by a preoperative opioid holiday, this represents a modifiable risk factor which should be discussed and addressed preoperatively to optimise outcomes.

New-Onset Depression After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Consideration of the At-Risk Patient.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative new-onset depression (NOD) has gained recent attention as a previously unrecognized complication which may put patients at risk for poor outcomes after elective total hip arthroplasty. We aimed to investigate risk factors for the development of NOD after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and assess its association with postoperative complications. METHODS: This is a retrospective, population-level investigation of elective TKA patients. Patients with a preoperative diagnosis of depression were excluded from this study. Two groups were compared: patients who were diagnosed with depression within one year after TKA (NOD) and those who did not (control). The association of both preoperative patient factors and postoperative surgical and medical complications with NOD was then determined using multivariate and univariate analyses. RESULTS: Of 196,728 unique TKA patients in our cohort, 5351 (2.72%) were diagnosed with NOD within one year of TKA. Age <54 year old, female gender, preoperative anxiety disorder, drug, alcohol, and/or tobacco use, multiple comorbidities, and opioid use before TKA were all associated with a diagnosis of NOD postoperatively (all P < .001). Postoperative NOD was associated with periprosthetic fracture (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.29-3.52; P = .033), aseptic failure (OR 1.61; 95% CI 1.24-2.07; P = .020), prosthetic joint infection (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.30-1.85; P < .001), stroke (OR 1.24; 95% CI 1.09-1.42; P = .006), and venous thromboembolism (OR 1.24; 95% CI 1.12-1.37; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Post-TKA NOD is common and is associated with poor outcomes. This may aid surgeons in developing both anticipatory measures and institute preventative measures for patients at risk for developing NOD.

Metformin Use Is Associated with Fewer Complications in Patients with Type-2 Diabetes Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is a well-established risk factor for complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and the incidence of type-2 diabetes is increasing. Metformin is considered first-line therapy for type-2 diabetes and has been shown to reduce all-cause mortality and to possess anti-inflammatory properties. The impact of metformin use as it relates to outcomes following TKA is unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate this relationship. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using the Truven MarketScan database. Adult patients undergoing unilateral, primary TKA were identified. We included only patients with a preoperative diagnosis of type-2 diabetes and established 2 cohorts based on metformin status. Propensity score matching was performed to match patients who used metformin to those who did not (1-to-1). Patients were matched on factors including age, sex, insulin status, other diabetic medications, comorbidities, complexity of diabetes, and smoking status. Regression analysis was then performed on matched cohorts to examine 90-day outcomes. A subgroup analysis was performed on 1-year revision rates. RESULTS: After matching, there were 32,186 patients in both the metformin group and the no-metformin group, resulting in a total of 64,372 included patients. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Regression analysis, performed on matched cohorts, demonstrated that the no-metformin group had increased odds of readmission (odds ratio [OR], 1.09 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04 to 1.15]; p < 0.001), emergency department presentation (OR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.04 to 1.14]; p < 0.001), extended length of stay (OR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.06 to 1.15]; p < 0.001), periprosthetic joint infection (OR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.13 to 1.50]; p < 0.001), deep vein thrombosis (OR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.09 to 1.26]; p < 0.001), acute kidney injury (OR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.09 to 1.33]; p < 0.001), hypoglycemic events (OR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.54]; p = 0.039), and 1-year revision (OR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.33]; p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Metformin use in patients with type-2 diabetes undergoing TKA appears to be associated with lower odds of multiple complications and resource utilization parameters, including periprosthetic joint infection and 1-year revision rates. Given the frequency with which TKA is performed in patients with type-2 diabetes, this knowledge has the potential to improve optimization protocols and outcomes in this group of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Anterior Revision Hip Arthroplasty is Associated With Higher Wound Complications but Fewer Dislocations Compared to Posterior Revision Hip Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Wound complication after primary direct anterior (DAA) hip arthroplasty has been reported in the literature but there has been no comparison regarding revision anterior vs revision posterior (PA) hip arthroplasty. The authors hypothesize that anterior approach revision surgery may have increased wound complications compared with posterior hip revisions and also report on secondary outcome metrics. METHODS: Ninety-nine DAA and 191 PA revisions were included for analysis. Preoperative demographic characteristics, indication for revision, operative details, type of revision performed, components utilized, and postoperative complications were compared between DAA and PA groups including multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The DAA cohort demonstrated an increased risk of superficial wound complications (7.1% vs 0.5%, P = .003) and a decreased dislocation rate (2.0% vs 13.1%, P = .002). There was a trend toward increased overall complications in the PA group (OR 1.71, P = .078). CONCLUSION: Revision DAA THA is associated with an increased risk of superficial wound complications, but may impart a decreased dislocation rate.

Preoperative Analgesia, Complications, and Resource Utilization After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Tramadol Is Associated With Less Risk Than Other Preoperative Opioid Medications.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative opioid use is known to be detrimental to outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This is concerning as multiple societies recommend tramadol for the management of arthritis. The purpose of this study was to determine if tramadol is associated with postoperative complications, increased resource utilization, and revision when compared with patients receiving nontramadol opioids (NTOs) and those who are opioid naive (ON). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using the Truven MarketScan databases (Truven Health, Ann Arbor, MI). Adult patients undergoing primary THA were identified and divided into 4 cohorts based on preoperative opioid medications (ie, ON, tramadol-only [TO], or NTOs; ±tramadol). Demographics, comorbidities, and 90-day complications were collected and compared between cohorts. Revision rates were compared at 3 years. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Finally, preoperative prescription patterns were trended during the study period. RESULTS: About 198,357 patients, including 18,694 TO and 106,768 ON, were identified. Compared with ON, TO patients had similar rates of complications and revision surgery (P > .05) but had slightly higher emergency department visits (odds ratio [OR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.01-1.12; P = .027), readmissions (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.09-1.22; P < .001), and nonhome discharges (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.12; P = .010). TO patients had significantly lower odds of incurring most examined complications, including revision surgery, when compared with NTO (P < .05). From 2009 to 2018, the proportion of patients prescribed preoperative opioids decreased. CONCLUSION: Preoperative TO is associated with less postoperative risk than NTO use and is similar to opioid naivety. Fortunately, the number of patients receiving preoperative NTOs appears to be decreasing. Our results support tramadol as an appropriate pre-THA analgesic.

The impact of preoperative tramadol-only use on outcomes following total knee arthroplasty - Is tramadol different than traditional opioids?

BACKGROUND: Opioid use prior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is known to have detrimental influence on postoperative outcomes. Whether or not the same is true for tramadol is currently unclear. The aim of this study was to clarify the relationship between preoperative tramadol and postoperative complications. METHODS: The Truven Marketscan® Databases were used to conduct this retrospective cohort study. Patients undergoing primary TKA were identified and divided into cohorts based on preoperative medication status (i.e. opioid naïve, tramadol-only, or non-tramadol opioids). Patient demographics, comorbidities, and 90-day outcomes were collected and compared between cohorts. Revision rates were analyzed at 1- and 3-years postoperatively. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed. RESULTS: 336,316 patients were included and 23,097 (6.9%) were preoperative tramadol-only users. Tramadol-only patients (v. opioid naïve) had increased odds of 90-day readmission (OR-1.07, 95%CI 1.02-1.12, p = 0.004), wound complication (OR-1.13, 95%CI 1.01-1.27, p = 0.34), and 3-year revision rates (OR-1.35, 95%CI 1.19-1.53, p < 0.001). However, when compared to the preoperative opioid cohorts, tramadol-only patients had decreased odds of nearly all outcomes. Over the study period, the number of patients receiving preoperative opioids decreased while the proportion of patients prescribed tramadol-only increased. CONCLUSIONS: While tramadol-only use has lower risk than traditional opioids, tramadol-only use preceding TKA is associated with increased rates of readmission, wound complication and revision surgery. This is important information for prescribers who may be using tramadol to treat symptomatic knee arthrosis prior to arthroplasty referral and for thought leaders producing clinical practice guidelines. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Prognostic.

Preoperative Patient Factors and Postoperative Complications as Risk Factors for New-Onset Depression Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Depression is known to be a risk factor for complication following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), but little is known about new-onset depression (NOD) following THA. The purpose of this study is to determine the incidence of NOD and identify risk factors for its occurrence after THA. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of the Truven MarketScan database. Patients undergoing primary THA were identified and separated into cohorts based on the presence or not of NOD. Patients with preoperative depression or a diagnosis of fracture were excluded. Patient demographic and comorbid data were queried, and postoperative complications were collected. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis was then performed to assess the association of NOD with patient-specific factors and postoperative complications. RESULTS: In total, 111,838 patients undergoing THA were identified and 2517 (2.25%) patients had NOD in the first postoperative year. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that preoperative opioid use, female gender, higher Elixhauser comorbidity index, preoperative anxiety disorder, drug or alcohol use disorder, and preoperative smoking were associated with the occurrence of NOD (P ≤ .001). The following postoperative complications were associated with increased odds of NOD: prosthetic joint infection (odds ratio [OR] 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42-2.34, P < .001), aseptic revision surgery (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.06-2.04, P = .019), periprosthetic fracture (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.13-2.61, P = .01), and non-home discharge (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.42-1.77, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: NOD is common following THA and there are multiple patient-specific factors and postoperative complications which increase the odds of its occurrence. Providers should use this information to identify at-risk patients so that pre-emptive prevention strategies may be employed.