The association between future time perspective and sexual behaviours in individuals attending HIV testing centres.

BACKGROUND: Most European countries are still facing a high burden of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) cases each year. Available literature has found associations between time preference, i.e. the relative weight given by individuals to future outcomes compared to present ones, and various health behaviours such as tobacco or alcohol consumption, vaccination or participation in cancer screening programmes. Our objective is to investigate the role of future preference in risky sexual behaviours. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study using self-administered questionnaires in three HIV testing centres in Paris. We collected data on sexual behaviours, risk perceptions, risk attitude, future preference (Considerations of Future Consequences scale) and socioeconomic and demographic variables. Full data for variables used in regression analyses were available for 1090 respondents. We study factors associated with condom use at the first sexual encounter, with the frequency of condom use and with the number of sexual partners. RESULTS: In the full sample, future preference is positively correlated with both measures of condom use while it is negatively correlated with the number of sexual partners. Decomposing the analysis by risk group, our results indicate that future preference has more impact on sexual behaviours, especially condom use, among men who have sex with men compared to heterosexual men and, to a lesser extent, compared to heterosexual women. CONCLUSION: If future time perspective is confirmed as a determinant of safer sexual behaviours, prevention campaigns could be shifted towards greater information on short-term consequences of STIs.

COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERVENTIONS BASED ON PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC CONDITIONS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to review evidence on the cost-effectiveness of exercise-based interventions in the treatment of chronic conditions a decade after the publication of Roine et al. in 2009 (Roine E, Roine RP, Räsänen P, et al. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25:427-454). METHODS: We carried out a review of published articles in PUBMED and JSTOR between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2016. Full economic evaluations of exercise programs targeting patients with a chronic condition were eligible for inclusion. Data on program, design, and economic characteristics were extracted using a predefined extraction form. The quality of the economic evaluations was appraised using the adjusted Consensus Health Economic Criteria List. RESULTS: A total of 426 articles were identified and thirty-seven studies were selected. Eleven studies dealt with musculoskeletal and rheumatologic disorders, ten with cardiovascular diseases, six with neurological disorders, three with mental illnesses, three with cancers, and four with diabetes, respiratory diseases, or pelvic organ prolapse. In total, 60 percent of exercise programs were dominant or cost-effective. For musculoskeletal and rheumatologic disorders, 72 percent of programs were dominant or cost-effective while this was the case for 57 percent of programs for cardiovascular diseases using a nonsurgical comparator. CONCLUSIONS: There is clear evidence in favor of exercise-based programs for the treatment of musculoskeletal and rheumatologic disorders and, to a lesser extent, for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. More research is needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of physical activity in the treatment of neurological disorders, mental illnesses, cancers, respiratory diseases, and diabetes/obesity.