Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Climacteric ; 22(3): 229-235, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30572743

RESUMO

Despite pelvic organ prolapse being a universal problem experienced in nearly 50% of parous women, the surgical management of vaginal prolapse remains an enigma to many, with wide variation in the rates and types of intervention performed. As part of the 6th International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI) our committee, charged with producing an evidence-based report on the surgical management of prolapse, produced a pathway for the surgical management of prolapse. The 2017 ICI surgical management of prolapse evidence-based pathway will be presented and summarized. Weaknesses of the data and pathway will be discussed and avenues for future research proposed.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Fatores Etários , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência
2.
Int Urogynecol J ; 24(3): 385-91, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22814931

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study was performed to determine whether abdominoplasty combined with abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC + A) increases perioperative morbidity compared with ASC alone. We hypothesized that patients undergoing combined procedures would have increased complications. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of all women undergoing ASC + A from 2002 to 2010 at Washington Hospital Center and Johns Hopkins University. We selected two women undergoing ASC alone for comparison with each ASC + A patient. Baseline demographics, surgical data, length of hospitalization, and perioperative complications were recorded. The primary outcome was any major complication within 6 weeks of surgery, including intraoperative complications, pulmonary embolism (PE), deep venous thrombosis (DVT), cardiac compromise, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, reoperation, and readmission. Surgical data and minor complications were also compared. RESULTS: Twenty-six ASC + A patients and 52 ASC patients were identified. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups. Patients with ASC + A had longer operating times (337 vs 261 min, p < 0.01), more intravenous fluid administration intraoperatively (4,665 vs 3181 ml, p < 0.01), and longer hospital stays (3.7 vs 2.7 days, p < 0.01). Major complications occurred in 23 % of the ASC + A group compared with 12 % of the ASC group (p = 0.20). The ASC + A group had greater declines in hematocrit levels and higher rates of PE, ICU admission, and blood transfusion, all of which were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: ASC + A increases length of stay and perioperative complications, such as PE, ICU admission, and blood transfusion, compared with ASC alone. Surgeons should consider recommending interval abdominoplasty due to increased morbidity risk with a combined procedure.


Assuntos
Abdome/cirurgia , Abdominoplastia/efeitos adversos , Abdominoplastia/métodos , Colposcopia/efeitos adversos , Colposcopia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Hematócrito , Humanos , Incidência , Tempo de Internação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Relações Médico-Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA