Medical therapy in patients with endogenous hypoglycaemia: Is euglycaemia achievable?

CONTEXT: While the only curative treatment for patients with endogenous hypoglycaemia related to inappropriate insulin or to insulin growth factor 2 (IGF2) secretion is surgery, medical treatment to normalize plasma glucose levels can be useful. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective single centre study was to assess whether patients with endogenous hypoglycaemia, considered euglycaemic with medical treatments, experienced asymptomatic hypo- or hyperglycaemic excursions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with endogenous hypoglycaemia related to inappropriate insulin or to IGF2 secretion between 2012 and 2016 and considered normoglycaemic with medical treatment (absence of clinical hypoglycaemia and self-monitoring blood glucose in the normal range) were enroled and underwent a six-day continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) recording. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (inappropriate insulin secretion n = 25 and IGF2 secretion n = 2), treated with diazoxide (n = 16), somatostatin analogues (n = 7), glucocorticoids (n = 3) or a combination of these treatments (n = 1) were enroled. Twenty-five CGMs were analysed. CGM confirmed normoglycaemia in 11/25 patients (44%). Hypoglycaemias below 0.60 g/L were present in seven patients (28%) and were associated with hyperglycaemic excursions above 1.40 g/L in five patients. Seven patients (28%) had only hyperglycaemic excursions. Based on these results, treatment was modified in 14 patients (56%). CONCLUSION: Despite the disappearance of hypoglycaemia-related clinical symptoms and normalization of blood glucose self-monitoring data, 56% of the patients with endogenous hypoglycaemia treated with medical therapy experienced asymptomatic hypo- and/or hyperglycaemia. Continuous glucose monitoring could be a useful approach to reveal and prevent hypo- or hyperglycaemic excursions.

Impact of Carbohydrate Content and Glycemic Load on Postprandial Glucose After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

BACKGROUND: Abnormal glucose profiles have been described after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) with intense postprandial hyperglycemic peaks in some but not all the patients. The underlying mechanisms of these anomalies are not totally understood. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine whether or not the composition of the meal impacts the existence and maximum interstitial glucose (IG) concentration, measured under real-life conditions. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Referral bariatric surgery left. METHODS: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and meal composition were recorded for at least 3 days on an outpatient basis in 56 patients after RYGB. The presence of postprandial peaks defined by IG above 140 mg/dl, the maximum postprandial IG, the carbohydrate content, and the glycemic load of the meals were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients had a hyperglycemic peak (PEAK), and 24 did not (NO PEAK). The average max IG was 159.6 ± 33.0 mg/dl in PEAK individuals and 111.8 ± 13.0 mg/dl in NO PEAK. Age was significantly higher in PEAK, but no other parameter was different between the two groups, including meal composition. In the PEAK patients, in multivariate analyses, carbohydrate content in model one and glucose load in model two explained respectively 50 and 26 % of maximum IG variance. For each gram of ingested carbohydrates, interstitial glucose increased by 1.68 mg/dl. CONCLUSIONS: Following a gastric bypass, under real-life conditions, irrespective of the carbohydrate content of the meal, some patients develop postprandial hyperglycemic peaks, whereas others do not. In patients with postprandial hyperglycemic peaks, the maximum IG depends on the carbohydrate content of the meal.

High glycemic variability assessed by continuous glucose monitoring after surgical treatment of obesity by gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Obesity surgery elicits complex changes in glucose metabolism that are difficult to observe with discontinuous glucose measurements. We aimed to evaluate glucose variability after gastric bypass by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in a real-life setting. METHODS: CGM was performed for 4.2 ± 1.3 days in three groups of 10 subjects each: patients who had undergone gastric bypass and who were referred for postprandial symptoms compatible with mild hypoglycemia, nonoperated diabetes controls, and healthy controls. RESULTS: The maximum interstitial glucose (IG), SD of IG values, and mean amplitude of glucose excursions (MAGE) were significantly higher in operated patients and in diabetes controls than in healthy controls. The time to the postprandial peak IG was significantly shorter in operated patients (42.8 ± 6.0 min) than in diabetes controls (82.2 ± 11.1 min, P = 0.0002), as were the rates of glucose increase to the peak (2.4 ± 1.6 vs. 1.2 ± 0.3 mg/mL/min; P = 0.041). True hypoglycemia (glucose <60 mg/dL) was rare: the symptoms were probably more related to the speed of IG decrease than to the glucose level achieved. Half of the operated patients, mostly those with a diabetes background before surgery, had postprandial glucose concentrations above 200 mg/dL (maximum IG, 306 ± 59 mg/dL), in contrast to the normal glucose concentrations in the fasting state and 2 h postmeal. CONCLUSIONS: Glucose variability is exaggerated after gastric bypass, combining unusually high and early hyperglycemic peaks and rapid IG decreases. This might account for postprandial symptoms mimicking hypoglycemia but often seen without true hypoglycemia. Early postprandial hyperglycemia might be underestimated if glucose measurements are done 2 h postmeal.