Clinical performance of multiplatform mutation panel and microRNA risk classifier in indeterminate thyroid nodules.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the clinical performance of an expanded mutation panel in combination with microRNA classification (MPTX) for the management of indeterminate thyroid nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MPTX included testing of fine-needle aspirates from multiple centers with a combination of ThyGeNEXT mutation panel for strong and weak driver oncogenic changes and ThyraMIR microRNA risk classifier (both from Interpace Diagnostics; Pittsburgh, PA). MPTX test status (positive or negative) and MPTX clinical risk classifications (low, moderate, or high risk) were determined blind to patient outcomes. Surgical pathology and clinical follow-up records of patients from multiple centers were used to determine patient outcomes. MPTX performance was assessed by Kaplan Meier analysis for cancer-free survival of patients, with risk of malignancy determined by hazard ratio (HR). RESULTS: Our study included 140 patients with AUS/FLUS or FN/SFN nodules, of which 13% had malignancy. MPTX negative test status and MPTX low risk results conferred a high probability (94%) that patients would remain cancer-free. MPTX positive test status (HR 11.2, P < 0.001) and MPTX moderate-risk results (HR 8.5, P = 0.001) were significant risk factors for malignancy, each conferring a 53% probability of malignancy. MPTX high-risk results elevated risk of malignancy even more so, conferring a 70% probability of malignancy (HR 38.5, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MPTX test status accurately stratifies patients for risk of malignancy. Further classification using MPTX clinical risk categories enhances utility by accurately identifying patients at low, moderate, or high risk of malignancy at the low rate of malignancy encountered when clinically managing patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules.

Clinical impact of testing for mutations and microRNAs in thyroid nodules.

BACKGROUND: We report results of a multicenter clinical experience study examining the likelihood of patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules to undergo surgery or have malignant outcome based on multiplatform combination mutation and microRNA testing (MPT). METHODS: MPT assessed mutations in BRAF, HRAS, KRAS, NRAS, and PIK3CA genes, PAX8/PPARγ, RET/PTC1, and RET/PTC3 gene rearrangements, and the expression of 10 microRNAs. Baseline clinical information at the time of MPT and clinical follow-up records were reviewed for 337 patients, of which 80% had negative MPT results. Kaplan Meier analysis for cumulative probability of survival without having a surgical procedure or malignant diagnosis over the course of patient follow-up was determined for MPT results of 180 patients, among which only 14% had malignancy. RESULTS: A negative MPT result in nodules with Bethesda III or IV cytology (2009) conferred a high probability of non-surgical treatment, with only 11% expected to undergo surgery and a high probability of survival without malignancy (92%) for up to 2 years follow up. A positive MPT result conferred a 57% probability of malignancy and was an independent risk factor for undergoing surgical treatment (Hazard Ratio [HR] 9.2, 95% confidence intervals 5.4-15.9, P < .0001) and for malignancy (HR 13.4, 95% confidence intervals 4.8-37.2, P < .0001). For nodules with weak driver mutations, positive microRNA test results supported high risk of cancer while negative results downgraded cancer risk. CONCLUSION: MPT results are predictive of real-world decisions to surgically treat indeterminate thyroid nodules, with those decisions being appropriately aligned with a patient's risk of malignancy over time.

IS MEASUREMENT OF CIRCULATING TUMOR DNA OF DIAGNOSTIC USE IN PATIENTS WITH THYROID NODULES?

OBJECTIVE: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), a subset of cell-free DNA (cfDNA), is a potential biomarker for thyroid cancer. We determined the performance of a ctDNA panel for detecting thyroid malignancy in patients with thyroid nodules. METHODS: Sixty-six patients with thyroid nodules without a prior history of cancer enrolled in a prospective, 1-year study in which blood was drawn for ctDNA analysis prior to undergoing fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of thyroid nodules. The ctDNA panel consisted of 96-mutations in 9 cancer driver genes. The primary outcome measures were the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) of our ctDNA panel for the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy as determined by pathologic and/or molecular tissue examination. RESULTS: Results from 10 subjects could not be determined due to inadequate volume or technical issues. The final classifications of the thyroid nodules were 13 malignant and 43 benign lesions. A KRAS G12V mutation was detected in the plasma of 1 patient with stage IVA papillary carcinoma whose tissue contained the same mutation. Two of the 43 patients with benign lesions also had ctDNA detected, giving a sensitivity of 7.7%, specificity of 95.35%, PPV of 33.33%, and NPV of 77.35%. There were no significant differences between benign or malignant lesions in cfDNA levels. CONCLUSION: Neither cfDNA measurements nor our panel of ctDNA mutations are sensitive or specific enough to provide valuable information over FNAB. An expanded panel and the inclusion of proteomics may improve sensitivity and specificity for thyroid cancer detection. ABBREVIATIONS: cfDNA = cell-free DNA; ctDNA = circulating tumor DNA; FNAB = fine-needle aspiration biopsy; NIFTP = noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features.

Centralized molecular testing for oncogenic gene mutations complements the local cytopathologic diagnosis of thyroid nodules.

BACKGROUND: Molecular testing for oncogenic gene mutations and chromosomal rearrangements plays a growing role in the optimal management of thyroid nodules, yet lacks standardized testing modalities and systematic validation data. Our objective was to assess the performance of molecular cytology on preoperative thyroid nodule fine-needle aspirates (FNAs) across a broad range of variables, including independent collection sites, clinical practices, and anatomic pathology interpretations. METHODS: Single-pass FNAs were prospectively collected from 806 nodules 1 cm or larger by ultrasonography at five independent sites across the United States. Specimens were shipped in a nucleic acid stabilization solution and tested at a centralized clinical laboratory. Seventeen genetic alterations (BRAF, KRAS, HRAS, and NRAS mutations, PAX8-PPARG and RET-PTC rearrangements) were evaluated by multiplex polymerase chain reaction and liquid bead array cytometry in 769 FNAs that met inclusion criteria. Cytology, histology, and clinical care followed local procedures and practices. All results were double-blinded. RESULTS: Thirty-two specimens (4.2%) failed to yield sufficient nucleic acid to generate molecular data. A single genetic alteration was detected in 80% of cytology malignant cases, 21% of indeterminate, 7.8% of nondiagnostic, and 3.5% of benign cases. Among 109 nodules with surgical histology reference standard, oncogenic mutations were present in 50% of malignant nodules missed by cytology. There were 14 cancers not identified by cytology or molecular tests, including 5 carcinomas with histologic sizes less than 1 cm (3 multifocal) and 8 noninvasive follicular variants of papillary carcinoma (4 encapsulated). No mutations were detected in 89% of the nodules benign by histopathology with 6 false-positive molecular results in 5 adenomas (2-5.5 cm) and 1 cystic nodule with an incidental papillary microcarcinoma (0.15 cm). The posttest probability of thyroid cancer was 100% for nodules positive for BRAF or RET-PTC, 70% for RAS or PAX8-PPARG, and 88% for molecular cytology overall. CONCLUSIONS: Centralized and standardized molecular testing for genetic alterations associated with a high risk of malignancy efficiently complements the local cytopathologic diagnosis of thyroid nodule aspirates in the clinical setting. Actionable molecular cytology can improve the personalized surgical and medical management of patients with thyroid cancers, facilitating one-stage total thyroidectomy and reducing the number of unnecessary diagnostic surgeries.