Anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 encephalitis revealed by a manic episode: insights from frontal lobe dysfunction in neuropsychiatry through neuropsychology and metabolic imaging. A case report.

Background: Anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (LGI1) encephalitis is a limbic encephalitis that rarely presents as an isolated psychiatric syndrome. Case presentation: A 70-year-old patient first presented with behavioral disorder including hyperactivity, euphoria, with disinhibition and accelerated speech associated with severe insomnia and cognitive disorder. A manic episode was diagnosed and he received various psychotropic medications with no improvement. Invesitgations were negative (MRI showed T2 aspecific hyperintensities with no hyperintensities in limbic regions and EEG was normal). He was transferred to a nursing home, with a diagnosis of neurodegenerative condition. Later, he was referred to our unit for further investigations. A cerebral 18F-FDG-PET revealed an association of frontal hypometabolism and temporal and striatum hypermetabolism and CSF analysis revealed slightly increased white blood cell counts. Plasmatic anti-LGI1 antibodies were detected. The patient was treated with intra-venous immunoglobulin (IvIg) but showed no improvement. Second-line treatment (a combination of rituximab and cyclophosmphamide) was then administered for a year, leading to an improvement of neuropsychiatric symptoms and normalization of metabolic impairment on 18F-FDG-PET. Conclusion: In this report, we describe a novel case of a patient withanti-LGI1 encephalitis with a predominant long-term psychiatric presentation. An atypical presentation (such as atypical psychiatric symptoms, neurocognitive disorder, and hyponatremia) should prompt further investigations such as CSF analysis, considering that MRI and EEG may be normal. FDG-PET might be of interest but few data are available in the literature. Early treatment of anti-LGI1 encephalitis is crucial for overall prognosis and may delay the development of dementia in some cases.

Interest of adjusting urine cannabinoids to creatinine level to monitor cannabis cessation therapy in heavy smokers with psychiatric disorders.

Up to 25% of hospitalized patients in a psychiatric department exhibit troubles linked to cannabis use. Weaning patients with psychiatric disorders off drugs of abuse requires specific care to improve their clinical outcome. The present study aims to develop a predictive model of urinary excretion of creatinine-normalized cannabinoids (UCNC ) and to determine UCNC thresholds corresponding to the widely used cut-offs of 20 ng/mL and 50 ng/mL for cannabinoids. One hundred thirty-two patients with 452 urine samples were included between 2013 and 2017. Urinary cannabinoids and UCNC elimination curves were computed for each patient. Using a mono-exponential mixed effect model with 88 samples from 26 subjects exhibiting at least 3 decreasing UCNC in a row, the average calculated elimination rate constant was 0.0108 ± 0.0026 h-1 , corresponding to a mean elimination half-life of 64 ± 12 hours. The use of UCNC is of particular interest because of a high inter- and intra-individual variability of urinary creatinine concentration (from 0.06 to 3.81 mg/mL). Moreover, UCNC allows for the detection of diluted or concentrated urine specimens that may lead to false positive (FP) or false negative (FN) results. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess UCNC thresholds of 32.4 and 124.7 ng/mg that provide a strong discrimination between positive and negative samples for cannabinoids cut-offs of 20 and 50 ng/mL respectively. The developed model and the defined UCNC thresholds allowed for the accurate prediction of the time needed to reach a negative UCNC result that could be used by clinicians to optimize clinical care.

Brain calcification process and phenotypes according to age and sex: Lessons from SLC20A2, PDGFB, and PDGFRB mutation carriers.

Primary Familial Brain Calcification (PFBC) is a dominantly inherited cerebral microvascular calcifying disorder with diverse neuropsychiatric expression. Three causative genes have been identified: SLC20A2, PDGFRB and, recently, PDGFB, whose associated phenotype has not yet been extensively studied. We included in the largest published case series of genetically confirmed PFBC, 19 PDGFB (including three new mutations), 24 SLC20A2 (including 4 new mutations), and 14 PDGFRB mutation carriers, from two countries (France and Brazil). We studied clinical features and applied our visual rating scale on all 49 available CT scans. Among the symptomatic mutation carriers (33/57, 58%), the three most frequently observed categories of clinical features were psychiatric signs (72.7%, 76.5%, and 80% for PDGFB, SLC20A2, and PDGFRB, respectively), movement disorders (45.5%, 76.5%, and 40%), and cognitive impairment (54.6%, 64.7%, and 40%). The median age of clinical onset was 31 years, 25% had an early onset (before 18) and 25% a later onset (after 53). Patients with an early clinical onset exhibited mostly isolated psychiatric or cognitive signs, while patients with a later onset exhibited mostly movement disorders, especially in association with other clinical features. CT scans rating allowed identifying four patterns of calcification. The total calcification score was best predicted by the combined effects of gene (SLC20A2 > PDGFB > PDGFRB mutations), sex (male), and (increasing) age, defining three risk classes, which correlated with the four patterns of calcification. These calcification patterns could reflect the natural history of the calcifying process, with distinct risk classes characterized by different age at onset or rate of progression.

Phenotypic spectrum of probable and genetically-confirmed idiopathic basal ganglia calcification.

Idiopathic basal ganglia calcification is characterized by mineral deposits in the brain, an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance in most cases and genetic heterogeneity. The first causal genes, SLC20A2 and PDGFRB, have recently been reported. Diagnosing idiopathic basal ganglia calcification necessitates the exclusion of other causes, including calcification related to normal ageing, for which no normative data exist. Our objectives were to diagnose accurately and then describe the clinical and radiological characteristics of idiopathic basal ganglia calcification. First, calcifications were evaluated using a visual rating scale on the computerized tomography scans of 600 consecutively hospitalized unselected controls. We determined an age-specific threshold in these control computerized tomography scans as the value of the 99th percentile of the total calcification score within three age categories: <40, 40-60, and >60 years. To study the phenotype of the disease, patients with basal ganglia calcification were recruited from several medical centres. Calcifications that rated below the age-specific threshold using the same scale were excluded, as were patients with differential diagnoses of idiopathic basal ganglia calcification, after an extensive aetiological assessment. Sanger sequencing of SLC20A2 and PDGFRB was performed. In total, 72 patients were diagnosed with idiopathic basal ganglia calcification, 25 of whom bore a mutation in either SLC20A2 (two families, four sporadic cases) or PDGFRB (one family, two sporadic cases). Five mutations were novel. Seventy-one per cent of the patients with idiopathic basal ganglia calcification were symptomatic (mean age of clinical onset: 39 ± 20 years; mean age at last evaluation: 55 ± 19 years). Among them, the most frequent signs were: cognitive impairment (58.8%), psychiatric symptoms (56.9%) and movement disorders (54.9%). Few clinical differences appeared between SLC20A2 and PDGFRB mutation carriers. Radiological analysis revealed that the total calcification scores correlated positively with age in controls and patients, but increased more rapidly with age in patients. The expected total calcification score was greater in SLC20A2 than PDGFRB mutation carriers, beyond the effect of the age alone. No patient with a PDGFRB mutation exhibited a cortical or a vermis calcification. The total calcification score was more severe in symptomatic versus asymptomatic individuals. We provide the first phenotypical description of a case series of patients with idiopathic basal ganglia calcification since the identification of the first causative genes. Clinical and radiological diversity is confirmed, whatever the genetic status. Quantification of calcification is correlated with the symptomatic status, but the location and the severity of the calcifications don't reflect the whole clinical diversity. Other biomarkers may be helpful in better predicting clinical expression.

Psychosis revealing familial idiopathic basal ganglia calcification.

We describe the case of a 39-year-old woman presenting with auditory hallucinations and delusions responsive to antipsychotic drugs. Computerized tomography scans revealed basal ganglia calcifications in the proband and in her two asymptomatic parents. Extensive etiological clinicobiological assessment allowed us to exclude known causes of brain calcifications and diagnose familial idiopathic basal ganglia calcification (IBGC). Neurological symptoms associated with psychiatric symptoms are common in IBGC. Nevertheless, purely psychiatric presentations, as demonstrated by the present case, are possible. However, a fortuitous association between asymptomatic IBGC and schizophrenia cannot be ruled out. Only brain imaging, followed by an extensive etiological assessment, allows for diagnosis of this rare disorder.

GIPC recruits GAIP (RGS19) to attenuate dopamine D2 receptor signaling.

Pleiotropic G proteins are essential for the action of hormones and neurotransmitters and are activated by stimulation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR), which initiates heterotrimer dissociation of the G protein, exchange of GDP for GTP on its Galpha subunit and activation of effector proteins. Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins regulate this cascade and can be recruited to the membrane upon GPCR activation. Direct functional interaction between RGS and GPCR has been hypothesized. We show that recruitment of GAIP (RGS19) by the dopamine D2 receptor (D2R), a GPCR, required the scaffold protein GIPC (GAIP-interacting protein, C terminus) and that all three were coexpressed in neurons and neuroendocrine cells. Dynamic translocation of GAIP to the plasma membrane and coassembly in a protein complex in which GIPC was a required component was dictated by D2R activation and physical interactions. In addition, two different D2R-mediated responses were regulated by the GTPase activity of GAIP at the level of the G protein coupling in a GIPC-dependent manner. Since GIPC exclusively interacted with GAIP and selectively with subsets of GPCR, this mechanism may serve to sort GPCR signaling in cells that usually express a large repertoire of GPCRs, G proteins, and RGS.