Blue-light imaging or narrow-band imaging for proximal colonic lesions: a prospective randomized tandem colonoscopy study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Blue-light imaging (BLI) is a new image-enhanced endoscopy with a wavelength filter similar to narrow-band imaging (NBI). We compared the 2 with white-light imaging (WLI) on proximal colonic lesion detection and miss rates. METHODS: In this 3-arm prospective randomized study with tandem examination of the proximal colon, we enrolled patients aged ≥40 years. Eligible patients were randomized in 1:1:1 ratio to receive BLI, NBI, or WLI during the first withdrawal from the proximal colon. The second withdrawal was performed using WLI in all patients. Primary outcomes were proximal polyp (pPDRs) and adenoma (pADRs) detection rates. Secondary outcomes were miss rates of proximal lesions found on tandem examination. RESULTS: Of 901 patients included (mean age, 64.7 years; 52.9% men), 48.1% underwent colonoscopy for screening or surveillance. The corresponding pPDRs of the BLI, NBI, and WLI groups were 45.8%, 41.6, and 36.6%, whereas the corresponding pADRs were 36.6%, 33.8%, and 28.3%. There was a significant difference in pPDR and pADR between BLI and WLI groups (difference, 9.2% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 3.3-16.9] and 8.3% [95% CI, 2.7-15.9]) and between NBI and WLI groups (difference, 5.0% [95% CI, 1.4-12.9] and 5.6% [95% CI, 2.1-13.3]). Proximal adenoma miss rates were significantly lower with BLI (19.4%) than with WLI (27.4%; difference, -8.0%; 95% CI, -15.8 to -.1) but not between NBI (27.2%) and WLI. CONCLUSIONS: Both BLI and NBI were superior to WLI on detecting proximal colonic lesions, but only BLI had lower proximal adenoma miss rates than WLI. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03696992.).

Long-term effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on colorectal cancer incidences.

Background: There is evidence supporting the association between Helicobacter pylori infection and colorectal cancer (CRC), but whether H. pylori eradication reduces the risk of CRC is still unknown. Objectives: To compare the incidence of CRC in subjects who had received H. pylori eradication therapy with general population. Design: A population-based retrospective cohort study. Methods: This study included all H. pylori-infected subjects who had received their first course of clarithromycin-containing triple therapy in 2003-2015 in Hong Kong. We compared the observed incidences of CRC in this H. pylori eradicated cohort with the expected incidences in the age- and sex-matched general population. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was computed. Results: Among 96,572 H. pylori-eradicated subjects with a median follow-up of 9.7 years, 1417 (1.5%) developed CRC. Primary analysis showed no significant difference in the observed and expected incidences of CRC (SIR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.97-1.09). However, when stratified according to the follow-up period, higher incidence of CRC was only observed in the first 5 years after eradication (SIR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.39-1.55), but it was lower (SIR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74-0.99) than general population after 11 years. When stratified by tumor location, the observed incidence was higher for colon (SIR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.12-1.29) but lower for rectal cancer (SIR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.81-0.999) among H. pylori-eradicated subjects. Conclusions: H. pylori-infected subjects appeared to have a higher incidence of CRC initially, which declined progressively to a level lower than general population 10 years after H. pylori eradication, particularly for rectal cancer.

Risk of Postcolonoscopy Thromboembolic Events: A Real-World Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND& AIMS: Although antithrombotic agents could increase the risk of postpolypectomy bleeding, interruption of these agents also increases the risk of thromboembolism (TE). We assessed the risks of postcolonoscopy TE events and their association with the interruption of antithrombotic agents. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study including consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy between January 2016 and March 2021. We determined the rates of postcolonoscopy TE events in patients taking various antithrombotic agents (with or without interruption), and in different patient groups according to indications for colonoscopy, underlying TE, and bleeding risks. RESULTS: Of the 6220 patients, 1755 (28.2%) were on antithrombotics. Overall, 20 patients (0.32%) developed TE events, and 25 (0.80%) of 3134 patients with polypectomy experienced major episodes of bleeding. Among all patients on antithrombotic agents, the highest rates of TE events were observed in patients on dual-antiplatelet therapy (4.65%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 28.0; 95% CI, 3.77-142.1) and clopidogrel (2.78%; aOR, 12.2; 95% CI, 2.10-57.0), compared with 0.11% among those not on antithrombotics. In patients interrupting anti-thrombotic agents, the risk of TE was increased compared to those on no agent as follows: stopping 2 or more antithrombotic agents (4.55%; aOR, 22.5; 95% CI, 1.09-158.0), monotherapy with clopidogrel (3.06%; aOR, 15.5; 95% CI, 2.86-69.6), warfarin (1.33%; aOR, 6.96; 95% CI, 1.14-33.5), or direct-acting oral anticoagulants (0.87%; aOR, 6.23; 95% CI, 1.22-26.8). Having an underlying high TE risk (aOR, 16.8; 95% CI, 6.33-46.6) was associated with higher postcolonoscopy TE events. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of post-colonoscopy thromboembolic events is low. However, the temporary interruption of antithrombotic agents, particularly stopping 2 or more agents, clopidogrel, warfarin, or direct-acting oral anticoagulants was associated with higher postcolonoscopy TE events, particularly in high-risk patients.

Clinical and Genomic Characterization of Interval Colorectal Cancer in 3 Prospective Cohorts.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Interval colorectal cancers (CRCs), cancers diagnosed after a screening/surveillance examination in which no cancer is detected, and before the date of next recommended examination, reflect an unprecedented challenge in CRC detection and prevention. To better understand this poorly characterized CRC variant, we examined the clinical and mutational characteristics of interval CRCs in comparison with screen detected CRCs. METHODS: We included 1175 CRCs documented in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial and 3661 CRCs in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) and Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS). Multivariable Cox models were performed to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of death risk. Whole exome sequencing was conducted in 147 PLCO cases and 796 NHS/HPFS cases. RESULTS: A total of 619 deaths (312 CRC-specific) and 2404 deaths (1904 CRC-specific) were confirmed during follow-up of PLCO and NHS/HPFS, respectively. Compared with screen detected CRCs, interval CRCs had a multivariate-adjusted HR (95% CI) of 1.47 (1.21-1.78) for CRC-specific mortality and 1.27 (1.09-1.47) for overall mortality (meta-analysis combining all 3 cohorts). However, we did not observe significant differences in mutational features between interval and screen detected CRCs (false discovery rate adjusted P > .05). CONCLUSION: Interval CRCs had a significantly increased risk of death compared with screen detected CRCs that were not explained by established clinical prognostic factors, including stage at diagnosis. The survival disadvantage of interval CRCs did not appear to be explained by differences in the genomic landscape of tumors characterized by whole exome sequencing.

Aspirin Use and Risk of Colorectal Cancer Among Older Adults.

IMPORTANCE: Although aspirin is recommended for the prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) among adults aged 50 to 59 years, recent data from a randomized clinical trial suggest a lack of benefit and even possible harm among older adults. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between aspirin use and the risk of incident CRC among older adults. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A pooled analysis was conducted of 2 large US cohort studies, the Nurses' Health Study (June 1, 1980-June 30, 2014) and Health Professionals Follow-up Study (January 1, 1986-January 31, 2014). A total of 94 540 participants aged 70 years or older were included and followed up to June 30, 2014, for women or January 31, 2014, for men. Participants with a diagnosis of any cancer, except nonmelanoma skin cancer, or inflammatory bowel disease were excluded. Statistical analyses were conducted from December 2019 to October 2020. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for incident CRC. RESULTS: Among the 94 540 participants (mean [SD] age, 76.4 [4.9] years for women, 77.7 [5.6] years for men; 67 223 women [71.1%]; 65 259 White women [97.1%], 24 915 White men [96.0%]) aged 70 years or older, 1431 incident cases of CRC were documented over 996 463 person-years of follow-up. After adjustment for other risk factors, regular use of aspirin was associated with a significantly lower risk of CRC at or after age 70 years compared with nonregular use (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.72-0.90). However, the inverse association was evident only among aspirin users who initiated aspirin use before age 70 years (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67-0.95). In contrast, initiating aspirin use at or after 70 years was not significantly associated with a lower risk of CRC (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.76-1.11). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Initiating aspirin at an older age was not associated with a lower risk of CRC in this pooled analysis of 2 cohort studies. In contrast, those who used aspirin before age 70 years and continued into their 70s or later had a reduced risk of CRC.

Cancer and Risk of COVID-19 Through a General Community Survey.

Individuals with cancer may be at high risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and adverse outcomes. However, evidence from large population-based studies examining whether cancer and cancer-related therapy exacerbates the risk of COVID-19 infection is still limited. Data were collected from the COVID Symptom Study smartphone application since March 29 through May 8, 2020. Among 23,266 participants with cancer and 1,784,293 without cancer, we documented 10,404 reports of a positive COVID-19 test. Compared with participants without cancer, those living with cancer had a 60% increased risk of a positive COVID-19 test. Among patients with cancer, current treatment with chemotherapy or immunotherapy was associated with a 2.2-fold increased risk of a positive test. The association between cancer and COVID-19 infection was stronger among participants >65 years and males. Future studies are needed to identify subgroups by tumor types and treatment regimens who are particularly at risk for COVID-19 infection and adverse outcomes.

Risk of malignancies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease who used thiopurines as compared with other indications: a territory-wide study.

AIMS: Thiopurines are believed to increase cancer risks, but data from Asian patients are sparse. We determined the risks of malignancies in thiopurine users with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or other indications from Hong Kong. METHODS: All patients who had received thiopurines between 2005 and 2009 in Hong Kong were identified from local electronic healthcare database. Patients were followed from the start date of thiopurines until death or end of study in 2017. We excluded patients with baseline malignancy. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) of all malignancies were computed against matched local general population from the cancer registry. Patients in the same diagnosis category but not exposed to thiopurines were included as controls. RESULTS: There were 7452 thiopurines users (median age 47.0 years), including 595 IBD patients, with a median follow-up of 11.2 years. Of them, 684 (9.2%) developed malignancies with an overall SIR of 2.30 (95% CI 2.13-2.48). The SIR in IBD patients who used thiopurines was 2.37 (95% CI 1.71-3.18) as compared with non-users (SIR 1.35, 95% CI 1.05-1.72). Highest risk of malignancies was observed in post-transplant patients (SIR 3.83, 95% CI 3.34-4.35), and lower risks were seen in patients with rheumatological diseases (SIR 1.46, 95% CI 1.02-2.02). CONCLUSION: IBD patients in Hong Kong who used thiopurines had 2.37-fold increase in risk of malignancies than the general population, which was higher than non-users and different from thiopurine users for other indications.

The COronavirus Pandemic Epidemiology (COPE) Consortium: A Call to Action.

The rapid pace of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19) pandemic presents challenges to the real-time collection of population-scale data to inform near-term public health needs as well as future investigations. We established the COronavirus Pandemic Epidemiology (COPE) consortium to address this unprecedented crisis on behalf of the epidemiology research community. As a central component of this initiative, we have developed a COVID Symptom Study (previously known as the COVID Symptom Tracker) mobile application as a common data collection tool for epidemiologic cohort studies with active study participants. This mobile application collects information on risk factors, daily symptoms, and outcomes through a user-friendly interface that minimizes participant burden. Combined with our efforts within the general population, data collected from nearly 3 million participants in the United States and United Kingdom are being used to address critical needs in the emergency response, including identifying potential hot spots of disease and clinically actionable risk factors. The linkage of symptom data collected in the app with information and biospecimens already collected in epidemiology cohorts will position us to address key questions related to diet, lifestyle, environmental, and socioeconomic factors on susceptibility to COVID-19, clinical outcomes related to infection, and long-term physical, mental health, and financial sequalae. We call upon additional epidemiology cohorts to join this collective effort to strengthen our impact on the current health crisis and generate a new model for a collaborative and nimble research infrastructure that will lead to more rapid translation of our work for the betterment of public health.

Accuracy of artificial intelligence on histology prediction and detection of colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We performed a meta-analysis of all published studies to determine the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) on histology prediction and detection of colorectal polyps. METHOD: We searched Embase, PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases to identify studies using AI for colorectal polyp histology prediction and detection. The quality of included studies was measured by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. We used a bivariate meta-analysis following a random-effects model to summarize the data and plotted hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves. The area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) served as an indicator of the diagnostic accuracy and during head-to-head comparisons. RESULTS: A total of 7680 images of colorectal polyps from 18 studies were included in the analysis of histology prediction. The accuracy of the AI (AUC) was .96 (95% confidence interval [CI], .95-.98), with a corresponding pooled sensitivity of 92.3% (95% CI, 88.8%-94.9%) and specificity of 89.8% (95% CI, 85.3%-93.0%). The AUC of AI using narrow-band imaging (NBI) was significantly higher than the AUC using non-NBI (.98 vs .84, P < .01). The performance of AI was superior to nonexpert endoscopists (.97 vs .90, P < .01). For characterization of diminutive polyps using a deep learning model with nonmagnifying NBI, the pooled negative predictive value was 95.1% (95% CI, 87.7%-98.1%). For polyp detection, the pooled AUC was .90 (95% CI, .67-1.00) with a sensitivity of 95.0% (95% CI, 91.0%-97.0%) and a specificity of 88.0% (95% CI, 58.0%-99.0%). CONCLUSIONS: AI was accurate in histology prediction and detection of colorectal polyps, including diminutive polyps. The performance of AI was better under NBI and was superior to nonexpert endoscopists. Despite the difference in AI models and study designs, AI performances are rather consistent, which could serve as a reference for future AI studies.

Linked color imaging versus narrow-band imaging for colorectal polyp detection: a prospective randomized tandem colonoscopy study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Linked color imaging (LCI) is a newly available image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) system that emphasizes the red mucosal color. No study has yet compared LCI with other available IEE systems. Our aim was to investigate polyp detection rates using LCI compared with narrow-band imaging (NBI). METHODS: This is a prospective randomized tandem colonoscopy study. Eligible patients who underwent colonoscopy for symptoms or screening/surveillance were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive tandem colonoscopy with both colonoscope withdrawals using LCI or NBI. The primary outcome was the polyp detection rate. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-two patients were randomized (mean age, 62 years; 48.2% male; colonoscopy for symptoms, 72.8%) with 136 in each arm. During the first colonoscopy, the polyp detection rate (71.3% vs 55.9%; P = .008), serrated lesion detection rate (34.6% vs 22.1%; P = .02), and mean number of polyps detected (2.04 vs 1.35; P = .02) were significantly higher in the NBI group than in the LCI group. There was also a trend of higher adenoma detection rate in the NBI group compared with the LCI group (51.5% vs 39.7%, respectively; P = .05). Multivariable analysis confirmed that use of NBI (adjusted odds ratio, 1.99; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-3.68) and withdrawal time >8 minutes (adjusted odds ratio, 5.11; 95% confidence interval, 2.79-9.67) were associated with polyp detection. Overall, 20.5% of polyps and 18.1% of adenomas were missed by the first colonoscopy, but there was no significant difference in the miss rates between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: NBI was significantly better than LCI for colorectal polyp detection. However, both LCI and NBI missed 20.5% of polyps. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03336359.).

Systematic review with meta-analysis: the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking third-generation P2Y12 inhibitors compared with clopidogrel.

BACKGROUND: Ticagrelor and prasugrel are third-generation oral P2Y12 receptor antagonists with rapid onset and pronounced platelet inhibition. However, higher overall bleeding rates have been reported for these agents when compared with clopidogrel. AIM: To compare the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) among users of third-generation P2Y12 inhibitors with clopidogrel. METHODS: We systematically searched for published randomised controlled trials of ticagrelor or prasugrel versus clopidogrel until September 2018. The primary outcome was the risk of GIB among users of third-generation P2Y12 inhibitors when compared to clopidogrel, expressed as risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The rates of non-coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) major bleeding, life-threatening bleeding, fatal bleeding, and intracranial bleeding were analysed as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Forty-one studies were included in the analysis of non-CABG major bleeding, of which 12 were included in the analysis of GIB including 58 678 patients. Third-generation P2Y12 inhibitors were associated with higher risk of GIB as compared with clopidogrel (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.13-1.46). The findings were consistent for upper (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.05-1.67) and unspecified GIB (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.01-1.53), but not lower GIB (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.95-1.65). Subgroup analysis showed higher GIB risk in prasugrel studies (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.10-1.77) than in ticagrelor studies (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.94-1.39). Third-generation P2Y12 inhibitors also increased the risk of non-CABG major bleeding (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.08-1.28). CONCLUSION: Third-generation P2Y12 inhibitors were associated with increased risk of GIB and non-CABG major bleeding when compared with clopidogrel.

Split-dose 4-L polyethylene glycol regimen for patients with previous colorectal surgery in bowel preparation before colonoscopy: A randomized, controlled, single-blind study.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the efficacy of a split-dose 4-L polyethylene glycol (PEG) regimen for the quality of bowel preparation in Asian patients with previous colorectal surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled, endoscopist-blinded study. Patients with previous colorectal surgery for CRC were randomly allocated to a routine, morning-only 2-L PEG (2-MO) group or a split-dose 4-L PEG (4-SD) group. The primary outcome was a successful bowel preparation rate. Secondary outcomes were polyp detection rate (PDR), adenoma detection rate (ADR), patient compliance, satisfaction, tolerance, willingness to repeat the preparation and difficulty of the bowel preparation process. RESULTS: In total, 187 patients were included (93 in the 2-MO group, 94 in the 4-SD group) in this study. The rate of successful bowel preparation in the 4-SD group was higher than in the 2-MO group (89.4% vs 66.7%, P < 0.001) in an intention-to-treat analysis according to the Aronchick score. Patients' satisfaction with the bowel preparation process in the 4-SD group was superior to that in the 2-MO group (93.4% vs 82.2%, P = 0.021). No significant differences were detected in PDR, ADR, patient compliance, tolerance, willingness to repeat the preparation or difficulty of the bowel preparation process. CONCLUSIONS: The 4-SD PEG regimen was superior to a routine, morning-only 2-L PEG preparation for bowel preparation in an Asian population with previous colorectal surgery.

Efficacy of segmental re-examination of proximal colon for adenoma detection during colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

Background and study aims Interval colorectal cancers detected after screening colonoscopy are more likely to be associated with missed lesions in the proximal colon. The aim of this study was to determine whether segmental re-examination of the proximal colon could increase the proximal adenoma detection rate (ADR) and to evaluate the time-effectiveness of this approach. Patients and methods Patients undergoing colonoscopy were recruited into the prospective randomized controlled study. They were randomly assigned to the segmental re-examination group, in which the proximal colon was examined twice segmentally, and a control group in which the withdrawal time was extended (EWT). Detection rates were calculated and compared for all polyps and adenomas in both the proximal colon and the whole colon. Withdrawal times were recorded and compared. Results A total of 360 patients were included in the study (re-examination 178 vs. EWT 182). The proximal ADR in the re-examination group was higher than that in the EWT group (33.1 % vs. 23.6 %; P = 0.045). More proximal adenomas were detected per patient in the re-examination group (0.54 vs. 0.36; P = 0.048). The ADR of the whole colon was similar in the two groups. Proximal withdrawal time was also similar (re-examination 4.29 ±â€Š1.23 minutes vs. EWT 4.34 ±â€Š1.36 minutes; P = 0.74). In addition, there was no statistically significant difference in the total duration of the colonoscopy between the two groups. Conclusions Segmental re-examination of the proximal colon increased the proximal ADR and the number of proximal adenomas detected, and was accomplished easily and safely without increasing the overall examination time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02581475).

Accuracy of i-Scan for Optical Diagnosis of Colonic Polyps: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: i-Scan is a novel virtual chromoendoscopy system designed to enhance surface and vascular patterns to improve optical diagnostic performance. Numerous prospective studies have been done to evaluate the accuracy of i-Scan in differentiating colonic neoplasms from non-neoplasms. i-Scan could be an effective endoscopic technique for optical diagnosis of colonic polyps. OBJECTIVE: Our aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of published data to establish the diagnostic accuracy of i-Scan for optical diagnosis of colonic polyps. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Medline, Elsevier ScienceDirect and Cochrane Library databases. We used a bivariate meta-analysis following a random effects model to summarize the data and plotted hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristic (HSROC) curves. The area under the HSROC curve (AUC) serves as an indicator of the diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included a total of 925 patients and 2312 polyps. For the overall studies, the area under the HSROC curve was 0.96. The summary sensitivity was 90.4% (95%CI 85%-94.1%) and specificity was 90.9% (95%CI 84.3%-94.9%). In 11 studies predicting polyps histology in real-time, the summary sensitivity and specificity was 91.5% (95%CI 85.7%-95.1%) and 92.1% (95%CI 84.5%-96.1%), respectively, with the AUC of 0.97. For three different diagnostic criteria (Kudo, NICE, others), the sensitivity was 86.3%, 93.0%, 85.0%, respectively and specificity was 84.8%, 94.4%, 91.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic diagnosis with i-Scan has accurate optical diagnostic performance to differentiate neoplastic from non-neoplastic polyps with an area under the HSROC curve exceeding 0.90. Both the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing colonic polyps are over 90%.