[Cardiovascular prevention in primary care in crisis situations: multicenter comparative study before, during and after the SARS-COVID-19 pandemic]. / Prevención cardiovascular en Atención Primaria en situación de crisis: estudio comparativo multicéntrico antes, durante y después de la pandemia por SARS-COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the appearance of a crisis situation such as the one caused by the SARS-COV-2 pandemic, together with the organizational changes adopted in Primary Care, have influenced the implementation of cardiovascular preventive activities in patients aged 40 to 74 years. DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter descriptive study for three years (2019-2022) in Primary Care. SETTING: 35 health centers of the Primary Care of the Northern Assistance Directorate of Madrid. PARTICIPANTS: 1008 patients of both sexes between 40 and 74 years with diagnosed of hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus and/or dyslipidemia. METHOD: The variables analyzed from the computerized clinical history were lifestyle activities (consumption of tobacco, alcohol, consumption of Mediterranean diet and exercise) considering 3 of the 4 parameters optimal; examination data (blood pressure record) and analytical record (glycemia, hbA1c, total cholesterol, HDL, LDL)considering 4 of the 5 parameters optimal. Differences are analyzed between based pre-pandemic (03/15/2019-03/14/2020), pandemic (03/15/2020-03/14/2021), and transition (03/15/2022-03/14/2022). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: MC Nemar's test to compare the main variables between the study periods. RESULTS: Data from 1008 patients are collected. The registration of preventive activities on lifestyle was 180 patients (17.9%) (IC95%: 0,155-0,204) in pre-pandemic, 29 patients (2.9%) (IC 95%: 0,019-0,041) in pandemic and 55 patients (5.5%) (IC 95%: 0,041-0,070) in the transition stage (p < 0.05). Exploration was registered in 393 patients (39%) (IC95%: 0,360-0,421) in the pre-pandemic, 133 patients 13,2% (IC 95%: 0,112-0,154) in the pandemic, and 218 patients (21,6%) (IC 95%: 0,191-0,243) in the transition (p < 0.05). The analytical record was 33 patients (3.3%) (IC955: 0,023-0,046), 10 patients (1%) (IC95%: 0,005-0,018) and 23 patients (2.3%) (IC95%: 0,015-0,034) respectively in each phase with one (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Activities on lifestyle, physical examination, and laboratory test as part of the cardiovascular prevention strategy are scarce in the prepandemic period and decrease drastically during the pandemic, at the first level of care.

Predictors of resilience in older adults with lower limb osteoarthritis and persistent severe pain.

BACKGROUND: Resilience refers to the process in which people function well despite adversity. Persistent severe pain may be considered an adversity in people with lower limb osteoarthritis (LLOA). The objectives of this study are: (1) to identify what proportion of older adults with LLOA and persistent severe pain show good functioning; and (2) to explore predictors of resilience. METHODS: Data from the European Project on OSteoArthritis (EPOSA) were used involving standardized data from six European population-based cohort studies. LLOA is defined as clinical knee and/or hip osteoarthritis. Persistent severe pain is defined as the highest tertile of the pain subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index both at baseline and follow-up. Resilience is defined as good physical, mental or social functioning at follow-up despite having LLOA with persistent severe pain. RESULTS: In total, 95 (14.9%) out of 638 individuals with LLOA had persistent severe pain. Among these, 10 (11.0%), 54 (57.4%) and 49 (53.8%) had good physical, mental and social functioning, respectively. Only 4 individuals (4.5%) were resilient in all three domains of functioning. Younger age, male sex, higher education, higher mastery, smoking and alcohol use, higher physical activity levels, absence of chronic diseases, and more contacts with friends predicted resilience in one or more domains of functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Few people with LLOA and persistent severe pain showed good physical functioning and about half showed good mental or social functioning. Predictors of resilience differed between domains, and might provide new insights for treatment.

Improving hip fracture care in Spain: evolution of quality indicators in the Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry.

This study was carried out to analyze the evolution of the quality indicators in the Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry, after disseminating a series of recommendations based on available clinical practice guidelines to the participating hospitals. Six of the seven proposed quality indicators showed a significant improvement. PURPOSE: The Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (RNFC) arises from the need to know the process and improve the quality of care. Our goal was to analyze the changes in the RNFC's quality indicators after an intervention based on disseminating specific recommendations among the participating hospitals, following available clinical practice guidelines. METHODS: Study comparing before and after performing an intervention in hospitals participating in the RNFC. Data from the hospitals that registered cases in 2017, and that kept registering cases in 2019. Seven quality indicators were chosen, and a standard to be achieved for each indicator was proposed. The intervention consisted in the dissemination of 25 recommendations with practical measures to improve each quality indicator, based on available clinical practice guidelines, by drafting and publishing a scientific paper and sending it via email and printed cards. Fulfilment of each quality indicator was measured after carrying out the intervention. RESULTS: Forty-three hospitals registered 2674 cases between January and May, 2017, and 8037 during 2019. The quality indicators chosen and the degree of compliance were (all with p<0.05): (1) surgery ≤48 h increased from 38.9 to 45.8%; (2) patients mobilised on the first postoperative day increased from 58.9 to 70.3%; (3) patients with anti-osteoporotic medication at discharge increased from 34.5 to 49.8%; (4) patients with calcium supplements at discharge increased from 48.7 to 62.8%; (5) patients with vitamin D supplements at discharge increased from 71.5 to 84.7%; (6) patients developing a grade >2 pressure ulcer during admission decreased from 6.5 to 5.0%; (7) patients able to move on their own at 1 month fell from 58.8 to 56.4%. More than 48% of hospitals improved the proposed indicators. CONCLUSION: Establishing quality indicators and standards and intervening through the dissemination of specific recommendations to improve these indicators achieved an improvement in hospital performance results on a national level.

Towards an Open Medical School without Checkerboards during the COVID-19 Pandemic: How to Flexibly Self-Manage General Surgery Practices in Hospitals?

BACKGROUND: Can we create a technological solution to flexibly self-manage undergraduate General Surgery practices within hospitals? Before the pandemic, the management of clerkships was starting to depend less on checkerboards. This study aims to explore undergraduates' perceptions of doing rotations in teaching hospitals using different teaching styles and elicit their views regarding the options of managing practices to design a mobile app that substitutes for checkerboards. METHODS: In this sequential exploratory mixed methods study, 38 semi-structured interviews at a teaching hospital were conducted. The data was used to survey 124 students doing their rotations in four teaching hospitals during the first wave of COVID-19. RESULTS: 21 themes highlighted concerns related to the practices, the teacher involvement in the students' education, and the students' adaptation to clinical culture. The students reported positive perceptions concerning self-managing and organizing practices via a mobile application. However, problems emerged regarding transparency, the lack of feedback, and the need for new tools. Regarding the teaching styles, the facilitator and personal models were perceived as optimal, but the personal style had no effect on using or not using a tool. CONCLUSIONS: A mobile-learning application designed like an educational opportunities' manager tool can probably promote self-directed learning, flexible teaching, and bidirectional assessments. However, teachers who employ a personal teaching style may not need either checkerboards or a tool. This solution supports teaching at hospitals in pandemic times without checkerboards.